Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201844 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169260 Nov 27, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
well then congratulations on its success, you removed Clinton from office by impeachment
not sure which parallel universe you live in, but congratulations on money and time well spent.
LOL
it was a total failure, we all know it, your saying it was not only makes you a fool
He wasn't removed from office you moron, he was acquitted.

But he was impeached, you finally admit that at least.

Give it up old man! He was impeached.

FUN Stuff!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169261 Nov 27, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
well then congratulations on its success, you removed Clinton from office by impeachment
not sure which parallel universe you live in, but congratulations on money and time well spent.
LOL
it was a total failure, we all know it, your saying it was not only makes you a fool
Look jackass, I didn't impeach him! I was against his impeachment as you well know you dishonest jerk.

I like Slick Willy and feel the POTUS's getting a blow job (or her dainty presidential peach eaten) are only the business of him/herself, the blower/peach eater, and his/her spouse if any.

But I accept reality, you should too. Clinton was impeached for obstructing justice and lying under oath, one count of each. For lying about a BJ! What a dope! Like you.

The impeachment didn't "fail in the Senate" or anywhere else.

Relax and accept it. It's history.
LiceAlled

La Puente, CA

#169262 Nov 27, 2012
You Republican idiots lost 2012, why do you want to get kicked again in 2012 - 2013 for?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169263 Nov 27, 2012
LiceAlled wrote:
You Republican idiots lost 2012, why do you want to get kicked again in 2012 - 2013 for?
Romney lost. Get over it.
jack rabbit swammi cowboy

Klamath Falls, OR

#169264 Nov 27, 2012
Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:
<quoted text>oh sorry i'm not gay stupid fluck!!! Just a hooker and stripper in seattle... but still way smarter then your dumbazz
is that all you got a lot of name calling. I don't buy for any hooker either. You got any comment on the cost of gay marriage to the rest of us?
jack rabbit swammi cowboy

Klamath Falls, OR

#169265 Nov 27, 2012
Winner by default by selfesh dum ass gay marriage backers is The Swammi.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#169267 Nov 27, 2012
jack rabbit swammi cowboy wrote:
<quoted text>Reason one; legitimizing gay marriage will be a recruitment tool for persuading more normal healthy young people to see an advantage in turning gay.
Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!".
jack rabbit swammi cowboy wrote:
Two; gay marriages are mostly sham marriages and when government and private employers start to pay for all the increase in partner benefits they will drop all benefits. Those who don't drop benefits will be stuck with the increase in cost and that could cost me $$$. Yes normal people do turn gay.
LOL.
So, gay people should work and pay taxes, but not get the same benefits? And, stupid, if they are going to get involved in a sham marriage to get benefits, they could marry someone of the opposite sex.
And still, not one rational argument against gay marriage.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#169268 Nov 27, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
And vice versa.
http://www.topix.com/forum/cit y/elk-grove-ca/T230I96GC33E7VK 5B/p178 The big Dope hangs out there a lot.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#169269 Nov 27, 2012
jack rabbit swammi cowboy wrote:
that 169183 post was a double click error. Point is the tax payers will not for long pay for your sham partner bennifits. but I guess the uk dufus has not heard that we are broke. jail house queers claim they can turn anyone they can overpower. No I am not. I won the fight.
You homophobes say "taxpayer" as if gay people don't pay taxes. Gay people are also taxpayers. Speaking of jail house, I'm surprised a song about gay sex was allowed on the radio in the 50's.(Jailhouse Rock)

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#169270 Nov 27, 2012
jack rabbit swammi cowboy wrote:
<quoted text> From a homosexual point of view you make valid points. But as an adult male I also have the right to offer rebuttal to your recruitment campaigns to the youngsters. I also think my point that the insurance for gay partners will break the bank or cause employers to drop insurance for all. I also think homosexuals don’t really see past their chosen community’s interests.
LOL. Your posts remind me of this:
"'98 Homosexual-Recruitment Drive Nearing Goal

SAN FRANCISCO—Spokespersons for the National Gay & Lesbian Recruitment Task Force announced Monday that more than 288,000 straights have been converted to homosexuality since Jan. 1, 1998, putting the group well on pace to reach its goal of 350,000 conversions by the end of the year. "

http://www.theonion.com/articles/98-homosexua...

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#169271 Nov 27, 2012
jack rabbit swammi cowboy wrote:
I heard a few years ago one gay supporter laughing along with her 6 year old at a cartoon gag where a boy tackles his dog with a "flying butt pliers" surprise surprise surprise! the boy is now an adult homosexual.
Wow! So not only can homosexuals recruit, they can speed up the growth process!
jack rabbit swammi cowboy wrote:
He rejected his manhood early dew[/QUPTE]

Early morning dew?

