Criminal FDA must be charged with cancer quackery.

[Winfield J Abbe]

This afternoon an article was posted in USA Today that the FDA is going to clamp down on unproven cancer treatments. But it is the FDA which has corruptly failed not only to regulate the many killer drugs it has fraudulently "approved" for cancer treatment, mistreatment would be a more appropriate description, but also failed to properly regulate our adulterated food supply which is likely the cause the cancer epidemic in the U.S.
Everyone should read this document: "The Truth About Hydrazine Sulfate-Dr. Gold Speaks" by Joseph Gold, M.D. at www.hydrazinesulfate.org , 2005. This remarkable and very well written document is basically a criminal indictment of the National Cancer Institute and the U.S. FDA.
Our duped and low level elected "leaders" have totally sold out the American Public. The failed War on Cancer has been going on for almost 50 years now, but despite the squandering of multi billions of public and private dollars, still, about one person every minute dies either from cancer, "treatment" or both. Decades ago the late Professor Hardin Jones, Ph.D., professor of physiology and medical physics at UC Berkeley and an expert on medical statistics, proved that untreated cancer patients lived up to 4 times longer than treated ones! Nothing has changed today. Here is what Prof. Jones said: "My studies have proved conclusively that untreated cancer victims actually live up to four times longer than treated individuals...Radical surgery or chemotherapy does absolutely nothing to prolong the life of a cancer victim...In fact, it appears as if all the conventional medical therapies actually disrupt the survival rate...downwards." Quoted from "Cancer-Its Causes, Prevention and Cure" by John P. Dobbins, Sc.D, Cytobiologische Revue No. 3, 1985, page 130.
See also these references:
"The Hidden Story of CAncer" by Brian Peskin, E.E. and Amid Habib, M.D., Pinnacle Press, Houston, 2006-2007.
"Cancer and the Search for Biochemical Inhibitors" by E.J. Hoffman, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., 2007.
"The CAncer Industry" by Ralph W. Moss, PH.D., Equinox Press, N.Y., 1996.
It is the cancer generals who must be fired and prosecuted for scientific misconduct, medical quackery, fraud and crimes against humanity. Ditto for the fraudulent and corrupt FDA which is bought and paid for by BIG PHARMA.

[Winfield J Abbe]

Dear Fellow Citizens: Suppose you had a repairman come to your house to repair a water leak in your air conditioner. Suppose you paid him for the job, but later it still leaked. You call him again and he comes out again and repairs it again and requests and additional payment. You pay him again. Following this you find it still leaks and you become very frustrated. Wouldn't you soon either dismiss this repairman and turn to another to do the job? Would you continue to pay him over and over and over again for failure? Obviously not.
This example illustrates what we as a nation have been doing with the "cancer generals", that is, those individuals who claim to be "scientists" and who direct the so called "war on cancer". This war has been going on now at least since 1971. It has had many "generals" over the years.
Multi billions, possibly trillions, of public and private dollars have been squandered by them. Yet, almost every spring, they come out of the woodwork, through their public relations propaganda mouthpieces, like the American Cancer Society, and many others, and claim the cancer cure is "right around the next billion dollar corner", without any justification or explanation of their expendature of the many billions already spend but with virtually no success. If you ask any of them, if you could even obtain an audience with them in their ivory towers wherever they may be located, and ask them a simple question, "what is cancer", they would likely hem and haw around and mumble words about genetics and genes "might" cause cancer and radiation might cause cancer and drugs might cause cancer...etc. In other words you likely would not get a straight answer from any of them. If you asked them why over half a million victims die every year either from cancer, treatment or both, after the squandering of all this money over the years, they likely would end the conversation immediately. In other words, they have failed, but still demand more dinero (money). At some point, as with the repairman in the example above, one must say NO MORE MONEY and fire the cancer generals just as one would fire the incompetent and possibly corrupt repairment in the example above. WE must stop being fooled by their fancy credentials, fancy talk, fancy degrees from fancy schools, etc.
Because the only thing that matters is they have failed period. They clearly don't know what they are doing because if they did, with all the money they have spent, they would have discovered the keys to preventing and treating this disease by now wouldn't they? We, as Americans, with functioning brains, must finally say to our duped elected non-representatives: "Enough is enough. The cancer generals have not only failed, they have negligently disregarded basic scientific information about cancer, they have lied to a gullible pbulic about it, they have approved fraudulent treatments, which actually do more harm than good, and they are responsible for untold human suffering. Therefore they must not only be fired immediately, they must be criminally charged with scientific misconduct, medical quackery, fraud and crimes against humanity."
My name is Winfield J. Abbe. I live in Athens, Georgia. I grew up in Sierra Madre, California.
I have degrees in physics from UC Berkeley (A.B., 1961) and UC Riverside (Ph.D., 1966) and CAlifornia State University at Los Angeles (M.S., 1962). I think the time is long overdue to finally talk turkey to our duped legislators and end this fraudulent war on cancer immediately.

