Talk About Homosexuality

Posted in the Bassett Forum

Comments (Page 14)

Showing posts 261 - 280 of753
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Barnsweb

Alliance, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266
Jul 19, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
I can read and my wife has studied the bible when she became an Associate Pastor........and there are currently 88 different versions of the bible.....I wonder which one is the "TRUE" bible and supposedly the word of God!!!
One thing for sure is it isn't the Greek version - as given originally in the Hebrew and Aramaic is what seems right to me.
Anonymous Proxy

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#267
Jul 19, 2013
 
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
I can read and my wife has studied the bible when she became an Associate Pastor........and there are currently 88 different versions of the bible.....I wonder which one is the "TRUE" bible and supposedly the word of God!!!
I have over a 100 versions of the bible myself, so your ignorance stands out about it just as it does of the perversion you are defending. The woman you speak of is also pretending to be a pastor because there is no such thing in the church of God as a woman pastor. You are in the church of something besides God's church. Look up the definition of reprobate and then look in the mirror.
Anonymous Proxy

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#268
Jul 19, 2013
 
Barnsweb wrote:
<quoted text>
My take was that it meant things like 'cross dressers'...?
'effeminate'
Does it ever make you wonder how, if there is no marriage in heaven, why sexuality could be a concern? There must be more to know? Just wondering. LDS have a systematic theology that would explain it, but what is the Catholic or Evangelical/Protestant viewpoint? CoC never touched it with a 100' pole - so to speak...
That is a very deep subject but it should not be messed up with this trash. I will just post marriage in heaven and start a new thread because I think there could be a lot in that. The problem is the bible statements are open to speculation our part. We are still behind a spiritual veil without the ability to clearly see.
killedjoe

Lindenhurst, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#269
Jul 19, 2013
 
Awesome_Steve_Monkey wrote:
<quoted text>
OK killedjoe - we have strayed very far from the topic of this thread: homosexuality. I am interested but confused about what you are speaking of.
I have created a discussion in this forum entitled: E=MC2 and I was hoping we could take this discussion about God and Science to that thread, OK? I am interested in what you are saying, but I want to take time to read your Bible references and maybe better understand what you are telling me. You said that E=MC2 was an important concept, so maybe you could start there. I don't mean for you to have to repeat what you have already said - I just haven't been able to follow you very well so far.
However, since you are here, perhaps you could elaborate about this:
How do you feel about homosexuality?
How do your religious beliefs affect your opinion of homosexuality?
Do you think that homosexual lifestyles will be accepted and honored throughout the US?
Do you support gay rights?
Homosexuality is wrong. The idea of man laying down with man for sexual pleasures is not only an "ungodly act, but an act against nature and science itself. For a man to get pleasure and fun by having a "dick up his ass" in itself is unnatural. I do believe what 2 person do behind close doors is none of my business. Leave it behind close doors, and don't "shove" your lifestyle down my throat, I can accept. Has far has making it legal, the reason that they want to have it that way is for tax purpose. By law, if a man and a women live for over 7 years together, if one dies, the survivor get what ascess is left. If 2 males living together and are Homos, tax law dictate what is left goes to next of kin. Just change the tax laws and this marriage thing goes alway and back in the closet.
Anonymous Proxy

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#270
Jul 19, 2013
 
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
First off......procreation is NOT required by any couple in order to get married.
Secondly.......it matters not what 2 Gay men need to do in order to have a child and family.......heterosexual couples who can't naturally conceive between them for whatever reason also use sperm donated or a surrogate.....I don't see you bitoching about them.......wonder why?
Thirdly........it is true that currently Lesbians need donated sperm from a sperm bank or a male friend.....again, how they mange to create a life is NOT your business.......oh and there is currently research being done with stem cells that have been changed into sperm.....so in the future, 2 Lesbians can be biologically parents to their own child:-)
If there are 2 men......they are both referred to as the father's.......the child may call one daddy and the other pappa.....but that is up to them and none of your business!!!
Nonsense period.
Anonymous Proxy

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#271
Jul 19, 2013
 
Awesome_Steve_Monkey wrote:
<quoted text>
This is the post where you started to become offensive. Why do you want to call gay people names like: pansies or fairies?
I am tired of the lies of the gay rights bunch, especially when it comes to perverting scripture. Regardless of what we may be the scriptures remain the same. They are vague in some areas but very specific in some areas. The scriptures remain the same and should not be perverted by a bunch of reprobates. Do as you wish, God has certainly given you that right but leave the scriptures alone. The gay community comments are either one of two things, deliberate lies or the product of a reprobate mind. both should be ignored.
Awesome_Steve_Monkey wrote:
<quoted text>You are very creative, can you think of a derogatory way to describe yourself? My mind feels free to think of some rotten ways to describe how you are acting - how about self-righteous or egotistical?
Self-righteous or egotistical are poor choices. A word that would be appropriate for the both of us is "sinner". All of us are sinners which encompasses any derogatory label that may be attached to us. Our main area of contention is your distortion of the facts especially concerning the bible. Homosexuality is what it is, perversion from the viewpoint of nature and scripture. It is your choice if you engage in that lifestyle but be honest enough to call it what it is.

