Bible study rules for public schools ...

Bible study rules for public schools proposed

There are 161215 comments on the The Courier-Journal story from Feb 10, 2010, titled Bible study rules for public schools proposed. In it, The Courier-Journal reports that:

FRANKFORT, Ky. - The state would create rules for teaching about the Bible in public high schools under a bill filed Monday by three Democratic senators.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Courier-Journal.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#104757 May 25, 2013
defender wrote:
<quoted text>
So if a woman in the military turns out to be to weak to hold the fifty cal when the firefight starts and get everybody killed well that's ok cause that what she wanted to do... Nice logic there!!!
Why would your little doomsday scenario not be applicable to a man? One of the main points of basic training is to determine fitness and capability. If she couldn't physically handle the responsibilities given her then that's a failure of the system to weed her out.

“Speaker of Mountain Wisdom....”

Since: Jan 10

http://www.pixoto.com/quantumm

#104758 May 25, 2013
_Ummm_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Just say "I don't know what pedophelia is" and drop it. Justifying your position by saying there are laws against it is not a justification, as you should well know.
Also, you might want to look into bra sizes and what they mean. 44DD is not something that many would find attractive.
A Consensus of Pedophiles would agree with you....
defender

Chicago, IL

#104759 May 25, 2013
Skeptical Spectacles wrote:
<quoted text>In other words, you can't answer any of my requests. As I suspected...
Pick one to start with ... Anything you want...

“pervinco per logica”

Since: Feb 12

Eradicate willful ignorance.

#104760 May 25, 2013
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>
A Consensus of Pedophiles would agree with you....
You're just being stupid at this point. Pedophiles find undeveloped children attractive. NOT fully developed girls who happen to not be adults by our arbitrary legal definition.
ProvenScience

Somerset, KY

#104761 May 25, 2013
Skeptical Spectacles wrote:
<quoted text>
Says the guy who believes the universe was created by an invisible man who lives in the sky.
And the subject was Evolution vs Intelligent Design (Creationism). If you want to change subjects just say so.
Evolution, the evolving process of intelligent design. Or vise verse...kinda like that chicken and egg thing.

And now for a "Moment of bandwidth hogging Zen"

http://www.livescience.com/16582-cyclops-shar...

“Speaker of Mountain Wisdom....”

Since: Jan 10

http://www.pixoto.com/quantumm

#104762 May 25, 2013
_Ummm_ wrote:
<quoted text>
You're just being stupid at this point. Pedophiles find undeveloped children attractive. NOT fully developed girls who happen to not be adults by our arbitrary legal definition.
Pedophiles have sexual attraction to underage Children.... Your Rationalization speaks more to your proclivity to such than our legal system... It's the same rationalization most child predators use... "She was asking for it with those short skirts" .. "She had great boobs so she was ready"...

It's your I'm not a Child Rapist because the Child had nice tit's excuse...

“pervinco per logica”

Since: Feb 12

Eradicate willful ignorance.

#104763 May 25, 2013
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>
Pedophiles have sexual attraction to underage Children.... Your Rationalization speaks more to your proclivity to such than our legal system... It's the same rationalization most child predators use... "She was asking for it with those short skirts" .. "She had great boobs so she was ready"...
It's your I'm not a Child Rapist because the Child had nice tit's excuse...
You couldn't be more wrong. Here are some resources to help you look less like an irrational idiot who knowingly uses well understood terms in an improper way in order to portray somebody he disagrees with in a negative manner (since he has no real argument):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia (<- as applies to adults, NOT teenagers within 3-4 years of each other)
http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_sexua...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_rape#R...

If I've over estimated you level of knowledge and your misuse of the term "pedophile" is not intentional, but you're instead simply ignorant, please do read these so that you can understand why I'm right and you aren't. It's good to actually understand these things instead of acting like an emotional idiot.

“Speaker of Mountain Wisdom....”