[Winfield J Abbe]

Dear Fellow Citizens: Most so-called "cancer research" today, funded mainly by agencies of the Federal Government like the National Cancer Institute or the National Institutes of Health or the quasi government agency the American Cancer Society or others, basically revolves around the subject of genetics and the prejudiced assumption of the cancer generals that the uncontrolled growth of cancer cells is regulated by various of the genes of cells. Many of them have held this prejudiced view since the discovery of DNA by Watson and Crick in the 1950's.
Ironically it was about this same period that the proof was completed, of another proposal of cancer causation, based on experiments and facts in the laboratory, not unproven genetic speculations. This other scientific information regarding cancer had been developed over roughly a period of 50 years going back to before 1920. Amazingly, most of those doing cancer research in the U.S chose to disregard the earlier information which was based on repeatable and verifiable experiments in the laboratory and indeed (in favor of their prejudiced genetic speculations), had been verified in numerous laboratories around the world by about 1970, the year of the death of the genius level scientist who was instrumental in developing this seminal information on cancer: Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D., in Germany. Otto Warburg was part of the great system once used in Germany, where they identified the very best individuals and basically gave them total freedom to perform research into any area they chose. "They could walk in the woods for two years and no one would say anything." This system paid huge dividends.
Otto Warburg invented the tissue slice technique. He also invented a pressure measuring instrument called the "Warburg manometer". This device measured, precisely, the intercellular oxygen pressure in living tissue. Otto Warburg knew that oxygen provided the basic energy for all living cellular operations with rare exceptions of glucose when quick energy is required. He knew that when all oxygen is removed from a living cell or living organism of the higher living animals, the cell or organism would die rather quickly. But he asked himself, what happens if the oxygen pressure is reduced but not made zero? He used animal tissue from the rat because changes happened rather quickly and could be observed directly. He found that when the oxygen pressure was reduced by about one third, the cells became cancerous in about 2 or 3 cell divisions. He and his assistants in his laboratory in Germany repeated these remarkable and original experiments over and over for different organs of the living rat tissue. They found almost no exceptions except occasionally for certain retina of the eye tissues. Later he was able to incorporate these apparent exceptions into the overall scheme. They also looked at other animals. They also found that instead of running on oxygen for energy, the cells switched to running on glucose primarily in the absence of oxygen. His conclusion was that the wrong energy caused cancer; namely, fermentation energy. Fermentation is the way the lowest forms of life obtain their energy (anerobically) and the uncontrolled growth is the same as when say, yeast cells, grow virtually uncontrollably from the wrong energy supply. This was a startling and seminal scientific discovery first published about 1923.

[Winfield J Abbe]

Dear Fellow Citizens: The genius level scientist Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D., was actually nominated for the first "cancer prize" by the Nobel Committee in 1926 for the discovery described above. First, he was recommended to share the prize with another scientist in Denmark by the name of Fibiger for other work. Then the committee decided to award the entire prize to Fibiger. But unfortunately that work later turned out to be incorrect, while Warburg's discovery has been verified over and over again.
It is an unfortunate accident of history that Warburg was not awarded this first cancer Nobel prize in 1926, for that might have changed the world. Otto Warburg was actually awarded the Nobel prize in medicine and physiology in 1931 for his discovery of the relation of iron to cell respiration. He was also nominated again in 1944 for different work, but that award was prevented by Hitler's decree preventing German citizens from receiving Nobel prizes. In a number of references, it is falsely stated that Otto Warburg received 2 Nobel prizes in medicine. The truth is that he was only actually awarded a single Nobel prize in 1931 and it was NOT for his cancer work. However, he was actually nominated for 3 Nobel prizes, one for the cancer work in 1926, the second actually awarded in 1931 for cell respiration and a third for again different work but which was not awarded for political reasons. Incidentally, three of Otto Warburg's pupils were also awarded Nobel Prizes in medicine, shared with others: Otto Meyerhof, Hans Krebs and Hugo Theorell. This remarkable achievement illustrates the true genius that Otto Warburg was in medicine. It is interesting, for example, that Hans Krebs, as a young M.D. in Germany, was without a job in 1926, but happened, by accident, to attend a dinner with Otto Warburg and Albert Einstein. Dr. Warburg needed an additional assistant for his laboratory. Dr. Krebs was hired and the next 4 years changed his life forever. He credits Warburg with all of his achievements.
Reference: "Otto Warburg Cell Physiologist Biochemist and Eccentric" by Hans Krebs, M.D. and Roswitha Schmid, Ph.D., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1981. This beautiful book even has many wonderful pictures of Dr. Warburg in his laboratory almost up until his death in 1970. It also has a picture of the device he invented for measuring intercellular oxygen pressure, the Warburg Manometer.
Dr. Warburg was only interested in science and truth. He was a dogged fighter for the truth his entire life. See page 64 in the above reference.

[Winfield J Abbe]