“TAKIA AND TA TONKA”

Since: Aug 08

HAPPY TOGETHER!!!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#272
Jul 19, 2013
 
Barnsweb wrote:
<quoted text>
One thing for sure is it isn't the Greek version - as given originally in the Hebrew and Aramaic is what seems right to me.
Don't forget that the bible was also translated into Latin for many years as well.

“TAKIA AND TA TONKA”

Since: Aug 08

HAPPY TOGETHER!!!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#273
Jul 19, 2013
 
Anonymous Proxy wrote:
<quoted text>I have over a 100 versions of the bible myself, so your ignorance stands out about it just as it does of the perversion you are defending. The woman you speak of is also pretending to be a pastor because there is no such thing in the church of God as a woman pastor. You are in the church of something besides God's church. Look up the definition of reprobate and then look in the mirror.
Interesting, why do you need that many? I don't believe that many exist......but if so, why would you personally make a comment that someone is going to question?

Did I say my wife was STILL an Associate Pastor? I don't believe I did and regardless of what you say, there are women Ministers, Pastors and other clergy who giver sermons......so, I wonder who is really showing their stupidity? My guess is you along with this garbage you are peddling!!!

“TAKIA AND TA TONKA”

Since: Aug 08

HAPPY TOGETHER!!!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#274
Jul 19, 2013
 
Anonymous Proxy wrote:
<quoted text>Nonsense period.
Sorry, not nonsense.....pretty factual:-)
pearl

Salt Lake City, UT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#275
Jul 19, 2013
 
Anonymous Proxy wrote:
Gay Marriage- they have to have a surrogate if they are males to have any resemblance of producing children. They role play again because they can in no way reproduce. They they say it is our child trying to link it to their pretend marriage,lol. They claim both are fathers I guess since neither can be a mother.
Then along comes the two lesbians pretending to have children. They find a man who will donate sperm and then artificially inseminate one of the pretenders. then they act as if the child is a product of their marriage. I have no clue whether the call themselves both mother or not but only one can be mother and neither can be father. PURE PERVERSION.
With that kind of logic we can't leave out those step parents and the perverted role they also must play, right? It surely can't be right, by your standard for a child to refer to a stepmom as mom. Perversion at the very least?
pearl

Salt Lake City, UT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#276
Jul 19, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Anonymous Proxy wrote:
<quoted text>Who cares? There are plenty who are gay and you might be more familiar with the term pansies or fairies. There are some terms I do not want to use here but feel free to let your mind go there if you wish. I have found your posts to be less than credible. This one is no different.
Apparently you care, your still going on about it.
pearl

Salt Lake City, UT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#277
Jul 19, 2013
 

Judged:

1

killedjoe wrote:
<quoted text> Homosexuality is wrong. The idea of man laying down with man for sexual pleasures is not only an "ungodly act, but an act against nature and science itself. For a man to get pleasure and fun by having a "dick up his ass" in itself is unnatural. I do believe what 2 person do behind close doors is none of my business. Leave it behind close doors, and don't "shove" your lifestyle down my throat, I can accept. Has far has making it legal, the reason that they want to have it that way is for tax purpose. By law, if a man and a women live for over 7 years together, if one dies, the survivor get what ascess is left. If 2 males living together and are Homos, tax law dictate what is left goes to next of kin. Just change the tax laws and this marriage thing goes alway and back in the closet.
Wrong again. Common law marriage does not exist everywhere. Your claims about people only using five to seven percent of their brain is much more interesting, but at least your ignorance is consistent. But don't bother reading up on the current laws they are changing faster than you are able to keep up, it will just confuse you.
pearl

