I'm repeating?? LOL!!!<quoted text>
Just because you are so insanely ignorant of what a scientific theory is, and how factual a scientific theory is, does not mean it is not factual.
It really bothers me that creationists are so ignorant and not educated to what words mean, or what phrases mean. It is like arguing with a five year old. Sorry, but you are just repeating a bunch of stupid creationist propaganda like a robot, and do not have the slightest idea of what you are talking about. You really are not helping your case by constantly showing no understanding of a scientific theory. Read and learn for a change.
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses. A scientific theory is differentiated from a hypothesis in that a theory must explain actual observations. A theory can be disproven, though in most cases it ceases to be a theory in its current state if it is. A scientific theory is not as clear cut as a scientific fact or law, in that facts and laws must be repeatedly confirmed through observation and experimentation and also be widely accepted to be true by the scientific community. While some theories are widely accepted to be true, this is not true of all theories. As with most (if not all) forms of scientific knowledge, scientific theories are inductive in nature and aim for predictive power and explanatory force.
That coming from someone who's been playing the same failing hand on here for more than a year!!
Let's do it like this: you have DOUBT in your own belief!! You leave a loophole, so without a doubt you have DOUBT!!!!
If you had FACTS to work with you would have no DOUBT!! If you believed in your so-called proof, you would have no DOUBT!!
Your DOUBT would keep you from teaching evolution of species as fact!!!