Dear Fellow Citizens: It took roughly another 40 years to prove that the same metabolism for cancer in animals, first published in 1923 and in a compendium in 1930 "The Metabolism of Tumours", also was true for human cancer. The reasons for the long time delay were several. First, the time for a normal human cell to transform to a cancer cell due to lack of adequate oxygen (energy) is quite long and can be decades of time, much longer than for the rat. Secondly, many ethical questions are always involved in human studies. Normal tumor tissue consists of mixtures of cancerous and non cancerous tissue and hence is not a good scientific tool to study. Time was required to obtain pure samples of pure cancerous tissue. It must also be remembered that Otto Warburg was a genius level scientist. He was both an experimental scientist and a theoretical scientist. He was a renaissance scientist not unlike Issac Newton in physics or Galileo Galilei in physics or Karl Gauss the physicist and mathematician or his idol, the great genius of the nineteenth century Louis Pasteur. Rarely did Dr. Warburg make any error in the laboratory. If there were discrepancies with others, it was usually the others who were wrong, not Otto Warburg. He would confirm results over and over again before publishing them. He was especially brilliant at conceiving experiments when small quantities that are difficult to measure, were involved. These sorts of situations were clear to him, but often confused by others. His Father was a very distinguished physicist and held the chair of physics at Berlin for many years. He produced many distinguished students himself, like James Franck, the Nobel Prize winner in physics. His Father wrote a seminal textbook "Experimental Physics" which was published through 22 editions! Much of his genius evidently came from his remarkable Father, who always held to the highest standards of ethics and truth and adherence to the scientific method at all times. So, by the 1950's and 1960's, when Dr. Warburg had confirmed that all human cancers metabolized by anerobic glycolysis and ran on fermentation energy, when another scientist like Van Potter, of the University of Wisconsin, came along and disputed his results, he proved them wrong every time although Van Potter never admitted that Dr. Warburg was right after all. This adherrence to prejudiced beliefs and feelings, rather than submission to the experimental results and facts proved in the laboratory by Dr. Warburg, and confirmed by others around the world, are what began the misinformation and confusion about his results by others who did not want to believe them, not because they could prove them wrong, but because the did not want to believe them and often because they simply were not operating at the same very high level as this genius who was far above any other scientist then or now.

[Winfield J Abbe]

Dear Fellow Citizens: Everyone is encouraged to read the above reference "The Hidden Story of Cancer" This book has the most thorough and complete review of the cancer research of Dr. Warburg in English in recent times. The final conclusion of Dr. Warburg by the time of his death in 1970 was that cancer is a disease of respiratory impairment or oxygen deficiency over a long period of time. Your body has about 100 trillion cells, everywhere from the innermost bone to the outermost skin, from your brain to your heart and so on. Everyone of these cells must be constantly supplied by oxygen to survive.
This is the job of the respiratory system. If adequate oxygen is available externally and this system is working at maximum efficiency, cancer is impossible. However, this is obviously a very complex "many body" system. If, for some reason, the transfer of vital oxygen is impaired or impeded or prevented from entering a particular cell of those 100 trillion cells, for a long period of time, due, say, to inadequate oxygen around the cell or problems with the cell wall lining preventing the necessary amount of oxygen from being transferred into the cell through the cell wall, then either the cell will die for lack of energy or switch, in its quest to survive, to another means of survival, operating on fermentation energy instead of oxygen energy, like the lowest forms of life. Once the transformation to fermentation has been completed, it is irreversible. In other words, once full blown cancer has developed from inadequate oxygen energy, it is not possible to reverse the process back to normal by simply adding more oxygen at that site. It is like frying an egg. After the egg has been fried by the addition of energy from the frying pan, it is impossible to reverse the process and, by simply the removal of energy alone, return the egg to its original form. This is called an irreversible thermodynamic process in physics and chemistry. This is what Dr. Warburg stated and discovered that cancer is. This is the prime, proximate, cause of cancer.
Unfortunately many scientists and others did not carefully read what Dr. Warburg wrote about all this in his 500+ scientific papers on this and all subjects, as many of them misrepresented his statements and claimed he said all one had to do is add oxygen back to cure cancer. Dr. Warburg NEVER said this. What he did say was that before full blown cancer has developed, that is, before the transformation from aerobic metabolism to anerobic metabolism has been reached, it might be possible to intervene with a type of chemotherapy (at the metabolic level) and reverse the process. He called these "sleeping cancer cells" and they have indeed been observed. Even that smiling, bearded doctor Andrew Weil, M.D., had, and still has, so far as I know, a completely false statement on his website about Dr. Warburg's conclusions, I made every effort to notify him and prove he was totally wrong, the incorrect statement has not been removed. This illustrates how some medical doctors simply do not understand and won't read the writings of Dr. Warburg, but evidently take the false rumors of others to disparage the remarkable and indisputable experiments and facts developed by this genius in Germany many years ago.

[Winfield J Abbe]

While Dr. Warburg discovered the proximate, prime cause of cancer, as that of respiratory impairment of living cells, he also showed that the other well known "causes" of cancer like high energy radiation or certain chemicals are secondary causes, ultimately leading to the prime cause. The medical orthodoxy claims, without proof, but based on speculations, that cancer is hundreds of different diseases, one for every organ of the body. What Dr. Warburg concluded, is a unifying concept that cancer is one disease; oxygen deficiency. This is the stuff of science. This is what science is all about. A great scientist seeks to unify experimental results and facts, not make them more complicated and less intelligible. The medical orthodoxy is moving in exactly the wrong and opposite direction from what is demanded by the scientific method they purport to follow. This is called the law of parsimony. Only the simplest explanations are sought at first to explain scientific phenomena, not more complicated ones. There are almost always more complicated "explanations" for observed facts, but in science we choose the simplest which is consistent with all observed facts. Why make things more complicated? It is difficult enough as it is isn't it?
Dr. Warburg even went further demonstrating his true genius for unifying facts. He observed that millions of years ago, before the appearance of oxygen on the earth, only fermenting organisms existed. The main property of these organisms was the useless ability of growth. They had no intelligence or ability to differentiate into complex organs or "higher" forms of life did they?
They were just like cancer. All cancer is is useless, mindless growth without any intelligence or controls out of any system control. Only with the appearence of oxygen in the atmosphere of the earth did the higher living forms of life develop. Only oxygen energy is capable of cell differentiation. Fermentation alone is incapable of accomplishing this, as Dr. Warburg stated over and over again. Hence he concluded that all cancer is is a manifestation, "before our very eyes", of what life was millions of years ago. It is simply the reversal of what happened with the appearence of oxygen. Isn't this beautiful? This is what science is all about. This unifies our thoughts and concepts of cancer and renders it intelligible for once and for all. Cancer is not hundreds of unintelligible diseases, but one disease, oxygen deficiency. With this information, we can now proceed to seeking ways to prevent this horrible, mindless, useless, uncontrolled growth. Yet, the medical orthodoxy has slighted these remarkable ideas and conclusions from the experiments and facts observed in the laboratory! SHAME, SHAME, SHAME, SHAME.... SHAME A THOUSAND TIMES, ON THEM! They have violated the rulse of science. They have violated the rules of the scientific method they falsely purport to follow. They are responsible for the patent failure of the war on cancer notwithstanding the multi billions of public and private dollars squandered by the cancer generals on it for decades. They are guilty of medical quackery, fraud, scientific misconduct and crimes against humanity and untold human suffering! Yet they have the unmitigated gall to use their underserved power to charge others with crimes!

