Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,794

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#181391 Feb 26, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I talked to your sister, she doesnít want you, maybe your goat will.
( chuckle )
Frankie, we all know already, you have no actual interest in poly marriage, you donít actually want to marry your sister, and you are refraining from telling us about your feelings toward you goat.
You only use these subjects as a way to try and attack supporters of Same Sex Marriage
You arenít fooling anyone.
So attack the messenger not the message?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#181392 Feb 26, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't like it when the government has a say regarding which gender you choose to marry.
But you like it when they have a say regarding how many you choose to marry.
Classic hypocrite.
What's good for the gay goose is not good for the poly gander.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#181393 Feb 26, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>No, doesn't sound better, you moron. The government grants marriage. OF COURSE they have a say. It seems that you lack even a basic understanding of the world.
Would marriage still exist if the government withdrew legal recognition?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181394 Feb 26, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again, probably for the hundredth time, I do not hate polygamists, so you can stop that lie anytime, although I doubt if you will.
Deny them equal protection? Huh? I'm not the Court, sweetcheeks. It's not up to me. Our Constitution grants equal protection. However, I don't believe you understand the concept of equal protection. You think it's the same thing as everyone should have equal rights. It's not the same thing.
So let's cut through your LIES.
You wish to deny polygamists the right to marry. You have stated they are not worthy. Remember? "What about the children!"

And besides, you cannot hide your hostility to poly. Or by association to me. It drips from your every post about it.

You are against equal protection and you are very paranoid. You think I'm trying to trick you. You're insane.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181395 Feb 26, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
What's good for the gay goose is not good for the poly gander.
Well said.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181396 Feb 26, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>No, doesn't sound better, you moron. The government grants marriage. OF COURSE they have a say. It seems that you lack even a basic understanding of the world.
Do you like it when they say it has to be an opposite gender person?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181397 Feb 26, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again, probably for the hundredth time, I do not hate polygamists, so you can stop that lie anytime, although I doubt if you will.
Deny them equal protection? Huh? I'm not the Court, sweetcheeks. It's not up to me. Our Constitution grants equal protection. However, I don't believe you understand the concept of equal protection. You think it's the same thing as everyone should have equal rights. It's not the same thing.
So let's cut through your LIES.
Isn't "sweetcheeks" an "anti gay epitaph Fruitcake?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#181398 Feb 26, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't "sweetcheeks" an "anti gay epitaph Fruitcake?
Maybe he was asking you out....
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181399 Feb 26, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
So attack the messenger not the message?
Big D loves the "you're a liar" straw man. It's all he's got. His rebuttal to all my posts.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#181400 Feb 26, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You wish to deny polygamists the right to marry. You have stated they are not worthy. Remember? "What about the children!"
And besides, you cannot hide your hostility to poly. Or by association to me. It drips from your every post about it.
You are against equal protection and you are very paranoid. You think I'm trying to trick you. You're insane.
So far no one cares enough about Poly ( including you ) to do the legwork to get things started, it is nothing but a poly for your hostility to supporters of Same Sex Marriage

It wonít work of course, Same sex marriage will continue to expand across states and nations.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181401 Feb 26, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
So far no one cares enough about Poly ( including you ) to do the legwork to get things started, it is nothing but a poly for your hostility to supporters of Same Sex Marriage
It wonít work of course, Same sex marriage will continue to expand across states and nations.
Your tired old "no one cares" argument. You have repeated it at least 20 times. You are every wrong. People do care. You are ignorant, not my problem. Don't use it as an argument though. That's stupid.

http://polygamyrights.net/
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181402 Feb 26, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
So far no one cares enough about Poly ( including you ) to do the legwork to get things started, it is nothing but a poly for your hostility to supporters of Same Sex Marriage
It wonít work of course, Same sex marriage will continue to expand across states and nations.
http://www.pro-polygamy.com/
http://www.al-islam.org/WomanRights/11.htm
http://www.nationalpolygamyadvocate.com/
http://polygamyrights.com/
Big D

Modesto, CA

#181403 Feb 26, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Your tired old "no one cares" argument. You have repeated it at least 20 times. You are every wrong. People do care. You are ignorant, not my problem. Don't use it as an argument though. That's stupid.
http://polygamyrights.net/
Ok .. You donít care enough to do anything about it, and so far no one else does either

do you like that better?