Since: Jan 10

http://www.pixoto.com/quantumm

#104764 May 25, 2013
_Ummm_ wrote:
<quoted text>
You couldn't be more wrong. Here are some resources to help you look less like an irrational idiot who knowingly uses well understood terms in an improper way in order to portray somebody he disagrees with in a negative manner (since he has no real argument):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia (<- as applies to adults, NOT teenagers within 3-4 years of each other)
http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_sexua...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_rape#R...
If I've over estimated you level of knowledge and your misuse of the term "pedophile" is not intentional, but you're instead simply ignorant, please do read these so that you can understand why I'm right and you aren't. It's good to actually understand these things instead of acting like an emotional idiot.
It's the same rationalization most child predators use... "She was asking for it with those short skirts" .. "She had great boobs so she was ready"...
It's your I'm not a Child Rapist because the Child had nice tit's excuse...
Oxymoron

Glasgow, KY

#104765 May 25, 2013
Where God Resides and the Devil Hides:


A shocking Revelation of a Man to whom many does not exist.

“pervinco per logica”

Since: Feb 12

Eradicate willful ignorance.

#104766 May 25, 2013
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you are correct. I was simply being an irrational twat when I implied or directly stated that you both were pedophiles and I'm very sorry. I'm all better now, and I definitely wouldn't repeat the same incorrect and insulting garbage to cement my position as closed minded and ignorant.
is the kind of thing you would have said if you actually were a reasonable person that was willing to admit when they are wrong. But you didn't because you apparently aren't. You pretty much want to ignore reality and call somebody whose spouse is 3 years younger than them a pedophile (and apparently me, as well, since I defended them).

Well, sorry, but that's disgusting hypocrisy. Especially considering the age gap you're currently living with. Those people were both consenting, both physically mature, and within very few years of the same age. I really have no idea what your motive could be for saying this garbage. I guess, since you're immune to reason, I'll just assume that you're nuts, and that idiots like you are the reason that innocent kids go to jail and get labeled "sex offender" for simply being kids.

“Speaker of Mountain Wisdom....”

Since: Jan 10

http://www.pixoto.com/quantumm

#104767 May 25, 2013
_Ummm_ wrote:
<quoted text>
is the kind of thing you would have said if you actually were a reasonable person that was willing to admit when they are wrong. But you didn't because you apparently aren't. You pretty much want to ignore reality and call somebody whose spouse is 3 years younger than them a pedophile (and apparently me, as well, since I defended them).
Well, sorry, but that's disgusting hypocrisy. Especially considering the age gap you're currently living with. Those people were both consenting, both physically mature, and within very few years of the same age. I really have no idea what your motive could be for saying this garbage. I guess, since you're immune to reason, I'll just assume that you're nuts, and that idiots like you are the reason that innocent kids go to jail and get labeled "sex offender" for simply being kids.
If their Spouse is 16 and they are 19... Then they are a Pedophile ..Don't like it,,, don't care,,, If their spouse is 18 and they are 92 then they are not.... You can rationalize Child Rape all you wish to make yourself feel better for having a pedophile mindset all you wish but your neighbors should be aware of your proclivities for considering their children targets if they grow boobs at 12... You are here telling the world that as long as the child is developed to your lust level go for it... Facts are Facts... Sexual contact with a Child under 18 is Child Rape no matter how much you wish it wasn't...
saywat

Frankfort, KY

#104768 May 25, 2013
what a joke. Dont brain wash a bunch of little kids. lol

“Question, Explore, Discover”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#104769 May 26, 2013
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>
19 year old going after a 15 .... Pedophilia... I don't care if the Kid has 44dd's .... Sexual Contact of even non intercourse type will get you 5 to 10 years in state prison and a life long registration to the Sexual Predator lists....
Turning 16, turning 19. Read before speaking please.

I'm surprised that you would consider arbitrary age limits of much consequence when we're talking about teens dating teens.

The term for a grown person being exclusively attracted to teens is ephebophilia, not pedophilia. I am a grown man and I've been married to my wife for more than 20 years, so I am neither.

The term for our dating period when we were teens is this:

Normal sexual behavior.

“Question, Explore, Discover”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#104770 May 26, 2013
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>
If their Spouse is 16 and they are 19... Then they are a Pedophile ..Don't like it,,, don't care,,, If their spouse is 18 and they are 92 then they are not.... You can rationalize Child Rape all you wish to make yourself feel better for having a pedophile mindset all you wish but your neighbors should be aware of your proclivities for considering their children targets if they grow boobs at 12... You are here telling the world that as long as the child is developed to your lust level go for it... Facts are Facts... Sexual contact with a Child under 18 is Child Rape no matter how much you wish it wasn't...
Look up the word, Q.

