Our View: Judy Chu is clear choice

JULY is an odd time for an election. And that's easy for us to observe. Imagine being a candidate in an important congressional race trying to whip up interest smack in the middle of the dog days of summer.

[Beloved Citizen]

The enabler of the Titan/El Monte Travel Village debacle is the better candidate? Good to see their difficulties haven't in anyway interfered with the hold they seem to have over PSN editorial policy.

Well, I guess that does pass as good governance in California these days. Bolivia, too.

[Left Cali to the Illegals]

Typical liberal Demoroid media rant "for" the (D) candidate and "against" the (R) candidate.

CA. is BK due to Demoroids in the CA. Legislature and U.S. Congress. However, the leeches who live off the CA. taxpayers will most likely keep CA. BK'd by voting in the (D) candidate.

[MSLSD]

Vote for the Independent/Libertarian candidate - Vote for Agrella. It's too bad that voters continue voting for these leftie Democrats who will continue to raise your taxes and stip away your rights. Californians will never learn.

[Tyrone]

Now you are touting experience as your reason for supporting this liberal. You certainly did not use experience when you supported Obama.

What is her position on:
1.cap and trade?
2.Socialized health care?
3.card check?
4.stimulus bills?
5.bailing out car manufactors?
6.raising taxes in California?

I do believe her positions on these items could be more important than the demographics of the district.

[Reality]

SGVT has been bought by the Left once again, it has been proven when Fred Ortega went to work for Judy Chu, and when she bought a full page propaganda on the primary. Well people are you ready to make your taxes higher on the Federal level a reality? if you are Vote for Judy. However you have a choice don't let this left wing paper tell you how to vote and vote for the one that is going to go to work for you and not the special intrest. Vote Betty Chu on July 14th!

[Left Cali to the Illegals]

MSLSD wrote:

Vote for the Independent/Libertarian candidate - Vote for Agrella. It's too bad that voters continue voting for these leftie Democrats who will continue to raise your taxes and stip away your rights. Californians will never learn.

Agree.

Both current and 2010 elections will hopefully be a great opportunities for Indy/Libertarian and even GOP Parties.

40 years of Democrat control has flat destroyed Cali.

Stupid is forever, and to prove that point, Cali voters have been voting in Democrats as the controlling party for 40 years!

They are getting very close to "forever" being stupid at this point.

[Reality]

This article must have been writen by Fred Ortega being he is Judy's spoke person.
The Valley does deserve better and it is not Judy Chu, she has raised taxes in California and forgot the fact that we are in an upside down economy. We need someone in Congress that is going to fight for Jobs and not raise Taxes someone who is behind the small business and someone that is not going to give things away to the highest bid like Judy when she took donations from Leung the Titan Group and sold the people of El Monte, and that is why El Monte is in a finacial problem.
Democrats you don't need to vote Dem, Vote for what's best for your wallet
Vote Samart Vote Betty!!!

[Voted NO on Y and Z]

I guess this means that the people still haven't learned their lesson yet ......

[JAB]

To be truthful I would rather shoot a democrat than vote for one. Having said that I doubt they is much difference between the Chu's.

[LURKEMODE]

JAB wrote:

To be truthful I would rather shoot a democrat than vote for one. Having said that I doubt they is much difference between the Chu's.

Respectfully, there is a BIG differance between them,Simply........BETTY is the better choice her Bio speaks for itself, judy has to much baggage, i'm a very liberal democrat but this contest i'm gonna kick the party, hilda,antonio,dolores,ed,etc in the arce, i voted for BETTY this is the work of fred ortega, he has no choice between judy & blondie i understand they are raking his ass over the coals, fred you want to disrespect Betty ? it's on let's rock ! i have heard some horror stories about what it is like to be around judy, likes to have tantrums, hit the walls & shit, quite the witch, esta loca! I encourge my Latino brothers & sisters to vote for BETTY, you won't be disappointed, I want to be the Brown Rev. Al Sharpton, lookin' out for you, cuz we have no one that really cares about our voice, they dangle a dollar or make a sweet deal they can't refuse, there goes the endorsement. VOTE BETTY !!!!!!!!!!

[schollolivia]

My fellow Gabrelinos please do not rely on the Tribune we must be independent thinkers. We must conduct our own research of a candidate background their political ties and what have accomplishments has directly improved the quality of life for common folks like us. Well I know that small business is suffering, the 10 HOV Toll Road is another tax, the voting record in the Assembly brought the Transit Village to the hands of John Leung. The City officials of El Monte are supporting Judy.
Okay so then the Tribune wants us the common folk to support Judy Chu who has been a key player in Pay to Play, friends with corrupt officials like in the ZCity of El Monte, lickerish split with the Titan Developers and uses her Board of Equalization(BOE)Staff to work on her campaign during work hours. Yes that is a fact BOE staff are on our time tax dollar time we pay Judy's staff. So again I ask read conduct research do not be fooled! Who is the BOE staff you ask Amalia Wang, Miguel Santiago just to name a few who I have seen wheeling and dealing for Judy. Conflict of interest. So think about this if Judy runs her campaign this way what are we to expect in Congress. With the economic crisis and high unemployment we need a person with an understanding of economics not a person who puts a tax on everything that passes her. This unemployed single mom is fed up with the mess that we have in California and we sure do not need to send a Sacramento politician to Washington.

