Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel

Full story: Newsday 71,541
Safety pins and screws are still lodged in 15-year-old Ami Ortiz's body three months after he opened a booby-trapped gift basket sent to his family. Full Story
Eric

Franklin Park, IL

#63534 Dec 2, 2013
HughBe wrote:
My boy, yes YOU Eric, I am going now but shall be back. Now surprise me and repost your quote with its link that supports your false claim that members on your list below were called Hebrews.
You are not only a FRAUD, Eric but you are a FOOL.
You are F squared.
LIST:
Midian
Zimran
Shuah
Jokshan
Ishbak
Medan
btw, did you ever notice that every time you give the list it gets shorter and shorter? I guess you must have found references to the others, but don't want to admit it.
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#63535 Dec 2, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
You know, Hugh, you can call Eric and the rest of us all the mean, nasty words in the world, for ever and ever and ever...
....but none of that EVER changes the fact that you can not (or have not) answer the question about patrilineal lineage of your pagan deity.
In reading your "You know, Hugh," I am reminded of the opinion of others which basically is that, I know all things. The correctness of such a view can be argued but I can understand where they are coming from. That aside, you are being encourage to stick to this widely accepted rule of thumb.

Against this background and against the background of truth I now declare that I can answer the question in a logical, scriptural and honest way BUT I shall not do so at this time.
Eric

Franklin Park, IL

#63536 Dec 2, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
In reading your "You know, Hugh," I am reminded of the opinion of others which basically is that, I know all things. The correctness of such a view can be argued but I can understand where they are coming from. That aside, you are being encourage to stick to this widely accepted rule of thumb.
Against this background and against the background of truth I now declare that I can answer the question in a logical, scriptural and honest way BUT I shall not do so at this time.
C'est la vie
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#63537 Dec 2, 2013
Eric wrote:
<quoted text>btw, did you ever notice that every time you give the list it gets shorter and shorter? I guess you must have found references to the others, but don't want to admit it.
Eric---did you ever notice that every time you give the list it gets SHORTER and SHORTER?

HughBe--- My poor Eric, unlike you I NEVER notice what has no existence. Why are you a compulsive liar? The shorter list is below now post your longer list.

Do you understand the conversation?

Can you explain to me why I have omitted ONE name i.e. Israel from the list?

Let me explain it to you. I have omitted Israel because I assumed that even YOU know that they were called Hebrews. So, I gave the remainder of your list except for Israel purely to help the simple i.e. YOU.

I shall not ask you to post your progressively shorter lists. You cannot post what does not exist.

Now post your FULL list.

Give sources that call my progressively "shorter" list, Hebrews.

LIST(my shortened list):
Midian
Zimran
Shuah
Jokshan
Ishbak
Medan
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#63538 Dec 2, 2013
HughBe---I am going now but shall be back.

Rick Moss --Thanks for the warning.

HughBe--- You're welcome
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#63539 Dec 2, 2013
Cult of Reason wrote:
<quoted text>
Until you can answer the question regarding Jesus' genealogy, you have no right to insist that anyone answer your questions. Cease and desist your childish behavior now.
My dear Cunti, I know that the discussion is not going over your head, so far. So be more balanced.

Required of Eric :

1. repost something that he claims that was posted already. Is this hard?

2. Give ONE bible text that calls anyone in his list Hebrews, not including Israel.

3. Note, thinking is not required or use of logic etc. all that is required of him is to demonstrate knowledge.

4. Jesus' genealogy is a different matter. Eric literally has hundreds of unanswered questions from me over many years. So there is no need for crippled excuses as he knows that what I say is true. Perhaps he does not know because he is challenged mathematically.

HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#63540 Dec 2, 2013
Eric wrote:
<quoted text>
C'est la vie
Your material.
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#63541 Dec 2, 2013
Eric wrote:
<quoted text>
Can't you just see the vein throbbing in your forehead as you get angrier and angrier?
There is an idiom, "As you sow so shall your reap." You have become a pariah on this thread because you dug in your heals and refused to respond to questions posed. Now no one will play with you anymore because you decided to take your ball and go home once too often.
If you want responses, you will need to offer responses first. If not, C'est la vie!
The fact that you are seeing things should tell you in your lucid moments that you need to take your medications consistently and do NOT skip a dose.
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#63542 Dec 2, 2013
Eric wrote:
<quoted text>btw, did you ever notice that every time you give the list it gets shorter and shorter? I guess you must have found references to the others, but don't want to admit it.
HughBe---surprise me and repost your quote with its link that supports your false claim that members on your list below were called Hebrews.

Observation, no surprise given.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#63543 Dec 2, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
In reading your "You know, Hugh," I am reminded of the opinion of others which basically is that, I know all things. The correctness of such a view can be argued but I can understand where they are coming from. That aside, you are being encourage to stick to this widely accepted rule of thumb.
Against this background and against the background of truth I now declare that I can answer the question in a logical, scriptural and honest way BUT I shall not do so at this time.
In other words, dont worry - the check is in the mail...