[brian peskin]

Dr. Winfield is exactly correct. Nobel Prize-winner Albert Einstein stated that "any intelligent fool can make things more complex...and that it takes real genius to move in the opposite direction."

Insignificant progress is made in preventing and treating cancer because they are all looking in the wrong place (genetics, etc.).

[Winfield J Abbe]

Dear Fellow Citizens: Let me provide an example from the field of physics to seek to illustrate why the cancer generals and the orthodox medical establishment is moving in the wrong, and more complicated direction, in cancer research. As you may recall, Issac Newton (1642-1727) was a genius level renaissance scientist in England. One of his seminal discoveries, published about 1665, was his discovery of the law of gravity. It was not called a law then, but it has become a law now because it has been demonstrated to be true so many times. The law states that all masses attract each other with a force proportional to the product of the masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. This is loosely referred to as a "one over the distance squared force". In other words, the larger the masses, the greater the force, but the farther away they are placed, the force becomes smaller, quite rapidly, with the square of the distance of separation. It is always attractive, never repulsive like the similar electric force. What the genius Issac Newton taught us is that this is the force law. He did not address the question of WHY this is the force law or what its underlying causes were at the time. I took basic physics in the 1950's. We used a book written by an eminent scholar and professor of physics at MIT; Fancis Weston Sears. This book was used by generations of physicists and engineers around the world for many years. In the chapter on gravitation in that book, professor Sears stated to the effect that then, we did not know the reason for the law of gravity or why all masses attracted the way they did then and do today. That was about 300 years from the discovery of Issac Newton. Today, we are about 350 years from his discovery and we still do not understand the fundamental, microscopic "reasons" or "causes" of the law of gravity. In fact, we may never understand the fundamental reasons or causes of the law of gravity. But fortunately for us, we don't need that information to design an automobile, or a skyscraper, or an airplane or a space shuttle or a bridge or to calculate the shape of a wire strung between two poles, etc., or avoid being struck by a falling brick. All we need is Newton's beautiful law which has been verified over and over again for centuries now. While it would be nice to understand why this is the law, and have some fancy, esoteric, set of theoretical rules, such as proposals and speculations of spin-2 particles "causing" this force, like the spin-1 photons purportedly cause the electro-magnetic force a-la quantumelectrodynamics, we do not have such a theory yet and fortunately don't need it, at least to do the marvelous engineering feats engineers can do without that knowledge.
The discovery of the cause of cancer in medicine by the genius Otto Warburg is similar to the law of gravity in physics. He discovered the prime cause of cancer based on experiments and facts; oxygen deficiency over a long period of time or, the wrong energy supply. This does not tell us why this is the law, or if mutated genes somehow enter the picture, but only that this is the experimental fact. What the cancer generals are doing is disregarding this information, but looking "deeper" for more complicated underlying information before they acknowledge this experimental fact FIRST. It would be like the physicists seeking to understand gravity at a more fundamental level but disregarding the experimental, phenomenological fact of the law of gravity. That would be foolish wouldn't it? But this is exactly what the cancer generals and their many henchmen and henchwomen around the country are doing. This is a patent violation of the scientific method. One is absolutely prohibited from disregarding earlier experimental information.
Continued below:

[Winfield J Abbe]

