Bible study rules for public schools ...

Bible study rules for public schools proposed

There are 147276 comments on the The Courier-Journal story from Feb 10, 2010, titled Bible study rules for public schools proposed. In it, The Courier-Journal reports that:

FRANKFORT, Ky. - The state would create rules for teaching about the Bible in public high schools under a bill filed Monday by three Democratic senators.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Courier-Journal.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#104398 May 22, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
You missed it. They did use them. But they aren't 100% reliable so they still got pregnant.
And abstinence teaching does not stop kids from having sex. So neither approach is one hundred percent effective. This is why both need to be taught.
And I think if they do happen to get pregnant, abortion and adoption is an option.
ProvenScience

London, KY

#104399 May 22, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
Yes you did. and then you changed my original post to reflect your %'s , which was wrong! I still don't believe you understand that what you posted was wrong ,and/or misleading.
The info YOU posted WAS misleading, just like I stated. the information I posted was from Planned Parenthood, not some made up bunch of bullchit opinion.
So now I WILL say-
Stop LYING and spreading FALSE propoganda!(which is NOT the same as resorting to a fifth grade level name calling MENTAL-ity.)

Need more FACTS to choke on?-

According to the World Health Organization...

Although Nonoxynol-9 has been shown to increase the risk of HIV infection when used frequently by women at high risk of infection, it remains a contraceptive option for women at low risk.

Nonoxynol-9 offers no protection against sexually transmitted infections such as gonorrhea or chlamydia.

There is no evidence that condoms lubricated with Nonoxynol-9 are any more effective in preventing pregnancy or infection than condoms lubricated with silicone, and such condoms should no longer be promoted. However, it is better to use an Nonoxynol-9 lubricated condom than no condom at all.

The Centers Of Disease Control (CDC) Report >
Letter on Nonoxynol-9 From the CDC >

Fact #1 - Nonoxyol-9 Does Not Kill HIV
For Years many have believed that Nonoxynol-9 Kills HIV. NOT TRUE. Here are some Articles Dispelling That Rumor..

[ The CDC Press Release ][ Non-9 DOESN'T Work ][ CDC Info On HIV and STD's ]

Fact # 2 - Nonoxynol-9 May Actually Increase Your Risk Of Acquiring HIV

There is evidence that supports an increase risk of HIV when using Nonoxynol-9 Spermicide. Non-9 is a powerful detergent. It is so strong that it can actually irritate the vaginal walls and rectal cavity causing a path for the virus to enter your system. Here is more information on this..

It appears that when used frequently in the vagina, contraceptive products containing Nonoxynol-9 can cause disruption of the vaginal epithelium (cell wall)- a condition that may increase a woman's risk of becoming infected with HIV. The impact of N-9 on the vaginal epithelial appears to be dose-related. Small infrequent doses of N-9 (once a day or less) appear to cause little or no disruption of the epithelium, whereas more frequent, larger doses consistently cause disruption.
(WHO/CONRAD Technical Consultation on Nonoxynol-9, June 2002)

( http://www.condomdepot.com/non9/ )

Fact # 3 - Nonoxynol-9 Does NOT Decrease Pregnancy Rates

According by a report from the World Health Organization (WHO). There is no proof that using non-9 will reduce your risk of becoming pregnant. Using a condom properly is over 98% effective.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#104400 May 22, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't mix topics.
That's how God works is the best answer you are getting right now about the priesthood. Yes I could go much deeper into doctrine, but you have shown me you aren't ready to talk about it. I'm not going to give you more fuel to bash things that I hold sacred.
How an I mixing topics? Your churches stance on blacks holding the priesthood and women holding the priesthood is different how? Just how is this a separate topic?
So you are offended? Well you should be, it offends me how your church has bigoted policies. It is one large reason I left the Mormon church. Do you want other to leave your church for these reasons?
You refuse to think the church could be wrong on women and the priesthood, but you should take note, they were wrong on blacks and the priesthood for over a hundred years. So why do you have such absolute blind faith they could not be wrong now?

Now go and run from my points like you so often do.
ProvenScience

London, KY

#104401 May 22, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
Your own website that you posted stated a 98% effective rating of condom use when used correctly and properly! now I must ask you, what part of that don't you understand?
1. That is NOT my website, it is the official website of Planned Parenthood.

2. YOU are remiss and guilty of FRAUD, for NOT posting ALL the FACTS as presented by that same website.
15-24 percent FAILURE rate, in NON perfect (REAL WORLD) situations.

NOT the BEST choice for females who TRULY wish to do the RIGHT thing.

