Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201847 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170332 Dec 8, 2012
17Patriot76 wrote:
That judge is violating the U.S Constitution by taking the power of the peoples votes... Same sex marriage isn't protected under the U.S Constitution!
Equal protection of the law is protected under the U.S n! That includes marriage laws!

Constitutio
17Patriot76 wrote:
Obviously it wouldn't be controversial if it was!
You don't think inter-racial marriage was controversial? How old are you? 12?
17Patriot76 wrote:
The founders wouldn't have supported same sex anything because it fell under the "Sodomy Law" that was in effect until the Liberal party was formed in the late 1800's..
The founders are worm poop now.
Some even supported slavery, and murder of Natives.
If funny that the same people who claim they are for small government want the government telling us which sex positions we can use. And they think putting men in jail is a good way to get then to stop engaging is sodomy.
It's the 2010's now..
17Patriot76 wrote:
The dictionary clearly defines Marriage as 1 man & 1 woman in holy matrimony...
Which dictionary, stupid?
Dictionary.com doesn't say anything about "holy" and it mentions "
a similar institution involving partners of the same gender: gay marriage. "

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/marria...
17Patriot76 wrote:
So in reality Government really has no say in marriage because it comes from the church! Churches are against homosexuality (unless they're 501C3).....
It's alright enjoy it while it lasts lol The American Resistance will return America back to the Good Moral Country we used to be with the soon to come 2nd American Revolution!! GOD BLESS AMERICA & THE AMERICAN PATRIOTS
What did you like the best about Good Moral America? Slavery? Women being denied the vote? Jim Crow? Slaughter of Natives and the theft of their lands? Concentration Camps? Let's hear it.
GODLESS AMERICA

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170333 Dec 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
"you're wrong"??? That's your argument.
How old are you?
Marriage is a cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. SS couples are a direct contradiction. A violation of nature. You could be blind as a bat and dumb as a rock and still know they are not the same. Even a child says, "Are you serious???"
Smirk.
Stupid, marriage is a legal contract. And you don't have to be able to reproduce in order to enter that contract.

Do you think you should have been aborted? You describe yourself as a mutated monster, or something similar.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170334 Dec 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
So you want to equate the rare exceptions to procreation in marriage to the absolute desolation of procreation in ss unions???
Really?
Kind of silly stupid, don't you think???
Smirk.
You are silly stupid. The ability to reproduce is just not a requirement for marriage.

Deal with that fact, for once.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170335 Dec 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
So you want to equate the rare exceptions to procreation in marriage to the absolute desolation of procreation in ss unions???
Really?
Kind of silly stupid, don't you think???
Smirk.
<quoted text>
Nothing you said addressed the facts I stated.
They certainly did not disqualify my facts;
1. Heterosexual couples who do not procreate are still a large minority.
You simply argue that heterosexual couples are delaying or may not at this time choose to have children (those 'decisions' change all the time). Minor fluctuations in rates does not change my facts.
2. Gay couples are 'absolutely desolate' by mutual procreation.
You blatantly attempt to make the same idiotic, deceitful comparison.
-The unnatural barrenness of heterosexual couples to the absolute mutual desolation of every single gay couple.
-Even worse, your 'solution' leaves the child always absent one parent and one gender! A horrible and cruel deprivation of a child's well-being. Something that is diabolical and should be criminal. Anyone deliberately perpetrating this on a child is despicable.
This is a example of what evil consequences the attempt to equate duplicate couples to marriage leads to...
Your denial is sick and dangerous!
If you want to put a chink in the armor of "Procreation is irrelevant in marriage" tell em you support incest marriage. Listen to the stuttering and double talk! Fun!

