Bible study rules for public schools ...

Bible study rules for public schools proposed

There are 148939 comments on the The Courier-Journal story from Feb 10, 2010, titled Bible study rules for public schools proposed. In it, The Courier-Journal reports that:

FRANKFORT, Ky. - The state would create rules for teaching about the Bible in public high schools under a bill filed Monday by three Democratic senators.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Courier-Journal.

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#114375 Oct 10, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
That is precisely the point.
And to challenge it indicates GUILT.
you're stupid

“I'll think about it.”

Since: Nov 07

central Florida

#114376 Oct 10, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
That is precisely the point.
And to challenge it indicates GUILT.
You are such an idiot.

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#114377 Oct 10, 2013
No to challenge it show's the innocent voicing the Truth.... The challenger is lacking comprehension, and the ability to just let it go when they've been proven the fool..

You do realize you've not had a lucid thought since I've been posting on this thread! Just petty, childish babble

“I'll think about it.”

Since: Nov 07

central Florida

#114378 Oct 10, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
<quoted text> you're stupid
AND...because we have the same opinion of the moron and posted within minutes of each other, the dolt will now accuse us of being the same person.
How does manage to get through each day being so stupid?
It's a wonder.
Oh, wait! It's a freaking MIRACLE! They DO happen apparently.

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#114379 Oct 10, 2013
You are basically calling me and others a liar. Try and think for a second, I know it's difficult for you, but do try....If you accuse someone of being a liar repeatedly to their face, do you actually think they will let it slide, or ignore it, or do you think they will deliver a smack down right in the center of your nose?

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#114380 Oct 10, 2013
aWitchintheWoods wrote:
<quoted text>
AND...because we have the same opinion of the moron and posted within minutes of each other, the dolt will now accuse us of being the same person.
How does manage to get through each day being so stupid?
It's a wonder.
Oh, wait! It's a freaking MIRACLE! They DO happen apparently.
The Simpleton has already done that!

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#114381 Oct 10, 2013
I'm moving on..... I think {Joe Dirt} as I referred to him had the right idea. This thread has become monotonous..

Perhaps we will chat again on another discussion board. WITW, MD, Q, Chrom, LOL, and SS

“I'll think about it.”

Since: Nov 07

central Florida

#114382 Oct 10, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
I'm moving on..... I think {Joe Dirt} as I referred to him had the right idea. This thread has become monotonous..
Perhaps we will chat again on another discussion board. WITW, MD, Q, Chrom, LOL, and SS
Yes, it's time to stop feeding the troll.
If he can't be civil, then there is no point in talking with him.

Hope to see you again some time, lodi.
It's been a pleasure.
Yes and Amen

Georgetown, KY

#114383 Oct 11, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
No ,never had a gang sign
At my age , I would not belong to a gang.
But , were I to start one , I would name it "The Disciples" and our sign would be an Unbeliever , kneeling, in deep prayer asking Christ to come into his life.
Great post!
A Repentant Sinner makes all of God's children happy!
Amen!
Yes and Amen

Georgetown, KY

#114384 Oct 11, 2013
Spaceship earth wrote:
<quoted text>
Being a liar was only half the equation to being an antichrist. He believes the Jesus came in the flesh. Still you cannot claim using
2John 1:7 that the Pope is the antichrist.
"those who do not confess the coming of Jesus Christ in the flesh.......the antichrist".
Now as far as being a liar the bible clearly shows all men are liars.
Romans 3:4
Let God be true, and every human being a liar. As it is written: "So that you may be proved right when you speak and prevail when you judge."
Antichrist Equation
(Liar +[rejects Jesus in the flesh])= antichrist.
Ok, first, and second John agrees with you, as "An" antichrist, as bot believing Christ came in the flesh...
But the deceiver in Revelation claims to be Christ!
The Pope claims to be the Vicar of Christ, many in catholic church thinks he is Christ on earth, and I guess, so does he...
to make such proclamations, as saying atheist who do good works will be in heaven... clearly heretical!
Yes and Amen

