Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
166,821 - 166,840 of 200,347 Comments Last updated 3 hrs ago
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191026
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

8

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
;)
Gets Jizzy real mad, he's not gay but...
Yeah, he's like that little kid, walking around in his daddies shoes, with a painted on mustache. Thinks he's got us fooled and that we'll treat him like an adult.
Pills

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191030
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rush Limbaugh that drug smuggler of his limp member pills.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191031
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Just the Facts wrote:
Oh and could you provide proof, that procreation is a requirement in marriage?
1.) Its not a requirement.

2.) Human reproduction is sexual

3.) Husband and wife engage in "marital relations"

I'll let you figure out the rest.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191032
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
First off, you deliberately distorted what I said. Why does a legitimate cause need that deceit??? You never answer that question VV.
Of course homosexuals can procreate. Just not within their orientation, as I said. So the reality remains. That lack of ability within orientation is a clear indication of a defect.
Second, while it could be true homosexuality has a purpose, the fact remains there still is no valid reason, and science is quickly confirming it as a epi-marker mistake.
All this exposes your denial about my purpose here; Exposing your deceit and BS. Over and over. And trust me, I will get back to you. Soon.
Smirk.
<quoted text>
1. I've never one time said that unless people are 'popping out babies' they are useless. You blatantly lied again.
2. I didn't assert homosexuality is mistake, science does. Nor have I asserted that a person is a mistake.
If your mouth is moving, it is doing something foul
Snicker.
<quoted text>
First, saying homosexuals are useless is not the same as saying they are broken. The back peddling is all yours as usual...
Moreover, I've said ALL people are broken.
However, the issue was your claim I said unless people are popping out babies they are useless.
You lied. You simply shifted from one lie to another when exposed. You have no problem lying. You are just like your dad.
As to homosexuality;
http://chronicle.com/article/The-Evolutionary...
This was prior to epi-marker mistake proposition.
Smile.
From your source...

"We are left with an undeniable evolutionary puzzle: What maintains the underlying genetic propensity for homosexuality, whatever its specific manifestations? Unlike most mystery stories, in which the case is typically solved at the finish, this one has no ending: We simply do not know."

--------

The author goes on to describe various POSSIBLE reasons for homosexuality. I am satisfied with one of his conclusions...

"Another question (also yet unanswered) is why should we bother to find out."

-------

We exist. We have always existed. There is no reason to believe that we will someday not exist. And since our presence has no negative impact on society--other than to frighten certain religious zealots--the question of "how" or "why" we exist is ridiculous.

As I've said multiple times, asking "why are there gays" is about as important as asking "why are there blondes".

You keep trying to find an answer to a question that doesn't need to be asked.

So your source has no answers and says nothing about homosexuality being maladaptive.

Better luck next time...
GDs will

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191033
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Gitmo detainees' looks like 'brutal' force-feeding of hunger strikers, but in reality this is OK under Islamic law for Muslim's.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191034
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Rock Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
We're sorry that you can't make him mad by asking him why he's mad. Must suck to impotent, like you.
Poor Jizzy, he's so stupid he thinks the "why are you mad?" schtick is pure genius.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191035
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

GDs will wrote:
Gitmo detainees' looks like 'brutal' force-feeding of hunger strikers, but in reality this is OK under Islamic law for Muslim's.
The way I see it hunger strikes are good. Saves us money on the food bill. I don't see the problem. They don't waste food, and they starve. Win/Win.

P.S. You are a weirdo.
guest

Long Beach, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191036
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Frankie, umadbro?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191037
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

guest wrote:
Frankie, umadbro?
No. You?
Hallelujah

Harrisonburg, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191038
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

14

14

11

You have no idea the "special rights" the gay cult in this country is asking for but you will when your child, grandchild, or even yourself is terminated from a job to hire a homosexual. The gay cult is suing churches to force those of faith to marry them; the gay cult is suing privately owned business who refuse to perform gay marriage which is infringing on the rights of God loving heterosexuals.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191039
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