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#63544 Dec 2, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
In reading your "You know, Hugh," I am reminded of the opinion of others which basically is that, I know all things. The correctness of such a view can be argued but I can understand where they are coming from. That aside, you are being encourage to stick to this widely accepted rule of thumb.
Against this background and against the background of truth I now declare that I can answer the question in a logical, scriptural and honest way BUT I shall not do so at this time.
You must have REALLY low intellectual standards to even consider that anyone would buy that pathetic excuse
Eric

Franklin Park, IL

#63545 Dec 2, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
Eric---did you ever notice that every time you give the list it gets SHORTER and SHORTER?
HughBe--- My poor Eric, unlike you I NEVER notice what has no existence. Why are you a compulsive liar? The shorter list is below now post your longer list.
Do you understand the conversation?
Can you explain to me why I have omitted ONE name i.e. Israel from the list?
Let me explain it to you. I have omitted Israel because I assumed that even YOU know that they were called Hebrews. So, I gave the remainder of your list except for Israel purely to help the simple i.e. YOU.
I shall not ask you to post your progressively shorter lists. You cannot post what does not exist.
Now post your FULL list.
Give sources that call my progressively "shorter" list, Hebrews.
LIST(my shortened list):
Midian
Zimran
Shuah
Jokshan
Ishbak
Medan
Original posted list http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/judaism/T...

Let's see, why don't we start with the descendants of Ishmael. Ask BMZ, Alex and MUQ about the descendants of Ishmael.

And don't forget about the descendants of Abraham's other sons:
Issac
Midian
Zimran
Shuah
Jokshan
Ishbak
Medan

Remember that Issac had another son other than Jacob. The descendants of Esau are Hebrews also.
Eric

Franklin Park, IL

#63546 Dec 2, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
You must have REALLY low intellectual standards to even consider that anyone would buy that pathetic excuse
Remember the toddler game you show me yours and I'll show you mine? Hugh is still playing the game.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#63547 Dec 2, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
My dear Cunti, I know that the discussion is not going over your head, so far. So be more balanced.
Required of Eric :
1. repost something that he claims that was posted already. Is this hard?
2. Give ONE bible text that calls anyone in his list Hebrews, not including Israel.
3. Note, thinking is not required or use of logic etc. all that is required of him is to demonstrate knowledge.
4. Jesus' genealogy is a different matter. Eric literally has hundreds of unanswered questions from me over many years. So there is no need for crippled excuses as he knows that what I say is true. Perhaps he does not know because he is challenged mathematically.
You first.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#63548 Dec 2, 2013
HughBe wrote:
...I now declare that I can answer the question in a logical, scriptural and honest way BUT I shall not do so at this time.
I don't know whether to laugh at you or feel sorry for you if you actually think you're convincing anyone that you have a logical, honest answer.

Since: Nov 13

Denver, CO

#63549 Dec 2, 2013
Rick Moss wrote:
<quoted text>
Au contraire. Both you and Frijoles are hilarious. Only difference being, he's INTENTIONALLY funny.
rabbee: and you are both, intentionally insane against G-D.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#63550 Dec 2, 2013
Eric wrote:
<quoted text>Remember the toddler game you show me yours and I'll show you mine? Hugh is still playing the game.
Except that he has nothing to show, and he knows it. There are several hundreds of millions of Christians, alive and before his time, and NOT ONE of them have provided a logically acceptable answer to this conundrum.

We have no reason to believe that Hugh is more brilliant than any of these people, past or present.

So really, he has two choices.

One, a negotiated surrender under fair and favorable terms (basically an acknowledgement that his religion is not based on logic, an apology for being a royal paux, and a promise not to berate anyone anymore), or;

Two, to dig himself in to an outlandishly stupid position and continue to look sillier and sillier..

Should we be shocked which choice he gravitated towards?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#63551 Dec 2, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
Should we be shocked which choice he gravitated towards?
Isn't the answer obvious?
Eric

Franklin Park, IL

#63552 Dec 2, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Except that he has nothing to show, and he knows it. There are several hundreds of millions of Christians, alive and before his time, and NOT ONE of them have provided a logically acceptable answer to this conundrum.
We have no reason to believe that Hugh is more brilliant than any of these people, past or present.
So really, he has two choices.
One, a negotiated surrender under fair and favorable terms (basically an acknowledgement that his religion is not based on logic, an apology for being a royal paux, and a promise not to berate anyone anymore), or;
Two, to dig himself in to an outlandishly stupid position and continue to look sillier and sillier..
Should we be shocked which choice he gravitated towards?
I'd settle for an admission on his part that he had not thought through his hypothesis completely nor thought to apply it to Jesus as described in the New Testament. Then we can move on. We have all had the opportunity on here to bite our tongue and admit mistakes. Hugh should not be made to do more.
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#63553 Dec 2, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
In other words, dont worry - the check is in the mail...
Now that is a surprise.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Bayard Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Gila Cliff Dwellings National Monument may rais... Jan 26 msgtdon 1
Town council approves restoration of the Silco ... Jan 23 Tony Betterton 2
Carlsbad air service provider will not renew co... Jan 23 Maybe 2
Silver City police search landfill for missing ... (Jun '11) Jan 23 citizencares 22
Your View: Letters to the editor (April 5) (Apr '11) Jan 13 Adl 5
Silver City-Grant County TEA Party Patriots hos... (Apr '14) Jan 7 WherdaPhuckawee 2
Grant County Corruption (Apr '10) Jan 5 curli 7

Winter Storm Warning for Grant County was issued at January 29 at 9:14PM MST

Bayard Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Bayard People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 3:16 am PST

NBC Sports 3:16AM
Report: Broncos reach out to Wade Phillips with defensive coordinator needed
NBC Sports 4:09 AM
Bears add two more assistants
Bleacher Report 6:03 AM
Is Balance of Power Shifting in AFC West?
NBC Sports 6:14 AM
Michael Bidwill on Larry Fitzgerald: We'll get this worked out
Bleacher Report 7:42 AM
Kubiak the Right Coach, with or Without Peyton