Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 200,977

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Joe Fortuna

Eureka, CA

#192772 May 21, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
So do you live in Fortuna? Fine town.
Not any more.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#192773 May 21, 2013
Joe Fortuna wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't know you were a homosexual.
A genetic chimera, a lesbian trapped in a straight man.

Surprise!

Smile.
Joe Fortuna

Eureka, CA

#192774 May 21, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
I was thinking the same thing. Seems this guys opinions were formed when his understanding was at itís weakest.
He was probaly taught that as a child, and can't help continuing the cycle.
Joe Fortuna

Eureka, CA

#192775 May 21, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
"Fortuna"? Italian?
The gist of the issue is how do we, as a society, define marriage? There has to be "line in the sand" so to speak. Other wise what's the point of the state issuing a license?
Why does the state need to issue a license?
freaked out

Antioch, CA

#192776 May 21, 2013
thats why i dont vote anymore doesnt mean a thing..........wasting our money..........
Joe Fortuna

Eureka, CA

#192777 May 21, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
A genetic chimera, a lesbian trapped in a straight man.
Surprise!
Smile.
:O)!
Could it get any better?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#192779 May 21, 2013
Joe Fortuna wrote:
<quoted text>
Not any more.
Spent a lot of time there in the nineties, geophysical research. The Mendocino triple junction. Nice little town the only thing is not enough sun!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#192780 May 21, 2013
freaked out wrote:
thats why i dont vote anymore doesnt mean a thing..........wasting our money..........
Good, if you donít understand this, then you should not vote.

I could get the majority of brown eyed people to vote on a ballot measure to deny blue eyed people the vote, it would be overturned as unconstitutional ( and rightly so )

Same thing here, a majority voted to deny a minority a right they already possessed, it will and should be overturned.
KeS

Modesto, CA

#192781 May 21, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Good, if you donít understand this, then you should not vote.
I could get the majority of brown eyed people to vote on a ballot measure to deny blue eyed people the vote, it would be overturned as unconstitutional ( and rightly so )
Same thing here, a majority voted to deny a minority a right they already possessed, it will and should be overturned.
Wrong is not a right!
KeS

Modesto, CA

#192782 May 21, 2013
100% of California voters should Vote this Judge out he's/she's obviously demon possessed. Bannish the Judge!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#192783 May 21, 2013
KeS wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong is not a right!
Yes that is why the wrong of Prop 8 wil be righted.
KeS

Modesto, CA

#192784 May 21, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
The Bible is an collection of ancient Jewish puppet plays.
GOD: 2 Kings 18:27, "...that they may eat their own dung and drink their own pisss with you..."
God was joking KeS, you can stop eating and drinking now.
God wasn't Joking in Moore, Oklahoma was he?
KeS

Modesto, CA

#192785 May 21, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes that is why the wrong of Prop 8 wil be righted.
"only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."
KeS

Modesto, CA

#192786 May 21, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes that is why the wrong of Prop 8 wil be righted.
Are the homosexual tendencies getting louder and louder?

Prop 8 is not wrong.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#192787 May 21, 2013
KeS wrote:
<quoted text>
"only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."
Yes they took away a right, and now same sex couples that cannot marry now are seeing for equal rights with same sex couples that are already married in California legally right now ( some 18,000 of them )

Prop 8 is doomed, one way or the other.

Either the Supreme Court will get it right and uphold it being overturned, or it will go back on the ballot and Prop 8 will be soundly and easily defeated.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#192788 May 21, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Good, if you donít understand this, then you should not vote.
I could get the majority of brown eyed people to vote on a ballot measure to deny blue eyed people the vote, it would be overturned as unconstitutional ( and rightly so )
Same thing here, a majority voted to deny a minority a right they already possessed, it will and should be overturned.
No you couldn't. You couldn't get the majority of brown eyed people to vote on a ballot measure to deny blue eyed people the vote, dummy. You couldn't even get the ballot measure. The state is broke enough without wasting money on your harebrained ideas.
REALLY

Marysville, CA

#192789 May 21, 2013
wow
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#192791 May 21, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes they took away a right, and now same sex couples that cannot marry now are seeing for equal rights with same sex couples that are already married in California legally right now ( some 18,000 of them )
Prop 8 is doomed, one way or the other.
Either the Supreme Court will get it right and uphold it being overturned, or it will go back on the ballot and Prop 8 will be soundly and easily defeated.
And if not we'll keep voting on it over and over until comes out the way Big D wants it dammit!

Let's redo the presidential election too!

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#192792 May 21, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Good, if you donít understand this, then you should not vote.
I could get the majority of brown eyed people to vote on a ballot measure to deny blue eyed people the vote, it would be overturned as unconstitutional ( and rightly so )
Same thing here, a majority voted to deny a minority a right they already possessed, it will and should be overturned.
So the color of one's eyes is equatable with one's gender? The "minority" already posed the right long before prop 22, and prop 8.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#192793 May 21, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes that is why the wrong of Prop 8 wil be righted.
The purpose of Prop 8 was to correct the wrong of those who defied the voters of prop 22.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Beverly Hills Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Has Gaga Lost the Gays? 1 hr Big mike 3
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 2 hr Bently 19,219
Wow Beaners Don't Know How To Drive 3 hr Jose Pablo Alonzo... 1
Do you use self storage? (Feb '11) 8 hr Cory Trevor 27
Scam: Scammers defraud aspiring 'secret' or '... 9 hr Joan 1
How does ISRAEL control all of U.S. 12 hr ZIONISM 1
Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) 12 hr scoop 2,273
•••

Beverly Hills News Video

•••
Beverly Hills Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Beverly Hills Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Beverly Hills People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Beverly Hills News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Beverly Hills
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••