14

14

14

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Are not the "body parts" sufficient?
No.
Our rights should not depend on what's in our underwear.
Pietro Armando wrote:
Is it not the joining of certain "body parts" and the natural result, that provides the biological foundation to marriage?
<quoted text>
Appealing to biology is logical though.
<quoted text>
"Sense" that you wish to acknowledge, and doesn't undermine your position....no.
Perhaps you can answer the questions I posed.
If its the consensus of society that marriage is simply a union of two consenting adults, there's no need to prohibit any two person, consenting adult, union, including blood relatives. Why should it matter who marries who, or who can't marry who?
I'll take that to mean you can't come up with a rational argument against gay marriage.
Pietro Armando wrote:
Your argument seems to be no restriction, except possible number of participants, among consenting adults.
If that is so, why bother licensing marriage at all?
Non sequitur.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191040
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

14

14

14

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Many relationships are 'equal' in love. That does not make them marriage.
I agree that gays have every right and opportunity to purse legitimate rights and an identity for their relationship. That is their responsibility. It is not legitimate to impose an imposter relationship on marriage.
As to children, two distinctions.
1. Children in the natural home of their biological parents are at a significant advantage over ANY default setting. That setting, or as close as possible should always be the primary pursuit of society.
2. A ss couple ALWAYS deprives a child of one parental role. To do so deliberately should be criminal. It is narcissistically diabolical.
What if one of the parents is a monster?
BTW Jesus had two dads.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191041
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

13

13

13

KiMare wrote:
That lack of ability within orientation is a clear indication of a defect.
Speaking of defects, what about chimerism? LOL!
Chimerism is an rare DISORDER.

Don't you hate god for being so sloppy when making you?

:)

Hallelujah

Harrisonburg, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191042
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

12

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of defects, what about chimerism? LOL!
Chimerism is an rare DISORDER.
Don't you hate god for being so sloppy when making you?
:)
That's funny and you forget that this is a action of man not God. I have read where you are minister but you blame God for everything you can.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191043
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

11

11

11

Rock Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
I wonder why his race is publicly described? Usually, at least when they are .
Racial slur reported.
Hallelujah

Harrisonburg, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191044
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

11

11

11

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Racial slur reported.
You are bearing false witness but that is the way the gay cult works.
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191045
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

11

11

11

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
From your source...
"We are left with an undeniable evolutionary puzzle: What maintains the underlying genetic propensity for homosexuality, whatever its specific manifestations? Unlike most mystery stories, in which the case is typically solved at the finish, this one has no ending: We simply do not know."
--------
The author goes on to describe various POSSIBLE reasons for homosexuality. I am satisfied with one of his conclusions...
"Another question (also yet unanswered) is why should we bother to find out."
-------
We exist. We have always existed. There is no reason to believe that we will someday not exist. And since our presence has no negative impact on society--other than to frighten certain religious zealots--the question of "how" or "why" we exist is ridiculous.
As I've said multiple times, asking "why are there gays" is about as important as asking "why are there blondes".
You keep trying to find an answer to a question that doesn't need to be asked.
So your source has no answers and says nothing about homosexuality being maladaptive.
Better luck next time...
Again, with the 'scared" or "frightened" schtick. Geez, do you really think that we are frightened? That's so silly, it's laughable, in a sad sort of way. About as scared of you as any of us are, when telling children not to play with matches...
Sorry, Boo-Boo, but you're not scary little spookies.
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191046
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

11

11

11

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
Our rights should not depend on what's in our underwear.
<quoted text>
I'll take that to mean you can't come up with a rational argument against gay marriage.
<quoted text>
Non sequitur.
It takes more than you, to dismiss valid differentiations. Sorry, Chongo. Rational has, again, been delivered.
You are the non sequitur. You do not follow. Not your fault that you cannot digest logic.
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191047
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

11

11

11

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Racial slur reported.
Oh, noes. Not again. Me so sad.
:-(

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191048
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

And still not a single rational argument against gay marriage!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

7 Users are viewing the Beverly Hills Forum right now

Search the Beverly Hills Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) 3 hr snodder 2,253
easy jobs from home 14 hr $$$ 1
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 22 hr Twilight sun 7,851
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 22 hr Facts facts 15,927
A girl waves a Mexican flag during rallies in L... (Mar '06) Jul 23 PEE PEE PETE 4,483
Taylor Swift's Secret Relationship Ends Because... Jul 23 boss hogg 7
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) Jul 21 Racjei 4,885
•••
•••

Beverly Hills News Video

•••
•••

Beverly Hills Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Beverly Hills People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Beverly Hills News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Beverly Hills
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••