Bible study rules for public schools ...

Bible study rules for public schools proposed

There are 143191 comments on the The Courier-Journal story from Feb 10, 2010, titled Bible study rules for public schools proposed. In it, The Courier-Journal reports that:

FRANKFORT, Ky. - The state would create rules for teaching about the Bible in public high schools under a bill filed Monday by three Democratic senators.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Courier-Journal.

amanda

Georgetown, KY

#115659 Oct 28, 2013
ChromiuMan wrote:
<quoted text>
One of those "the U.S. was founded on Christian principles" people - aren't you? In the nation that imprisons a higher percentage of its populace than any other country, we should remember that our spiritual principles center around forgiveness - and what better place to start than with the politicians, bankers and stock brokers (and televangelists, of course), since they are the ones who need forgiveness the most.
You like to make assumptions about people don't you?
amanda

Georgetown, KY

#115660 Oct 28, 2013
amanda wrote:
<quoted text>
What the hell? Seriously man.
Sorry sista that was for that crazy comment you were held "responsible" for answering.
curious

Ocoee, FL

#115661 Oct 28, 2013
Khatru wrote:
<quoted text>

And here we have the mindset of the believer encapsulated in a single sentence. "I don't want to hear....etc" That's what it boils down to. Why concern your self with the facts when you can have your beliefs instead?
<quoted text>
And here we have the mindset of the believer encapsulated in a single sentence. "I don't want to hear....etc" That's what it boils down to. Why concern your self with the facts when you can have your beliefs instead?
<quoted text>
I know, I know, science, history, geology, biology, physics, etc have failed to convince you otherwise, some idiot rolling around on the floor speaking in "tongues" may be all the evidence you need to prove Christianity.
It is you Atheists who worship Science. Science itself admits it is in no position to discuss the supernatural and has to try to explain supernatural evenrs by Natural means. That is impossible.

Stephen Hawkins , a renowned man of Science , whom you claims is an expert ,has provided us with a theory that " The law of Gravity is the Cause that created the universe and life as we know it"
He says that Nothing ,spontaneously converted itself into what we know as the universe and Life."
Of course , he is quite unable to demonstrate how this series of events took place .
What he does say is that God need not be invoked.
So what he has done is,dig deep into the fountain of mythical Science Fiction and propose an outlandish opinion worthy of The Twilight zone.
That type of nonsense , attempting to explain the supernatural by natural means ,incoherency at it's apex , is precisely what I do not want to hear.
I do not want to hear it and you are quite unable to defend it.
Not able to defend it , but still wanting to justify your nonsencical beliefs , you desperately make the claim that all the evidence to believe in Christianity , is someone speaking in tongues.
Foolish one , I have given you a substantial body of evidence on which I base my beliefs.
You have not attempted to refute them ,because you Can not.

Therefore your many meaningless and futile smokescreens.
Get real , live a life based on reality , not science fiction.

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#115662 Oct 28, 2013
SistaNoneYa wrote:
<quoted text>
I have some favorite "Christian" type literature I like to read daily...I've actually read it for YEARS, on and off.
I find it to be some very positive reading, and often times rather uplifting.
Is there something you see wrong with that?
I have no issue with gleaning wisdom from any source that offers it - including but not limited to the Bible. It's with the airheads who throw away those pearls because they are enthralled with the fantastic back story.

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

#115663 Oct 28, 2013
SistaNoneYa wrote:
I wouldn't waste my time,
Fare enough, I was only interested to se what your ranking order would be. No big deal
SistaNoneYa wrote:
I live here, in the universe I was put in. Anything else is just irrelevant.
Very much akin to what I say when believers insist that there is life after death.

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

#115664 Oct 28, 2013
SistaNoneYa wrote:
<quoted text>
It was more often than NOT, people of the faith(s) that went far and wide, and treated the diseased and sick...then ;ending Science the knowledge they had gained in doing so.
Too many documented cases of that fact, to not beleive it.
I see no need to CONdemn people of any faith, who try and do good works. They are just as WORTHY, as those of little or no faith, who do the same, and even MORE worthy, than those who do nothing but condemn others for doing so.
Many people of faith went far and wide in search of plunder in the form of riches and souls. After all, their idea of good works was also to try and convert the natives.

They would go to remote places and attempt to substitute the locals ju-ju with their own brand of ju-ju.

