Bible study rules for public schools ...

Bible study rules for public schools proposed

There are 143067 comments on the The Courier-Journal story from Feb 10, 2010, titled Bible study rules for public schools proposed. In it, The Courier-Journal reports that:

FRANKFORT, Ky. - The state would create rules for teaching about the Bible in public high schools under a bill filed Monday by three Democratic senators.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Courier-Journal.

curious

Ocoee, FL

#114117 Oct 6, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Most all medicine is dangerous to a certain extent, and consent is needed for most all of medicine.
I broke my arm as a kid and I could not receive any pain medicine until my father got to the hospital from work. It took over two hours and I was in serious pain.
Good thing his dogma did not demand he deny me that medicine.
And my example was not even life threatening.
I see your religion feels it knows better than the science, as per usual.
It is amazing how you Atheists make ujp stories in order to justify your unbelief.
Chro makes up a story about taking his car to be fuxrd by someone who included a crucifix and some Christian staement in his advertising. He supposedly got ripped off for $2500.00
Knowing that ,why did he take his car there in the first place.
Witchetty claims to have worked for a Christian lady , decorating Christmas trees and makes some absurd allusions to someone being fired.
When I mention that were it not for the one she denies ,she would not have a job , then she claims to have 3 other jobs.
You concoct some story about a broken arm and the pain it caused and you endured. Selfish little you.
Think of the pain you have caused your parents ,by turning your back on God
curious

Ocoee, FL

#114118 Oct 6, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>You guys never answer my questions on this or much else. All you do is divert. I see it continues.
Maybe if you registered I could keep up with who answered what. One guy did address it a bit, but mostly diverted when pressed on specifics.
It is a serious charge, but I see you guys can't take the charge seriously enough to defend your beliefs. And yet you wonder why we don't take you seriously.
I see your faith built upon the claims of a cold blooded mass murderer.
Now this "known fact" fellow did not even know about the event. So why are you speaking to the question posed to him?
Well , I answered the question posed to him because the fact that you keep asking the same misguided question by taking the event in question out of context is beginning to ANNOY ME.
In effect , you are begining to fulfill the Atheist objective , as
described by Witchetty , to annoy those who participate on this forum.
BTW I researched the spelling of your name in Spanish;
here is what I came up with
Duquette = DonQuixote

Since: Feb 12

Roseville, CA

#114119 Oct 6, 2013
Knbown Fact wrote:
<quoted text>
The Bible requires the animal to be properly bled and so does the FDA.
So you trust the ruler of the world "Satan" to make sure the blood is clean from the meat your eat. If Satan were real as you say their would be some blood in the meat for all to eat by the FDA.

The Jews show blood must be removed from kosher meat, usually by salting and soaking, before it may be cooked and consumed. Jehovah Witnesses doe not do this, they trust Satan who they claim is the ruler of the governments of this world to do clean it for them.

The Jewish people whos religion you claim is false and yet you rather the trust "the ruler of this world" you claim is Satan to clean the blood from your meat.

Your teaching is a contridiction. I see why Jehovah Witnesses would now be allowed to teach their religion in public schools.

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#114120 Oct 6, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
You keep on self proclaiming yourself the victor as you dig a deeper hole for yourself.
I stated that you used 3 different monikers and that I am fairly dertain you use 4.
You responded that I accused you of using 6 differfent monikers.
By that statement you are admitting to having been SP.
Thanks for clearing that up for me.
Elementary my dear Watson
long live the queen
Hey Dick, you have accused me of being 1) Chrom 2) MD 3)SS 4) Skeptic 5) WitW 6) idk
Again, you're an idiot, prove that I'm all these ppl, post my IP #, you are about as bright as a burn out light bulb.

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#114121 Oct 6, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
You keep on self proclaiming yourself the victor as you dig a deeper hole for yourself.
I stated that you used 3 different monikers and that I am fairly dertain you use 4.
You responded that I accused you of using 6 differfent monikers.
By that statement you are admitting to having been SP.
Thanks for clearing that up for me.
Elementary my dear Watson
long live the queen
I'm not self proclaiming anything, I'm merely pointing out your futile attempts of proving your statement correct.
It's obvious Elementary along with simple reading comprehension is not your forte.
Stop pretending to be Sherlock, you're embarrassing yourself.

