Comments
1 - 20 of 43 Comments Last updated Mar 14, 2011
First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Just Me

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Feb 4, 2011
 
Does anyone know whats going on with Will? Has he been sentenced yet?
curious

West Lafayette, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Feb 4, 2011
 
Sentenced for what?
queen bee

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Feb 4, 2011
 
His child porn charges. It was either a big fine and/or prison time plus registering as a sex offender. I haven't heard anything else about the case since it hit the papers a few months ago. Is this kid out or is he in jail somewhere awaiting trial/sentencing??
Just Me

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Feb 5, 2011
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Last I heard he was going to be sentenced in February and was looking at maybe 10 years in prison. I hope they don't do that to him.
Status

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Feb 5, 2011
 

Judged:

2

Just Me wrote:
Last I heard he was going to be sentenced in February and was looking at maybe 10 years in prison. I hope they don't do that to him.
He did it to himself, douchebag. Nobody did anything to him.
Just a Grown Up

Springfield, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Feb 8, 2011
 
I don't think I've ever been called a "douchebag" before... He's so young to go to prison for 10 years. And what did he really do?
u kidding

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Feb 8, 2011
 
child porn is children being assaulted.
Just a Grown Up wrote:
I don't think I've ever been called a "douchebag" before... He's so young to go to prison for 10 years. And what did he really do?
tonythetiger

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Feb 8, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

He had around 20 videos of child porn and about 2000 child porn (mostly male) pics on his computers at his home. Search on the Southern's website for the article..

You are right..the kid doesn't deserve ten..he deserves about 40.

Don't even say that 'they were 17 year olds in the pics/videos" because that's complete crapola. It really is too bad though, he is an acquaintance of mine and I know its torn his Grandma up; its a shame. Can't help what our family does though.

Ps. You probably have been called a douchebag, just not to your face or online. I'm sure I've been called worse lol.
Just a Grown Up

Springfield, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Feb 9, 2011
 
Were they young kids or high school age kids? Was he ever accused of touching any of the kids? I know he has been around kids doing the summer musicals etc... and has never shown much interest in the little kids. Ive read the articles about him, but don't see anything about him molesting or attempting to molest anyone.
tonythetiger

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Feb 9, 2011
 
He was just brought in on being in possession of A LOT of child porn ( pics and videos). I think the only person he was touching was himself.

I heard it was younger kids.
porter

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Feb 10, 2011
 

Judged:

1

It doesn't really matter if they were younger or older kids. They were still pictures of UNDERAGE kids. Will always knew a lot about the government in school. Too much probably. He knew what he was doing was illegal. I was shocked when I found out he was gay 2 years ago and this shocked me also.
Just a Grown Up

Springfield, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Feb 10, 2011
 
tonythetiger...thanks for the information, i appreciate the maturity in your answers. I DO think the ages of the kids in the photos actually matter. Wil is only what, 19? This happened two years ago when he was 17? So pictures of kids that age would make sense wouldn't they? He's gay, so he's going to look at other males. It's wrong for sure, but to what extent?
disgusted

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Feb 10, 2011
 
Just a Grown Up wrote:
tonythetiger...thanks for the information, i appreciate the maturity in your answers. I DO think the ages of the kids in the photos actually matter. Wil is only what, 19? This happened two years ago when he was 17? So pictures of kids that age would make sense wouldn't they? He's gay, so he's going to look at other males. It's wrong for sure, but to what extent?
It is deff wrong!! Considering the videos were of small children being tied up and raped.(info from a family member) If it were 17 yr olds I wouldn't see a problem, but it was young children. There is no way you can make this case sound ok. I feel bad for the kid because he obviously has a problem, but he deserves every year he gets for watching small boys tortured and raped.
Just a Grown Up

