Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201854 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178630 Feb 6, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Only 9 states do, moron.
Which means that 41 do not. Hopefully, the fad will end soon, and we can return to normality...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178631 Feb 6, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Did I say poly was your obsession dummy? Learn to read.
So what if you don't give a flip about poly? Most people don't give a flip about SSM. What do I care what you give a flip about? So what if it might not be decades? Are these your real reasons to deny equal rights?
By what logic do you insist on the traditional, arbitrary, religious and discriminatory number of two?
Many do not give a flip about SSM, but are forced to watch as it becomes valid. But for those that give a flip about poly and incest, it must be a slap in the face to watch "equality' being doled out, but only for some....Like "Animal Farm". We are all created equal, but some are more equal than others...
Pressed shirts

Monrovia, CA

#178632 Feb 6, 2013
If you want to get away with a crime of stealing money since 2001 then join a police department and you'll get your free "white collar" crime pass card.

Four defendants remain in the case against a group of sheriff's deputies caught in a decade-long pay scandal.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178633 Feb 6, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>
So I will not find any post by you on this thread, correct?
I just clicked on your link, and guess what ? Brian_G's name didn't appear, JizzyLips...You moron. Go invest in some more Reynolds Wrap, your protective layer has worn away. Dumb-ass.....
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178634 Feb 6, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
That's ignorance and bigotry.
Some homosexuals are bad too. Does that mean we should not allow SSM? Of course not.
Big D would probably state that it was only bigotry and ignorance when it was used against the gays, as all others are below his protective threshold...

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13


#178636 Feb 6, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Which means that 41 do not. Hopefully, the fad will end soon, and we can return to normality...
You can't stop the beat.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178637 Feb 6, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
No. I am not arguing that it won't be a decade or two away. So what? Why do you keep stressing that?
Your arguments regarding polygamy seem to be:
-I don't care.
-Polygamists are bad people.
-Same sex marriage is here now, polygamy is not.
-Frankie's obsessed with polygamy.
Did I miss any?
Looks like a perfect summary to me...Except you forgot the part where he says "poly is off-topic"...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178639 Feb 6, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Again you are confusing what I might think ( which doesnít matter ) with the reality that nothing will come of it for the next couple of decades.
did you want to make the wager?
...Because, Big D, I'll take that bet. How much ? And I don't take checks...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178640 Feb 6, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, you have to prove that it does someone harm, that is why Prop 8 was overturned and that decision upheld by the California appellate courts.
You canít just deny people the right to happiness just because you donít like them. You arenít royalty, you donít get to just decide on a whim who is protected under the law and who is not.
You have to show how it harms others, your lawyers have already failed in that task twice, and now at the supreme court no new evidence can be presented, only failed evidence already presented.
You are on the wrong side of history.
This argument, RIGHT HERE, sounds an awful lot like the one used to benefit the gays:
"The Browns present a strong argument that what they do in their home is their business. And the more they argue for privacy and rights to marry whomever they choose, the more it morphs into a parallel argument in favor of same-sex marriage. In fact, if Turley is right when he says that, in this marriage debate, we are truly concerned with liberty and protections for ďprivate relations among consenting adults,Ē then the number should not matter any more than sex."
...doesn't it ? In fact, if we delete a couple of words..."then the number should not matter any more than sex.", then it is a carbon copy. As is proper. As Frank and I have been saying.
Smile. You're the guest star of "Ooops, Guess I F**ked Up Again"....Played nightly on Topix.

Monrovia, CA

#178641 Feb 6, 2013
A 72-year-old homeowner immediately retrieved his handgun when he heard several home intruders attempting to gain entry to his Las Vegas residence.

This happened early Feburary 04, 2013 Monday morning when the criminals entered his bedroom, he opened fire, killing one of the suspects and sending the rest fleeing.

Finally the police showed up so they could clean up the crooks and haul them away.

Since: Jan 12

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

#178642 Feb 6, 2013
UK legalizes gay marriage. Meanwhile in the "land of the free" we have drone strikes killing US civilians without trial. Pathetic AmeriKKKa
Crazy EXs

Monrovia, CA

#178643 Feb 6, 2013
Arm yourself, crazy LAPD cops are killing people.