Georgetown, KY

#114385 Oct 11, 2013
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>
I know a guy that knew a guy that had a friend that had an ingrown toe nail that he cut and it was fine... In a week it got infected and he died...
I also knew a guy (actually two)that never got on a scoot without full face helmet, racing leathers and boots... One died last year after 6 years as a paraplegic and the other I visit from time to time and I helped build the ramp for his wheel chair to get to the front door.....
The friend of my dad's was "our" Barber...
Funny though... He didn't have a hair on his head!
A lil spray paint, and you'd thought he was wearing a helmet
He was a good guy!
Good day to you :-)
Yes and Amen

Georgetown, KY

#114386 Oct 11, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>God can silence no one, god damn it. See?
Do you remember...
God is long suffering... Patient...
WAIT for it!

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#114389 Oct 11, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
You are basically calling me and others a liar. Try and think for a second, I know it's difficult for you, but do try....If you accuse someone of being a liar repeatedly to their face, do you actually think they will let it slide, or ignore it, or do you think they will deliver a smack down right in the center of your nose?
The "logic" is that if he calls everyone a liar over and over and over again it becomes God's own "Truth", but when corrected over and over and over it is proof that they lie. But don't call him a hypocrite, because non-Christians don't know what one is? 0.o
Between the nya-nya, the cultist, the burnout and Bonzo the born again banker, this thread has hit a moral and mental bottom.

Since: Feb 12

Rancho Cordova, CA

#114390 Oct 11, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
I'm moving on..... I think {Joe Dirt} as I referred to him had the right idea. This thread has become monotonous..
Perhaps we will chat again on another discussion board. WITW, MD, Q, Chrom, LOL, and SS
Fun chatting, come back again.

Since: Feb 12

Rancho Cordova, CA

#114391 Oct 11, 2013
Yes and Amen wrote:
<quoted text>Ok, first, and second John agrees with you, as "An" antichrist, as bot believing Christ came in the flesh...
But the deceiver in Revelation claims to be Christ!
The Pope claims to be the Vicar of Christ, many in catholic church thinks he is Christ on earth, and I guess, so does he...
to make such proclamations, as saying atheist who do good works will be in heaven... clearly heretical!
What makes one heretical teaching worse than others? Can you list which religious organizations that have heretical teachings other than Catholics?
curious

Winter Garden, FL

#114392 Oct 11, 2013
ChromiuMan wrote:
<quoted text>
The "logic" is that if he calls everyone a liar over and over and over again it becomes God's own "Truth", but when corrected over and over and over it is proof that they lie. But don't call him a hypocrite, because non-Christians don't know what one is? 0.o
Between the nya-nya, the cultist, the burnout and Bonzo the born again banker, this thread has hit a moral and mental bottom.
Chroe , I do not remember calling anyone a liar.
That being the case , your logic falls of it's own weight.
What I have said is that , based on the evidence I have gleaned , I believe that some unbelievers on this website use multiple monikers.
The issue is really unimportant and inconsequential.
It should have been ignored , but wasn't.
The only one that has not jumped in the fray has been he who goes by the moniker of Q.
I am assuming that he has not done so , because he deems this discussion to be nonsencical , at best.
Actually , I am begining to develop a fondness for the old curmudgeon.
I have noted that we have some things in common.
Among them we are old and crotchetty.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#114393 Oct 11, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
You are ,intentionally or otherwise , ignoring a very important fact.
The Israelis were governed by a covenant between God and the Congregation. The covenant was agreed to by all in the congregation.
It contained statutes and commandments that they agreed to obey.
The most IMPORTANT of which are;
I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
“You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, theLord your God, am a jealous God.
They understood that they were to obey all statutes and command ments so all would go well with them and they agreed to those terms.They knew that God would test them to see if they were truly obedient. They knew disobedience would have bad consecuences.
In America , we are ruled by man made laws , not by a covenant with God.
Those are 2 completely different situations , under different circumstances governed by different rules.
Trying to apply the rules of 1 event to the other totally unrelated event is absurd and illogical.
The israelis agreed to obey the rules. they did not.
They were given the opportunity to repent and they did not.
Therefore they had to bear the consecuences for their actions.
This is almost like the imperfect manmade system we are governed by.
We have laws, if those laws are violated , there are consecuences.
Generally speaking there are consecuences,although not in all cases. You got the money and a smart lawyer and you can beat a murder rap. OJ and Zimmerman come to mind
On the streets ,we hyave a saying , don't do the crime if you can't do the time.
You can spin it any way you want , but it will become unravelled.
Not sure why you think I am ignoring it, when I have directly addressed this point multiple times.
The command is unjust, as was the punishment.
Just because it was a law, does it mean it was a just law? Did Saddam Hussien have all just laws? Nope. And neither did your god. That is my point. If your god was actually a god, I would think he would be a just god, but here we see he is not. He is a an unjust god, at least in my eyes. Maybe your sense of justice has different standards.

