Triangle UFOs over seen over Fresno

[Terry]

Has anyone scene triangle ships flying over Fresno?

[Tammie]

I have not seen them in or near Fresno, but I have seen them on Highway 5 heading out of Vallejo in October of last year. There were 3 with a triangle shape and they were not moving. They were just sitting there in line like they had been placed there and left. I don't believe in UFO's, aliens, etc, so I tried to find a logical explanation but I couldn't. I was thinking maybe weather/traffic monitoring or something....?

[saviorself]

anybody got a picture?

[Paul44]

Yep but it was a few years ago. I also dont believe in aliens and them thangs but there was no logical answer i could find for what my eyes were seeing that night. Basically very large, triangle, with three red light.
What was wierd is not to long after it hovered away outta site, you could hear fighter jets taking off.

[saviorself]

Paul44 wrote:

Yep but it was a few years ago. I also dont believe in aliens and them thangs but there was no logical answer i could find for what my eyes were seeing that night. Basically very large, triangle, with three red light.
What was wierd is not to long after it hovered away outta site, you could hear fighter jets taking off.

really? sounds cool. how come there's no video?

[Vote Green Party]

Wow did not think anyone would reply here.

I tried with my nikon, but it could not pick up the dim lights at night.

[e-mail]

[saviorself]

well what'd they look like?

[Hmmmm]

Could they be Stealth Bombers. I live in MO and they are based in Knobknoster Missouri. They could be out at LNAS. Lemoore. Just a thought..

They are awesome to watch!!!

[shaymirror]

I dont live in Calif .I live in Indiana ,but I also here have seen a huge triangle black ufo it had three huge red glowing lights, hovering low to earth near a river by my house,When it lifted extremely fast but there was no engine sound ,I was oh my AT first when I seen it I thought it was a plane getting ready to crash it was so low. Tya

[Oh My]

There coming to take you away, oh my....

Bet its our governments newest toys. You the ones we can spend millions on but not be able to afford healthcare and food for homeless and VETS...

[Vote Green Party]

The one we saw was massive. And it floated along like a balloon - rotating and such with ease. It was silent - yes - 3 red lights (at each corner).

If it is our military then we are in trouble as a civilian population. If they have all this type of stuff - the military industrial complex that we were warned about.....who can know.

And on the flip side one would have to ask themself - if it is our military, why would they fly such craft right over our heads for all to see?

Makes no sense.

[saviorself]

Vote Green Party wrote:

The one we saw was massive. And it floated along like a balloon - rotating and such with ease. It was silent - yes - 3 red lights (at each corner).
If it is our military then we are in trouble as a civilian population. If they have all this type of stuff - the military industrial complex that we were warned about.....who can know.
And on the flip side one would have to ask themself - if it is our military, why would they fly such craft right over our heads for all to see?
Makes no sense.

what are you talking about? If you have any sense at all, you WANT your military to have such technology. The "military-industrial complex" warning was simply one stick true to American ideals and not get excessively involved in endless brush-wars all over the planet (foreign entanglements) and secondarily making war a "profitable" endeavor (thus perpetuating the cycle of endless involvement.) If it's ours and it's being flown right over your head for testing purposes, so be it. experimental aircraft have to be tested.

[Another possiblity]

Often the National Gaurd planes fly in formation with only their nav lights on--looks wierd unless you know what it is... Just another possibility... On the other hand, my son who's 17 and walks the dog every night swears he's seen what you described. We may never really know, I guess.

[Vote Green Party]

saviorself wrote:

<quoted text>
what are you talking about? If you have any sense at all, you WANT your military to have such technology. The "military-industrial complex" warning was simply one stick true to American ideals and not get excessively involved in endless brush-wars all over the planet (foreign entanglements) and secondarily making war a "profitable" endeavor (thus perpetuating the cycle of endless involvement.) If it's ours and it's being flown right over your head for testing purposes, so be it. experimental aircraft have to be tested.

The military works for the people. Getting used to giving them free reign to create such advanced weopanry without our knowledge is very dangerous.

Eisenhower said Military Industrial Complex - almost like a corporation - and we know what corporations do when unchecked.

Heck we can see it now. GE is one of the largest war contractors - they dont make money unless bombs are being dropped - they own NBC - no coverage of the what are we up too - 3 wars now.

Again you think that with all the secret and secure bases in this country the military is going to fly advance secret plane low over populated areas?

I will say again - it makes zero sense.

[Vote Green Party]

Another possiblity wrote:

Often the National Gaurd planes fly in formation with only their nav lights on--looks wierd unless you know what it is... Just another possibility... On the other hand, my son who's 17 and walks the dog every night swears he's seen what you described. We may never really know, I guess.

Funny you should bring that up because thats exactly what we saw a few weeks later. At a distance it looked like one of the ships, but as they got closer the formation broke up and strangely we could then hear their engines.

Almost makes you wonder if they do it on purpose.

But we all know what we saw. Massive ship floating silently by. Pretty crazy! My Uncle and I were thinking the same thing as we saw it fly by.