Irvine and LAPD Police have identified a former Los Angeles Police Department officer suspected of shooting a newly engaged couple to death in an Irvine parking garage.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#178644 Feb 6, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. The cross cultural constraint predates gay couples claiming marriage by quite some time making your point pointless.
The statement is a simple fact that you cannot directly refute, hence these games.
2. I said the basic essence of marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. You had no logical counter, so you made up a statement (lied) I never made. Again, where did I say marriage wasn't about love?
3. Maybe you've heard the term 'survival of the fittest',
"Survival of the fittest" is a tautology because there is no way to measure who is fittest apart from survival.
KiMare wrote:
which is the summation of the four points in the link. Or put simply, no mutation occurs if there is not procreation. There is no procreation by gay couples.
4. Point 3; hence gay couples are an evolutionary blunder.
You say you are a monster mutation. Are you an evolutionary blunder? Should you have been aborted?
KiMare wrote:
This is simple logic. Perhaps you might try a direct response to the fact; Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
By the way, here is some of the other elements of marriage distinguished from gay couples;
If you
believe denying marriage to a relationship
will prevent love
If you
demand any committed relationship
has to be called marriage
If you
claim rights and benefits can only be acquired
by a imposition on marriage
If you
equate the diversity of two genders
with the redundancy of same genders
If you
desecrate the sacred tradition of all major religions
and violate the historic practice of every single culture in history
If you
believe a fundamental change to the building block of society
will have absolutely no affect
If you
think a law can change
the reality of crucial distinctions in relationships
If you
pretend duplicating sexuality
is the same as blending masculinity and femininity
If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent
If you
ignore the design of sexual union
to manipulate a harmful act
If you
violate evolution's law of reproduction
to equate a genetic dead end
If you
risk the healthiest human relationship
to include one of the unhealthiest
If you
parallel the sole birthplace of every other relationship
with one that can reproduce none
If you
dilute all these things
down to just 'a committed relationship of two people'
Then, and only then, can you equate same-sex unions with marriage.
Whatever, you worthless blunder, marriage is a right.

Monrovia, CA

#178645 Feb 6, 2013
Time to choke a chicken again.

Monrovia, CA

#178646 Feb 6, 2013
Arm yourself, those crazy LAPD cops are killing people.

Irvine and LAPD Police have identified a former Los Angeles Police Department officer suspected of shooting a newly engaged couple to death in an Irvine parking garage.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#178647 Feb 6, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
Well now, since you've not provided a real argument...
The real arguments include the probable consequences of introducing gender segregation to marriage.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#178648 Feb 6, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>The real arguments include the probable consequences of introducing gender segregation to marriage.
i agree and just like the boy scouts, it will be a matter of time when Churches will be sued that refuse a homosexual marriage.
Black momma OG

Norwalk, CA

#178649 Feb 7, 2013
This is a if or but I do believe in a contract between two people some things I guess I am old fashion to a degree. A person chose to be together need some kind of financial protection as far as the boyscott thing that is crazy to me. Just get your seperate sector you're setting yourself up for more lawsuits

Honolulu, HI

#178650 Feb 7, 2013

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#178651 Feb 7, 2013
chance47 wrote:
<quoted text>
By calling my questioning 'games' I take it you are simply dismissive on this. Noted.
<quoted text>
Careful now... asking why you think marriage isn't about love is NOT claiming that you made the statement. Telling me I lied is , well, ironically a lie of yours.
<quoted text>
Another lie... lots of gays have procreated... and lots of straight people do not....
<quoted text>
I daresay that is not simple logic (maybe simpleton logic!).'blunders' are what define and drive evolutionary forces. I would contend that humans have a certain frequency of how many will be gay - just like a certain frequency will have curly hair or blue eyes. There is no 'blunder' in what we are... just variation.
<quoted text>
1. Only if you are dismissive of the unrefuted answers.

2. So defensive (and avoiding the issue...)! The difference is between asking "do you think" (a question) and stating "why do you think" (an assertion). You lied. Like I said, why are these childish word games necessary for a legitimate cause?

3. Of course lots of gays have procreated. That's not what I said and you know it. Another act of deception. I said gay couples.

Not one single gay couple in ALL of human history has ever procreated.

The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;

A apple tree bearing fruit.
A apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A walnut tree who never bears apples wanting to be a apple tree.
A walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.

Even funnier?

The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!

4. You make a simpleton blunder by confusing 'blunder' and 'defect' with 'mutation'. Evolution thrives on mutation. However, a mutation that cannot perpetuate itself is a blunder/defect.

Remember when I schooled you about the fundamental goal of evolution (VIST)?

I = Inheritance: Genetic traits are inherited from parents and are passed on to offspring.

S = Selection: Organisms with traits that are favorable to their survival get to live and pass on their genes to the next generation.

It seems to me your post picture should be a buff ego with no head...


Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Beverly Hills Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Vanessa Hudgens enjoys her day out in Beverly H... 3 hr vanessa hudgens real 1
News D.A.: Operators Will Be Prosecuted For Murder I... 5 hr marg 1
News Kanye, Sam Smith, the Who set for iHeartRadio M... 9 hr K-DJ 6
Very Large Burmese python bagged in Everglades 22 hr Tom 1
Skanky"s Bar coming to Beverly hills Jul 24 Ricky Ray 1
racist twitter account Jul 23 565656abc 1
News Be aware: Vice President Joe Biden's visit expe... Jul 22 Marin County 4
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Beverly Hills Mortgages