Fox news owned by Saudi prince...

“Not afraid to stand alone.”

Since: Jun 09

Flat Lick Ky.

#21 Feb 11, 2010
Prince Alwaleed owns 6.7% of the companys stocks.
some 1 who knows

Cynthiana, KY

#22 Feb 11, 2010
looks like we have an issue.. u bunch of CRY BABIES... gimme a break neither of u all know what u r talkin about for cryin out loud...
duh wrote:
<quoted text>
Israel owns congress.
Sidewinder

El Monte, CA

#23 Feb 16, 2010
I just amazes me how these Faux News right wingers are so fanatically devoted to their politics. They seem to ignore indisputable facts and believe everything their pundits tell them, no matter how ridiculous it is. They think that Ronald Reagan was the greatest President even though he sold missiles to the Iranians and negotiated with terrorists. not to mention running up the biggest record deficits that put us in the financial dire straights that we're in today. How delusional they are.

They kinda remind me of the WWE fans that believe that wrestling is real.
LMCinfantry

Richmond, KY

#24 Feb 16, 2010
That point you made about Wrestlers and Republicans was a very good analogy.(and funny) I've never thought about them like that, but I'm sure I will from now on. Thanx!!!
Reality

Jellico, TN

#25 Feb 16, 2010
What is really funny is how left wing obamabots think that someone owning 6% of the stock of a publicly traded company 'owns' it. Shows the level of sheer ignorance on the left.
Chittle

Winchester, KY

#26 Feb 16, 2010
Reality wrote:
What is really funny is how left wing obamabots think that someone owning 6% of the stock of a publicly traded company 'owns' it. Shows the level of sheer ignorance on the left.
Hes the second largest shareholder and has a say in how and what I reported...
Sprinkler

Ellijay, GA

#27 Feb 16, 2010
Prince Alwaleed as well as anyone that has enough money can buy stock. He owns 7% of News Corp. stock. If News Corps. Rupert Murdoch and Alwaleed are best buds it has nothing to do with reporting FACTS. Fox does not control big gov. as for that matter, politicians, especially the Dems do not like Fox because the truth hurts. Back to stock ownership, The Ky. Dem. posted this info. thinking it would sway some to turn away. Investing is for making profits don't you think if News Corps. stock started to fall that Alwaleed would not dump his stock and it would matter if Murdoch was his father. If the Dems. started telling the truth for a change and stop trying to change and take away our Constitution we would all be better off. Reps are to blame as well - power and money has gone to their heads and they want more. The Saudis have so much money we cannot stop them from investing in any co. and yes they can use profits to fund any terrorist group they choose and we cannot stop that. We need to take back our own gov. and run it the way our founding fathers intended and put our money in our own country, stop borrowing for China or anyone else and start using the tech. we have to put illegals out. At this rate it will never happen because gov. wants its people to argue, fight, hate, distrust and fear each other because we focus on everything else but the big picture. Which is gov. control.

We need to let every politician know they work for us not the other way around and do the right thing for America.
REBEL

Barbourville, KY

#28 Feb 16, 2010
You liberals will try anything to keep the fair and balanced news from getting to the people! Just because a media company does not "worship" and fall at the feet of you democRATs, and your boy obama, you think they are against you! Well you are right, if you are not for free speech, and the rights promised to us by the founding fathers, then go ahead and suck on anything that MSNBC pukes out!

Like it or not, LIBERALS, the REAL people of this country are TAKING it back, at the polls, and election booths, we will not allow you to take this country down to the 3rd world nation you want us to be!
Chittle

Winchester, KY

#29 Feb 16, 2010
And active inside U.S. society living rooms -- even better. Alwaleed would seem to have hit on a Fox strategy some time after then-New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani refused to accept, on behalf of a 9/11-shattered New York City, his $10 million check-cum-lecture that essentially justified the al Qaeda attacks as having been a response to U.S. foreign policy.
This was "such an egregious, outrageous, unfair offense that I would have nothing to do with his money either," Sean Hannity said at the time on Fox News' "Hannity & Colmes," his remarks (and those of other Fox personalities) recently re-examined by the left-wing group Media Matters. "This is a bad guy," Hannity said. "Rudy was right to decline the money." Bill Sammon called Alwaleed's check "blood money," adding, "we're better off without it."
How terribly ironic that this same "bad guy" is now a News Corp. blood-money bags, a boss who must be handled with care as, for example, Fox host Neil Cavuto did in a deferential interview with Alwaleed last month.
How does this influence Fox News coverage? It's impossible to say. Alwaleed has bragged that it only took a phone call to ensure that Fox coverage of Muslim rioting in France not be described as "Muslim" rioting in France, a boast News Corp. has never denied.
This week, security analyst Thomas Trento, in light of recent negotiations between Alwaleed and Murdoch, mused online whether his own recent interview on "Fox & Friends" didn't appear in Fox's online video cache because he had told host Steve Ducey that "Saudi Arabian money was still financing al Qaeda." The doubt itself is damaging.
Chittle

Winchester, KY

#30 Feb 16, 2010
I want you to read this paragraph again..