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#114122 Oct 6, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>So just what is our MO? Seems all the religious here have the same MO. Does that mean they are all just one person, or maybe they just have similar philosophical views?
Again, if someone can change their writing style on cue like this, they are very talented.
I know you change your name once in a while because the style is unmistakable. Sista does it also. I note you both do not deny doing it. So tell me, just what purpose does it serve to change your name?
I stand by name. This is why I registered.
Honestly, it's quite amusing to see Dick (curious) spin himself into a state of total confusion. I actually thought he was above playing all these child-like games but I stand corrected. He's constantly posting comments of other's mental state , when in reality he is actually showing signs of a complete mental collapse.
He's constantly accusing other's of using several Monikers, when in reality he and sista have done so on numerous occasions.
It's odd.... Crom, Q, Witw, myself, and you Mike along with Space are all registered....yet YaY, Curious, Sista , Known Fact are not!

“I'll think about it.”

Since: Nov 07

central Florida

#114123 Oct 6, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
I have figured out your MO.It would be foolish for me to reveal to you how I accomplished that feat.
It falls on you to figure out what you are doing wrong and correcting it.
it's called "hiding your tracks".
"Clueless" doesn't begin to describe you.
You've got some serious paranoia issues, honey.

“I'll think about it.”

Since: Nov 07

central Florida

#114124 Oct 6, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
<quoted text> Honestly, it's quite amusing to see Dick (curious) spin himself into a state of total confusion. I actually thought he was above playing all these child-like games but I stand corrected. He's constantly posting comments of other's mental state , when in reality he is actually showing signs of a complete mental collapse.
He's constantly accusing other's of using several Monikers, when in reality he and sista have done so on numerous occasions.
It's odd.... Crom, Q, Witw, myself, and you Mike along with Space are all registered....yet YaY, Curious, Sista , Known Fact are not!
Some people are honest and don't hide behind multiple names.

Then there is Yaa, curious, Sista and Known Fact...who, because THEY lie, expect it in others.

I have noticed that curious is starting to sound more and more like Sista, who, in turn is sounding more like Yaa. It's a downward spiral.

KFact though... he just keeps cut and pasting. He sounds like no one.

“I'll think about it.”

Since: Nov 07

central Florida

#114125 Oct 6, 2013
^^^^^...like no one. Not even a real person.

“I'll think about it.”

Since: Nov 07

central Florida

#114126 Oct 6, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks for the compliment. Your not so bad yourself at the debating thing.
I recall liking the debate as a Mormon teen. It often frustrated me when my claims had no evidence to back me up. So I guess in my quest for evidence I found truth. The truth is, religion is man made.
I had a girlfriend who decorated peoples houses for extra money on the holidays. The holiday is a cash cow.
Heheheee... "cash cow."
Hadn't thought of that. You are absolutely right.
Without Xmas, the American economy would be in big trouble.
curious

Ocoee, FL

#114128 Oct 6, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
<quoted text> Honestly, it's quite amusing to see Dick (curious) spin himself into a state of total confusion. I actually thought he was above playing all these child-like games but I stand corrected. He's constantly posting comments of other's mental state , when in reality he is actually showing signs of a complete mental collapse.
He's constantly accusing other's of using several Monikers, when in reality he and sista have done so on numerous occasions.
It's odd.... Crom, Q, Witw, myself, and you Mike along with Space are all registered....yet YaY, Curious, Sista , Known Fact are not!
Don't get me wrong . That you 2 or 3 atheists are posting under different monikers ,is not illegal.
Like I've said before , it is an effort on your behalf , to make it appear to be more of you than there really are.
Now , myself , yaa , Sista and Known fact ARE not registered , therefore unable to hide our locations.
As I understand it , based on something one of the participants of the Harlan forum ,rawtruth , posted , one can only hide their location by registering .
One can also register in more than one name , or so I was informed.
let me give you an example of your attempts to mislead.
Lodi posts out of Somerset , Kentucky , before he hid his location.
Now we have IDK and kejgkejgqggggbeq posting out of Somerset Kentucky , this, right after Lodi hid his location.
Generally , when you hide your location , it's because you have something to hide.
Now , who are those who hide their location on this forum?
Need I mention names ?
Again , I do not consider it illegal or immoral . It is an attempt to give the appearance of superior numbers.
I don't have a problem with that .
I brought it up as a topic of discussion.
Now that I have proven my point , I can honestly say " I am who I am , not who you think I am.
When I played softball , I loved to steal second base , then I'd feel guilty and go back to first.