"They came with a Bible and their religion, stole our land, crushed our spirit, and now tell us we should be thankful to the Lord for being saved."

Chief Pontiac

"When the missionaries came to Africa they had the Bible and we had the land. They said "Let us pray." We closed our eyes. When we opened them we had the Bible and they had the land."

Desmond Tutu

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

#115665 Oct 28, 2013
SistaNoneYa wrote:
<quoted text>
I will add however that, No, I don't think any one particular "relgion" is always "right".
Far from it, because I don't believe there's any such thing as "perfect" as far as all that type of thing goes.
There is good and bad in all religions.

Yet that's not how many believers on this thread would see it.

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#115666 Oct 28, 2013
amanda wrote:
<quoted text>
You like to make assumptions about people don't you?
You do not believe that the U.S. was founded by and on Christian ideals?

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

#115667 Oct 28, 2013
amanda wrote:
<quoted text>
It wasn't an exercise of self tolerance, and it wasn't for you. I have never referenced Stalin because Stalin has no bearing on the here and now, or you and I. I am very of atheism, as I totally understand and am very familiar with it. However, I am not tolerant of those who go by the name, whose only mission is to degrade others and destroy thier faith.
I never said it was for me. However, when you post on a forum like this you have to expect replies.

Isn't destroying people's faith what so many Christians try to do?

When they go door knocking, they want to convert you from whatever faith you have to their own. When the missionaries go to the world's far-flung places they want to destroy the locals faith in whatever and get them to worship the bible god.

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

#115668 Oct 28, 2013
amanda wrote:
Excuse me......very *tolerant* of atheism.
No probs
SistaNoneYa

London, KY

#115669 Oct 28, 2013
ChromiuMan wrote:
<quoted text>
The underlying principles might be good, but the doctrine and practice falls far short. How is it good, ethical, moral or spiritual to tell someone they must believe a certain set of indisputable lies in order to escape an illusory punishment? Do you offer the empty threat of a beating to a child for disbelieving Santa Claus and the Easter bunny?
There is NO doctrine to that particular philasophy and it's few simple stanzas.

And there is no "CONdemnation" within it either.

You're just trying to weasel it around ...for whatever your agenda is.

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

#115670 Oct 28, 2013
amanda wrote:
<quoted text>
Irrelevance seems to be the name of the game. Throw out a bunch of irrelevant crap and then insist that you answer for it.....
Believers do that, too.

All that stuff about sins and being held responsible.

Maybe sista thought my post was irrelevant, it's no skin off my back.
However, I didn't insist that she answered it. All I said was that I'd be interested in seeing her response - it certainly wasn' imperative to me that she respond.
SistaNoneYa

London, KY

#115671 Oct 28, 2013
Khatru wrote:
<quoted text>
There is good and bad in all religions.
Yet that's not how many believers on this thread would see it.
I think a lot of people see it that way...believers and non-believers.

But then again, I don't feel a need to be crtitical of others for not believing all the same.
SistaNoneYa

London, KY

#115672 Oct 28, 2013
amanda wrote:
<quoted text>
What the hell? Seriously man.
Seriously what?
amanda

Georgetown, KY

#115673 Oct 28, 2013
Khatru wrote:
<quoted text>
Many people of faith went far and wide in search of plunder in the form of riches and souls. After all, their idea of good works was also to try and convert the natives.
They would go to remote places and attempt to substitute the locals ju-ju with their own brand of ju-ju.
"They came with a Bible and their religion, stole our land, crushed our spirit, and now tell us we should be thankful to the Lord for being saved."
Chief Pontiac
"When the missionaries came to Africa they had the Bible and we had the land. They said "Let us pray." We closed our eyes. When we opened them we had the Bible and they had the land."
Desmond Tutu
Yes, and if they'd been muslim they might have given them prayer mats (they probably would have just slaughtered them though, they aren't exactly the "go out and spread the word" types). So.....what's your point? That Christianity took thier land? Or did humans, inherently flawed, take the land of weaker people as they've been doing since the beginning of time?

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

#115674 Oct 28, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
It is you Atheists who worship Science. Science itself admits it is in no position to discuss the supernatural and has to try to explain supernatural evenrs by Natural means. That is impossible.