I am not even sure if Moses(not god) told the people to have no other gods before him(before he murdered them). Can you show a scripture showing your claim?
But even if he did, it was not god making this covenant, it was Moses and the people. God never showed himself. And the claimed miracles could have just been natural phenomenon. Clearly these people did not believe this god was responsible for the miracles. This is why they looked back to their old god(superstition).

And need I mention again, the ones murdered could never tell their side of the story.

Why do you ignore ALL of my points?

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#114394 Oct 11, 2013
Yes and Amen wrote:
<quoted text>Do you remember...
God is long suffering... Patient...
WAIT for it!
Oh, you mean that threat that you can never show is real?
Dude, your boogie man story does not scare me. It is a hoax.
When Muslims say you must believe Mohammed or else you go to hell,does this scare you? Take this outsiders test.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#114396 Oct 11, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>A different opinion on what is justice and it involves killing, is the very definition of the subject (murder)!
Murder is an unjust killing. If we differ on what is a just killing, then we differ on what is murder. Do I need to explain this any more? It is just English.
You feel it is just to kill someone due to their religious beliefs, I do not. Simply put, I think it is murder, you do not.
Consequences can mean many things. When you decide to kill someone for worshipping a calf, American justice would call it murder.
Evidently you have a different and double standard for Moses. I do not. I hold the same standards for him as I would anyone.
It is a question of what is moral.
Now you claim the group would have been harmed somehow due to some worshiping a calf. Please tell us how? And please do not assume I know what is in the mind of yourself. We have extremely different thoughts. For example, I see killing someone due to worshiping a golden calf, murder. You do not.
America was not founded upon values like this. In fact, they are polar opposites. America has a fundamentally different opinion of what constitutes a just killing(murder).
Still waiting for an answer to my questions. Mainly, what harm would have surely come to the group if these people were not brutally killed?

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#114397 Oct 11, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
Chroe , I do not remember calling anyone a liar.
That being the case , your logic falls of it's own weight.
What I have said is that , based on the evidence I have gleaned , I believe that some unbelievers on this website use multiple monikers.
The issue is really unimportant and inconsequential.
It should have been ignored , but wasn't.
The only one that has not jumped in the fray has been he who goes by the moniker of Q.
I am assuming that he has not done so , because he deems this discussion to be nonsencical , at best.
Actually , I am begining to develop a fondness for the old curmudgeon.
I have noted that we have some things in common.
Among them we are old and crotchetty.
Whatever. Typically, you've "gleaned" the aspersions which you wish to opine. Asserting a belief as a fact, especially when it contains no shred of hard (or even circumstantial) evidence, is nothing short of a lie.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
I love you 14 min Facts 27
Three liquor stores in bville 1 hr Quantummist 5
Shawntaea and curt Brown? 1 hr Boo 23
Msc topic disappeared wonder why lol??? 2 hr Horrible 6
Jo Ore 2 hr Fact 3
Jill 2 hr Stupid 11
green beans 3 hr Judy 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Barbourville Mortgages