Comments
|
The State of Ohio may well want to review their decision to deploy the Intoxilyzer 8000 in view pf the US Supreme Courts ruling on June 25 in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts. The court held that the defense has the right to challenge and that the originator of all lab testing data must be available for cross examination in court for the lab results to be admitted. Since CMI refuses to relaese its source code or make their experts available for cross examination this could make Intoxilyzer 8000 data not admissable as evidence in court.
|
||||
|
||||
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday Depression | 4 hr | Depressed | 1 |
| 30 students attack Ohio officer who broke up fight | 6 hr | curious joe | 11 |
| Dems want GOP state rep removed | 8 hr | bigstud | 4 |
| Red-light camera revenue down 17% | The Columbu... | 15 hr | Big Johnson | 51 |
| 11 Inaccuracies in Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth (Oct '07) | 19 hr | Partner | 32 |
| Health Care - Cincinnati, OH | Thu | Who Dey | 37 |
| Central Ohio home sales rise sharply | The Colu... | Thu | jimmy agler | 17 |