gun laws

[ridiculous]

the gun laws are crazy. you can only have 3 shells in a shotgun if caught you will be fined. but you can have as many rounds as you want in a high powered rifle or assault weapon. im a hunter but this is crazy. just the other day I saw a guy with an assault weapon hunting along a household community in princeton. he was just firing away. if you are a smart hunter or a good shot you dont need that many rounds nor should you be near any residence. so yes they should regulate gun laws. before you comment read my first sentence carefully

[ridiculous]

and another point I would like to make. who would want a deer full of bullets? it only takes one good shot if you are a real hunter

[Really]

Regardless of your shooting ability or your taste of metal in the meat; the 2nd amendment is about protecting yourself an your family due to a tyrinical government or whatever you feel is neccesarry to own own guns. I believe that if we teach our children about guns like we do baseball or apple pie, which is as American as it gets, that tere would be less gun laws or shootings. According to the constitution legally any American citizen is elligable to own anything that our military has access to; hence any laws revoking my gun rights are unconstitutional. UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!! Come an get them Obama

[learn your facts]

It pisses me off when people think gun laws are based around huntin..there here for our protection...not to make you a better shot

[Really]

Like I said any type of gun laws are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!! Obama is unconstitutional aswell!!!

[just me]

Really wrote:

Like I said any type of gun laws are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!! Obama is unconstitutional aswell!!!

you are right about Obama, but clueless on the guns.the 2nd admendment is not for hunters. but for our protection for the likes of Obama and the rest of the democrates

[gunlover]

ridiculous wrote:

the gun laws are crazy. you can only have 3 shells in a shotgun if caught you will be fined. but you can have as many rounds as you want in a high powered rifle or assault weapon. im a hunter but this is crazy. just the other day I saw a guy with an assault weapon hunting along a household community in princeton. he was just firing away. if you are a smart hunter or a good shot you dont need that many rounds nor should you be near any residence. so yes they should regulate gun laws. before you comment read my first sentence carefully

You are allowed 3 rounds in a shotgun for hunting. You are allowed 10 rounds in a rifle deer hunting. There is no limit on rounds for fur bearer. How many rounds do you carry in your pocket hunting? I just prefer to carry my rounds in a box magazine instead of loose in my pocket.

[gunlover]

ridiculous wrote:

and another point I would like to make. who would want a deer full of bullets? it only takes one good shot if you are a real hunter

I practice one shot, one kill even though I have plenty of rounds for backup. If you are such an awesome shot, then don't worry about how many shells you can carry in your gun and just hunt with a single shot there high speed

[Really]

just me wrote:

<quoted text>you are right about Obama, but clueless on the guns.the 2nd admendment is not for hunters. but for our protection for the likes of Obama and the rest of the democrates

I'm clueless!?! Apparently u did not fully read my comment, in which I was making a statement towards the original poster which whom was regarding gun laws with hunting. If u read my post it says any type of gun laws are unconstitutional.

[jrssueellen]

Really wrote:

Like I said any type of gun laws are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!! Obama is unconstitutional aswell!!!

You may have as many guns as you want as long as they are the typeguns that was used when the 2nd ammendent was written, otherwise YOU nor any other average citizen has any business with a BUSHMASTER or any of those other pcs tahn can mow down dozens in a minute. I also have a consitional right to saftey !

[Really]

Well in that case u have the right to shut ur mouth; cuz if ur going to hold the 2nd amendment to the guns of its time then u can also hold the 1st amendment to its times...thats right the freedom of speach. If u wanna take this route shut down ur computer an write me a letter. Computers weren't used n those days. Like I said b4 according to the constitution we have just as much right to preditor drones as our military does. Don't limit my constitutional rights to benifit u an I give u the right to use ur computer to run ur liberal mouth...now cuz of the first amendment I have the right to call u a Obamanazi!!!

[gunlover]

^^^^^^^^^^ this!

[Really]

gunlover wrote:

^^^^^^^^^^ this!

Not quite understanding ur comment, but if u believe the constitution is aloud for guns of today's time ur welcome to use ur first amendment right an use the computer to say what u wan...hahahahaha

[HAHA]

It does not matter what kind of gun mag or ammo is used..if a law abiding citizen feels like a Bushmaster AR 15 with 25 or 30 bullets is what they need to protect his/her family, well so be it. People need to be teaching children about right and wrong. We as a country differ from other countries because the people who STARTED this country had a CLEAR vision on what it should be like. Therefore we can sit at home on our computers running our mouths with our gun cabinets filled up with whatever the f*** we want.

[Fact]

HAHA wrote:

It does not matter what kind of gun mag or ammo is used..if a law abiding citizen feels like a Bushmaster AR 15 with 25 or 30 bullets is what they need to protect his/her family, well so be it. People need to be teaching children about right and wrong. We as a country differ from other countries because the people who STARTED this country had a CLEAR vision on what it should be like. Therefore we can sit at home on our computers running our mouths with our gun cabinets filled up with whatever the f*** we want.

Obviously the protection aspect isn't working out considering all the murders.

[Shrek]

Fact wrote:

<quoted text>Obviously the protection aspect isn't working out considering all the murders.

I don't hear of people losing their lives while protecting their families using their ar-15

[Really]

Fact wrote:

<quoted text>
Obviously the protection aspect isn't working out considering all the murders.

Not really a fact but what is a fact is that these murders you r talking about happen in "GUN FREE ZONES"...I'm telling everyone right now hence I'm always carrying that if some raged lunitic comes in firing he'll b brought down. An you'll b thinking me the gun owner

[collectors]

I know lots of very SANE people who collect guns for a hobby!!! i don't see any thing wrong with it at all!!! Are they gonna ban knives, hammers, ball bats, crowbars? this is the craziest thing i have ever heard!!!

[rediculous]

Fact wrote:

<quoted text>
Obviously the protection aspect isn't working out considering all the murders.

let me inform you on something...that asshole that killed all those kids killed himself once a man with a gun came...that last mall shooting once an armed civilian aimed his firearm at him after he killed all those people in that mall he killed himself...the only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun...and buddy apparently you don't give a shit about your family cause if someone breaks in my home threatening my family you better beleive their not gonna make it five steps...

[jrssueellen]

Really wrote:

Well in that case u have the right to shut ur mouth; cuz if ur going to hold the 2nd amendment to the guns of its time then u can also hold the 1st amendment to its times...thats right the freedom of speach. If u wanna take this route shut down ur computer an write me a letter. Computers weren't used n those days. Like I said b4 according to the constitution we have just as much right to preditor drones as our military does. Don't limit my constitutional rights to benifit u an I give u the right to use ur computer to run ur liberal mouth...now cuz of the first amendment I have the right to call u a Obamanazi!!!

you my friend are utterly ridiculous, a sensible conversation with you would be impossible !