If you are descended from apes chimpanzees , then you are a monkey's uncle

Elementary my dear Watson , elementary

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#114129 Oct 6, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't get me wrong . That you 2 or 3 atheists are posting under different monikers ,is not illegal.
Like I've said before , it is an effort on your behalf , to make it appear to be more of you than there really are.
Now , myself , yaa , Sista and Known fact ARE not registered , therefore unable to hide our locations.
As I understand it , based on something one of the participants of the Harlan forum ,rawtruth , posted , one can only hide their location by registering .
One can also register in more than one name , or so I was informed.
let me give you an example of your attempts to mislead.
Lodi posts out of Somerset , Kentucky , before he hid his location.
Now we have IDK and kejgkejgqggggbeq posting out of Somerset Kentucky , this, right after Lodi hid his location.
Generally , when you hide your location , it's because you have something to hide.
Now , who are those who hide their location on this forum?
Need I mention names ?
Again , I do not consider it illegal or immoral . It is an attempt to give the appearance of superior numbers.
I don't have a problem with that .
I brought it up as a topic of discussion.
Now that I have proven my point , I can honestly say " I am who I am , not who you think I am.
When I played softball , I loved to steal second base , then I'd feel guilty and go back to first.
If you are descended from apes chimpanzees , then you are a monkey's uncle
Elementary my dear Watson , elementary
you're an idiot
<quoted text>
Lodi posts out of Somerset , Kentucky , before he hid his location.
Now we have IDK and kejgkejgqggggbeq posting out of Somerset Kentucky , this, right after Lodi hid his location.
Are you now accusing me of being this Kej Person? Well that makes it official, I am Everyone!
You might want to go back and look at your own comments addressed to me. Those where you stated my location was in Pikeville, yet now , you are saying it was listed as Somerset, Ky to prop up your argument.
<quoted text>
I can honestly say " I am who I am , not who you think I am.
Here's a quarter, call someone who actually cares!

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#114132 Oct 6, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
Well , I answered the question posed to him because the fact that you keep asking the same misguided question by taking the event in question out of context is beginning to ANNOY ME.
In effect , you are begining to fulfill the Atheist objective , as
described by Witchetty , to annoy those who participate on this forum.
BTW I researched the spelling of your name in Spanish;
here is what I came up with
Duquette = DonQuixote
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
Well , I answered the question posed to him because the fact that you keep asking the same misguided question by taking the event in question out of context is beginning to ANNOY ME
So you can respond to a comment addressed to someone else w/out being accused of being that person, but no one else can? There's that double standard again.

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#114133 Oct 6, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't get me wrong . That you 2 or 3 atheists are posting under different monikers ,is not illegal.
Like I've said before , it is an effort on your behalf , to make it appear to be more of you than there really are.
Now , myself , yaa , Sista and Known fact ARE not registered , therefore unable to hide our locations.
As I understand it , based on something one of the participants of the Harlan forum ,rawtruth , posted , one can only hide their location by registering .
One can also register in more than one name , or so I was informed.
let me give you an example of your attempts to mislead.
Lodi posts out of Somerset , Kentucky , before he hid his location.
Now we have IDK and kejgkejgqggggbeq posting out of Somerset Kentucky , this, right after Lodi hid his location.
Generally , when you hide your location , it's because you have something to hide.
Now , who are those who hide their location on this forum?
Need I mention names ?
Again , I do not consider it illegal or immoral . It is an attempt to give the appearance of superior numbers.
I don't have a problem with that .
I brought it up as a topic of discussion.
Now that I have proven my point , I can honestly say " I am who I am , not who you think I am.
When I played softball , I loved to steal second base , then I'd feel guilty and go back to first.
If you are descended from apes chimpanzees , then you are a monkey's uncle
Elementary my dear Watson , elementary
You have the uncanny ability to post utter nonsense and expect everyone to accept it as fact.
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
it is an effort on your behalf , to make it appear to be more of you than there really are.
Again , I do not consider it illegal or immoral . It is an attempt to give the appearance of superior numbers.
I don't have a problem with that .
Apparently you do have a problem with it, because you've been harping on it since I joined this thread months ago. It's time you accept the fact that more and more people are waking up from their somber sleep.
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
When I played softball , I loved to steal second base , then I'd feel guilty and go back to first.
We knew you were an idiot, no need to show examples!

“I'll think about it.”

