Posted in the Barbourville Forum
#1 Jul 6, 2013
There is no fossil evidence to support the "ape-man" image, which is unceasingly promulgated by the media and evolutionist academic circles. With brushes in their hands, evolutionists produce imaginary creatures, nevertheless, the fact that these drawings correspond to no matching fossils constitutes a serious problem for them. Despite the fact that no complete "transitional form" fossil has ever been found, the theory of evolution is taught more than ever in classrooms around the world. We keep finding more and more huge burial sites of dinosaurs, which are supposedly 65 million years old, yet we cannot find a single skeleton of a half man, half ape, pre-human being. Such fossils should stand a much better chance of being preserved, since they would only be maybe tens of thousands of years old, not millions as with the dinosaurs (in the evolutionist's timeline). Now why do you suppose this is? Maybe simply because evolution never happened? If evolution were true, we would find at least thousands of skeletons of the "transitional" skeletons shown in the evolutionist drawing below. Now if I were a believer in evolution, I would need to seriously question my faith in the absence of any such skeletons.
But since there aren't any such skeletons, one of the interesting methods evolutionists employ to overcome this problem is to "produce" the fossils they cannot find.
Evolutionists present much of their finds as if they were compelling and factual explanations to human evolution. In fact, they base their conclusions on mere speculation and often the flimsiest of 'finds'. Many discoveries of supposed hominids consist of only a mouth fragment, a leg bone, a hip bone, or a knee joint. On this alone, they have considered it to be a hominid. They even name it, reconstruct what it looked like, and present it to the public as a fact. Some of these finds have turned out to be those of a pig, donkey, or the result of a hoax.
Piltdown Man, which may be the biggest scandal in the history of science, is a typical example of this method.
In 1912, a well-known doctor and amateur paleoanthropologist named Charles Dawson came out with the assertion that he had found a jawbone and a cranial fragment in a pit in Piltdown, England. Even though the jawbone was more ape-like, the teeth and the skull were like a man's. These specimens were labelled the "Piltdown man". Alleged to be 500,000 years old, they were displayed as an absolute proof of human evolution in several museums. For more than 40 years, many scientific articles were written on "Piltdown man", many interpretations and drawings were made, and the fossil was presented as important evidence for human evolution. No fewer than 500 doctoral theses were written on the subject. While visiting the British Museum in 1921, leading American paleoanthropologist Henry Fairfield Osborn said "We have to be reminded over and over again that Nature is full of paradoxes" and proclaimed Piltdown "a discovery of transcendent importance to the prehistory of man.
In 1949, Kenneth Oakley from the British Museum's Paleontology Department, attempted to use "fluorine testing", a new test used for determining the date of fossils. A trial was made on the fossil of the Piltdown man. The result was astonishing. During the test, it was realised that the jawbone of Piltdown Man did not contain any fluorine. This indicated that it had remained buried no more than a few years. The skull, which contained only a small amount of fluorine, showed that it was not older than a few thousand years old.
It was determined that the teeth in the jawbone belonging to an orangutan, had been worn down artificially and that the "primitive" tools discovered with the fossils were simple
#2 Jul 6, 2013
Gets life dude!! Who gives a shit??
#3 Jul 6, 2013
LOL, Your understanding of Evolution is laughable and your foolish ideal that there is no archaeological (and biological) evidence is sickening. For starters try researching ,Homo habilis, Homo ergaster, and Homo erectus.
I could go on but my time would be wasted trying to educate a Bible Thumper that has a limited Neanderthal understanding of the world they live in.
#4 Jul 6, 2013
Think about this genius. You think every dead dog laying on the side of the road will be a fossil 65 million years from now??
Ever think they might have just rotted?
#5 Jul 6, 2013
Darwin was a great scientist, his theory on evolution was just that, a theory with no hard science to back it up.
#6 Jul 12, 2013
I ate the bones after making a truck payment
#7 Jul 12, 2013
I ate the bones and now I need a box of exlax.
#8 Jul 13, 2013
gator bones makes a goog soup
#9 Jul 14, 2013
i am afther you your 6 months behind on your truck payment
ill get it and ill have another gator head mounted on my wall
Add your comments below
|Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10)||22 min||curtjester1||135,599|
|Houses for rent?||29 min||interested||1|
|for rent||33 min||interested||6|
|Was Jesus Christ and the Apostle John Homosexua...||45 min||Saint Pecker||18|
|Knox County Sheriff speeding||53 min||Uncle Sam||4|
|Kim bingham||1 hr||Ha ha||7|
|ralph smith||1 hr||lo lo||1|
|the Creekmart||13 hr||smartass||9|
Find what you want!
Search Barbourville Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC