Homosexuals, the fathers of all lies!

Since: May 11

Reality, USA

#43 Jan 10, 2012
DON W SOUTH wrote:
who="LindaS"]The U.S. National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study (NLLFS) just released its results on its 24-year long study on families with lesbian parents, finding that not one of the 78 adolescents in the study had reported being sexually or physically abused by their parents. This compares to 26% of American adolescents overall who report parent or caregiver physical abuse. 8.3% report sexual abuse.
Additionally, only 2.8% of the adolescents in the study identified themselves as gay. Apparently the majority of them didnít catch their parentsí gayness.
http://www.nllfs.org/
XXXXX
Yep! It looks like "GOD got it wrong."
If there were such a thing as a god(s) I would have to agree with you. Your "god" is wrong.

But then again your "god" was created by man so that explains a lot doesn't it?
GBA

Saint Marys, OH

#44 Jan 10, 2012
USN Atheist wrote:
<quoted text>
If there were such a thing as a god(s) I would have to agree with you. Your "god" is wrong.
But then again your "god" was created by man so that explains a lot doesn't it?
Our Heavenly Wrong, please help this retched soul to heal. We pray that You Wrong will guide him in Your path to the light. In Wrong's name we pray, amen

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#45 Jul 2, 2012
USN Atheist wrote:
<quoted text>
That was sarcasm Don...I use it on a daily basis.
{That was sarcasm Don...I use it on a daily basis.}

Yes we all know that you are mean spirited.

Since: May 11

Reality, USA

#46 Jul 2, 2012
The Voice Of Sound Reason wrote:
<quoted text>
{That was sarcasm Don...I use it on a daily basis.}
Yes we all know that you are mean spirited.
Want a tissue?

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#47 Jul 2, 2012
USN Atheist wrote:
<quoted text>
Want a tissue?
Yes we all know that you are mean spirited.

Since: May 11

Reality, USA

#48 Jul 2, 2012
The Voice Of Sound Reason wrote:
<quoted text>Yes we all know that you are mean spirited.
Yea, I "heard" you the first time.

Want a tissue?

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#49 Jul 4, 2012
USN Atheist wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, I "heard" you the first time.
Want a tissue?
Since your a homosexual and a homosexual supporter. And since you have been posting on other sites. This was posted to me, and since you support this kind of stuff I thought you might enjoy it.

The Voice Of Sound Reason wrote:
Given the most recent conviction of the homosexual pedophile Jerry Sandusky. Is there really much difference between what he did and what homosexuals are teaching school children?[...snap ...]

You hit on the entire point of the "born this way" lie: to promote the notion homosexuality is nature not nurture. This lie gets homosexuals in the schools, Boy Scout Troops, all the places where there are young boys.

This lie is not supported by a shred of evidence yet straight morons who support same sex marriage bandy it around as if it's a cosmic law.

This lie puts millions of young boys at risk of being swayed into the misery of homosexuality.

The man-boy sex industry is the fastest growing industry around. Gay pimps are making BILLIONS from it. Back in the days of NAMBLA the idea was to spread the Gospel of man-boy assignations. Today the unholy amounts of money to be made has eliminated this kind of twarted idealism. Nobody cares about spreading the Gospel anymore, now it's about getting filthy rich.

Rent-a-Boy is a good example of how man-boy sex has gone big business. First, it was necessary to acquire an almost unlimited supply of STRAIGHT boys. I capitalize "straight" because straight boys are the only kind homosexual clients are interested in. Gay boys such as Perez Hilton are considered "too gay-looking" by men who patronize these places.

What they put in place in Massachusetts is an assembly-line system for recruiting, training, and seasoning young straight boys for sex industry employment.

Once a gay man became the head of the Massachusetts Public Health Department, gay males took over the entire youth health wing. The principle strategy for replacing everyone with gay males was to add an HIV-AIDS component to every aspect of youth health. Once this was done only gay males were deemed qualified for opening positions. It was complete bullshit, but it worked -- spectacularly well.