I do. I support all forms of marriage among consenting adults. I find some of the biggest bigots against less common forms of marriage are same sex marriage advocates. Funny that. You'd think maybe they are hypocrites.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170336 Dec 8, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
There you go again, with that fantasy stuff. He didn't say that. He said marriage had a clear purpose, other than sexual gratification. Can't you post without adulterating context ? And you are not in any position to hand anything over, you have no power to control it. The Constitution was written very clearly, and no mention was made of SSm.
But stupid, it can't mention every law in the Constitution. So, it says we should have equal protection under THE law. That includes marriage laws. That's why the 14th Amendment was sited in Loving v VA. The Constitution doesn't mention inter-racial marriage either.
R Hudson wrote:
Your side is using legal loopholes to turn our society upiside down, and if we didn't have special interest groups involving themselves in politics, we'd not be facing this issue now. Fact of the matter is, common sense has been replaced with libertine values, and we are witnessing the demise of sensibility and order. Our politicians have decided that the very nature of our country is to be violated.
Gay marriage will violate the very nature of our country!?
Wiccan, my black backside.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170337 Dec 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You are silly stupid. The ability to reproduce is just not a requirement for marriage.
Deal with that fact, for once.
Yes. that is why there is no reason incest marriage not be allowed.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170338 Dec 8, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is you don't comprehend the definition of "Equal Protection"- you seem to think that is synonymous with equal outcome.
BTW< how about you come off the playground for a minute and stop ending your sentences with- grow a pair, and LOLSER- thay hardly add any meaning to your already meaningless rants.
LOLSER. Look who's talking! All you do is attack me, and don't even try to counter what I've said. So, b!tch, STFU.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170339 Dec 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Equal protection of the law is protected under the U.S n! That includes marriage laws!
Constitutio<quoted text>
You don't think inter-racial marriage was controversial? How old are you? 12?
<quoted text>
The founders are worm poop now.
Some even supported slavery, and murder of Natives.
If funny that the same people who claim they are for small government want the government telling us which sex positions we can use. And they think putting men in jail is a good way to get then to stop engaging is sodomy.
It's the 2010's now..
<quoted text>
Which dictionary, stupid?
Dictionary.com doesn't say anything about "holy" and it mentions "
a similar institution involving partners of the same gender: gay marriage. "
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/marria...
<quoted text>
What did you like the best about Good Moral America? Slavery? Women being denied the vote? Jim Crow? Slaughter of Natives and the theft of their lands? Concentration Camps? Let's hear it.
GODLESS AMERICA
Let's hear it for Rose and her perfect implementation of Rose Tactic #8.

Good Work Rose-

Rose tactic #1- Act stupid-(not so sure it is an act)
Rose Tactic #2- Misdirect
Rose Tactic #3- Make stupid comments until opposition is tired of replying then claim victory
Rose Tactic #4- Attack the poster- scream Racist, Bigot, Homophobe
Rose Tactic #5- Act intelligent by making silly statistical references such as- Most people who have anal sex are straight-
Rose Tactic #6- Falsely accuse others of lies- when proven wrong through links to previous posts revert back to tactics 2 and 4.
Rose Tactic #7- Claim to have made an argument, then claim others can't counter the argument that doesn't actually exist.
Rose Tactic #8- Claim that everything is linked to- Slavery, Jim Crow Laws, and the plight of the blacks.(See also Tactic #4)

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170340 Dec 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You are silly stupid. The ability to reproduce is just not a requirement for marriage.
Deal with that fact, for once.
Good, than what is the argument against incest?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170341 Dec 8, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Anyone want to try and translate this into English?
Guess you are too dumb to get it.
Oh, well.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170342 Dec 8, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
Nevertheless, there is plenty of evidence that homosexuality is not innate....zzzz....
From: http://www.defendthefamily.com/_docs/resource...
From a fundie hate site.
Wow, there's a shock.
Why would a Wiccan slurp up fundie splooge like you do?
Could it be you're not really a Wiccan?
Nah...

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170343 Dec 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
From a fundie hate site.
Wow, there's a shock.
Why would a Wiccan slurp up fundie splooge like you do?
Could it be you're not really a Wiccan?
Nah...
No one seems to care what religion other posters are except you.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170344 Dec 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Guess you are too dumb to get it.
Oh, well.
Perhaps you'd tell us what it means then. We won't wait.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170345 Dec 8, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's hear it for Rose and her perfect implementation of Rose Tactic #8.
Good Work Rose-
Rose tactic #1- Act stupid-(not so sure it is an act)
Rose Tactic #2- Misdirect
Rose Tactic #3- Make stupid comments until opposition is tired of replying then claim victory
Rose Tactic #4- Attack the poster- scream Racist, Bigot, Homophobe
Rose Tactic #5- Act intelligent by making silly statistical references such as- Most people who have anal sex are straight-
Rose Tactic #6- Falsely accuse others of lies- when proven wrong through links to previous posts revert back to tactics 2 and 4.
Rose Tactic #7- Claim to have made an argument, then claim others can't counter the argument that doesn't actually exist.
Rose Tactic #8- Claim that everything is linked to- Slavery, Jim Crow Laws, and the plight of the blacks.(See also Tactic #4)
Yes.#8. She's got that old tattered dog eared race card and she just can't believe it doesn't work so well anymore.

