We don't have to disprove something that doesn't exist anyway.<quoted text>
For a Scientist to state that there is no rational or defensible reason for proposing the involvement of a designer or God in the formation of life clearly indicates a closed mind that has no interest in finding the truth ,but is only interested in blindly justifying his Atheistic beliefs by any means possible.
His unscientific approach "the ends justify the means" is not what science is all about.
And yes , my reasons foor wanting to know are motivated by my faith.
You Atheists are always asking for the reasons for my faith.
One of the principal reasons for my faith are based on who or what do I owe for being here.
If Science can provide the sequence of natural events that can prove how life came into being, then , there would be good reasons for me to question my faith..Fact is that Science is quite unable to do so and therefore no reason for me to question the basis for my beliefs.
If Science were to design an experiment whereby they could create life , then my faith would still hold for the following reasons;
Science claims that life does not need a creator ,Science also claims that only life can create life . Seems contradictory.
,If life does not need a creator and Science someday,is able to create life , that would totally destroy their theory.
In their efforts to disprove God's existence and that he is not needed , they would merely be proving what I and many others already believe....Life arose as a result of intelligent design and not by natural means.....
I know that you and the other Atheists will not be able to grasp that which is obvious ,But,it does not hurt to try
In a roudabout way, I am giving you the opportunity to disprove your ignorance...Probably to no avail.
You're the one who claims your god exists and in that respect, you're no different from all those other believers who have faith in different gods to yours.
Guess what? Just like you, they can't prove their gods exist either.