Proof of this is the thoroughly homosexualized Cambridge Cares About Youth man-boy sex worker clearing house. All the boys who come through this corrupter of youth bucket shop are immediately thrown into a world of homosexual reinforcement. All are immediately introduced to the insidious idea they might be homosexual and not know it.

For example, Youth on Fire, is a drop-in center run by CCA. The first thing the boys -- as young as 14!-- get when they walk into the drop in center is a copy of the homosexual sex guide The Little Black Book.

Why a sex guide, you might well ask? And why a homosexual sex guide? The gays running the place reply most boys living in the streets are bisexual if not openly homosexual; thus, sex education -- HIV prevention -- is paramount.

The reality is these boys have been placed on a track to become man-boy sex industry workers.

All this, none of which would be possible without the straight morons who support same sex marriage.
Au Contraire

Spencer, NY

#50 Jul 4, 2012
The Voice Of Sound Reason wrote:
Homosexuals, the fathers of all lies!
You can say that again!

I've yet to know one that isn't a pathological liar.

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#51 Jul 4, 2012
Au Contraire wrote:
<quoted text>
You can say that again!
I've yet to know one that isn't a pathological liar.
All homosexual adoption is based upon the false assumption that homosexuals in some perverse way are entitled to children because they have chosen a lifestyle that, by its very nature has denied them off spring! All homosexual adoption is built upon the false premise that children are to be given to homosexuals based upon nothing more then the private purpose to obtain, based upon the desire for that which one because of the choices they have made forbids them children by a natural and Godly means! All homosexual adoption is based upon the homosexuals desire to posses children for a private purpose rather then what is actually best for the child! Homosexual adoption is nothing more then a slight of hand trick carried out via the state to shift the adoption of children from an essential purpose, to the inessential private purpose of the homosexual!

“Marriage=Love+Co mmitment.....”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#53 Jul 4, 2012
The Voice Of Sound Reason wrote:
<quoted text>

You hit on the entire point of the "born this way" lie: to promote the notion homosexuality is nature not nurture. This lie gets homosexuals in the schools, Boy Scout Troops, all the places where there are young boys.
This lie is not supported by a shred of evidence
Wrong.

First, twin studies. Recent studies have found that when one identical twin is gay, there is a 52 percent chance the other is also gay; if one fraternal twin is gay, the probability the other twin is gay drops to 22 percent; and if one separate-birth sibling is gay, there is only a 6 percent to 10 percent chance another sibling will be gay. This indicates both heritability and that something environmental (probably hormone levels in utero) is at play. This is reinforced by the fact that more recent studies have indicated that when identical twins share an amniotic sack, they nearly always have the same orientation, gay or straight.

Look also at studies on fraternal birth order. Ray Blanchard and colleagues discovered accidentally that each time a woman gives birth to a son, the chance that the boy will be gay increases by about 30 percent. Older sisters do not affect the probability, only older brothers. Blanchard argues that this indicates an immunoresponse by the mother to the presence of a male child.

Sexuality is not strictly a genetic trait, like skin color or eye color, but it is certainly not a conscious choice people make.