We have voted as a nation for a black president twice and I am proud of that. Not Rose_NoHo. Rose_NoHo misses the old days.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170346 Dec 8, 2012
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Qusetion. Why do people referance the bible at all. Its not a law, nor does it pertain to the question of same sex marriage? Answer, Jesus Freaks think that the bible is law. Now move on asshat
Aw shuddup jackass! Keep your bible nonsense to yourself it's off topic here.

Take your fundie ass to the Jesus threads if you want to talk about that stuff.

Fundie dope!
Lisa

Irvine, CA

#170347 Dec 8, 2012
God made Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve and Jane and eat

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170348 Dec 8, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's hear it for Rose and her perfect implementation of Rose Tactic #8.
Good Work Rose-
Rose tactic #1- Act stupid-(not so sure it is an act)
Rose Tactic #2- Misdirect
Rose Tactic #3- Make stupid comments until opposition is tired of replying then claim victory
Rose Tactic #4- Attack the poster- scream Racist, Bigot, Homophobe
Rose Tactic #5- Act intelligent by making silly statistical references such as- Most people who have anal sex are straight-
Rose Tactic #6- Falsely accuse others of lies- when proven wrong through links to previous posts revert back to tactics 2 and 4.
Rose Tactic #7- Claim to have made an argument, then claim others can't counter the argument that doesn't actually exist.
Rose Tactic #8- Claim that everything is linked to- Slavery, Jim Crow Laws, and the plight of the blacks.(See also Tactic #4)
I gotta say it again. You've got the old war horse down to a tee!

Truly LOL!

P.S. I'm on her sh!t list. She swore to never ever respond to me again. I'm real proud of that!
phaines

Big Bear Lake, CA

#170352 Dec 8, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
3 corrections..."too" long, not "to" long, "didn't" read, not "did not" read, and "reference", not "referance". I tend to give vets some slack, so don't push it with the "asshat" ...
spelling natzi's ..

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170353 Dec 8, 2012
Lisa wrote:
God made Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve and Jane and eat
Actually, Eve was made from Adam's rib. Eve would have had the same DNA Adam did. Eve would have been a man.
Looks like god made Adam and Steve after all.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170355 Dec 8, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
The Federal Government has no constitutional power to legislate marriage law. Fact. Protection is not a grant.
Worm poo, perhaps, but their ideals live on. Slavery made this country great,
A racist Wiccan who approves of slavery?
Sorry, you're no more Wiccan than the Pope.
Why not just admit you are a fundie?
R Hudson wrote:
for better or worse, and the rift between the states was not brought about by the desire to abolish it, but how to use the proceeds from it's use.
And the Government isn't deciding which positions are to used, it is illegally debating it's power to regulate MARRIAGE.
The Constitution says the states can't make laws that violate equal protection, even laws that regulate MARRIAGE.
R Hudson wrote:
I liked best the custom of ignoring idiots,
You should ignore yourself then!
R Hudson wrote:
like you. What did you say your religious beliefs were ? Because if you don't respect religion of some sort, then you have little in common with 90% of us. You know, the majority...
You don't like the fact that minorities have rights, but we do.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Beverly Hills Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Inglewood Lanes is new located at 4030 W. Centu... 5 hr Inglewood Lanes B... 1
2 remaining jail escapees arrested in San Franc... 6 hr Eyuiop 3
News NAACP show expects sparks, not fireworks from #... Thu LukesWall 1
no black actors worth a sh t Feb 1 huh 2
News Nine people who want to be Susan Myers' new war... Jan 30 wheres the truth 1
News Will Smith says he won't attend Oscars Jan 21 Rose_NoHo 2
News Welch: Modeling agents hated my body (Apr '10) Jan 20 gerf 8
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Beverly Hills Mortgages