But, in disregarding, and likely failing to read any of the 500+ scientific papers of Otto WArburg, the cancer generals have violated the very scientific method they purport to follow. What if the physicists and engineers disregarded the discoveries of Issac Newton in 1665 because they didn't like his religion or the way he parted his hair or the color of his skin or the fact that he was very arrogant? All these things are totally irrelevant. All that matters is WHAT he discovered and is it consistent with reality and experiments and facts. That is all that matters, nothing else. Here is what Issac Newton said in about 1718: "We must learn the properties of the atraction before we enquire into the cause by which the attraction is performed". Otto Warburg already discovered that basic information we need to know about cancer in order to prevent the disease. While curing the irreversible disease of cancer once it has developed is much more difficult, we must proceed on the basis of the experimental discoveries of Otto WArburg first, not wasting valuable resources, money and time looking for more complicated, "underlying" causes when Otto Warburg already taught us the prime cause necessary to prevent the disease, just as Issac Newton taught us the prime cause of gravity necessary for virtually all engineering systems.
These are both phenomenogical causes based on experiments and facts, which is really all science is. Finally, most physicists have a much more rigorous background in mathematics, statistics, probability and logic than most medical doctors and many in the life sciences field, unfortunately. Did you know that most pre med students have been treated to a watered down set of beginning physics classes, differing little from high school physics, for over half a century? If the physicists have not been able to discover all the underlying theoretical "causes" of gravity, the less prepared medical doctors are certainly not equipped to explain the underlying causes of uncontrolled growth of fermenting cells, which may never be explained in our lifetime. Forunately this is not necessary since all we need is the experimental information discovered by Otto WArburg to prevent cancer, just as all the physicists and engineers need is the information about gravity discovered by Issac Newton over 3 centuries ago.

[Winfield J Abbe]

Today Dr. Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D. posted a discussion of how the government again obstructed and killed a clinical trial to test an alternative method of treating pancreatic cancer based on enzymes;
http://www.cancerdecisions.com/062208.html
Dr. Moss uses very polite language to discuss this fraudulent and corrupt activity of the government "scientists" to kill a test so this method could not ever be considered for approval. This method was not based on anything about the Warburg cancer discoveries above, but still had merit. The prejudiced non scientists of government have been doing this for years and are experts and killing anything they don't prejudically want, as is also described above by Dr. Gold at www.hydrazinesulfate.org . Hydrazine sulfate is a cheap and inexpensive substance which blocks the glycolic pathway discovered by Otto Warburg to exist in all cancer patients. It has been tested from the Soviet Union to UCLA as Dr. Gold discusses above. The government non scientists used fraud and deception and outright lies to kill the approval of this substance, which Dr. Gold has sought for about a half century now. This is why the cancer generals must not only be fired immediately, but charged with scientific misconduct, medical quackery and fraud and crimes against humanity. It is too bad the corrupt United States Attorney and U.S. Attorney General won't provide a little justice for the lowly but shafted U.S. citizen. Do you recall the attack a few years ago on the federal judge in Chicago? Did you know that that attack was provoked by a disgruntled cancer patient who was denied his day in court. He was seeking to act as his own attorney, pro se, and bring a massive legal action against the cancer establishment. This is the last thing the cancer generals want, since it would bring all their lies and deception out into the open for all to see in a public courtroom.

[Winfield J Abbe]

Dear Fellow Citizens: The late Dean Burk was a very distinguished scientist. He earned a Ph.D. from UC Berkeley at a very young age. He was appointed Head of Cell Chemistry at the National Cancer Institute. He was a colleage of Otto Warburg and even himself a genius level scientist. He was one of the few foreign members of Dr. Warburg's laboratory in Germany, called "The Palace of Cell Physiology".
In the 1989 editon of the book "The Cancer Industry" by Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D., on page 191, here are a few things Dr. Burk said about hydrazine sulfate:
In 1973 Burk made this statement to officials of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in N.Y.:

"Let me tell you this perfectly true story. There is nothing mystical or poetic aqbout it-and I could give you many. A woman with Hodgkin's disease who had been flat on her back for seven weeks, who had no appetite and who had lost all her weight-a 'paper thin' patient-too hydrazine sulfate.. One week later she was shopping in the grocery story with her own bag; five days later she was spending most of the day in her garden. I don't give you that as any miraculous story-it is simply the plain truth."
While this anecdotal story does not prove everyone with cancer should take this substance, read the article above by Dr. Gold at www.hydrazinesulfate.org to see how the medical orthdoxy obstructed it for almost a half century and refused to approve it in the face of overwhelming evidence favoring it and even lied to the public about it on a government website. The reason they don't like it are first, because it is very inexpensive and would not enrich the already rich pharmaceutical companies, and also because it is based on the work of Otto Warburg, whom they hated and have repeatedly sought to falsely discredit. Yet the medical orthodoxy routinely publishes anecdotal stories of cancer treatments that appear to be miraculous, as one Susan Brink did the other day in the Los Angeles times for a single melanoma patient, but seeking to promote the research of the medical orthodoxy. I have written her about this and other misleading articles she has published promoting the failed medical orthodoxy, but she never replies. I have also written many so-called "scientists" from Georgia to Massachusetts, from Canada to California and asked them the simple question: "How many of Otto Warburg's 500+ scientific papers have you read"? Or, did you form your prejudiced opinion of him and his work based on the prejudiced opinions and rumors and innuendo of others? I almost never receive a reply. This means they have not read these seminal scientific papers. What this means is that these so-called "scientists" are not scientists at all, but little more than propagandists seeking to promote a failed dogma to continue a failed research program based on failed assumptions that mutated genes cause cancer, but without proof, while violating the scientific method and disregarding the experiments and facts developed by Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D. in Germany decades ago and confirmed by other laboratories around the world. Therefore, it is the medical orthodoxy which is wrong and betraying the American people who provide most of the funding for its fraudulent so-called "cancer research".
Suppose the physicists and engineers had disregarded the discovery of the law of graviation by Issac Newton? We wouldn't be able to explain the motions of the planets around the Sun, we wouldn't be able to design and construct buildings, no space shuttle or airplane could fly, etc, etc, etc. The members of the medical establishment are grossly negligent in their fundamental duties. I am not convinced any of them every learned the scientific method.

