"Known fact"(ironic) is clearly avoiding a direct answer. I assume this is due to his innate understanding of how wrong this is to do.<quoted text>
My response is utter disgust that you and yours would connive and construe an irrelevant Bible >story< as support of a thoroughly despicable JW policy. Where is "God's angelic representative" while a woman is being raped with a knife at her throat? Where is the Christian "love" in compounding a woman's shame and trauma? You consider disfellowshipping to be some warped tough love? I think it's just a way for your abominable leaders to shun someone they consider despoiled and unclean. My response is that I hope there is a God and a Lake of Fire for you and your GB to answer to.
What is mind boggling is how certain "sins" these churches view as unforgivable.
How could excommunication be a moral solution?
Perfect example of how religion closes the mind to questioning the morality of their dogma.