Since: Oct 09

Russells Point

#54 Jul 4, 2012
LindaS wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
First, twin studies. Recent studies have found that when one identical twin is gay, there is a 52 percent chance the other is also gay; if one fraternal twin is gay, the probability the other twin is gay drops to 22 percent; and if one separate-birth sibling is gay, there is only a 6 percent to 10 percent chance another sibling will be gay. This indicates both heritability and that something environmental (probably hormone levels in utero) is at play. This is reinforced by the fact that more recent studies have indicated that when identical twins share an amniotic sack, they nearly always have the same orientation, gay or straight.
Look also at studies on fraternal birth order. Ray Blanchard and colleagues discovered accidentally that each time a woman gives birth to a son, the chance that the boy will be gay increases by about 30 percent. Older sisters do not affect the probability, only older brothers. Blanchard argues that this indicates an immunoresponse by the mother to the presence of a male child.
Sexuality is not strictly a genetic trait, like skin color or eye color, but it is certainly not a conscious choice people make.
I have to agree Linda. People often want to argue that homosexuality is a choice but they never take the time to consider when it was that they "chose" to be straight. If sexual orientation were a choice, then wouldn't a person have to make the decision to be straight as well? Chances are that if you were to first ask the same person if they ever made a choice to be straight or were they born that way, most would likely say that they were born that way, and never made an actual choice...at least until you mention homosexuality and they realize that they just killed their own argument. But even if it were a choice, we each as individuals have the right to make our own choices. I have never seen where whether it is a choice or environmental or genetic could really make a difference in the argument that homosexuality is wrong. But often we see that this hinges, at least in the mind of the homophobe, on whether it is a choice or not, when really that changes nothing as far as I can tell. And in my opinion, pretending to have a direct link to the source of all creation and know what it wants or what it thinks (as if it were a "who" rather than a "what") just to back your claim, is just ridiculously unintelligent and very low.

“Marriage=Love+Co mmitment.....”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#55 Jul 5, 2012
trailoftears wrote:
<quoted text>
I have to agree Linda. People often want to argue that homosexuality is a choice but they never take the time to consider when it was that they "chose" to be straight. If sexual orientation were a choice, then wouldn't a person have to make the decision to be straight as well? Chances are that if you were to first ask the same person if they ever made a choice to be straight or were they born that way, most would likely say that they were born that way, and never made an actual choice...at least until you mention homosexuality and they realize that they just killed their own argument. But even if it were a choice, we each as individuals have the right to make our own choices. I have never seen where whether it is a choice or environmental or genetic could really make a difference in the argument that homosexuality is wrong. But often we see that this hinges, at least in the mind of the homophobe, on whether it is a choice or not, when really that changes nothing as far as I can tell. And in my opinion, pretending to have a direct link to the source of all creation and know what it wants or what it thinks (as if it were a "who" rather than a "what") just to back your claim, is just ridiculously unintelligent and very low.
Very well said

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#56 Jul 5, 2012
LindaS wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
First, twin studies. Recent studies have found that when one identical twin is gay, there is a 52 percent chance the other is also gay; if one fraternal twin is gay, the probability the other twin is gay drops to 22 percent; and if one separate-birth sibling is gay, there is only a 6 percent to 10 percent chance another sibling will be gay. This indicates both heritability and that something environmental (probably hormone levels in utero) is at play. This is reinforced by the fact that more recent studies have indicated that when identical twins share an amniotic sack, they nearly always have the same orientation, gay or straight.
Look also at studies on fraternal birth order. Ray Blanchard and colleagues discovered accidentally that each time a woman gives birth to a son, the chance that the boy will be gay increases by about 30 percent. Older sisters do not affect the probability, only older brothers. Blanchard argues that this indicates an immunoresponse by the mother to the presence of a male child.
Sexuality is not strictly a genetic trait, like skin color or eye color, but it is certainly not a conscious choice people make.
{Sexuality is not strictly a genetic trait, like skin color or eye color, but it is certainly not a conscious choice people make.}

And that will support Jerry Sanduskys sexuality.

If homosexuals are genetically born, then pedophiles can be genetically born.

And we know that sperm and egg have no bias.

Oh what a tangled web you have weaved. Carry on for all to see.

“Marriage=Love+Co mmitment.....”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#57 Jul 5, 2012
The Voice Of Sound Reason wrote:
<quoted text>
{Sexuality is not strictly a genetic trait, like skin color or eye color, but it is certainly not a conscious choice people make.}
And that will support Jerry Sanduskys sexuality.
If homosexuals are genetically born, then pedophiles can be genetically born.
And we know that sperm and egg have no bias.
Oh what a tangled web you have weaved. Carry on for all to see.
Jerry Sandusky is a heterosexual, married 50 years to the same woman.
If heterosexuals are genetically born, then pedophiles can be genetically born.

