First you claim homosexuality is normal.
Then you admit scientists don't know what causes it.
The only explanation for that is political correct baloney spouted by the Queen of DeNial.
1. How does your response answer the quandary of scientists not having an explanation for homosexuality, but can turn around and assert it is 'normal'?
2. Scientists do understand attraction. Mating behavior. It is why a butch lesbian dresses and acts like a man to attract another lesbian who almost wants a man, but not quite. It's just a major sexual screwed up. Well, it can't ever be a literal screw up, but it clearly is a defect.
Another limp brained gay twirl from the Queen of DeNial.
By your definition, Sandusky was normal.<quoted text>
Scientists can assert that homosexuality is normal by doing a very simple test. Namely, they can look around at NATURE (thus the name "natural) and see that homosexuality and SSSB exists pretty much everywhere.
Scientists can look at gays and lesbians and see that their sexual orientation and attractions DO NOT impeded their ability to function, live a happy and fulfilling life, and contribute to society.
If a person is capable of doing these things, then there is nothing "unnatural" about them.
Not knowing the "cause" or "reason" behind a person's attractions to same-gender people, certain foods, certain food preferences, etc. does not indicate that their behaviors, attractions, and preferences are abnormal or unnatural.
If you can show me one scientist who believes that a "cause" or a "reason" must be identified before preferences can be labeled as "natural", I'll eat my hat.
As has been pointed out to you multiple times, you have NO understanding of science--none at all.
You're like those guys who I used to work with in hospitals; the ones who worked behind a desk gathering admission information and who wore lab coats to throw the general public off--making them think that they were "medical professionals".
You say scientific-sounding things, but you're truly ignorant when it comes to understanding basic, scientific information.
You're worse than the "Great and Powerful Oz". He also professed to be an expert--a God--when he was nothing more than a carnival barker behind a curtain.
You are, without question, the Queen of DeNial1