Salt Lake City, UT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#278
Jul 19, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Anonymous Proxy wrote:
<quoted text>I am tired of the lies of the gay rights bunch, especially when it comes to perverting scripture. Regardless of what we may be the scriptures remain the same. They are vague in some areas but very specific in some areas. The scriptures remain the same and should not be perverted by a bunch of reprobates. Do as you wish, God has certainly given you that right but leave the scriptures alone. The gay community comments are either one of two things, deliberate lies or the product of a reprobate mind. both should be ignored.
<quoted text>Self-righteous or egotistical are poor choices. A word that would be appropriate for the both of us is "sinner". All of us are sinners which encompasses any derogatory label that may be attached to us. Our main area of contention is your distortion of the facts especially concerning the bible. Homosexuality is what it is, perversion from the viewpoint of nature and scripture. It is your choice if you engage in that lifestyle but be honest enough to call it what it is.
Homosexual activity does occur in nature, which kinda blows your theme out of the water.
killedjoe

Lindenhurst, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#279
Jul 19, 2013
 
pearl wrote:
<quoted text>Wrong again. Common law marriage does not exist everywhere. Your claims about people only using five to seven percent of their brain is much more interesting, but at least your ignorance is consistent. But don't bother reading up on the current laws they are changing faster than you are able to keep up, it will just confuse you.
In the state Of New York, it is a fact. Together 7 years, on dies, the survivor get the ascess. Also, Calif is a common laws state.
Barnsweb

Alliance, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#280
Jul 19, 2013
 
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't forget that the bible was also translated into Latin for many years as well.
And the original language has meanings that may not exist in the translation, such as Aramaic having broader meanings to words and Greek being very specific and sometimes limiting understanding that should be broader or deeper. What bothers me also is the wholesale change of Y'shua's name to Jesus - not a transliteration or translation, but a perversion from the name of God as contained. And how did they get Acts 2:38,39 from the 'Master YHWH Y'shua' spoken by Peter? No need for a Trinity doctrine when you know what His real name is.
Mike Peterson

Birmingham, AL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281
Jul 19, 2013
 
Barnsweb wrote:
<quoted text>
And the original language has meanings that may not exist in the translation, such as Aramaic having broader meanings to words and Greek being very specific and sometimes limiting understanding that should be broader or deeper. What bothers me also is the wholesale change of Y'shua's name to Jesus - not a transliteration or translation, but a perversion from the name of God as contained. And how did they get Acts 2:38,39 from the 'Master YHWH Y'shua' spoken by Peter? No need for a Trinity doctrine when you know what His real name is.
Toig ahf kapores!

“TAKIA AND TA TONKA”

Since: Aug 08

HAPPY TOGETHER!!!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#282
Jul 19, 2013
 
killedjoe wrote:
<quoted text> In the state Of New York, it is a fact. Together 7 years, on dies, the survivor get the ascess. Also, Calif is a common laws state.
Sorry but you'd be wrong here.....California hasn't recognized Common Law marriages in probably 15 years and they stopped doing so because Common Law marriages NEVER specified the gender of the couple......it was based on strictly living together......which meant that Gay and Lesbian couples could claim they were married according to Common Law and that COULDN'T possibly be allowed!!!

“TAKIA AND TA TONKA”

Since: Aug 08

HAPPY TOGETHER!!!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#283
Jul 19, 2013
 
Barnsweb wrote:
<quoted text>
And the original language has meanings that may not exist in the translation, such as Aramaic having broader meanings to words and Greek being very specific and sometimes limiting understanding that should be broader or deeper. What bothers me also is the wholesale change of Y'shua's name to Jesus - not a transliteration or translation, but a perversion from the name of God as contained. And how did they get Acts 2:38,39 from the 'Master YHWH Y'shua' spoken by Peter? No need for a Trinity doctrine when you know what His real name is.
It matter's not what one considers God's real name......it is simply a proven factor that not all words can be translated from one language to another!!!

“TAKIA AND TA TONKA”

Since: Aug 08

HAPPY TOGETHER!!!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284
Jul 19, 2013
 
killedjoe wrote:
<quoted text> In the state Of New York, it is a fact. Together 7 years, on dies, the survivor get the ascess. Also, Calif is a common laws state.
Common law marriage is recognized only in the following states:
Alabama
Colorado
District of Columbia
Georgia (if created before 1/1/97)
Idaho (if created before 1/1/96)
Iowa
Kansas
Montana
New Hampshire (for inheritance purposes only)
Ohio (if created before 10/10/91)
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
Texas
Utah
http://www.nolo.com/article.cfm/pg/2/objectId...

Apparently neither California nor New York are on this list!!!

“TAKIA AND TA TONKA”

Since: Aug 08

HAPPY TOGETHER!!!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#287
Jul 19, 2013
 
Anonymous Proxy wrote:
You are entitled to your religious beliefs and you can post until hell freezes over that you think effeminate means homosexual, but it still is irrelevant because there are those who disagree with you and have provided evidence to support their claim.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 261 - 280 of753
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Bassett Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Bassett People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••