[QUOTE who="jack rabbit swammi cowboy"]

to his mother's encouragement.
Fellow rational thinkers we must counter the gay recruitment everywhere.
i respect the mother and son greatly but to bad they fell for the gay recruitment.
Rational tolerance forever
Yeah, we all believe your story.
Moniker

La Puente, CA

#169272 Nov 27, 2012
I thought it was it's city hall who were in to robbing the business?

The "McBandit," so named because of the McDonalds paper bag he placed his stolen cash in.

He robbed the Chase Bank inside Ralphs, 655 South Grand Avenue, Glendora, Californai.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#169273 Nov 27, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I suppose it was too much to hope for that you could learn
Yes he was impeached by the house
that impeachment failed at trial in the senate :)
It died there, and no penalty from the impeachment were applied, a total waste of time money and effort.
Effect... zero ( other than to give you a hard on ) LOL
You are dense as a rock. The impeachment did not fail, the house has the SOLE power of impeachment and it most certainly did not fail, the House very much impeached Clinton.

The fact that the Senate did not convict or remove him from office does not change the fact that he was-is-and will always be- and IMPEACHED President.

The impeachment did not fail, if it had failed the Senate would not have held a trial.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#169274 Nov 28, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
He wasn't removed from office you moron, he was acquitted.
But he was impeached, you finally admit that at least.
Give it up old man! He was impeached.
FUN Stuff!
Oh I know he wasn’t, your successful impeachment didn’t do a darn thing, but you think it was a total success so I thought I would just humor you along until the men in the white suits come and pick you up. Not one thing listed in the articles of impeachment were actually applied. Zip… nada… a total failure.

It failed in the senate that is history, Just like the previous impeachment of Andrew Johnson did.

but you want to believe they were successes and I don’t want to strain your already strained mind
Big D

Modesto, CA

#169275 Nov 28, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You are dense as a rock. The impeachment did not fail, the house has the SOLE power of impeachment and it most certainly did not fail, the House very much impeached Clinton.
The fact that the Senate did not convict or remove him from office does not change the fact that he was-is-and will always be- and IMPEACHED President.
The impeachment did not fail, if it had failed the Senate would not have held a trial.
and the senate has the power to try impeachments

so, did the trying of the impeachment succeed or fail?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169276 Nov 28, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
and the senate has the power to try impeachments
so, did the trying of the impeachment succeed or fail?
It succeeded jackass. Look it up! It's history.

What a moron!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#169277 Nov 28, 2012
Well I saw the vote when the impeachment went to trial in the senate.

You don’t get to re-write history

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169278 Nov 28, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh I know he wasn’t, your successful impeachment didn’t do a darn thing, but you think it was a total success so I thought I would just humor you along until the men in the white suits come and pick you up. Not one thing listed in the articles of impeachment were actually applied. Zip… nada… a total failure.
It failed in the senate that is history, Just like the previous impeachment of Andrew Johnson did.
but you want to believe they were successes and I don’t want to strain your already strained mind
Clinton's impeachment didn't "fail in the Senate". It was successfully concluded with his acquittal on Feb 12, 1999.

You are truly a moron!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#169279 Nov 28, 2012
It certainly didn’t succeed as you seem to think it did. The impeachment is tried in the senate, and did not get the votes to pass, you call that a success?

Clinton was not removed from office as stated in the articles of impeachment.

You may have a different idea of success than I do.

How do you feel about what you would call the successful criminal case against OJ Simpson?

LOL

You might as well drop it, you are not capable of understanding what happened.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169280 Nov 28, 2012
Big D wrote:
It certainly didn’t succeed as you seem to think it did. The impeachment is tried in the senate, and did not get the votes to pass, you call that a success?
Clinton was not removed from office as stated in the articles of impeachment.
You may have a different idea of success than I do.
How do you feel about what you would call the successful criminal case against OJ Simpson?
LOL
You might as well drop it, you are not capable of understanding what happened.
Was Clinton impeached Big D? Yes Mike he was.

How could his impeachment be a failure then Big D? Because I said it was and I am never wrong Mike.

Priceless!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Beverly Hills Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Looking for T in West Hollywood 11 hr Lisa 1
News A girl waves a Mexican flag during rallies in L... (Mar '06) Jul 31 Pyrite Smith 4,505
News Wandering turkey causes stir at University of M... Jul 31 Go Blue Forever 4
News Kanye, Sam Smith, the Who set for iHeartRadio M... Jul 30 K-DJ 6
Skanky"s Bar coming to Beverly hills Jul 24 Ricky Ray 1
racist twitter account Jul 23 565656abc 1
News Be aware: Vice President Joe Biden's visit expe... Jul 22 Marin County 4
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Beverly Hills Mortgages