[Winfield J Abbe]

Dear Fellow Citizens: After the above statement was made about Susan Brink, she did respond to another comment about a cancer article written by her. Her is her comment followed by the text of the comment June 23, 2008:

Thank you for your comment.

----------
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 7:52 PM
To: Brink, Susan
Cc: Letters
Subject: Propaganda about Cancer by Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles Times Editors: Surely you can do better than this. I guess you are in the corrupt pockets of the FDA and the NCI too, bought and paid for by BIG PHARMA.

This is nothing but a propaganda article seeking to fool a gullible public. Every day thousands of victims are killed by the medical "profession", but the death certificate tells a lie that they died from "blood poisoning", when the blood poisoning was caused by the chemotherapy treatment. Does Ms. Brink think any medical doctor will admit they are negligent or that they would criticize the medical orthdoxy which has fraudulently approved dangerous and toxic drugs that can and often do kill a patient? By the way let's see how the Senator is doing in 6 months or a year.
Ms. Brink read this article by Dr. Joseph Gold, M.D.: www.hydrazinesulfate.org .
Winfield J. Abbe, PH.D., Physics
AThens, GA

[Winfield J Abbe]

Dear Fellow Citizens: Many in the medical orthodoxy prejudically believe that cancer is caused by mutated genes. Most of them have prejudically failed to read and comprehend the seminal experiments described in the 500+ scientific papers of the genius in Germany Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D. decades ago. The authors of the book "The Hidden Story of CAncer" above even have a whole chapter demolishing the myth that cancer is genetically caused. However, notwithstanding all this, how could the discoveries of Dr. Warburg be reconciled with the prejudiced beliefs of the "mob" or large group of brainwashed "scientists" all over the country, mostly funded by the federal government? Here is a suggested and speculated answer to this question:
The main reason the medical orthodoxy believes cancer is caused by mutated genes is because they observe an unnusually large number of them in some tumor tissues, that is abnormal cancer tissues. But consider this analogy: Suppose one came upon a car accident and observed two vehicles involved in the accident and all the tires were blown out. Does this mean the accident was caused by the blow outs? No, it does not. In fact the accident could have been caused by many other factors, such as a mechanical failure of one of the automobiles, or a driver falling asleep at the wheel, or an object thrown from a bridge above or a host of other causes. Of course it could also have been caused by a gunman shooting out the tires or blowouts caused by running over roofing nails from a box of them which dropped off a truck in front of the vehicles. The only way one could know for sure about the causes of the accident would be to investigate and either discover from the investigation the true causes or have the equivalent of a moving picture of the accident or its history, to learn the cause. The mere observation of the 8 blown out tires does not in any way, shape or form, prove that the accident was caused by the blow outs. Similarly, the mere observation of the mutated genes in cancer tumor tissue does not in any way, shape or form prove that the cancer was caused by those mutated genes.
But how then could one explain the observation of the mutated genes in tumor tissues?
Continued below.

[Winfield J Abbe]

Dear Fellow Citizens: The answer to the above question, "But how then could one explain the observation of the mutated genes in tumor tissue?" might be the following. We know from many other experiments that genes can and are mutated (altered or adulterated or changed from normal) by various forms of energy. For example a high energy x-ray could mutate a gene. A certain chemical could mutate a gene. Nuclear radiation could mutate a gene. Consider this analogy: All physical or engineering systems have a particular energy associated with them.
For example, a direct current circuit must have energy supplied only with an energy source for direct current; if you try to supply it with a different source you may destroy the circuit or it won't work properly.
Or, if you seek to operate a d.c. circuit or battery with alternating current, you may destroy the circuit. Suppose you try to blow up a balloon with a machine gun. All this energy would do is make holes in the balloon wouldn't it? You must blow up the balloon with a regulated supply of air or gas, not the high energy of a machine gun. Suppose a driver of an automobile supplies too much energy and turns the steering wheel of his car too far to one side or another. He will obviously risk a head on collision. Suppose you try to operate your car with water instead of gasoline for fuel. Suppose you deplete the oxygen environment in a human living environment so the normal carbon dioxide is replaced by carbon monoxide. Any human life will be destroyed. One could go on and on. Every physical system is controlled by a particular type of energy appropriate for that system and no other. The same is true of human cells. Only oxygen energy is the appropriate energy for the operation of human cells, as Dr. Warburg proved.
As he also proved, based on experiments and facts, cancer is caused by the abnormal energy of fermentation which is unable to differentiate the higher living forms and possesses only the useless ability of uncontrolled growth. Why could not this wrong energy supply have caused the mutated genes observed in cancer tumor tissue by the cancer generals and their brainwashed "scientists"? I suggest this is the likely sequence of events. One could even prove it by repeating the seminal experiments of Dr. Warburg with genetic markers, not available in his time, and actually possibly answer the question for once and for all.(Assuming you had honest and expert scientists performing the experiments, not prejudically obstructing them.) But of course the prejudiced cancer generals do not want the truth; all they want is to continue the confusion and lies and public deception they have been fraudulently fooling the public with for decades. This is why they disregard the remarkable book above "The Hidden Story of CAncer."