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#58 Jul 5, 2012
LindaS wrote:
<quoted text>
Jerry Sandusky is a heterosexual, married 50 years to the same woman.
If heterosexuals are genetically born, then pedophiles can be genetically born.
More homosexual honey filled with poison.
Giganus

Bellefontaine, OH

#60 Jul 5, 2012
I love all of you
Au Contraire

Spencer, NY

#61 Jul 6, 2012
LindaS wrote:
<quoted text>

Recent studies have found that when one identical twin is gay, there is a 52 percent chance the other is also gay
That blows your theory right there.

Identical twins have the same DNA. If homosexuality were genetic, which is isn't, then 100% of identical twins would be one way or the other.

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#62 Jul 6, 2012
Au Contraire wrote:
<quoted text>
That blows your theory right there.
Identical twins have the same DNA. If homosexuality were genetic,
You are correct, good post!!

Yes the acceptance of pedophilia has begun. This is more homosexual honey laced with poison.

This is also the homosexual goal of {Neutral Gender Sexual Identity} Which would remove all the boundaries for lawful and proper sexual expression.

And when these boundaries are removed no one could be held accountable legally for sexual contact with minor children.

American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit against the state of Kansas over the state's criminal sodomy law involving children.

The ACLU is defending Matthew Limon, a homosexual who committed sodomy against a 14-year-old boy in 2000.

As you can see the (ACLU) under the direction of upper level homosexuals have been hard at work since 2000 and before pushing for these changes to the age of consent laws.

And as I have shown:

If the words of what constitutes sexual perversion can be changed, then the perception of what constitutes sexual perversion can be changed.

Remember the homosexuals are masters at word manipulation.

Although homosexuals will deny this, but they are encouraged via the Jerry Sandusky situation.

The Jerry Sandusky situation keeps their agenda on the front burner as they work behind the scenes.

The Jerry Sandusky situation opens all these homosexual insanities up for national discussion.

The Jerry Sandusky situation has already involved the mental health establishments to begin to consider if someone is really born with a propensity toward children.

Homosexuals claim their born homosexual.

Is it really a bridge to far for the mental health establishments to conclude that pedophiles are in fact born with a propensity toward children.

And all this done as the nation continues to buy into the homosexual lies of,{Neutral Gender Sexual Identity}

And if no ones Sexual Identity can be given a legal definition.

Then no ones sexual appetites can be denied or prosecuted.

The ultimate goal of the homosexual agenda is to remove all sexual boundaries.

Which of course means removing all the language that describes what constitutes a sexual criminal act.

And the success or failure of this goal in entirely dependent upon, the acceptance of word manipulation.

Remember Clinton's is, is comment.

His comment was designed to build confusion, to manipulate words. Much the same way homosexuals do.

Love TVOSR, Hate TVOSR? But this is the truth of whats really gong on.

NAMBLA Exposed!

(North American Man/Boy Love Association)

NAMBLA And Homosexual Activism

Pedophiles And Homosexual Activists Push For Total Sexual Liberation

American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit against the state of Kansas over the state's criminal sodomy law involving children.

The ACLU is defending Matthew Limon, a homosexual who committed sodomy against a 14-year-old boy in 2000.

At the time of his crime, Simon was 18 years old. The ACLU is claiming that Limon's conviction is unconstitutionally discriminatory because the penalties for sodomy with a minor are different than for heterosexual sex with a minor.

Kansas Attorney General Phill KIine says the fairness of Limon's sentence should be a state legislative issue, not a constitutional one.

According to Kline, "If the ACLU wins in the thrust of their arguments, it means the state has no right to say that it is illegal for an adult to have sex with a 13-year-old child."

Kline also fears that an ACLU victory will make it difficult for the state to enforce laws against polygamy, incest, bestiality, and other sexual perversions.

The effort to abolish "age of consent" laws has been a long-time goal of homosexual activists. The 1972 Gay Rights Platform, for example, called for the abolition of all laws prohibiting sex with children.

The platform demands: "Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent.

