How much do homosexuals cost tax payers?

Posted in the Bellefontaine Forum

Comments (Page 2)

Showing posts 21 - 40 of224
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: May 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Jun 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

All presumed homosexual marriage compromises all true civil and religious liberty's of a nation and the individual within that nation.

And all presumed homosexual marriage is a vain attempt to destroy the natural and civil norm of heterosexual marriage that has stood since antiquity.

And there is no doubt that all presumed homosexual marriage is pure tyranny, forced upon a civil and peaceful abiding people.

TVOSR

Since: May 11

Reality, USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Jun 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The Voice Of Sound Reason wrote:
All presumed homosexual marriage compromises all true civil and religious liberty's of a nation and the individual within that nation.
And all presumed homosexual marriage is a vain attempt to destroy the natural and civil norm of heterosexual marriage that has stood since antiquity.
And there is no doubt that all presumed homosexual marriage is pure tyranny, forced upon a civil and peaceful abiding people.
TVOSR
Six states and the District of Columbia say that your statement of "presumed" homosexual marriage is incorrect. According to those states, there is nothing "presumed" about their marriages.

And tell me Silly Voice, who has said that their mission is to "destroy the natural and civil norm of heterosexual marriage" or is that just another one of your fear inducing sayings?

"If a man would follow, today, the teachings of the Old Testament, he would be a criminal. If he would follow the teachings of the new, he would be insane."
-Robert G. Ingersoll-

Since: May 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Jun 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Clearly as children are turned over to homosexuals. The proliferation of tax payer HIV-aids health care only increase. Since homosexuality is a learned behavour and children provide the most fertile soil to plant the corrupt seeds of this behavour, the increase is inevitable. Is this really what tax dollars should be spent for? We as a society do not promote smoking, obesity, alcoholism, domestic abuse etc. Why? Because these are not desirable behaviors within our culture. Not to mention the financial cost to tax payers for these behaviors. It makes no sense to place these children in these homosexual environments. Would you place children in a home with known domestic violence? Would you place children in a alcoholic environment? Children become what they are around. And the lifelong cost to tax payers for these dysfunctional children will be staggering. Children were never intended to be placed in such corrupt environments.

Pro-Homosexual Researchers Conceal Findings:
Children Raised by Openly Homosexual Parents More Likely to Engage in Homosexuality

By Trayce Hansen, Ph.D.

Research by social scientists, although not definitive, suggests that children reared by openly homosexual parents are far more likely to engage in homosexual behavior than children raised by others. Studies thus far find between 8% and 21% of homosexually parented children ultimately identify as non-heterosexual. For comparison purposes, approximately 2% of the general population are non-heterosexual. Therefore, if these percentages continue to hold true, children of homosexuals have a 4 to 10 times greater likelihood of developing a non-heterosexual preference than other children.

Some researchers who uncovered sexual preference differences between homosexually and heterosexually parented children, nonetheless declared in their research summaries that no differences were found. Many believe they concealed their findings so as not to harm their own pro-homosexual, sociopolitical agendas.

All social scientists who conduct research in this emotionally-charged area have personal biases. That's a given. But if the authors of these studies want to be regarded as scientists, and not activists, they must set aside their biases and straightforwardly present their findings.

Regardless, no one should be surprised that homosexual parents are more likely to raise homosexual children. As one of the few forthright pro-homosexual advocates proclaimed, "Of course our children are going to be different."

In fact, many believe the percentages of non-heterosexual children in these studies would be even greater if more of the children had been raised from birth by openly homosexual parents. But most weren't. A majority of these children actually were born into and raised by mother-father couples before one of their parents "came-out" and the parents divorced.

Findings from the best and most recent twin studies have found that homosexuality, unlike eye color, is not genetically-caused. But there are a number of non-genetic mechanisms through which homosexuality could be transmitted from one generation to the next. Those mechanisms include role-modeling, social learning and differential reinforcement, as well as outright encouragement of non-heterosexuality by parents or others.

No one knows for sure by what complex mechanisms homosexual parents disproportionately rear homosexual children. But regardless of how, it appears they do. The public needs to be made aware of the findings of these studies so that when courts adjudicate and citizens vote on issues related to homosexuality, they're fully informed as to the possible consequences of those decisions on children.

http://www.drtraycehansen.com/Pages/writings_...