3. Are you some sort of developMentally challenged person that cannot accept the FAULTs and Wrongs with in yourself? Sounds like it.
Seek help.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#104402 May 22, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not running from it. We aren't talking about that topic anymore. You seem to think gay marriage and contraceptives are the same topic.
Urging contraception is not relevant to church. The purpose of a church is to teach people about God and His gospel. Abstinence before marriage is God's law. This should be taught from the pulpit. It is the responsibility of the parents to educate their youth about other protection when they succumb to weakness.
And really? You are going to link obesity to churches? I'm sorry but this was the dumbest comment you have made to me. I hope it was just a childish jab and you weren't really serious.
The common link is, your church just sticks to teaching fiction and does not concern itself with actually teaching what helps people the most.
ProvenScience

London, KY

#104403 May 22, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
anyway, here is one of those sites if you want to read it in it's entirety http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/publications...
Many of us prefer to only allow those with some actual SENSE, that know how to interact with DECENCY towards others, and have the credentials to work within edu envirnments, to teach our children.

Mostly because it keeps nutcases like yourself AWAY from being allowed to damage/corrupt or mislead young minds.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#104404 May 22, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you are just wrong about the purpose of a church.
That's like making an argument that Piggly Wigglies should educate people on car maintenance. Without it, they won't be able to make it to their stores.
Piggly Wigglies do not claim to be getting messages from a god and do not claim to be promoting agendas to life. Your church does.
Talk about changing the subject.
ProvenScience

London, KY

#104405 May 22, 2013
Skeptical Spectacles wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. If used correctly. That's true of any tool or device isn't it? If used incorrectly a chainsaw's effectiveness drops drastically.
<quoted text>
Again, not according to their numbers.~18% if not always used correctly. Which, now that I think about it, is still pretty effective (for something being used incorrectly).
<quoted text>
Better than 98%? Why don't you just admit that you're talking out of your ass?
Missed the given numbers for the piktures did ya?

Go back-look again-look for 15-24 percent (FAILURE rate)

And if I was talkn out muh butt-you wouldn't be typing about it! Maroon.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#104406 May 22, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
Your mistake in writing changed the entire meaning of your post.
One final time: sex education should not be taught in church. It should be taught in the home. I would say it should be taught in schools as well, but I've never seen it done well so I didn't see the benefit. If they modify the program, maybe that would be best. Maybe bring a doctor in to teach that day.
Yet you knew exactly what I meant.

Bring in a doctor? You ready for taxes to go up?
When did you ever see sex ed being taught? Or are you just parroting what your church told you?
Fact is, Christian churches often oppose sex ed in schools. Sounds like you are on the team of demeaning the program.
And if you church is in agreement with you, maybe they should bring in a doctor to teach the congregation?
ProvenScience

London, KY

#104407 May 22, 2013
Skeptical Spectacles wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, if you actually take the time to read it. Are you admitting that you were mistaken?
Are you talking to yourself?

If you have a bowl of alphabet soup in front of you, and a bowl of chicken soup to the side of you, would you try and FRAUDUENTLY call the chicken soup, alphabet bet soup, just because it's soup?

(sniff sniff...ah smell FRAUD, FAKE and PAFONEY lol)
ProvenScience

London, KY

#104408 May 22, 2013
Skeptical Spectacles wrote:
<quoted text>
I can't believe, after this little exercise with the Planned Parenthood website and your exposed glossing over (manipulation) of data, that you had the gall to say that. I think it's time for one of your little quiet, introspective periods that you claim to have from time to time.
Can't admit it's NOT a "bahhhhhhhhhhhDUH" website huh?

Bless their LONGTIME helpful hearts, for those MATURE enough, who CHOOSE to walk the pathways of sense, sensibility, PERSONAL responsibility and PERSONAL accountability anyway.
ProvenScience

London, KY

#104409 May 22, 2013
Skeptical Spectacles wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. It's hard to not get irritated by them (there are several in this forum who behave similarly to PS). I sometimes wonder how they act in real life and how frustrating it would be to work with or supervise them.
Oh now THERE'S a LOAD-- of dung lol.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#104410 May 22, 2013
ProvenScience wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you talking to yourself?
If you have a bowl of alphabet soup in front of you, and a bowl of chicken soup to the side of you, would you try and FRAUDUENTLY call the chicken soup, alphabet bet soup, just because it's soup?
(sniff sniff...ah smell FRAUD, FAKE and PAFONEY lol)
Go back and read the data again.

Data from the very website you provided:

Like all birth control methods, condoms are more effective when you use them correctly.
Each year, 2 out of 100 women whose partners use condoms will become pregnant if they always use condoms correctly.
Each year, 18 out of 100 women whose partners use condoms will become pregnant if they don't always use condoms correctly.

http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topic...

