Exactly as the teachings said you would, eh? Exactly? You don't feel like you're doing some interpreting/inferring? If not, you and I(and the rest of the English speaking world) have massively different definitions for the word "exact".<quoted text>
A)That you do not understand is very evident in your responses.
I tested the teachings that I read.Did as they instructed me to do.
I received the desired results,exactly as the teachings said that I would.
I'm sure you have. I'd also be willing to bet that the "positive" results you received were easier to come by with each new "test".<quoted text>
This did not happen just once,it happened on a number of occassions, extended over a period of time.
The number of times you execute a poorly constructed test is irrelevant. All that it shows is a capability to reproduce an erroneous result (and probably with increased efficiency).
No, they were not "plainly addressed" by you. You go through extravagant exercises of poor logic in an attempt (I believe) to confuse whoever you are "debating" (I quoted debating because I believe you to be disingenuous and not really trying to debate the issue at all).<quoted text>
The reasons why I dismissed your so called logical explanations,were plainly addressed in what I posted...
If you have a problem with the reasons I gave, and that they are not valid,THEN,address them and explain why,in your view they are valid.
Address each specific point,based on facts,not on your still misguided opinion.
Prove to me,based on facts,how...
Every explanation given to you had minimal assumptions applied (if any) and all of them were reasonable to expect.
One of the other posters asked you specifically if anything in your scenario could have happened if you hadn't prayed. If you had simply ran your classified ad. You, to the best of my knowledge, ignored that question. Let me answer it for you. Yes...all of it.
There isn't a single event in your story that couldn't have happened without "divine intervention" and you know it. Any other answer is an attempt to deflect or distract and it displays your dishonesty.
You require a test that produces the exact same results now? That's funny because initially you just asked for a plausible explanation. You do realize those are separate things don't you?<quoted text>
I do not believe ,that either you,or Science,can duplicate the results.
Was it possible for Shaquille O'Neal to have made 20 consecutive free throws? Of course it was. Did he ever do it? No, I don't think so. But, according to your logic, because Shaq never did it it was (is) impossible for him to have done it. That's an idiotic position.
Another example of your lack of integrity. State it now to cover our behinds? Many of us have confessed (repeatedly) to being prior "believers". How convenient of you to overlook those admissions though.<quoted text>
I arrived at that conclusion,based on the fact,that,even though,you had the opportunity to do so, none of you have stated that you have put into practice the teachings of the Bible and that they failed you..
You might state that now,as a way of covering your behinds,but when it was relevant,the thought never occurred to you,because there was no basis for you to think that way .