If the rail runner is built it will be used. I would love to be able to go to go to crappy meetings in Albuquerque without putting up with the crappy drive. I know a lot of other people who would use it too. The world has changed and will continue to change even if some people don't like the changes. Although the 1966 Fairlane is good to look back at, it is outdated and impractical. Although the high school diploma is a good thing, it is outdated and not enough any more. Although Fossil fuels built this country, it is not practical for the future. Old people in their 90's have seen so many changes. It is a different world than they were born into. It didn't progress overnight. It progressed step by step. What would have happened if the previous generation would have stood in the way of tv, computers, X rays, and Radiation therapy? By the way, Albuquerque just pops up when I type, I live in Cruces. I don't know why either. If it starts to bother me, I'll ask a kid why.<quoted text>
"WE in Las Cruces..."??? Have you a **** in your pocket? Amusing, you claim LC as your residence yet your ISP is Abq, and your handle "Still Standing" is that of an earlier TWIT that used to post the same senseless liberal garbage all over this Topix forum...
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Las Cruces Sun-News.
#21 Jun 17, 2011
Since: Jan 10
#22 Jun 18, 2011
I don't have a problem with trains or mass public transportation. Buses are great, so are trains - when they make economic sense. I also understyand and support public subsidies for such, up to a point. What I do have a problem with is the cost when it is very very excessive and accomplishes very little.
An example is the FailRunner. The cost has been horrendous exceeding $500mil. It currently serves less than ¼ of 1% of the corridor population. Even the figures in today's Journal article today tend to back that up. They use one-way figures because it makes the numbers appear bigger at a glance but we all know that if you go on it, you'll return on it, and THAT is NOT two riders, that's one doing a round trip. It says:
- 2500 Saturday one way trips(that = 1250 people)
- 1000 Sunday one way trips(that = 500 people)
- 4500 weekday boardings(that = 2250 people)
Keep in mind that many of these SAT/SUN riders are children who are also riding for free, and weekdayers are state employees.
All in all it doesn't provide enough for what it costs, nor will it as the population of this state is not enough to make much of a dent in the costs, even with the massive subsidies it already gets. Santa Fe is not the alpha and omega of the world as some seem to think. There is life outside the corridor.
Also keep in mind that a tax was passed a few years ago to fund maintenance of the FailRunner, some $20mil annually. The very day after it was passed, we were told it wasn't enough. Why didn't they ask for what they needed instead in the first place? Because they knew if they did, it'd likely be rejected by the voters. And that lack of money has manifested itself in part as an upcoming stoppage of weekend service. Add to it the number of stations, how often they're used, why they are where they are($Bills buds), how much they cost and how they impact travel time.
Bottom line is it's a great concept, but its simply not economically viable for NM, at this point in time anyway. It serves too few for the cost. We have too many other more important needs to spend our tax dollars on than a train that moves mostly state employees.
Add your comments below
|Today I Saw (Nov '09)||4 hr||Mister Chix||57,985|
|Good Old Days 2 (Apr '10)||4 hr||Cooties||108,673|
|bandido support clubs (Nov '11)||5 hr||Monty||163|
|Giddens Leads New Mexico Over UNLV, 59-45 (Mar '08)||8 hr||Fartin24 7||22|
|Same-Sex Marriage Trumps Religious Liberty in N... (Aug '13)||17 hr||Sally||1,047|
|APS Leadership Disgraces Itself Yet Again (Nov '06)||17 hr||Jill||4|
|White House looks like a circus lit up||17 hr||Paulie||31|
Find what you want!
Search Bernalillo Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC