First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Just Me

AOL

#1 Feb 4, 2011
Does anyone know whats going on with Will? Has he been sentenced yet?
curious

West Lafayette, IN

#2 Feb 4, 2011
Sentenced for what?
queen bee

United States

#3 Feb 4, 2011
His child porn charges. It was either a big fine and/or prison time plus registering as a sex offender. I haven't heard anything else about the case since it hit the papers a few months ago. Is this kid out or is he in jail somewhere awaiting trial/sentencing??
Just Me

AOL

#4 Feb 5, 2011
Last I heard he was going to be sentenced in February and was looking at maybe 10 years in prison. I hope they don't do that to him.
Status

Dallas, TX

#5 Feb 5, 2011
Just Me wrote:
Last I heard he was going to be sentenced in February and was looking at maybe 10 years in prison. I hope they don't do that to him.
He did it to himself, douchebag. Nobody did anything to him.
Just a Grown Up

Dix, IL

#6 Feb 8, 2011
I don't think I've ever been called a "douchebag" before... He's so young to go to prison for 10 years. And what did he really do?
u kidding

Bloomsburg, PA

#7 Feb 8, 2011
child porn is children being assaulted.
Just a Grown Up wrote:
I don't think I've ever been called a "douchebag" before... He's so young to go to prison for 10 years. And what did he really do?
tonythetiger

United States

#8 Feb 8, 2011
He had around 20 videos of child porn and about 2000 child porn (mostly male) pics on his computers at his home. Search on the Southern's website for the article..

You are right..the kid doesn't deserve ten..he deserves about 40.

Don't even say that 'they were 17 year olds in the pics/videos" because that's complete crapola. It really is too bad though, he is an acquaintance of mine and I know its torn his Grandma up; its a shame. Can't help what our family does though.

Ps. You probably have been called a douchebag, just not to your face or online. I'm sure I've been called worse lol.
Just a Grown Up

Dix, IL

#9 Feb 9, 2011
Were they young kids or high school age kids? Was he ever accused of touching any of the kids? I know he has been around kids doing the summer musicals etc... and has never shown much interest in the little kids. Ive read the articles about him, but don't see anything about him molesting or attempting to molest anyone.
tonythetiger

United States

#10 Feb 9, 2011
He was just brought in on being in possession of A LOT of child porn ( pics and videos). I think the only person he was touching was himself.

I heard it was younger kids.
porter

United States

#11 Feb 10, 2011
It doesn't really matter if they were younger or older kids. They were still pictures of UNDERAGE kids. Will always knew a lot about the government in school. Too much probably. He knew what he was doing was illegal. I was shocked when I found out he was gay 2 years ago and this shocked me also.
Just a Grown Up

Dix, IL

#12 Feb 10, 2011
tonythetiger...thanks for the information, i appreciate the maturity in your answers. I DO think the ages of the kids in the photos actually matter. Wil is only what, 19? This happened two years ago when he was 17? So pictures of kids that age would make sense wouldn't they? He's gay, so he's going to look at other males. It's wrong for sure, but to what extent?
disgusted

Chicago, IL

#13 Feb 10, 2011
Just a Grown Up wrote:
tonythetiger...thanks for the information, i appreciate the maturity in your answers. I DO think the ages of the kids in the photos actually matter. Wil is only what, 19? This happened two years ago when he was 17? So pictures of kids that age would make sense wouldn't they? He's gay, so he's going to look at other males. It's wrong for sure, but to what extent?
It is deff wrong!! Considering the videos were of small children being tied up and raped.(info from a family member) If it were 17 yr olds I wouldn't see a problem, but it was young children. There is no way you can make this case sound ok. I feel bad for the kid because he obviously has a problem, but he deserves every year he gets for watching small boys tortured and raped.
Just a Grown Up