Springfield, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Feb 10, 2011
 
disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
It is deff wrong!! Considering the videos were of small children being tied up and raped.(info from a family member) If it were 17 yr olds I wouldn't see a problem, but it was young children. There is no way you can make this case sound ok. I feel bad for the kid because he obviously has a problem, but he deserves every year he gets for watching small boys tortured and raped.
If it was young children then it is very wrong. It doesn't seem like anyone actually knows the ages of the kids. At least it's not mentioned in the newspapers.
disgusted

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Feb 10, 2011
 
Just a Grown Up wrote:
<quoted text>If it was young children then it is very wrong. It doesn't seem like anyone actually knows the ages of the kids. At least it's not mentioned in the newspapers.
The ages that his family know of for sure range from 7-12. There could be other ages in the case since there was so much found. We probably won't ever know the ages of them all.
Status

Chicago, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Feb 10, 2011
 

Judged:

1

Just a Grown Up wrote:
<quoted text>If it was young children then it is very wrong. It doesn't seem like anyone actually knows the ages of the kids. At least it's not mentioned in the newspapers.
You're a moron. Yeah, I'm sure the 20 videos and 2000 photos are of 17 year old kids...because his perversion was only satisfied by seeing pictures of kids that are 365 days or less before they are 18. The rush of them simply being illegal was enough for him to squeeze a nut out. You don't have to touch kids for it to be criminal and sick to have pictures of 5 year old kids sucking an adult off. Are you a pedophile or just their dumbass defender?
Just a Grown Up

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Feb 10, 2011
 
Status wrote:
<quoted text>
You're a moron. Yeah, I'm sure the 20 videos and 2000 photos are of 17 year old kids...because his perversion was only satisfied by seeing pictures of kids that are 365 days or less before they are 18. The rush of them simply being illegal was enough for him to squeeze a nut out. You don't have to touch kids for it to be criminal and sick to have pictures of 5 year old kids sucking an adult off. Are you a pedophile or just their dumbass defender?
I didn't realize he had pictures of 5 year olds. You must be closer to him than most, since you have such detailed information. Being 18 and looking at pictures of 15 year olds isn't the same as looking at 5 year olds.
just my thoughts

Equality, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Feb 11, 2011
 
Just a Grown Up wrote:
tonythetiger...thanks for the information, i appreciate the maturity in your answers. I DO think the ages of the kids in the photos actually matter. Wil is only what, 19? This happened two years ago when he was 17? So pictures of kids that age would make sense wouldn't they? He's gay, so he's going to look at other males. It's wrong for sure, but to what extent?
The police would not make a case if he was 17 and kids were 15. If the police did that then every kid in HS that has ever set a sexting pic would be in jail. And yes it is sick to watch a video of a lil child being rape and getting pleasure out of it. even if they cant prove you touch a child.
Just a Grown Up

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Feb 11, 2011
 
just my thoughts wrote:
<quoted text>
The police would not make a case if he was 17 and kids were 15. If the police did that then every kid in HS that has ever set a sexting pic would be in jail. And yes it is sick to watch a video of a lil child being rape and getting pleasure out of it. even if they cant prove you touch a child.
I agree, just looking at children is enough reason to go to prison, it shows the desire and possibility to act on it. I really just wanted to find out some facts, everyone can guess and make accusations but I was hoping someone might know a little more.
Harsh

Woodmere, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Feb 13, 2011
 
I don't have any real facts , but 10 years for just looking is HARSH

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Benton Discussions

Search the Benton Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
IL Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 2 hr truth 48,894
looking for Rick Long (Aug '13) 3 hr Yes 13
Debate: Gay Marriage - Benton, IL (Aug '10) 7 hr Joe Rock Extreme Auto 99
IL Who do you support for Governor in Illinois in ... (Oct '10) 9 hr AnyCommieWillDoCantBWorse 3,829
Darren Shoemaker 10 hr curious2 10
Zach Labuwi liking amy brown 11 hr bhahahooo 9
Bust 14 hr Exposed 5
•••
•••
•••
•••

Benton Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Benton People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Benton News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Benton
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••