Benghazi survivors "told to be quiet"!

Benghazi survivors "told to be quiet"!

Posted in the Bellefontaine Forum

“ +IAN, AMERICAN, OHIOAN, BELLE”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#1 Mar 18, 2013
FromLiberty Counsel Action [email protected]
Mathew Staver, Chairman
Liberty Counsel Action

3/18/2013

Senator Lindsay Graham has now had contact with several Benghazi survivors. The information emerging from these encounters is the stuff about which conspiracy novels are written!

Here is the indisputable truth: There is a massive cover-up and the witnesses are being aggressively suppressed.

Thank God for the efforts of grassroots Americans and a few bold congressional leaders who are keeping the news on this outrageous cover-up alive through Fox News and a few other conservative media outlets. Please see my very important update below – Mat.


DONALD,

During extensive interviews on Fox News over the past few days, Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) revealed alarming new details concerning the Benghazi attacks and the subsequent cover-up that many of us knew must be taking place but have not been able to conclusively confirm.

All that is rapidly changing. The stone wall is cracking!

Senator Graham disclosed in separate Fox News interviews…

“I've had contact with some of the survivors. Their story is chilling…. The bottom line is they feel that they can't come forth, they've been told to be quiet… They’re scared to death to come forward without some institutional support.”

Reports are that there are as many as 33 remaining survivors. The identities, status, and locations of these people have been kept a State Secret – against the demands of many members of Congress who want investigative access to the survivors. At this point, Members of Congress are considering issuing subpoenas.

For his part, Senator Graham is threatening to “hold up the business of the Senate until we get these survivors on record.” Here’s how he phrased it in a weekend interview:

“We cannot let this administration or any other administration get away with hiding from the American people and Congress, people who were there in real time to tell the story.”

Of course, the White House has denied any cover-up or intimidation to prevent the survivors from telling their stories. But until Senator Graham somehow uncovered the incriminating facts and actually made contact with some of the survivors, the administration refused to divulge any substantive information to Congress or the American people!

++Why is the mainstream media still cooperating in the cover-up?

Where is the alarm? Why isn’t every “news” organization asking targeted questions of the Obama administration?

Instead, they naively accept the latest propagandist “talking points” without question, just as U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice did when, following the attacks, she and the Obama administration intentionally misled the American people for weeks prior to Obama’s reelection.

Have Americans become so desensitized or apathetic to the treachery and deceit coming from this White House that this does not give cause for great concern?

“Humpty Trumpty”

Since: Nov 11

You were all conned

#2 Mar 18, 2013
Don, you are one stupid fcker.
GBA

Saint Marys, OH

#3 Mar 19, 2013
Flip Flopper wrote:
Don, you are one stupid fcker.
This might just prove you correct. We all thought that Obama needed a teleprompter to speak, but I think we have found the real secret.

&fe ature=youtube_gdata_player

“ +IAN, AMERICAN, OHIOAN, BELLE”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#4 Mar 24, 2013
Liberals don't wanna touch this with a 10 foot pole!
GBA

Saint Marys, OH

#5 Mar 24, 2013
DON W SOUTH wrote:
Liberals don't wanna touch this with a 10 foot pole!
You are right. They sure stayed away from the topic. Wonder if they will read these?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03/23/ch...

http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/03/the_wi...

“Humpty Trumpty”

Since: Nov 11

You were all conned

#6 Mar 24, 2013
GBA wrote:
<quoted text>
You are right. They sure stayed away from the topic. Wonder if they will read these?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03/23/ch...
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/03/the_wi...
Smart people don't read fake news.
GBA

Saint Marys, OH

#7 Mar 24, 2013
Flip Flopper wrote:
<quoted text> Smart people don't read fake news.
A smart person would have to read the material first before rendering a judgment on its veracity. A dupe would just label it without reading.

“Humpty Trumpty”

Since: Nov 11

You were all conned

#8 Mar 24, 2013
GBA wrote:
<quoted text>
A smart person would have to read the material first before rendering a judgment on its veracity. A dupe would just label it without reading.
I would listen to your advice if you were a smart person but you're not.