Same Sex marriage will continue to become legal in more states and nations
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181404 Feb 26, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
So far no one cares enough about Poly ( including you ) to do the legwork to get things started, it is nothing but a poly for your hostility to supporters of Same Sex Marriage
It wonít work of course, Same sex marriage will continue to expand across states and nations.
You are just plain wrong and too bullheaded to learn. Either that or your "not enough people want it" schtick is a straw man.

Which is it?

Stop lying and acting like I'm against SSM. You know that's not true.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#181405 Feb 26, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
I donít see signatures on a ballot measure yet, and nothing is in the news about legal action or their gaining any ground

Just a lot of private websites you are posting, I can create those for $5

I am talking serious here
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181406 Feb 26, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok .. You donít care enough to do anything about it, and so far no one else does either
do you like that better?
Same Sex marriage will continue to become legal in more states and nations
Same old schtick.

You can talk of travel to Mars without actually traveling to Mars. I can talk about rights for poly without actively going out in the streets for it. And besides, I am doing something about it, I'm arguing with bigots and idiots.

You don't care enough to do anything about SSM. Do I use that against you when you discuss SSM?

Same old tired schtick over and over again, And then again. like it's going to work one if these times! I won't it's stupid and no argument against equal rights at all.

What a jackass.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#181407 Feb 26, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
So far no one cares enough about Poly ( including you ) to do the legwork to get things started, it is nothing but a poly for your hostility to supporters of Same Sex Marriage
It wonít work of course, Same sex marriage will continue to expand across states and nations.
Really Big D? You seem like a reasonable....fella? Anyway...every victory for SSM is also a victory for plural marriage. The standard's been changed.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#181408 Feb 26, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Really Big D? You seem like a reasonable....fella? Anyway...every victory for SSM is also a victory for plural marriage. The standard's been changed.
according to you

but SSM was legal in California before prop 8, not poly

SSM is legal in some 10 states now, and DC, is poly?

SSM has had a LOT of victories lately

How many has Poly had?

You are under the delusion that one goes hand in hand with the other. Not at all true, and you are failing to frighten anyone with that crap.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#181409 Feb 26, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
BS
Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on mating behavior.
What does that mean in part?
It means you are an idiot.
KiMare wrote:
A constraint on the evolutionary PRIORITY to pass DNA
You have two sets.
Do you think you should have been aborted?
KiMare wrote:
along to as many as possible. Marriage actually constrains the evolutionary desire for numerous mates, and requires the male care for their offspring and support the mother.
What you actually point out is clear evidence that homosexuality is a genetic DEFECT.

Moreover, homosexuality is a far more promiscuous orientation than heterosexuality.
Smile.
Speaking of genetic DEFECTS, do you think chimeras should be aborted?
:)
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181410 Feb 26, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I donít see signatures on a ballot measure yet, and nothing is in the news about legal action or their gaining any ground
Just a lot of private websites you are posting, I can create those for $5
I am talking serious here
OK I'll go along with your stupid straw man argument for a moment and humor you.

Let's say only 3 people in the whole world want a poly marriage. Is that a reason to deny poly marriage?

HOW MANY PEOPLE WANT IT IS IRRELEVANT.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Beverly Hills Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Finding right fit for Los Angeles still eludes NFL (Apr '14) 3 hr bhesh 2
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 3 hr Save you lives 19,719
How can I delete my topix account? (Sep '11) 6 hr stacey Barron 12
Review: Barry O Bernstein Law Office (May '10) 13 hr Victims of Barrys... 25
Marco Rubio in 2016! 17 hr Junior Rodrigues ... 30
News Mel Gibson apologizes for drunk driving (Jul '06) 18 hr swedenforever 31
News Carlton Gebbia implies Kyle Richards doesn't se... (Mar '14) Fri Frank Lee 3

Beach Hazards Statement for Los Angeles County was issued at March 29 at 6:20AM PDT

Beverly Hills Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Beverly Hills People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]