The New York Times’ Benghazi Revisionism<quoted text>
Your "birther" conspiracy theory did not work.(Ask Orly Taitz.)
And now your "Benghazi" conspiracy theory has been proved wrong, by a "New York Times" article this week:
(But keep looking for yet another conspiracy. Don't give up hope yet, after all the time and effort you have put into all these fairy tales. Keep in mind that only your "Tea Partier" associates are dumb enough to believe in them, and it keeps their false hopes up that Republicans will win any elections in 2014 or 2016.)
~ The're all a bunch of obamaBat Pinocchios' an extension of the OutHouse!
To help put Hillary Clinton in the White House, the once-great New York Times has published a dubious report swallowing the Obama administration’s lies about the Sept. 11, 2012 Islamist attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya.
In an act of journalistic malfeasance, the agenda-setting newspaper of record concluded over the weekend that the once-obscure “Innocence of Muslims” YouTube video sparked the armed assault that left four Americans dead at the height of last year’s presidential election cycle. The newspaper also concluded that al-Qaeda wasn’t involved, ignoring the mountain of evidence suggesting al-Qaeda was involved.