I have the facts on my side. You calling me names doesn't change that.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#104411 May 22, 2013
ProvenScience wrote:
<quoted text>
Can't admit it's NOT a "bahhhhhhhhhhhDUH" website huh?
Bless their LONGTIME helpful hearts, for those MATURE enough, who CHOOSE to walk the pathways of sense, sensibility, PERSONAL responsibility and PERSONAL accountability anyway.
I really have no idea what you're saying here. I believe the info on the Planned Parenthood website is accurate. Condoms are ~98% effective if used correctly and ~82% effective even if used incorrectly. I've also shown (repeatedly) that you are misrepresenting the data from the website. By continuing your argument you are only showing that this wassn't an honest mistake, but instead an intentional lie.

Surely your god must be disappointed in you. Tsk tsk.
So true

Coxs Creek, KY

#104412 May 22, 2013
One sin is the same as another, and we all have our fall backs. Just lucky we can bounce back,, good day all.. Thanks to all the soliders, you fight so that we may have what we do..., hugs y'all!!!
stuck in a lodi

Elkhorn City, KY

#104413 May 22, 2013
ProvenScience wrote:
<quoted text>
1. That is NOT my website, it is the official website of Planned Parenthood.
2. YOU are remiss and guilty of FRAUD, for NOT posting ALL the FACTS as presented by that same website.
15-24 percent FAILURE rate, in NON perfect (REAL WORLD) situations.
NOT the BEST choice for females who TRULY wish to do the RIGHT thing.
3. Are you some sort of developMentally challenged person that cannot accept the FAULTs and Wrongs with in yourself? Sounds like it.
Seek help.
Ok my gloves are off! I tried to be nice , I didn't say it was YOUR website as "ownership" I was saying as your source of information, you IDIOT. I didn't intentionally botch another's post to make my stats look more legit, and you have the gall to call me a FRAUD! IDIOT. About the facts : I posted in my original comment that when used correctly and properly the condom was 90 - 95% effective , I was wrong ACCORDING TO THE WEBSITE YOU COLLECTED YOUR DATA FROM! it was actually 98%. Now I must ask you! Are you some sort of Mentally Disturbed/challenged person that cannot accept the FAULTS and wrongs within yourself? Sounds like it. Seek Help!

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#104414 May 22, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
If someone you don't know kills someone else you don't know, is it your business? No, not really. But would you want the killer prosecuted and kept off the streets? Most people would say yes.
It's alive. You shouldn't kill it because you had a valley girl moment and decided you just don't need that burden right now.
i think the language of "valley girl" is what leads one to abortion over adoption.
The condemnation you just showed towards the burden of raising a child is cause for some to abort in secret instead of being judged by the likes of you in church.
This is just another reality you ignore.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#104415 May 22, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
Think of what germs do for us though. They aren't all bad. Just like vultures. They are disgusting but serve a purpose.
So bad germs had to be created by god in order for him to create bad ones?
You have all the answers for magic, don't you?

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#104416 May 22, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok my gloves are off! I tried to be nice , I didn't say it was YOUR website as "ownership" I was saying as your source of information, you IDIOT. I didn't intentionally botch another's post to make my stats look more legit, and you have the gall to call me a FRAUD! IDIOT. About the facts : I posted in my original comment that when used correctly and properly the condom was 90 - 95% effective , I was wrong ACCORDING TO THE WEBSITE YOU COLLECTED YOUR DATA FROM! it was actually 98%. Now I must ask you! Are you some sort of Mentally Disturbed/challenged person that cannot accept the FAULTS and wrongs within yourself? Sounds like it. Seek Help!
1) you are still being nice
2) the answer is yes.

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#104417 May 22, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>So bad germs had to be created by god in order for him to create bad ones?
You have all the answers for magic, don't you?
You have to look at it from a religious perspective - just like birth defects are punishment for the sins of the parents,
recovering from life threatening diseases give people the opportunity to repent their sinful ways and Praise His Name. HIV is God's "magic bullet" against homosexuals. How could Jesus cure lepers if there was no Hansen's disease? STD's are a Divine Deterrent against promiscuity. God loves us all - He spares 1 in 10 Ebola cases, doesn't He? Plagues give Him the opportunity to demonstrate how well He restrains His wrath.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
barbourville mafia (Oct '14) 2 hr WhatsReallyHappening 23
Pamela Bargo arrested after stealing money from... 4 hr So funny 4
Fertility Problems...Any Suggestions? (Jan '10) 5 hr Lester 34
CJ Clark Info needed (Oct '12) 5 hr marie 11
sunday sales!!!!!!! 7 hr A fact 8
Abortion 7 hr Just sayin 1
alicia johnson 9 hr curious 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Barbourville Mortgages