Vallejo loses councilwoman in 2012, b...

Vallejo loses councilwoman in 2012, but gets new voice on county board

There are 74 comments on the Vallejo Times-Herald story from Dec 27, 2012, titled Vallejo loses councilwoman in 2012, but gets new voice on county board. In it, Vallejo Times-Herald reports that:

Elections tend to be about change, and the 2012 elections brought with them some political adjustments in Vallejo and Solano County that will take them into 2013 and beyond.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Vallejo Times-Herald.

First Prev
of 4
Next Last
obamas son

Los Altos, CA

#1 Dec 27, 2012
she might just raise the IQ of both places
sam plays VPDs skin flute

Concord, CA

#2 Dec 27, 2012
With Hannigan's departure, Vallejo is waking up from a coma. Let's see if Malguapo has enough information.

(t)urd enragement!
Salty Dog

Vallejo, CA

#3 Dec 27, 2012
To quote Maligapo during 2011 election and his reason for running for elected representation:

" As an ordinary citizen of Vallejo, who is going to listen to me?"

Yes well, as an ordinary rate payer, who are you going to listen to- your union benefactors or the best interests of Vallejo?

Watch this guy very closely....his motives are self serving and his understanding of the role and responsibilities of a Councilor are fuzzy.
Pinoy

Vallejo, CA

#4 Dec 27, 2012
So what? He is in the minority, sounds like you are Filipino bashing, a trademark of VIB. We do not forget.
sam plays VPDs skin flute

Concord, CA

#5 Dec 27, 2012
Pinoy wrote:
So what? He is in the minority, sounds like you are Filipino bashing, a trademark of VIB. We do not forget.
You shouldn't pose as a Filipino sammie, that is Filipino bashing at its worse.

(t)urd enragement!
Salty Dog

Vallejo, CA

#6 Dec 27, 2012
Pinoy wrote:
So what? He is in the minority, sounds like you are Filipino bashing, a trademark of VIB. We do not forget.
Hey ass hat, I was quoting his own words. The color of his skin is completely irrelevant.

Or are you suggesting anyone who is non white are off bounds? Now that is racism, you clown.
Pinoy

Vallejo, CA

#7 Dec 27, 2012
Back to hurling insults when you hear opinions different from your own. You've been pounding on Sunga for two terms now and now the Malgapo insults are starting to take root and grow. Yes, he supports public safety, so what. Everyone should, not tell them you are coming for them, and blew that anyway.
Pinoy

Vallejo, CA

#8 Dec 27, 2012
Salty Dog wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey ass hat, I was quoting his own words. The color of his skin is completely irrelevant.
Or are you suggesting anyone who is non white are off bounds? Now that is racism, you clown.
In other words, you are condemning what he said. Again, an opinion and you starting condemning an opinion. That's typical of your over-rated social class, IMO.
Salty Dog

Vallejo, CA

#9 Dec 27, 2012
Pinoy wrote:
<quoted text>In other words, you are condemning what he said. Again, an opinion and you starting condemning an opinion. That's typical of your over-rated social class, IMO.
Gosh,golly....didn't know I belonged to a "social class". Perhaps you are knowledgeable enough to explain this class to which you have elevated me.

Now, read my post again and realize that I am quoting him directly - he ran for office so that he would no longer be "an ordinary citizen" As an elected representative and as a representative backed by organized labour (his admission), people will have to listen to him.

So yes, in my humble opinion, this guy with a narrow agenda and in the pocket of labor, and with an inferiority complex as one of the former ordinary citizens, deserves careful scrutiny.

Unless he has learned something from the working Council majority.
Dumb Slope

Vallejo, CA

#10 Dec 27, 2012
Salty Dog wrote:
<quoted text>
Gosh,golly....didn't know I belonged to a "social class". Perhaps you are knowledgeable enough to explain this class to which you have elevated me.
Now, read my post again and realize that I am quoting him directly - he ran for office so that he would no longer be "an ordinary citizen" As an elected representative and as a representative backed by organized labour (his admission), people will have to listen to him.
So yes, in my humble opinion, this guy with a narrow agenda and in the pocket of labor, and with an inferiority complex as one of the former ordinary citizens, deserves careful scrutiny.
Unless he has learned something from the working Council majority.
So what is the point of declaring he should be "watched"? He is in the minority. Sure he supports organized labor, the depth of citizens that do propelled Erin over Tony easily, Osby over Joanne last year, re-elected Erin and Hermie. Now that is fact. It may be unpleasant for you to swallow, but it is what it is.
You people are loud but that's about it.
The voters have awoken.
Salty Dog