Since: May 11

Reality, USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
Jun 1, 2012
 
USN Atheist wrote:
<quoted text>
Six states and the District of Columbia say that your statement of "presumed" homosexual marriage is incorrect. According to those states, there is nothing "presumed" about their marriages.
And tell me Silly Voice, who has said that their mission is to "destroy the natural and civil norm of heterosexual marriage" or is that just another one of your fear inducing sayings?
"If a man would follow, today, the teachings of the Old Testament, he would be a criminal. If he would follow the teachings of the new, he would be insane."
-Robert G. Ingersoll-
Not going to answer this either are you Silly Voice?

You say alot but have nothing to back up your lies. I believe I compared you to the North Korean Gov't or one of those other 3rd world dictatorship nations at one time.
They too think so much of themselves and their misguided beliefs but when they are called on it they slink away.
You, as well as they, are children, cowardly children in the playground kicking dirt at people and then running away...all the while crying out how much it isn't your fault and that the bigger kids are picking on you.
It is obvious that you got your a$$ kicked alot when you were in school... you probably deserved most of it too.

"Atheist - A person to be pitied in that he is unable to believe things for which there is no evidence, and who has thus deprived himself of a convenient means of feeling superior to others."
-The American Heretic's Dictionary-

Since: May 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
Jun 1, 2012
 
The amazing coincidence of the rise of homosexual promiscuity just prior to the end of the Roman empire is obvious, and should only be encouraged by those intent upon ending this one. And the homosexual orgies of Rome, the public baths, and the Spartan military admonishments to relieve oneself of sexual appetites in any convenient way before battle. Are evidence to the fact that rampant homosexuality played a large part in bringing down the great Roman Empire.

Since: May 11

Reality, USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#26
Jun 1, 2012
 
The Voice Of Sound Reason wrote:
Pro-Homosexual Researchers Conceal Findings:
Children Raised by Openly Homosexual Parents More Likely to Engage in Homosexuality
And this affects you how Silly Voice? If they are happy why should they care what you think or why should you really care anyway? Are you in the business of destroying someone's happiness for your own pleasure?

"You hate me because I am the embodiment of all your doubts."
-Madalyn Murray O'Hair-

Since: May 11

Reality, USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27
Jun 1, 2012
 
The Voice Of Sound Reason wrote:
The amazing coincidence of the rise of homosexual promiscuity just prior to the end of the Roman empire is obvious, and should only be encouraged by those intent upon ending this one. And the homosexual orgies of Rome, the public baths, and the Spartan military admonishments to relieve oneself of sexual appetites in any convenient way before battle. Are evidence to the fact that rampant homosexuality played a large part in bringing down the great Roman Empire.
You have been disproven before on this one Silly Voice. Though sexual promiscuity and a significant drop in human morals was a symptom, it was one of many...and not high on the list either.

Try again turd.

Since: May 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#28
Jun 1, 2012
 
Atheist- Individuals that starved to death feeding upon the shadow of a self-serving empty belief.

TVOSR

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29
Jun 1, 2012
 
The Voice Of Sound Reason wrote:
And all presumed homosexual marriage is a vain attempt to destroy the natural and civil norm of heterosexual marriage that has stood since antiquity.
TVOSR
The natural & civil norm of heterosexual marriage destroyed?????

Not for me. I've been married a long time. I wake up next to my wife every morning. I really don't care what anyone else does and why should you??? Because the Bible tells you so? Kinda makes me wonder if you wake up next to anyone in the morning. The stuff you post is both funny & retarded at the same time. I can not, for the life of me, imagine someone being as wacked out as you are. Simply trip weed. You need to have your own show on WBLL. I would tune in just to listen to your rants. You are just toooo funny. Sadly, you're serious...but it's still funny to me.

Since: May 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30
Jun 1, 2012
 
Although I have already covered this on another thread in a little different light. This article will augment what I have already shown concerning the Catholic church using pedophiles as a cover for hardened homosexuals within the church. What I did not show was how the Catholic church fed this bogus information to the Journalists to be assimilated as it was spoon fed the the U.S. populace.

Journalists and the Pedophile Smokescreen

By Trayce Hansen, Ph.D.

Here’s a question: Since most journalists know the definition of a pedophile, and therefore must realize that the vast majority of priests involved in the current sex abuse scandal don’t fit that definition, why do they persist in calling them pedophiles?

Let me offer an answer.

Most journalists purposely mislabel the abusive priests as pedophiles in order to create a smokescreen; their aim is to obscure the fact that most of these men are actually predatory homosexuals. Other journalists—a smaller subset—merely parrot the oft repeated phrase “pedophile priest”—without definitional consideration—and therefore participate only inadvertently in this obfuscation.