Alwaleed has bragged that it only took a phone call to ensure that Fox coverage of Muslim rioting in France not be described as "Muslim" rioting in France, a boast News Corp. has never denied.
LMCinfantry

Richmond, KY

#31 Feb 16, 2010
REBEL wrote:
You liberals will try anything to keep the fair and balanced news from getting to the people! Just because a media company does not "worship" and fall at the feet of you democRATs, and your boy obama, you think they are against you! Well you are right, if you are not for free speech, and the rights promised to us by the founding fathers, then go ahead and suck on anything that MSNBC pukes out!
Like it or not, LIBERALS, the REAL people of this country are TAKING it back, at the polls, and election booths, we will not allow you to take this country down to the 3rd world nation you want us to be!
REBEL, I suppose you and your ilk are the "REAL PEOPLE" of the country. Fox is avery successful news channel. They do however, tend to pick and choose which stories to run, not only that, but they are masters at putting the spin on topix that they fundamentally agree with. Don't misconstrue this statement because the Liberal channels do this as well, but honestly I think that FOX is by far the best at sensationalizing the smallest things. I also believe that they lead the ratings in sthe popular time slots because yes they do report but the level of theatrics combined with sensational negative spin is unsurpassed by any other station. It is very entertaining.

Do you guys really believe that Glenn Beck really works himself up into teary eyed fervors in EVERY OTHER show? Really.

Also, REBEL when you lump every liberal together in the same idiotic preconceived over used derrogative terms it literally stiffels any credibility you might have otherwise exhibited.

I LOVE FREE SPEECH!!!
REBEL

Barbourville, KY

#32 Feb 16, 2010
LMCinfantry wrote:
<quoted text>
REBEL, I suppose you and your ilk are the "REAL PEOPLE" of the country. Fox is avery successful news channel. They do however, tend to pick and choose which stories to run, not only that, but they are masters at putting the spin on topix that they fundamentally agree with. Don't misconstrue this statement because the Liberal channels do this as well, but honestly I think that FOX is by far the best at sensationalizing the smallest things. I also believe that they lead the ratings in sthe popular time slots because yes they do report but the level of theatrics combined with sensational negative spin is unsurpassed by any other station. It is very entertaining.
Do you guys really believe that Glenn Beck really works himself up into teary eyed fervors in EVERY OTHER show? Really.
Also, REBEL when you lump every liberal together in the same idiotic preconceived over used derrogative terms it literally stiffels any credibility you might have otherwise exhibited.
I LOVE FREE SPEECH!!!
LMCinfantry, I LOVE FREE SPEECH, as well, and I suppose you think that MSNBC is the "WORD"! Also I could care less about gaining any "credibility" with you liberals. I state my point, and if it pisses off those of you that love the socalists, then SO BE IT! GOD BLESS THE USA, and those that love FREEDOM!
LMCinfantry

Richmond, KY

#33 Feb 16, 2010
REBEL wrote:
<quoted text>
LMCinfantry, I LOVE FREE SPEECH, as well, and I suppose you think that MSNBC is the "WORD"! Also I could care less about gaining any "credibility" with you liberals. I state my point, and if it pisses off those of you that love the socalists, then SO BE IT! GOD BLESS THE USA, and those that love FREEDOM!
U give yourself way too much credit. I really doubt that your very normal insults managed to piss off anybody. If anyone seems perturbed on this forum it's obviously you.

I try to look at any given story with an objective view point. Especially political ones. I don' trust dems or repubs. I've made that much clear threw past posts. When I look at politicians I see Purdue Pharmacutical and Halliburton representatives. The recent judgement of the Supreme Court(Big Corporation Campaign Contributions) only proves and exacerbates the problem.
Calm Down Rebel
LMCinfantry

Richmond, KY

#34 Feb 16, 2010
pls someone answer this question!

Do you guys really believe that Glenn Beck really works himself up into teary eyed fervors in EVERY OTHER show? Really.
Xment

Winchester, KY

#35 Feb 16, 2010
I stopped paying any attention to rebels name calling, racist rants a long time ago. It's not even worth responding to him. His bet ammo is the word democRATS. I mean come on. When was there any credibility with this guy?
Xment

Winchester, KY

#36 Feb 16, 2010
Chittle wrote:
I want you to read this paragraph again..
Alwaleed has bragged that it only took a phone call to ensure that Fox coverage of Muslim rioting in France not be described as "Muslim" rioting in France, a boast News Corp. has never denied.
Thats embarassing.
LMCinfantry

Richmond, KY

#37 Feb 16, 2010
Do you guys really believe that Glenn Beck really works himself up into teary eyed fervors in EVERY OTHER show? Really.
some 1 who knows

Winchester, KY

#38 Feb 17, 2010
u guys seem to like to talk about fox. have any of u watched cnn lately all they do is dog sarah palin an her family. they got alot to do to catch fox for sure in real reporting...
Xment

Winchester, KY

#39 Feb 17, 2010
some 1 who knows wrote:
u guys seem to like to talk about fox. have any of u watched cnn lately all they do is dog sarah palin an her family. they got alot to do to catch fox for sure in real reporting...
At least a Saudi prince that funds terrorism isn't calling and telling what to report...
FOX RULES

Barbourville, KY

#40 Feb 17, 2010
some 1 who knows wrote:
u guys seem to like to talk about fox. have any of u watched cnn lately all they do is dog sarah palin an her family. they got alot to do to catch fox for sure in real reporting...
sarah palin made the stupid choice to parade her family around as a campaign sign so she could hide from attacks behind her children,now her dirty laundry is becoming public.She's a joke,what a role model for young women,she should take her first dude back to alaska ,join the alaska independance party and withdraw from the union like they planned,you betcha'~~;)~~

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 8 min Mickey402 143,215
Prayers for Clerk Kim Davis 37 min James 15
Election Who do you support for U.S. House in Kentucky (... (Oct '10) 40 min Rogers Suks 729
Jeff Mills 49 min Friend 3
Old drive inn 6 hr Intheknow 6
Judge hall gives daughters boyfriend health dep... 6 hr Mug head 8
Qualfications of a Pastor? 6 hr Blaster 15
Is judge ex Jm hall going to prison ? 9 hr Observation 24
Sixty minutes asking questions about Knox court... Thu lost my faith 20
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Barbourville Mortgages