Vallejo, CA

#11 Dec 27, 2012
Dumb Slope wrote:
<quoted text>So what is the point of declaring he should be "watched"? He is in the minority. Sure he supports organized labor, the depth of citizens that do propelled Erin over Tony easily, Osby over Joanne last year, re-elected Erin and Hermie. Now that is fact. It may be unpleasant for you to swallow, but it is what it is.
You people are loud but that's about it.
The voters have awoken.
If you value elected representation and if you understand the role and responsibility of a Council to the ENTIRE community, and if you believe some sub sectors should not receive "special considerations" above those of "ordinary citizens", then, YES, he should be watched closely to validate his understanding of broader responsibilities.

But, you are correct. The electorate has awoken and has resulted in a functioning Council. Malgapo enters this arena as a third string player and without a mandate other than labor. Lets see if he can rise above that narrow interest.
sam plays VPDs skin flute

Concord, CA

#12 Dec 27, 2012
Dumb Slope wrote:
<quoted text>So what is the point of declaring he should be "watched"? He is in the minority. Sure he supports organized labor, the depth of citizens that do propelled Erin over Tony easily, Osby over Joanne last year, re-elected Erin and Hermie. Now that is fact. It may be unpleasant for you to swallow, but it is what it is.
You people are loud but that's about it.
The voters have awoken.
Yes supporting only labor has propelled Hermie and Ozz into the minority.

(t)urd enragement!
hate them all

Vallejo, CA

#13 Dec 27, 2012
Salty Dog wrote:
<quoted text>
If you value elected representation and if you understand the role and responsibility of a Council to the ENTIRE community, and if you believe some sub sectors should not receive "special considerations" above those of "ordinary citizens", then, YES, he should be watched closely to validate his understanding of broader responsibilities.
But, you are correct. The electorate has awoken and has resulted in a functioning Council. Malgapo enters this arena as a third string player and without a mandate other than labor. Lets see if he can rise above that narrow interest.
the record of elected and re-elected pro-labor candidates right down the line has demonstrated the mandate of the majority of voters, "the community", as you folks like to say.
Salty Dog

Vallejo, CA

#14 Dec 27, 2012
hate them all wrote:
<quoted text>the record of elected and re-elected pro-labor candidates right down the line has demonstrated the mandate of the majority of voters, "the community", as you folks like to say.
No, it hasn't. And that is not just an opinion.
hate them all

Vallejo, CA

#15 Dec 27, 2012
yes, it has, and you are wrong, as usual.
Salty Dog

Vallejo, CA

#16 Dec 27, 2012
hate them all wrote:
yes, it has, and you are wrong, as usual.
NO, it hasn't, and I am right.....once again.

And "hate" is not in my vocabulary. My "class" disavows hatred....but readily recognizes ignorance.
What Is the Question

Daly City, CA

#18 Dec 27, 2012
Ans: "No economic development progress so hostile council will continue to balance budget on employees backs year after year with imposed contracts"

JAAAAjajajajajajajajaaaaaaa!
Salty Dog

Vallejo, CA

#19 Dec 27, 2012
Mrs Salty Dog wrote:
Salty, STFU you annoying miscreant.
lol....Is that the best you have?

I guess it is annoying being right all the time ....and you with no rational reply. But I am not a miscreant although Mrs Dog feels I should be able to have sex more than five times a day. Tough getting old :)
Salty Dog

Vallejo, CA

#20 Dec 27, 2012
What Is the Question wrote:
Ans: "No economic development progress so hostile council will continue to balance budget on employees backs year after year with imposed contracts"
JAAAAjajajajajajajajaaaaaaa!
wrong thread.
What Is the Question

Daly City, CA

#21 Dec 27, 2012
Ans: "City council sympathetic to dispatched criminals families."

JAAAAAjajajajajajajajaaaaa!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Berkeley Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 16 min Gomer 20,034
News Pacheco man pleads not guilty to child sex charges (Apr '12) 8 hr Zag 28
News Music as a bridge between form and the formless Mon Islam Forbids 1
2015 Oakland Murders Sun OMF 19
News Race and Beyond: Let's Talk About Race and Poverty (Oct '12) Sun Go Blue Forever 43
News Nuts on a Plane, Literally: 5 Craziest Cri... Sat Dr Wu 5
Jack London Square area Jun 27 Ex Oakland Reside... 6
More from around the web

Berkeley People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Berkeley Mortgages