I waited before saying what I thought and then he said what I was thinking "That thing is big!"

[Vote Green Party]

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Watch at 3:15.

[saviorself]

Vote Green Party wrote:

<quoted text>The military works for the people. Getting used to giving them free reign to create such advanced weopanry without our knowledge is very dangerous.
Eisenhower said Military Industrial Complex - almost like a corporation - and we know what corporations do when unchecked.
Heck we can see it now. GE is one of the largest war contractors - they dont make money unless bombs are being dropped - they own NBC - no coverage of the what are we up too - 3 wars now.
Again you think that with all the secret and secure bases in this country the military is going to fly advance secret plane low over populated areas?
I will say again - it makes zero sense.

WHAT "secret and secure" bases? Who are you trying to kid? Do you have any IDEA how many people camp outside of the most "secure" military bases in our country every single day just hoping to catch a snashot of whatever picture it's going to take to verify their crackpot theories with telescopic lenses? You must have never lived in or around any of the "secret facilities" utilized by the military. And why would they NOT test anything they wanted to over populateed areas? Populated areas are their ultimate destination. It's GOOD to see what things such as civillian traffic and multiple radar-interferrance is going to cause. Plus, you assume something like this must inevitably come from "our" military-industial complex. Since Eisenhower made his statement we have had the Vietnam War, the war in Grenada, military excursions in Lebanon, the war in Haiti, the war in Bosnia, Gulf War 1, Gulf War 2, and the war in Afghanistan (among many probably hundreds of other individual, covert "brush-fire" operations during the cold war around the globe.) The prblem with people who want to make Eisenhower's statement mean what they WANT it to mean, as opposed to what he was actually saying (in regards to his very own specific time) is that they don't expect human history to continue to occur around them.

[saviorself]

cause guess how much MONEY NBC made from sending Dan Rather to report from Vietnam? A damn sight less than they ever made from manufacturing contact switches with Honeywell for an actual PRODUCT.

[Vote Green Party]

saviorself wrote:

<quoted text>
WHAT "secret and secure" bases? Who are you trying to kid? Do you have any IDEA how many people camp outside of the most "secure" military bases in our country every single day just hoping to catch a snashot of whatever picture it's going to take to verify their crackpot theories with telescopic lenses? You must have never lived in or around any of the "secret facilities" utilized by the military. And why would they NOT test anything they wanted to over populateed areas? Populated areas are their ultimate destination. It's GOOD to see what things such as civillian traffic and multiple radar-interferrance is going to cause. Plus, you assume something like this must inevitably come from "our" military-industial complex. Since Eisenhower made his statement we have had the Vietnam War, the war in Grenada, military excursions in Lebanon, the war in Haiti, the war in Bosnia, Gulf War 1, Gulf War 2, and the war in Afghanistan (among many probably hundreds of other individual, covert "brush-fire" operations during the cold war around the globe.) The prblem with people who want to make Eisenhower's statement mean what they WANT it to mean, as opposed to what he was actually saying (in regards to his very own specific time) is that they don't expect human history to continue to occur around them.

Thats fair enough. So what other revolutionary vehicles do they test in civilian areas?

Which ones are you talking about.

And with Eisenhower - are you saying he was wrong or are you saying he was talking about something else.

Because lets face it - war is good business for these guys and we are always at war somewhere.

Heck now we in 3 looking to go into 4 at any time.

[saviorself]

Vote Green Party wrote:

<quoted text>Thats fair enough. So what other revolutionary vehicles do they test in civilian areas?
Which ones are you talking about.
And with Eisenhower - are you saying he was wrong or are you saying he was talking about something else.
Because lets face it - war is good business for these guys and we are always at war somewhere.
Heck now we in 3 looking to go into 4 at any time.

every revolutionary vehicle ever designed has been tested "around" civillian areas, from the Horten Ho 229 to the stealth flyers or the SR-21. It's not like the world's militaries construct their vehicles on the moon. Eisenhower was speaking specificially to his life and times, regarding what he felt were skirmishes being exacerbated by profiteers on BOTH sides of the aisle during the Cold War, SPECIFICALLY in regards to the Korean conflict, that is why he took the most direct route possible in bringing a quick end to that war by directly threatening North Korea with nuclear annihilation. More people should have payed much closer attention to what he was trying to say at the time instead of trying to read into a ridiculous "war is so horrible the blessed poor would never engage in it unless some greedy corporation was behind arming them into it" nonsense. Once the cold war actually ended and it became apparent that the Russians did'nt have even a tenth of what they claimed to have had even as late as the 1990's, the world may very well be a dramatically different-looking place than the one that seems to terrify everyone now. If you believe we are in World War 3 I salute your optimism, given the remarkably low number of casualities and belligerent nations involved, it's a cake-walk in comparison to the first two. But if you are REALLY interested in the idea of what America may or may not have in it's arsenal in regards to such vehicles, you should look into the experiments done by Russia two years ago that resulted in actually doubling the half-life of element 115, which may not sound like much, but there's definate quantum-tunnelling during it's decay.