“ +IAN, AMERICAN, OHIOAN, BELLE”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#9 Mar 24, 2013
Flip Flopper wrote:
<quoted text> Smart people don't read fake news.
When it's all said & done, most should realize that a lot of reported news is slanted. However, what many don't seem to realize, or will not admit, is that lots of information never becomes news, because certain net works, if they don't release information that is detrimental to a certain candidate or certain office holder, this failure to report, in effect, slants the ball game in favor of the person that the detrimental information is not published or broadcast about.

The non reporting of "FAST & FURIOUS" for sometime after those "radical right wing news outlets had covered the story, is a case-in-point, and the same case can be made over the "BENGHAZI DEMONSTRATION."
freedom for me

Brinkhaven, OH

#10 Mar 24, 2013
Flip Flopper wrote:
<quoted text> I would listen to your advice if you were a smart person but you're not.
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE! Lol! flip floppy your as dumb as Obama in an NRA convention.

“Humpty Trumpty”

Since: Nov 11

You were all conned

#11 Mar 24, 2013
freedom for me wrote:
<quoted text> WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE! Lol! flip floppy your as dumb as Obama in an NRA convention.
Next time have a point.

“Humpty Trumpty”

Since: Nov 11

You were all conned

#12 Mar 24, 2013
DON W SOUTH wrote:
<quoted text>
When it's all said & done, most should realize that a lot of reported news is slanted. However, what many don't seem to realize, or will not admit, is that lots of information never becomes news, because certain net works, if they don't release information that is detrimental to a certain candidate or certain office holder, this failure to report, in effect, slants the ball game in favor of the person that the detrimental information is not published or broadcast about.
The non reporting of "FAST & FURIOUS" for sometime after those "radical right wing news outlets had covered the story, is a case-in-point, and the same case can be made over the "BENGHAZI DEMONSTRATION."
Your two right wing make believe stories, Benghazi and Fast and Furious.. didn't get much traction did they?
freedom for me

United States

#13 Mar 24, 2013
Flip Flopper wrote:
<quoted text> Your two right wing make believe stories, Benghazi and Fast and Furious.. didn't get much traction did they?
not in the liberal media you won't. Hey floppy flip or what ever since your good pals with Obama and shit. Ask him were he was during the attacks...our should we just say WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE and move on...

“ +IAN, AMERICAN, OHIOAN, BELLE”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#14 Mar 24, 2013
Flip Flopper wrote:
<quoted text> Your two right wing make believe stories, Benghazi and Fast and Furious.. didn't get much traction did they?
That's what I am trying to tell you. The old line press that you love sooo well, hardly reported or did investative reporting on these two happenings. You gloat that "they didn't get much traction." Of course that's good politically for you libs, but is it good for our common country? Once again, your news people do more ignoring than slanting!

PS. These two events are not the only cases of "news black out."
mike

Polk City, FL

#15 Mar 24, 2013
In years to come history will show that Obama was one of the most incompetent, corrupt men ever to hold office.

“ +IAN, AMERICAN, OHIOAN, BELLE”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#16 Mar 25, 2013
mike wrote:
In years to come history will show that Obama was one of the most incompetent, corrupt men ever to hold office.
Should happen that way, but probably not. Currently, "he is one of the most incompetent, corrupt men ever to hold office," but it is not reprted that way. Actually, it depends on who "writes the history."
GBA

Saint Marys, OH

#17 Mar 25, 2013
DON W SOUTH wrote:
<quoted text>
Should happen that way, but probably not. Currently, "he is one of the most incompetent, corrupt men ever to hold office," but it is not reprted that way. Actually, it depends on who "writes the history."
And Flip Floppy's words and thoughts will fall upon the ash heap of gaydom.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Bellefontaine Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Another Right Wing Nut (Nov '15) 14 min GBA-freedom 12
This Should Scare Everyone 25 min GBA-freedom 21
School shooting at West Liberty 36 min GBA-freedom 2
IS the DEMOCRAT PARTY in DANGER of EXTINCTION? 9 hr Flip Flopper 94
Life Lesson's! 13 hr Donnie the Dork 117
Warren Buffett is a Liar 15 hr yidfellas v USA 18
Logan county courthouse Thu Goldfinger 10

Bellefontaine Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Bellefontaine Mortgages