I've never changed names on this site. And I'm far smarter than you are.<quoted text>
You are still dumb as dirt , even after you changed your moniker fro Lodi to the Box.
The poster is an atheist. The post in question is from a site called AskTheAtheists.com . The post gave a clear answer that "informed consent" is the important factor in sexual acts and then followed that with a facetious sentence about how people are welcome to try having "consensual" sex with lions, tigers, bears, and alligators since they could really express a lack of consent.It was obvious that the poster was not an Atheist and was mocking the behaviour of those like yourself , who condone such aberrant behaviour
Your lack of reading comprehension is not a knock against my ethics.
...who cares what Peter Singer thinks? I'm not Peter Singer. Peter Singer is of no importance to me.But , more to the point , Peter Singer states that hye sees nothing wrong with Beastiality or necrophilia as long as the perpetrator has the consent of him whom he is trying to sexually abuse.
Correct. I do not support any form of sex which is non-consensual. Your Bible does though.Rape by any other name ,is still rape , whether it be a Beast or a corpse.