California Proposition 19: the Mariju...

California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legalization Initiative

Created by CitizenTopix on Oct 7, 2010

19,879 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Rush

Fairbury, NE

#13910 Dec 16, 2012
The impeachment was a succcess but getting him removed from office was a failure. you are both right, from a certain point of view.
Mr Anderson

Washington, UT

#13911 Dec 16, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry dope. The impeachment was a success.
I'm right. You're wrong.
so successful??... that bill was out campaigning and getting Barack Obama jr re-elected.

where was bush deux during this campaign??

why wernt the romneys and ryans embracing the legacy of GWB2??

why wasnt gerald ford embracing Nixon?? who resigned? but WASnt impeached??

you are clueless mikey, you have NO ability to see the larger picture...

that is especially true with your understanding of the cold war.

ps: people just forgave clinton, because his biggest crime was lying about it....

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#13912 Dec 16, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
so successful??... that bill was out campaigning and getting Barack Obama jr re-elected.
where was bush deux during this campaign??
why wernt the romneys and ryans embracing the legacy of GWB2??
why wasnt gerald ford embracing Nixon?? who resigned? but WASnt impeached??
you are clueless mikey, you have NO ability to see the larger picture...
that is especially true with your understanding of the cold war.
ps: people just forgave clinton, because his biggest crime was lying about it....
Yes a success. Bill Clinton was successfully impeached on Dec 19, 1998. Every jackass except you knows that.

Even Big D seems to know it I think, but he says it "failed" so I'm not real sure he knows it or not.

Sometimes he says he agrees Clinton was impeached. And sometimes he says it failed. If I say he said one or the other, he says I'm a liar.
Clooed

Covina, CA

#13913 Dec 16, 2012
What flood control.
Mr Anderson

Washington, UT

#13914 Dec 16, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes a success. Bill Clinton was successfully impeached on Dec 19, 1998. Every jackass except you knows that.
Even Big D seems to know it I think, but he says it "failed" so I'm not real sure he knows it or not.
Sometimes he says he agrees Clinton was impeached. And sometimes he says it failed. If I say he said one or the other, he says I'm a liar.
Im not to interetstd in your stuggles with other posters...

what the rethuglicans aimed to do was NOT acheived...

therefore, the effort FAILED, although technically, they "impeached" him in congress!!

big whoop, when the loony tunes have been in control of that body ???

they have come up with some real whoopers.....that make impeachment for a blow job look almost sane...

but in the end??

it wasnt 1963 anymore.....it was 1997.

so people didnt really care about the BJ...

it was more a problem with him lying....

but since he left office, with a 68% approval rating??

id say he did something right???

RIGHT>>>???

in other words the efforts of the rethugs in congress.....failed.

sorry mikey.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#13916 Dec 16, 2012
Andy: you don't put a question mark after a statement you babbling fool.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#13917 Dec 16, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
Andy: you don't put a question mark after a statement you babbling fool.
It sure is annoying?

Andy is a dope?

And a babbling fool?
Mr Anderson

Washington, UT

#13918 Dec 16, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
It sure is annoying?
Andy is a dope?
And a babbling fool?
neither of you spam masters have anything new to say...

just pi&&ed off that im still here, giving you tons of S&&t?

get a life....YOU LOST the election...

now DEAL with it!!

the top 2 percent are going back to clinton era rates...

DEAL with it, cry babies!!

YOU LOST

YOU LOST !!!!!
Mr Anderson

Washington, UT

#13919 Dec 16, 2012
BTW....YOU LOST!!!

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#13920 Dec 17, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
BTW....YOU LOST!!!
The whole country lost actually.

But you really need to get over it and move on. Soon no one will even remember who ran against Obama in 2012 except you, still whining about it.

BOOHOO!

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#13921 Dec 17, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
sorry mental mikey!!
removing clinton was a TOTAL failure....
Your whole argument seems to be Cliton's impeachment was a failure because Clinton wasn't removed from office. You are wrong, the reason you think that is that you are stupid and ignorant.

Clinton's impeachment was a success. If it hadn't been, it wouldn't have even gone to the Senate where he was acquitted.

What a dummy!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#13922 Dec 17, 2012
Mr Anderson he isn’t going to get it, he never will.

He is far too stupid to have this conversation

To him it was a magnificent success, much like the charges in the criminal OJ trial were such a tremendous success

Or Romney running for president was a success

His problem is he doesn’t understand the meaning of the words success and failure.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#13923 Dec 17, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
neither of you spam masters have anything new to say...
just pi&&ed off that im still here, giving you tons of S&&t?
get a life....YOU LOST the election...
now DEAL with it!!
the top 2 percent are going back to clinton era rates...
DEAL with it, cry babies!!
YOU LOST
YOU LOST !!!!!
Do Lower Taxes Create Jobs? Bill Clinton raised marginal tax rates in 1993. Over the next few years and beyond, economic growth flourished, unemployment plummeted and the budget picture brightened. In 2001 and 2003, President George W. Bush cut marginal tax rates. Over the next few years and beyond, the economy stagnated, unemployment rose and the deficit ballooned. Clearly, there were other important factors than taxes: the technology boom of the 1990s benefited Mr. Clinton; terrorism and wars hindered Mr. Bush.

Why do liberals want to go back in time. We can't compare the Clinton era to now, we won't have a tech boom, with Bush we won't have y2k tech boom crash, and 9/11. The one thing liberals leave out with Clinton ear is his spending, because today the liberals want to keep growing government. keep spending on garbage solar and wind.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#13924 Dec 17, 2012
Big D wrote:
Mr Anderson he isn’t going to get it, he never will.
He is far too stupid to have this conversation
To him it was a magnificent success, much like the charges in the criminal OJ trial were such a tremendous success
Or Romney running for president was a success
His problem is he doesn’t understand the meaning of the words success and failure.
I agree, Mr Anderson won't ever understand, plus he can't read or wrote.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#13925 Dec 17, 2012
john m w wrote:
Police activities are like maximum Germany digging a hole to china no wonder legalizing pot has been so difficult rehab is big business and jail is politics
This is true. As taxpayers when voting on the issue we need only to think about the endless hallway deemed the ”war on drugs” and the hotdog (our tax dollars) we keep slinging down it. Not to mention the drain on the economy.-vs- The millions legalization will bring in to the economy coupled with the fact that it would reduce crime rate, and would be beneficial to the green movement, and better for our enviroment.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#13926 Dec 17, 2012
Big D wrote:
Mr Anderson he isn’t going to get it, he never will.
He is far too stupid to have this conversation
To him it was a magnificent success, much like the charges in the criminal OJ trial were such a tremendous success
Or Romney running for president was a success
His problem is he doesn’t understand the meaning of the words success and failure.
You shouldn't be so hard on Andy. He's just a dope. But he looks up to you.

And besides he's right, Clinton's impeachment was a success.

Please tell us what you think. Success or failure? You say both, please be clear once and for all. Easy.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#13927 Dec 17, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>I agree, Mr Anderson won't ever understand, plus he can't read or wrote.
I third that.

So it's me, Big D and RiccardoFire saying you're a dumbass Andy. What do you think of that?

HAR!HAR!HAR!
Mr Anderson

Washington, UT

#13928 Dec 17, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Do Lower Taxes Create Jobs? Bill Clinton raised marginal tax rates in 1993. Over the next few years and beyond, economic growth flourished, unemployment plummeted and the budget picture brightened. In 2001 and 2003, President George W. Bush cut marginal tax rates. Over the next few years and beyond, the economy stagnated, unemployment rose and the deficit ballooned. Clearly, there were other important factors than taxes: the technology boom of the 1990s benefited Mr. Clinton; terrorism and wars hindered Mr. Bush.
Why do liberals want to go back in time. We can't compare the Clinton era to now, we won't have a tech boom, with Bush we won't have y2k tech boom crash, and 9/11. The one thing liberals leave out with Clinton ear is his spending, because today the liberals want to keep growing government. keep spending on garbage solar and wind.
I dont think anyone proposed going "BACK" in time.

YET our country had more solvency power when the tax rates were 39% on the wealthy...

they dont pay that.....they actually pay about half of 33%... or 16.5%

like warren buffet reminded us, because of all the loopholes and deductions.

and ninja tax lawyers...

what ever BOOM or economic stimulus happens?? always comes from the needs of the middle class "GETTING" new things, like tech.
LumberYard

Covina, CA

#13929 Dec 17, 2012
How many trees did you cut down for this one Roncco?

Roncco - run on nothing cranky crooked org.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#13930 Dec 17, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
I dont think anyone proposed going "BACK" in time.
YET our country had more solvency power when the tax rates were 39% on the wealthy...
they dont pay that.....they actually pay about half of 33%... or 16.5%
like warren buffet reminded us, because of all the loopholes and deductions.
and ninja tax lawyers...
what ever BOOM or economic stimulus happens?? always comes from the needs of the middle class "GETTING" new things, like tech.
And you pay nothing. nada. zip. zed. zilch. not one thin dime.

And you suck up resources and whine! And demand more! more! more! Well there ain't no more moocher!

GET A JOB!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Beverly Hills Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
This aint this aint know thinkin thing ! Kourtn... 1 hr Trace 1
News Royal Wedding: 'Beverly Hills' pumped for its p... 22 hr Raydot 13
Try God he is great May 19 just me 1
News Paris Hilton appears in court for hacker's sent... May 9 someone 1
Satan Is Liar Jim Carrey Is Liar May 9 someone 3
News California governor warns against trade war wit... May 4 Solarman 1
Donald Trump ( LOVE THE MEXICANS ) WWJD Apr 30 Voices 3

Beverly Hills Jobs

Personal Finance

Beverly Hills Mortgages