It seems that you don't like having your intellect challenged.

Now, to the meat of what you posted here.

The 18 age limit is a necessary legal invention. We have to draw a line somewhere and 18 seems to be a good place to do it. At 18 people tend to be fully mature. I fully agree that this is a good age limit and it helps protect kids from predators.

But a 3-year gap between teens is not the stuff that sexual predation is made of. You are being pedantic. Do you honestly think that at age 19 I was some kind of sexual monster preying on kids?

Do you think the 18yo lesbian from the story I was responding to is a sexual predator because her girlfriend was not yet 18?

If so, can you be a bigger kook?

“Question, Explore, Discover”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#104771 May 26, 2013
Wow. I thought we were discussing the Bible, not my social life from 20+ years ago.

Hey maybe I'm like Joseph Smith. He married Fanny Alger when she was 16 and he was 28!

Nah. That really is kinda creepy, at least by 20th century standards.
How stupid can you be

Winchester, KY

#104772 May 26, 2013
Yiago wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey asshat, when I started dating my wife she was about to turn 16 and I was about to turn 19.
You got something to say about that? If I was gay would it be any different?
You bigots absolutely kill me. And then have the nerve to talk about morals.
"asshat" Really???
Yes it would be different!
(1) you are male, she, Female!(NORMAL)
(2) That fifteen year old "Girl" Probably never, "NEVER"
knew a guy, probably heard the song "I kissed a girl, and I liked it!"
NOW... She "THINKS" she's gay, instead of "CONfused!
How blind of you not to see that!
RIGHTEOUSNESS IS NOT AN OPTION!
Funny part is... you calling me a Bigot... Hahahaha!
Look in the Mirror!
How stupid can you be

Winchester, KY

#104773 May 26, 2013
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>
That's called a Pedophile ....
Hahaha!
I'd hate to see what's on his computer... LOL
How stupid can you be

Winchester, KY

#104774 May 26, 2013
_Ummm_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Whoa there....
Not EVEN remotely. You generally seem to make sense when you post, but you must have turned off your brain on this one.
Pedophelia is a sexual attraction to an undeveloped child. As in pre-pubescence. There is essentially no such thing as a pre-pubescent 16 year old. This is almost certainly not some sick inappropriate physical attraction, and you should not be insulting and jump so such conclusions.
A sexual attraction to a fully developed 16 year old female is NOT remotely pedophelia. The arbitrary 18 year limit is completely wrong in many cases. The only reason one should be prevented from having a relationship when there is a small age gap like <3 years is if there is a significant gap in mental development which could cause the younger party to be taken advantage of, which is again not likely. I mean, yeah, it's pretty sick when a 50 year old man goes after a 17 year old girl, but that's entirely for reasons other than pedophelia.
"This is almost certainly not some sick inappropriate physical attraction"
You mean like a man with a man/boy/dog.... a girl with the same?
Unrighteousness is Wrong!
How stupid can you be

Winchester, KY

#104775 May 26, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
You have 0 experience with this obviously. I spend 80% of my time off of work trying to make my wife happy (the other 20% I am making my kids happy). I do not rule over my wife in any way.
Great post!
That's why we call us "FAMILY"...
Not Slaves, and Masters!
Ye of lil Understanding

Winchester, KY

#104776 May 26, 2013
Yiago wrote:
<quoted text>
Several states do. Most do not. Soon all will.
But as it stands if I marry a dude in some state with marriage equality my marriage will not be recognized if I move to Kentucky.
You call that equal?
"marriage equality" opens the door for ALL other abominations!
But when that does happen, as you say it will...
My Bible said it first!
The Lord Will surely fallow, and ALL
Unrighteousness will be cleaned away!
AMEN!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Nobody could ever change my opinion on Relation... 8 min bigdawg 9
Crystal Elliott 41 min know 2
Reward 1 hr Bodean 1
Sprinkles firing 30 teachers but keeps making j... 2 hr Wilton J Mills 3
do gauges hurt 3 hr want to know 2
Knox school for knox 6 hr Snatch 31
anywhere filling out of state perscriptions 6 hr steven 1

Barbourville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Barbourville Mortgages