But I’m getting ahead of myself. Perhaps we should start with a basic definition of pedophile. A pedophile is any adult who has a sexual desire for prepubescent children. Since most of the offending priests preyed sexually on teenage boys, they are not, by definition, pedophiles.

A significant majority of the sexually abusing priests are actually pederasts. Pederasts are adult male homosexuals who seek post-pubescent male minors with whom to act out their sexual inclinations. In my business of psychology they’re called sexual predators; in the business of law enforcement they’re called statutory rapists, or more simply, criminals. But no matter what, they’re not pedophiles.

Here are some additional facts that bear on the subject: First, according to most published estimates, between 25% and 50% of priests are homosexual. This figure stands in stark, statistical contrast to the fact that only about 3% to 5% of the general population is homosexual. Homosexuals, therefore, disproportionately fill the ranks of the priesthood. Second, approximately 85% to 95% of the known sexual abuse perpetrated by priests was against teenage boys. Since one would statistically predict only 25% to 50% of the priest molestation cases to be homosexual—based on their percentages in the total priest population—one is struck by the fact that these homosexual priests are molesting in much higher percentages than one would expect, and thus in much higher percentages than their heterosexual priest counterparts.

Male homosexuals with whom I’ve spoken are not surprised by these percentages and have frankly acknowledged that a significant number of gay men, priests or not, do seek out teenage boys as “sex partners”—these men are known in the homosexual community by various monikers such as “chicken-hawks.”

As an aside, it is interesting to note that those who lambasted the Boy Scouts for barring openly gay scoutmasters have turned deafeningly silent since the priest scandal broke. I wonder if that’s because the fears implicit in the Boy Scout regulations now seem thoroughly reasonable in light of the predatory behavior of far too many homosexual priests?

But let me get back to the issue at hand—journalistic truth telling. Though as many as 95% of the priest molestation cases reported so far involve homosexuals molesting teenage boys, most journalists ignore the sexual orientation angle and inaccurately label the abusive priests as pedophiles. For most, this is not a mistake.

It appears that many journalists intentionally use the word pedophile because it is nonspecific as to sexual preference and thus conceals the fact that a disproportionately high number of the predatory priests are homosexual.

http://www.drtraycehansen.com/Pages/writings_...

“ DRIVE-BY POSTS 4 CONSERVATISM”

Since: Sep 11

Bellefontaine, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31
Jun 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

USN Atheist wrote:
<quoted text>
Neither are you.
Your two cents are noted though.
It's not about me, or you , for that matter. What is important, is your illogical reference to the 13th & 19th Amendments to bolster your thinking.

Since: May 11

Reality, USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#32
Jun 1, 2012
 
DON W SOUTH wrote:
<quoted text>It's not about me, or you , for that matter. What is important, is your illogical reference to the 13th & 19th Amendments to bolster your thinking.
Your buddy is the one who brought the Constitution into play therefore it made it fair game to comment in the manner I did.

Since: May 11

Reality, USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#33
Jun 1, 2012
 
The Voice Of Sound Reason wrote:
Atheist- Individuals that starved to death feeding upon the shadow of a self-serving empty belief.
TVOSR
Lame...how many times a month do you post this? It means as much as it did the first time...nada.

Hope your Friday went well Silly Voice, that temp took a tumble didn't it? I sincerely hope you stay warm and dry, it would be so terrible should you come down sick with something.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34
Jun 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

DON W SOUTH wrote:
<quoted text>It's not about me, or you , for that matter. What is important, is your illogical reference to the 13th & 19th Amendments to bolster your thinking.
I don't see how it was illogical. USN bringing up abolishing slavery and granting women the right to vote was an obvious reference to Voice's antiquated views as to how society should conduct itself.

If you think that's important, well, that's your call. You made a big deal about nothing, if you ask me.

“ DRIVE-BY POSTS 4 CONSERVATISM”

Since: Sep 11

Bellefontaine, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35
Jun 1, 2012
 
USN Atheist wrote:
<quoted text>
Your buddy is the one who brought the Constitution into play therefore it made it fair game to comment in the manner I did.
Yes, but like I tried to tell you b4, bringing in the 13th & 14th to bolster your thinking, does little to bolster your thinking. You might "just of well of" used a quote from Anne Oakley.
Moldylocks

Belle Center, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36
Jun 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

Ironbutterfly wrote:
<quoted text>
The natural & civil norm of heterosexual marriage destroyed?????
Not for me. I've been married a long time. I wake up next to my wife every morning. I really don't care what anyone else does and why should you??? Because the Bible tells you so? Kinda makes me wonder if you wake up next to anyone in the morning. The stuff you post is both funny & retarded at the same time. I can not, for the life of me, imagine someone being as wacked out as you are. Simply trip weed. You need to have your own show on WBLL. I would tune in just to listen to your rants. You are just toooo funny. Sadly, you're serious...but it's still funny to me.
Splendid suggestion of a BLL talk show, IB! You and USN Atheist can be co-producers. How will we bill it? "The Voice of America Takes On Gays"? "God's Word at Work in Belletown"? "I Was a Missionary in Deepest Ohio"?

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37
Jun 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

Moldylocks wrote:
<quoted text>
Splendid suggestion of a BLL talk show, IB! You and USN Atheist can be co-producers. How will we bill it? "The Voice of America Takes On Gays"? "God's Word at Work in Belletown"? "I Was a Missionary in Deepest Ohio"?
Well, they already have Zell on the Bell. How about "You're All Going to Hell on the Bell"?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38
Jun 1, 2012
 
Ethel K wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, they already have Zell on the Bell. How about "You're All Going to Hell on the Bell"?
OK....That's funny.
Moldylocks

Belle Center, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39
Jun 1, 2012
 
LOL @Ethel K! "Hell on the Bell Express, for Gays Only! Is It Fair They Get There Faster?"

“Marriage=Love+Co mmitment.....”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40
Jun 1, 2012
 
The Voice Of Sound Reason wrote:
Pro-Homosexual Researchers Conceal Findings:
Children Raised by Openly Homosexual Parents More Likely to Engage in Homosexuality
By Trayce Hansen, Ph.D.
Dr. Trayce Hansen

First let’s look at one small item in the court’s order. When describing the facts of the proceedings, one thing lept out at me:

The court-appointed expert, Dr. Miller, presented testimony regarding her educational background and her parenting plan evaluation.Kulstad presented testimony by Dr. Silverman and Suzanne Dixon, M.D.(Dr. Dixon). Trayce Hansen, Ph.D.(Dr. Hansen), testified for Maniaci.

Silverman was a court appointee. Miller was a specialist in clinical psychology specializing in the protection of children. Who, though, is Hansen.

Dr. Hansen admitted on cross-examination that parenting evaluations represented a new area for her and that she never actually had prepared one. Dr. Hansen never had been qualified as an expert witness by any court. Dr. Hansen never had been retained by any party as an expert witness. Dr. Hansen’s psychology practice involved geriatric patients. Dr. Hansen conceded that she currently did not work with children and had fewer than four years of professional experience after earning her Ph.D. She had worked as a research assistant and had published one article in the journal Personality Assessment in a forensic-type situation.

Why, then, was Hansen presented as a witness credible enough to attack Dr. Miller and the state’s entire evaluation process?

In June of last year, Dr. Hansen issued a press release breathlessly declaring,“Children raised by openly homosexual parents are more likely to engage in homosexual behavior themselves.” This was a follow up to her ” 5 Reasons Why Same-Sex Marriage Will Harm Children.”

What Hansen forgets to reveal in her arguments is that as a research assistant working with geriatric patients, she has no more qualification to make such claims than do I. But, like many anti-gay activists, she’s not above using her title deceptively to achieve her dishonest goals.

The court was not impressed.

The court noted that, contrary to Dr. Hansen’s testimony, the APA concludes that no evidence suggests that same-sex couples are unfit to be parents, or that psychosocial development among children of same-sex couples would be compromised in any respect.

http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/tag/trayce-h...

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 21 - 40 of224
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

69 Users are viewing the Bellefontaine Forum right now

Search the Bellefontaine Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
How do you feel Obama has damaged the nation? 33 min SOLOMONS WISDOM 62
what topix lib is immitating voice on thread"m... 41 min SOLOMONS WISDOM 20
My Confession to Topix 58 min USN Atheist 38
Could SOLOMONS WISDOM be a Black Female? 1 hr leave bellefontaine 6
OH Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010? (Oct '10) 1 hr Pope Che Reagan Christ I 28,462
Some of Your Favorite Things 1 hr GANNY 21
Logan County Fair 2014 1 hr guyDATurWIFEwantz2SCREW 10
•••
•••
•••
•••

Bellefontaine Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Bellefontaine People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Bellefontaine News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Bellefontaine
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••