[Winfield J Abbe]

Everyone should read the article today in the New York Times by Gina Kolata and Andrew Pollack:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/06/health/06av... . This well written and documented article shows again how the medical orthodoxy operates with one set of rules, while they impose a totally different set of rules on everyone else, including alternative medicine. Licensed medical doctors are authorized to use drugs for other purposes than which they have been tested. This is called off label use and is absolutely outrageous and should be banned and illegal. At the same time alternative medicine is forced to prove efficiacy with double blind testing, while the medical orthodoxy, as shown by this article, is provided indulgence to make guesses and speculations about efficacy of drugs, like the multi billion money maker Avistan, which is part of the current medical quackery by the cancer generals in the U.S. All this confirms what the late professor Hardin Jones proved decades ago that untreated cancer patients live up to 4 times longer than treated ones, as quoted in the above posts. All these small, trivial efficts are virtually statistically meaningless not only since they are all so small, but likely fraudulent as well. Also, when a patient taking these quack medicines dies, they likely died from the drug itself, but the death certificate will tell a lie since the doctor in charge obviously does not want to admit personal negligence does he or she? But who can prove otherwise? Why even the so called "scientific committee" failed to approve this quack drug, but the FDA approved it anyway. This is all corrupt, medical quackery. The only reason medical doctors are doing it is because they won't be prosecuted and lose their licenses since the mob of them is all engaged in this nonsense. But the have not approved a single non toxic or inexpensive cancer drug like hydrazine sulfate as documented at www.hydrazinesulfate.org . The cancer generals obviously do not know what they are doing period. This article proves it along with the above one by JOseph Gold, M.D. on hydrazine sulfate. Every citizen must take personal control of their own lives. Even if insurance pays for this nonsense, reject it. Don't aid them in their quest to fleece you and your insurance company out of multi billions of dollars. Tell them to "take that drug and shove it". Read up on how to prevent cancer with vitamins like vitamin C, possibly taken interveniously, minerals like Selenium in doses of about 200 micrograms daily and essential fatty acids to increase oxygen transfer across cell membranes to prevent cancer.
The most foolish thing onc could do is take a drug that would prevent oxygen from being transferred to cells. After all it is oxygen which is deprived in cancer patients! This article shows what a bunch of scientific fools we have running the FDA and the National CAncer Institute, who violate the rules and disregard the experiments and racts of Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D, decades ago, proving that cancer is caused by the wrong energy supply. Even if oxygen is transferred into cancer cells, it may be too late since once cancer is developed it is irreversible. But I can't think of anything much worse that seeking to impede the transfer of vital oxygen into cells cancerous or not, can you?
This shows again how and why the cancer generals must be fired immediately, charged criminally with scientific misconduct, medical fraud and quackery and crimes against humanity.

[Jason Senter]

duh

[Winfield J Abbe]

Today it was announced that the prominent news reporter for the White House Tony Snow died of colon cancer. Mr. Snow would have had access to the "best" the cancer general can offer, but despite this, they failed to keep him alive and he is now dead along with the other over half million or so others who will die this year either from cancer, treatment or both. All approved cancer treatments by the cancer generals are life threatening, so when one dies with cancer, if the patient is under treatment by the protocol approved by the cancer generals, and dies, one never really knows for sure if the death was due to the cancer, the treatment or a combination thereof. The press almost always incorrectly reports the death as due to the disease rather than the treatment in deference to the medical "profession". But in many cases the death could easily be caused by the treatment but the doctors in charge are certainly not going to admit that their recommended "therapy" killed the patient are they? NO, they will lie on the death certificate to cover up this fact since the obviously do not want to incriminate themselves and face loss of license and large lawsuits do they? In fact, this is exactly why they and the institution the are at must not be permitted to sign death certificates because all involved have a conflict of interest.
Wouldn't you think the journalists writing about all this every day would begin to question the cancer generals and what they are doing regarding cancer, with all this failure all around? Why all the indulgence for these medical quacks who obviously do not know what they are doing? How long would you continue to pay the local market if they sold you bad and spoiled food? How long would you buy gas at the local station if it had water in it? How long would you continue to pay a serviceman if he continually failed to repair your wiring, plumbing, air conditioning, or anything else? Why, then, all the indulgence for these so called medical doctors, who are obviously engaged in nothing but medical foolishness, but fraudulently billing insurance companies for large sums of money while totally failing in their jobs as those who treated Mr. Snow and numerous other medical quacks around the country every day? Isn't it time to stop being duped by the cancer generals? Let's call a spade a spade. Obviously they do not know what they are doing but don't have the courage to admit it.
Do we ever even hear an apology from any of them for their gross failures and grossly irresponsible medical recommendations vis a vis cancer and its "treatment", which often fails and even kills the patient? NO, only arrogant silence.
This is why the cancer generals must be charged with scientific misconduct, medical quackery, fraud and crimes against humanity. We must stop indulging them. Wake up journalists and citizens.
If you don't look, you don't see.

