Jim Muir and Orders of Protection

[What do you think]

Just in case Jim reads this stuff a friend of Jim coulter thinks your articles will help him to move his trial what do you think. I believe they can move it to where ever it will not matter he will be found guilty! This is what she had to say on another comment page about Jim.
MYSELF AM WORKING ON THAT AND I THANK JIM MUIR FOR MAKING IT ALOT EASIER. ANY EDITOR FOR AS LONG AS HE SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BETTER FOR US ITS A BLESSING

[Newshound]

PST wrote:

Dont know is this is true, but i have heard that he had one against him at one time.

If you go to judici.com and look at the case, it was Muir who had the OP against his former wife. It was 9 years ago, water under the bridge. They share a child, everyone gets along now.
I would rather have a reporter who has either had an OP issued on someone or one issued on him, than to have a Chief of Police who had one against him for over 2 years, filed by a former girlfriend he was stalking and threatening. That's the chief patrolling the streets of West City! He's pretty easy to find on judici.com and if you can get access to the file at the court house, it is very scary the things he did!

[Newshound]

Skeptic wrote:

I'm surprised Muir thinks he can get away with writing an article on Orders of Protection without people talking about the fact that he was hit with one. That was pretty commonly known when I was in Franklin County. I agree with those who say he shouldn't be trying to hide this if he is going to get up on a soapbox about Orders of Protection. I don't know if what was said about him by his ex-wife was true or not but it kind of makes you wonder if he tries to hide it.

HE had the OP against HER!!

[Diogenes]

Was Muir removed from this story? I noticed a different reporter wrote the last installment in this series.

[sam]

Surly wrote:

I too have seen this happen. There is always another side to the story. Many women do it for spite and the OP is unjustified.

Ask heather bartlett how its done. That skank knows all about it.

[Laughing]

Blessed in Benton wrote:

It's easy to get file and order of protection against someone, even if they aren't really guilty, I've seen it done many times! Don't be so judgemental people!

You're right. It is easy to file an unjustified OP. If one chooses to file one without cause only to harass the other person, he/she should be sued for libel so the ignorant petitioner can be held accountable. OP is for people who really need one.

[Been there]

Orders Of Protecton are a joke. They are designed by judges to cover the states ass's and used by scum sucking female filth to rob steal and plunder their husbands boyfriends or any poor sucker that gets in their way. You would be a fool to think that anyone who has had a O P on them did anything wrong for real. Lawyer scum advise it to gain custody to any woman wanting a divorce(ask Brian Drew, he and that scum sucking pig daddy of his have did and done it for decades). I say rock on Mr Muir, the truth needs to be told about just how corrupt the courts really are. Especially in Franklin County

[meddling kids]

I heard he wears women's clothes and prances around like a merry man. The exact people he claims to detest.

[ThisSite]

You people need lives! Jobs hobbies something to do for crying outloud! And judici.com . Wow u people prob sit on computer and go back and forth from this site to that to Facebook to who knows what else. Wake up and realize you only have one life that is only yours to live so do it before you regret being miserable through it all trying to make others miserable because your really only making yourself miserable. Nobody that matters believes anything on this site. Even I'd some stuff may be true. Move on crap happens in life and you just move on and make your life better each and everyday! Just trying to help you guys out here. Try having a heart with love and not hate and I promise you will live a happier life!

[Heather]

The order of protection you are talking about was requested BY Jim against an ex-wife.(and this happened 15-16 yrs ago). I know this not bc of Judici.com but because I am the daughter of whom the OP was taken out against.
All was forgiven and it was water under the bridge. The 2 of them were able to move on from that point, as should all of you.
My mother passed away in 2011 and she and Jim had long made ammends.
Please be respectful to both Jim AND my mother by dropping this forum.
Thank you,
Heather

[Hambone]

Heather wrote:

The order of protection you are talking about was requested BY Jim against an ex-wife.(and this happened 15-16 yrs ago). I know this not bc of Judici.com but because I am the daughter of whom the OP was taken out against.
All was forgiven and it was water under the bridge. The 2 of them were able to move on from that point, as should all of you.
My mother passed away in 2011 and she and Jim had long made ammends.
Please be respectful to both Jim AND my mother by dropping this forum.
Thank you,
Heather

Thanks for posting!