[Voted NO on Y and Z]

LURKEMODE wrote:

<quoted text>Respectfully, there is a BIG differance between them,Simply........BETTY is the better choice her Bio speaks for itself, judy has to much baggage, i'm a very liberal democrat but this contest i'm gonna kick the party, hilda,antonio,dolores,ed,etc in the arce, i voted for BETTY this is the work of fred ortega, he has no choice between judy & blondie i understand they are raking his ass over the coals, fred you want to disrespect Betty ? it's on let's rock ! i have heard some horror stories about what it is like to be around judy, likes to have tantrums, hit the walls & shit, quite the witch, esta loca! I encourge my Latino brothers & sisters to vote for BETTY, you won't be disappointed, I want to be the Brown Rev. Al Sharpton, lookin' out for you, cuz we have no one that really cares about our voice, they dangle a dollar or make a sweet deal they can't refuse, there goes the endorsement. VOTE BETTY !!!!!!!!!!

So you're going to vote along party lines ???? Haven't you leanred anything yet ????? They, the politicians, are screwing us ALL OVER...

[Cisco]

Reality wrote:

This article must have been writen by Fred Ortega being he is Judy's spoke person.
The Valley does deserve better and it is not Judy Chu, she has raised taxes in California and forgot the fact that we are in an upside down economy. We need someone in Congress that is going to fight for Jobs and not raise Taxes someone who is behind the small business and someone that is not going to give things away to the highest bid like Judy when she took donations from Leung the Titan Group and sold the people of El Monte, and that is why El Monte is in a finacial problem.
Democrats you don't need to vote Dem, Vote for what's best for your wallet
Vote Samart Vote Betty!!!

Article? You mean editorial!

Most likely, the boob who wrote this piece of trash
doesn't even live in our district, but presumes to tell us for whom to vote.

Judy Chu? Yes, if you want higher, higher taxes,
more and more illegals to take our jobs,
more and more waste, and the ever-increasing encroachment on our lives by BIG BROTHER/BIG SISTER.

Judy is another Solis and, by golly, one of those was one too many.

No to Judy, Yes to Betty. And, that's the way it is!

[Limongi]

Tyrone wrote:

Now you are touting experience as your reason for supporting this liberal. You certainly did not use experience when you supported Obama.
What is her position on:
1.cap and trade?
2.Socialized health care?
3.card check?
4.stimulus bills?
5.bailing out car manufactors?
6.raising taxes in California?
I do believe her positions on these items could be more important than the demographics of the district.

Who knows what Judy stands for?
She turned down the forum in Monterey Park to have another fund(fun?) raiser. She's already raised
$1.3 million--how much more does she need for God's sake?
With all this loot, she couldn't even pay to put a ballot statement on our sample ballot!
Too costly or too dangerous?
The SGVTrib endorses Judy? No surprise at all!
But, SGVTrib people overlook us independent/declined to state voters.
We are in the majority and many of us are simple against Judy and her GIVE AWAY THE STORE TO HELP THE POOR!
Vote for Judy? No way, Josefina!

[Bob Just]

Hopefully you and your paper are wrong. What we don't need is another greedy politician, especially here in the valley. We need representatives who are willing to cut spending, not create more taxes for the own projects. Think about where your current tax money is going and then think about Judy....wrong choice.

[Andy]

Another liberal paper endorsing a Democrat who helped bankrupt the State and now recommending her on to bigger things so she can now help bankrupt the Nation. I suggest that the editorial group take a few months off, go camping, clear your heads and maybe you will begin to see the light!

[Dawson]

If we all band together to tolerate gay rights and support more social policies, maybe there wouldn't be so much support for the lefties.

[Andy]

"...more liberal policies" Why not get a job and work for your money? Liberal policies never create private sector jobs, only in the public sector which only creates more bureaucrats. Enjoy the stimulas and endless debt for your children.

[Voted NO on Y and Z]

Andy wrote:

"...more liberal policies" Why not get a job and work for your money? Liberal policies never create private sector jobs, only in the public sector which only creates more bureaucrats. Enjoy the stimulas and endless debt for your children.

"Why not get a job and work for your money?" ????
Because its easier to put your hand out and get it for doing nothing ....

[Rosemead]

Plain and simple ! the chinese need to go back to Mars and the gays's should all go to a remote island,(gay island) then we could bomb it! nobody the insects or the poop packers