Stephen Hawkins , a renowned man of Science , whom you claims is an expert ,has provided us with a theory that " The law of Gravity is the Cause that created the universe and life as we know it"
He says that Nothing ,spontaneously converted itself into what we know as the universe and Life."
Of course , he is quite unable to demonstrate how this series of events took place .
What he does say is that God need not be invoked.
So what he has done is,dig deep into the fountain of mythical Science Fiction and propose an outlandish opinion worthy of The Twilight zone.
That type of nonsense , attempting to explain the supernatural by natural means ,incoherency at it's apex , is precisely what I do not want to hear.
I do not want to hear it and you are quite unable to defend it.
Not able to defend it , but still wanting to justify your nonsencical beliefs , you desperately make the claim that all the evidence to believe in Christianity , is someone speaking in tongues.
Foolish one , I have given you a substantial body of evidence on which I base my beliefs.
You have not attempted to refute them ,because you Can not.
Therefore your many meaningless and futile smokescreens.
Get real , live a life based on reality , not science fiction.
Ha ha ha

Ah yes, that'll be your reality where a group of gods created the universe.
amanda

Georgetown, KY

#115675 Oct 28, 2013
Khatru wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said it was for me. However, when you post on a forum like this you have to expect replies.
Isn't destroying people's faith what so many Christians try to do?
When they go door knocking, they want to convert you from whatever faith you have to their own. When the missionaries go to the world's far-flung places they want to destroy the locals faith in whatever and get them to worship the bible god.
There's nothing wrong with knocking on a door, and there's nothing horrific about about one telling you the "good news". Your stance, forgive me if I'm wrong, seems to assume that adults are not capable of hearing one out and making this decision for themselves. I would have a problem though, if those same Christians went to those far flung places and changed laws against the will of the people and destroyed the monuments that had become a thing of tradition for thier communities.
amanda

Georgetown, KY

#115676 Oct 28, 2013
Sorry guys, my baby girl is wanting my attention. I'll try to come back.

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

#115677 Oct 28, 2013
SistaNoneYa wrote:
<quoted text>
I think a lot of people see it that way...believers and non-believers.
But then again, I don't feel a need to be crtitical of others for not believing all the same.
Fair enough.

However there are many more believers than non-believers and millions of those believers are indeed critical and judgemental of people who don't believe the same.

Sure there are also non-believers who will criticise believers. However, that's relatively recent.

There was a time when the believers were in charge, when they tortured and burned non-believers.

However, non-believers refused to buckle and gradually they de-clawed the christian tiger. So much so that it became illegal to kill people for heresy and blasphemy.

Christians still did all they could to marginalise non-believers and the word "atheist" was linked to being immoral and non-believers were reluctant to declare their atheism.

Now it's the christians who cry "persecution" when all I want is that they keep their ju-ju to themselves.

That's pretty god treatement compared to what christians used to dish out.

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#115678 Oct 28, 2013
CM wrote:
<quoted text>The underlying principles might be good, but the doctrine and practice falls far short. How is it good, ethical, moral or spiritual to tell someone they must believe a certain set of indisputable lies in order to escape an illusory punishment? Do you offer the empty threat of a beating to a child for disbelieving Santa Claus and the Easter bunny?
SistaNoneYa wrote:
<quoted text>
There is NO doctrine to that particular philasophy and it's few simple stanzas.
And there is no "CONdemnation" within it either.
You're just trying to weasel it around ...for whatever your agenda is.
Weasel what around? If anyone here is prone to diverting from the topic with snide quips about other posters it is you. THAT is how you brought up AA in the first place. I've stated that my "agenda" is an opposition to superstitious willful ignorance and the blatant dishonesty that seems intrinsic and pervasive with it. I find indoctrinating children into religious cults to be abominable. I've made no attempt to shroud those "agendas" in mystery.
Even if there aren't any doctrines or condemnations in AA,(which I have no evidence of either way) the consequences of alcohol abuse are documented and very, very real, so obviously I wasn't talking talking about 12 step programs.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Phillip Vaughn & underage porn 5 min Cheer mom 2
KC Football 10 min curious 10
Black 4 door saturn 1 hr Bill 1
Woman ran-over in Mcdonald's parking lot. 1 hr Praying 14
Joe Ore arrested again 2 hr curious 7
Jeff Mills 2 hr Need to know 1
Who is a woman thats up for a good time? 2 hr Little tool 24
Is judge ex Jm hall going to prison ? 16 hr Knox county voter 21
Sixty minutes asking questions about Knox court... 17 hr Kit 18
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Barbourville Mortgages