Dix, IL

#14 Feb 10, 2011
disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
It is deff wrong!! Considering the videos were of small children being tied up and raped.(info from a family member) If it were 17 yr olds I wouldn't see a problem, but it was young children. There is no way you can make this case sound ok. I feel bad for the kid because he obviously has a problem, but he deserves every year he gets for watching small boys tortured and raped.
If it was young children then it is very wrong. It doesn't seem like anyone actually knows the ages of the kids. At least it's not mentioned in the newspapers.
disgusted

Chicago, IL

#15 Feb 10, 2011
Just a Grown Up wrote:
<quoted text>If it was young children then it is very wrong. It doesn't seem like anyone actually knows the ages of the kids. At least it's not mentioned in the newspapers.
The ages that his family know of for sure range from 7-12. There could be other ages in the case since there was so much found. We probably won't ever know the ages of them all.
Status

Chicago, IL

#16 Feb 10, 2011
Just a Grown Up wrote:
<quoted text>If it was young children then it is very wrong. It doesn't seem like anyone actually knows the ages of the kids. At least it's not mentioned in the newspapers.
You're a moron. Yeah, I'm sure the 20 videos and 2000 photos are of 17 year old kids...because his perversion was only satisfied by seeing pictures of kids that are 365 days or less before they are 18. The rush of them simply being illegal was enough for him to squeeze a nut out. You don't have to touch kids for it to be criminal and sick to have pictures of 5 year old kids sucking an adult off. Are you a pedophile or just their dumbass defender?
Just a Grown Up

AOL

#17 Feb 10, 2011
Status wrote:
<quoted text>
You're a moron. Yeah, I'm sure the 20 videos and 2000 photos are of 17 year old kids...because his perversion was only satisfied by seeing pictures of kids that are 365 days or less before they are 18. The rush of them simply being illegal was enough for him to squeeze a nut out. You don't have to touch kids for it to be criminal and sick to have pictures of 5 year old kids sucking an adult off. Are you a pedophile or just their dumbass defender?
I didn't realize he had pictures of 5 year olds. You must be closer to him than most, since you have such detailed information. Being 18 and looking at pictures of 15 year olds isn't the same as looking at 5 year olds.
just my thoughts

Equality, IL

#18 Feb 11, 2011
Just a Grown Up wrote:
tonythetiger...thanks for the information, i appreciate the maturity in your answers. I DO think the ages of the kids in the photos actually matter. Wil is only what, 19? This happened two years ago when he was 17? So pictures of kids that age would make sense wouldn't they? He's gay, so he's going to look at other males. It's wrong for sure, but to what extent?
The police would not make a case if he was 17 and kids were 15. If the police did that then every kid in HS that has ever set a sexting pic would be in jail. And yes it is sick to watch a video of a lil child being rape and getting pleasure out of it. even if they cant prove you touch a child.
Just a Grown Up

AOL

#20 Feb 11, 2011
just my thoughts wrote:
<quoted text>
The police would not make a case if he was 17 and kids were 15. If the police did that then every kid in HS that has ever set a sexting pic would be in jail. And yes it is sick to watch a video of a lil child being rape and getting pleasure out of it. even if they cant prove you touch a child.
I agree, just looking at children is enough reason to go to prison, it shows the desire and possibility to act on it. I really just wanted to find out some facts, everyone can guess and make accusations but I was hoping someone might know a little more.
Harsh

Woodmere, NY

#21 Feb 13, 2011
I don't have any real facts , but 10 years for just looking is HARSH

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Benton Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Olivia Rutland (Jul '15) 1 hr Poptart 6
donald j trump 2 hr Buzzkill 159
Frank Parola banging Kimberly Ingoldsby? 13 hr Avery 13
JessP 17 hr Hustlindonutz 5
News If charged, Sprind could face 'the maximum sent... (Jan '07) Tue Yep 28
Womans head found in Wayne Fitzgerald s.p. (Oct '11) Tue Scared 35
Mike H Apr 24 Truth 12

Benton Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Benton Mortgages