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#63 Jul 6, 2012
LindaS wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
First, twin studies. Recent studies have found that when one identical twin is gay, there is a 52 percent chance the other is also gay; if one fraternal twin is gay, the probability the other twin is gay drops to 22 percent; and if one separate-birth sibling is gay, there is only a 6 percent to 10 percent chance another sibling will be gay. This indicates both heritability and that something environmental (probably hormone levels in utero) is at play. This is reinforced by the fact that more recent studies have indicated that when identical twins share an amniotic sack, they nearly always have the same orientation, gay or straight.
Look also at studies on fraternal birth order. Ray Blanchard and colleagues discovered accidentally that each time a woman gives birth to a son, the chance that the boy will be gay increases by about 30 percent. Older sisters do not affect the probability, only older brothers. Blanchard argues that this indicates an immunoresponse by the mother to the presence of a male child.
Sexuality is not strictly a genetic trait, like skin color or eye color, but it is certainly not a conscious choice people make.
{Recent studies have found that when one identical twin is gay, there is a 52 percent chance the other is also gay;}

Which will prove there is no homosexual gene. And for those of you still wondering? There is also no pedophilia gene. Nope, just free will sexual perversion.

Just another homosexual jar of honey laced with poison!

Since: Oct 09

Russells Point

#64 Jul 6, 2012
The Voice Of Sound Reason wrote:
<quoted text>
{Recent studies have found that when one identical twin is gay, there is a 52 percent chance the other is also gay;}
Which will prove there is no homosexual gene. And for those of you still wondering? There is also no pedophilia gene. Nope, just free will sexual perversion.
Just another homosexual jar of honey laced with poison!
You continue to show your level of education KJ. What the data indicates is that there may indeed be a genetic factor as the percentage jumps quite a bit when considering identical twins. It does not mean that the other child will have a 100% chance of being gay as somebody else indicated, but it means that they will have more of a predisposition towards being gay. But you would still need to factor things like environmental factors, personal experience, etc. Sure, for the most part, identical twins share the same dna but this does not mean that they will think or like the same things. They do not share the same fingerprints. One could like to sing and the other might like football. One might love chocolate and the other strawberry. Identical twins are never exactly the same but the jump in percentages with identical twins is what you would expect to find if there is indeed a genetic factor at work as well.

Educate yourself, please, instead of trying to latch on to any and everything that you think supports your view that homosexuality is wrong, an offense against your evil god, corrupt, a perversion, and whatever else you always try to claim it is. If you don't like homosexuals, don't be gay. Don't associate with them. By focusing so hard on the issue of homosexuality, all you do is make it a bigger factor in your life. If it is truly something that turns your stomach or that you cannot tolerate, why put so much energy into it? Your actions are illogical. You must love to talk about things that disgust you. You must also somehow think that it is your responsibility to stamp out those things that you do not agree with. You do not wish to allow others the same freedoms to choose how to live as has been given to you and by this alone, your actions become immoral. You are not a good person but you could be if you truly wanted to. But I fear that at present, you have a very weak understanding of what is truly good. You think that obedience to a higher authority equals good. I would argue that this in itself is not at all what constitutes as good. You would say that I am souless or void of the spirit and cannot know God while I would simply say that you are ignorant and mean.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Bellefontaine Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
RELIGIOUS FREEDON vs THE PROGRESSIVE STATE--WHI... 14 min DON W SOUTH 17
ARE WAGES HIGHER or LOWER in RIGHT-TO-WORK STATES? 22 min DON W SOUTH 1
News Ex-sheriff's detective wins dismissal of key se... (May '06) 36 min everyone knows 1,219
The man is worthless 4 hr You Decide 1
The Facts on Mt .Tabor Church of God (Aug '09) 4 hr unshackled 1,961
Will Hillary capture the White House or Jail? 5 hr Big Bertha 232
Is Trump Just Radicial and Crazy Enough to WIN? 5 hr True Justice 1
What the hell are these little black bugs that ... (Oct '07) Aug 27 tbo2185 364
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Bellefontaine Mortgages