I'm wagering from what I've read about him that he's a Republican.

At any rate sTINKy and her toadies and chums at World Nuts Daily are lying when they say Hasan was an advisor to the Obama Administration or Homeland Security:
http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/wnd-c...
________

The God of the Christians is a father who makes much of his apples, and very little of his children.---- Denis Diderot

All the religious nuts/radicals are conservative, rightwinger, intolerent people who want to force their religion and viewpoints on others and that fits right in with being a repuglican!

Buncy wrote:

I'm wagering from what I've read about him that he's a Republican.
At any rate sTINKy and her toadies and chums at World Nuts Daily are lying when they say Hasan was an advisor to the Obama Administration or Homeland Security:
http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/wnd-c...
________
The God of the Christians is a father who makes much of his apples, and very little of his children.---- Denis Diderot

Here's the report. He's listed as a participant on page 32. Why is that, do you suppose? Do you have any idea other than your ultra-lefty toady's words about it? Are they any different than Corsi?

http://www.gwumc.edu/hspi/old/PTTF_Proceeding...

Alberto Gonzo wrote:

All the religious nuts/radicals are conservative, rightwinger, intolerent people who want to force their religion and viewpoints on others and that fits right in with being a repuglican!

Good to hear you've joined the Republican Party.A bit surprising.

reasonable wrote:

<quoted text>
Here's the report. He's listed as a participant on page 32. Why is that, do you suppose? Do you have any idea other than your ultra-lefty toady's words about it? Are they any different than Corsi?
http://www.gwumc.edu/hspi/old/PTTF_Proceeding...

He's on 29 and all that means is that he attended the conference.

You'd see the virgin Mary on a pancake if you wanted bad enough to.

reasonable wrote:

<quoted text>
Here's the report. He's listed as a participant on page 32. Why is that, do you suppose? Do you have any idea other than your ultra-lefty toady's words about it? Are they any different than Corsi?
http://www.gwumc.edu/hspi/old/PTTF_Proceeding...

Never ever give them names or proof of something, it just does not register in their tiny little brains

reasonable wrote:

<quoted text>
Here's the report. He's listed as a participant on page 32. Why is that, do you suppose? Do you have any idea other than your ultra-lefty toady's words about it? Are they any different than Corsi?
http://www.gwumc.edu/hspi/old/PTTF_Proceeding...

He was an advisor/participant to Homeland Security under the Bush administration, while he was at Walter Reed, not the Obama administration!

Bill wrote:

<quoted text>Good to hear you've joined the Republican Party.A bit surprising.

I did vote repuglican, once, voted for Nixon, big mistake, never again!

reasonable wrote:

<quoted text>
Here's the report. He's listed as a participant on page 32. Why is that, do you suppose? Do you have any idea other than your ultra-lefty toady's words about it? Are they any different than Corsi?
http://www.gwumc.edu/hspi/old/PTTF_Proceeding...

Did you see the dates of the article. He participated from April 2008 to January 2009, with participation ending prior to Obama taking office! The committee's report was published in May but Hasan's participation was all while Bush was POTUS!

Alberto Gonzo wrote:

<quoted text>Did you see the dates of the article. He participated from April 2008 to January 2009, with participation ending prior to Obama taking office! The committee's report was published in May but Hasan's participation was all while Bush was POTUS!

Did you even SEE the report? No, you didn't. Here's the title:

"Thinking Anew—Security Priorities for the Next Administration"

You see the word "Next" don't you GD?

Buncy wrote:

<quoted text>
He's on 29 and all that means is that he attended the conference.
You'd see the virgin Mary on a pancake if you wanted bad enough to.

It's page 32 of the PDF and I'd never see any apparitions at all. I did see HIS name, however, on page 32. Try it, it works.

reasonable wrote:

<quoted text>
It's page 32 of the PDF and I'd never see any apparitions at all. I did see HIS name, however, on page 32. Try it, it works.

OK, 32 with your software, 29 with mine. Of course, the question is whether you can tag the Obama Administration with this monster. You can't. You'd do better tagging the Bush Administration with him. That would suit me and the facts, but not your predilections, old bud.

Buncy wrote:

<quoted text>
OK, 32 with your software, 29 with mine. Of course, the question is whether you can tag the Obama Administration with this monster. You can't. You'd do better tagging the Bush Administration with him. That would suit me and the facts, but not your predilections, old bud.

The facts support Obamabot/lib political correctness prevented the FBI from telling the Army it had a terrorist in its officer corps.

Buncy wrote:

<quoted text>
OK, 32 with your software, 29 with mine. Of course, the question is whether you can tag the Obama Administration with this monster. You can't. You'd do better tagging the Bush Administration with him. That would suit me and the facts, but not your predilections, old bud.

Do you happen to know approximately when the FBI first became aware of him?

Bill wrote:

<quoted text>Do you happen to know approximately when the FBI first became aware of him?

During the Bush administration.

reasonable wrote:

<quoted text>
It's page 32 of the PDF and I'd never see any apparitions at all. I did see HIS name, however, on page 32. Try it, it works.

And the whole thing, except the compiling of the report, was completed prior to Obama taking office. Check out the 2006 lecture by Hasan where he made comments that were reported by students, especially where he said he was a Muslim first and a soldier second, hmmmmm, who was POTUS in 2006, 2007, 2008 and Jan 2009? Could it have been "W"? Over 3 years, while "W" was Commander in Chief, Hasan was spouting anti-American, pro-Muslim, anti-War statements and trying to get out of the military, all on "W's" watch!

Bill wrote:

<quoted text>The facts support Obamabot/lib political correctness prevented the FBI from telling the Army it had a terrorist in its officer corps.

He was reported to the Army by students and even a fellow Doctor, all while Bush was POTUS!

reasonable wrote:

<quoted text>
Did you even SEE the report? No, you didn't. Here's the title:
"Thinking Anew—Security Priorities for the Next Administration"
You see the word "Next" don't you GD?

Yes, it was a report for the following administration, prepared prior to "W" leaving office, by people chosen by the Bush administration, hmmmm, "W" chose Hasan to be on the panel, what does that say when Hasan had been being reported for his actions/comments/behavior for over 3 years?

Just another retarded poll by an America hating libtard douche.
Too bad the best part of you ran down your Mothers leg Duncy.
When are the Democracks gonna pencil you into the health care 'reform' bill as the poster child for abortion?

Alberto Gonzo wrote:

<quoted text>He was reported to the Army by students and even a fellow Doctor, all while Bush was POTUS!

Obama could cure cancer and these goobers would not only fail to give him credit for it but would also find a way to counter the accomplishment, like saying that it is a HUGE blow to the drug and insurance industries...pathetic.