[Winfield J Abbe]

Dear Fellow Citizens: This morning Sunday, July 13, 2008, a well known physician made misleading comments on the Fox News Channel about Laetrile also called vitamin B-17 by the late Dean Burk, the genius level scientist who worked at the National Cancer Institute for many years and was also a foreign member of Dr. Warburg's laboratory in Germany. The doctor this morning stated that Laetrile was banned by the FDA. This is true but what he did not say was that the studies on which it has been banned are fraudulent and the actions of the criminal FDA are fraudulent much as they are in the case of hydrazine sulfate above. All this is documented in many places. The author of the book "The Cancer Industry Unravelling the POlitics" by Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D., paragon House, N.Y., 1989 has an extensive documentation in this book, and the later one in 1996 on this subject. He is very well qualified on this issue since he was fired from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York for refusing to lie to the public about research on Laetrile in the 1970's. This substance, made from apricot pits, is in many foods now. There is anecdotal evidence that it prevents cancer and those who live in areas who ingest these types of foods. The medical orthodoxy desperately fears any type of substance which might prevent cancer since then it would turn off their money machine for failed drugs. All drugs for cancer treatment by the medical orthodoxy are life threatening. Not a single one is non toxic. All are very expensive and enrich the drug companies and doctors dispensing this often quack medicine approved by the cancer generals.
Dean Burk was a genius level scientist and likely forgot more about Laetrile than the physician this morning ever knew. Here is an obituary about this remarkable scientist who was awarded a PH.D. degree from UC Berkeley at about age 23:

http://www.whale.to/b/fl.html (In memoriam for Dean Burk). It is true one should never take this substance or any other substance without the aid of a knowledgeable professional. Laetrile is not a cancer cure nor was it ever claimed to be that by its proponents. However, there is much scientific evidence that it acts as a preventative for cancer as does the mineral selenium and vitamin C. But the medical orthodoxy is still arguing about the RDA of vitamin C and only recommends about 60 milligrams to prevent scurvy when one cannot hardly find a bottle in any store with tablets less than a half a gram! Doctors don't make any money with disease prevention do they? All they want to do is wait until we all have cancer and then seek to kill the cancer by often killing the patient! All this is similar to the way iodine prevents goitre. But luckily for us, iodine was added to salt before the FDA. Otherwise they might still be arguing about that too and many people would die from goitre since the FDA would likely still prevent iodine from being added to common table salt.

[Winfield J Abbe]

The following letter was submitted to the editors of Car and Driver August 9, 2008:
Dear Editors:
"On page 94, Car and Driver, Sept.'08, appears a propaganda advertisement for another sham fund raising proposal for more failed cancer research. The American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) has been around for about 100 years, but still about one person every minute dies either from cancer, treatment or both. This is over half a million victims a year. Billions, possibly trillions of public and private dollars have been squandered on the so-called "War on Cancer" since 1971. But on the website for this organization when I put the words "Otto Warburg M.D., Ph.D." into their search engine I get zero responses. But Otto Warburg was the genius in Germany who discovered the prime cause of cancer decades ago; oxygen deficiency to living cells, proved by experiments and facts, not genetic speculations. Dr. Warburg proved that cancer is not the 200+ diseases falsely claimed by this fraudulent organization, but one disease, oxygen impairment, or the wrong energy supply, fermentation.
Suppose the engineers at GM or Ford disregarded the laws of physics. How successful would they be in developing the automobile for the past century? Our cars would be crashing and falling apart. Suppose the civil engineers designing our buildings disregarded the laws of physics. Our buildings would be falling down. Suppose the engineers designing the space shuttle disregarded the laws of physics; the shuttle would not fly and would crash. This is what the cancer generals have been doing, disregarding the experiments and facts developed by the genius in Germany, Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D., nominated for 3 Nobel Prizes in medicine and physiology; 1926, 1931 and 1944. Three of his pupils also received Nobel Prizes; Otto Meyeroff, M.D., Hans Krebs, M.D. and Hugo Theorell, M.D.
How long would you continue to pay someone for FAILURE? If an engineer continually failed would you or GM or Ford or Chrysler hire that engineer? Obviously not. We cannot expect those who have failed for decades, to find the ways to prevent and cure for cancer, especially if they have disregarded and slighted the genius in Germany, Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D.
Here is a link to the current state of affairs with references, including but not limited to: http://www.topix.net/forum/city/bethesda-md/T...


"The Hidden Story of Cancer" by Brian Peskin E.E. and Amid Habib, M.D., Pinnacle Press, Houston, 2006-2008.
"The Truth About Hydrazine Sulfate-Dr. Gold Speaks" by Joseph Gold, M.D. at www.hydrazinesulfate.org .
"CancerGate" by Samuel S. Epstein, M.D., Baywood Press, N. Y. 2005.
"The Cancer Industry" by Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D., Equinox Press, N.Y., 1996, first published as "The Cancer Syndrome", 1980.
The internal combustion engine only operates with oxygen and refined fuel, gasoline. It won't work with any other energy. Similarly, only oxygen can provide the energy necessary for cell differentiation. Cancer is a disease of the wrong energy supply, fermentation as proved by Otto Warburg and confirmed in many laboratories around the world. The failure to recognize these facts is partly why the war on cancer is a patent failure. The cancer generals must be fired, not provided more fraudulent money from a gullible and unwitting public as requested in your fraudulent advertisement.

Winfield J. Abbe
A.B., Physics, UC Berkeley, 1961
M.S., Physics, California State University at Los Angeles, 1962
Ph.D. Physics, UC Riverside, 1966
Institute of Science and Technology Fellow, University of MIchigan, Ann Arbor, 1966-1967.
150 Raintree Ct.
Athens, GA 30607

Copy to Brian Peskin, E.E." Note that while Otto Warburg was nominated for 3 Nobel Prizes, he was actually only awarded one prize in 1931, not for the cancer work.