Since: Nov 07

central Florida

#114134 Oct 6, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
It is an attempt to give the appearance of superior numbers.
You think we go to the trouble of lying and trying to pretend to be someone else to impress YOU with our numbers?
Like that was important? Really?

It wouldn't matter to any of us if we were the only atheist on this forum.

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#114137 Oct 7, 2013
kkkurious wrote:
<quoted text>
It is amazing how you Atheists make ujp stories in order to justify your unbelief.
What is amazing is that you don't detect your own rash bigotry and the irrationality of your allegations.
kkkurious wrote:
<quoted text>
Chro makes up a story about taking his car to be fuxrd by someone who included a crucifix and some Christian staement in his advertising. He supposedly got ripped off for $2500.00
Knowing that ,why did he take his car there in the first place.
I made up a story? Prove it. WitW, MD, plus anyone and everyone else who corrects you and/or admonishes your duplicity is lying? Prove it.
"Thou shalt not bear false witness against they neighbor." All Kkkurious demonstrates is that Atheists not only have a better understanding of the Bible than "Christians", they're more likely to implement its spiritual principles.

$2400, not $2500. Trust a banker not to get the numbers right. I took the car to a transmission shop because the transmission was busted. Yeah, I know - weird behavior, ain't it? Maybe I was drunk on sacramental wine I pilfered from a church storeroom or was on some kind of atheist drug. 0.o
The advertising had no crucifix or statement. It had an icthys. Old man Grimes said "Yup, I get a lot of these Caravans. They keep making the transmissions lighter to get better mileage and cheaper to save money, They just don't last." Well, he was right. 2 more breakdowns in a month after getting it back.
Now I suppose the guy who maintains that 'the Creator of All Space and Time answered his lost dog ad' will imply that I've never even owned a Caravan...
Of course, everyone is aware that's just part of your game of diversion you think is clever (because you have precious little else to contribute)- and just as your prejudiced little blame game of "Atheists are______" is nothing but your irrational fears manifesting themselves.

Since: Feb 12

Roseville, CA

#114138 Oct 7, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't get me wrong . That you 2 or 3 atheists are posting under different monikers ,is not illegal.
Like I've said before , it is an effort on your behalf , to make it appear to be more of you than there really are.
Now , myself , yaa , Sista and Known fact ARE not registered ,
I see you're trolling again. Gave up on preaching?

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#114139 Oct 7, 2013
Spaceship earth wrote:
<quoted text>
I see you're trolling again. Gave up on preaching?
How can you tell the difference between when he's trolling and when he's preaching? Delusions, dishonesty and vitriol... They seem exactly the same to me.

Since: Feb 12

Roseville, CA

#114140 Oct 7, 2013
ChromiuMan wrote:
<quoted text>
How can you tell the difference between when he's trolling and when he's preaching? Delusions, dishonesty and vitriol... They seem exactly the same to me.
Good point, I should have said his sorry preaching. You know, "God is real and you'll be sorry you didn't get to know him." He's thinks he is Sherlock Holmes the master "troll" detective. Curious is trolling the line until Watson "YAA,KF,sisTIC shows up.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#114141 Oct 7, 2013
Known Fact wrote:
It is in him that all the fullness of the divine quality dwells bodily.”(Col. 1:19; 2:9) Having been with his heavenly Father for aeons of time, Jesus knows better than anyone else the personality and will of God. Throughout his earthly ministry, Jesus taught others what his Father had taught him and reflected in his actions the qualities that his Father had nurtured in him. That is why Jesus could say:“He that has seen me has seen the Father also.”(John 14:9) All the wisdom and knowledge of God are hidden, or are dwelling, in Christ, and there is no better way for us to learn about Jehovah than by carefully learning all that we can about Jesus.
I see you're still avoiding me on the question of Moses the mass murderer. Are you awaiting the official church response first?
Do you feel it was just and moral to have those who worshiped what they wished, killed?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
creek mart scandal 46 min Nadine 1
Who's had Curt brown 1 hr Pam 37
Is judge ex Jm hall going to prison ? 2 hr Customer 9
Wet Vote Petition 2 hr Kim 17
kink 2 hr Darren west 5
Will the federal grand jury indit Jm hall 3 hr Knox voter 1
Where is preacher Lester on the weekends ? 4 hr Just facts 20
walmart shooting 5 hr uknow 17
Shooting at Walmart??? 9 hr Nimbletwig 40
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Barbourville Mortgages