Bible study rules for public schools ...

Bible study rules for public schools proposed

There are 155175 comments on the The Courier-Journal story from Feb 10, 2010, titled Bible study rules for public schools proposed. In it, The Courier-Journal reports that:

FRANKFORT, Ky. - The state would create rules for teaching about the Bible in public high schools under a bill filed Monday by three Democratic senators.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Courier-Journal.


Winter Garden, FL

#101366 Apr 27, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
No, jut those with delusions that their imaginary friend controls the universe and world, even if they call it a god, it's still a delusion, and delusions do not have rights.
This "Imaginary Friend ,as you call him,is my Best Friend.

This Imaginary Friend has helped me resolve some Real life problems
that I've had to face when no one else was able to help me

But ,that is what Best Frieds are for..

This Imaginary Friend has also made me become very aware of the many faults I posses,has helped me deal with them and has given me a Peace of mind that I had never experienced before.
As he said" My Peace I leave with You,not as the world knows it"

He has been my Friend and advisor.
The only payment he requires is that I be obedient to his teachings,which have proven themselves to be excellent.
let me ask you ;
Do you have a friend that you can compare to my "Imaginary Friend"?
I am waiting

Johnson City, TN

#101367 Apr 27, 2013
Satanic Priest wrote:
<quoted text>But, but that would mean it is "gods" fault when these things happen. That would mean it is gods fault people starve and children get beaten to death, gods fault when people get killed in horrible accidents, why it would also be gods fault when people commit crimes..........
Oh, brain fart because there is no god
Why would a Gaytanic Priest care about children starving or being beaten? Don't you sacrifice them on your gods alter? Or do you just have Gaytanic sex there?

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#101368 Apr 27, 2013
-NEPHILIM- wrote:
<quoted text>I'm not saying this is the case with your ear story but as a JW growing up we had all kinds of weird demon stories and we use to repeat them as we were there and saw it. One of them was about Smurfs being demonic and a JW who's child brought one home from school saw it walking around. Lots of JWs have claimed to see Smurfs move, not just the one. Then there are books that won't burn or music albums that were also fire retardant because it was Devil music. I've even have a few of my own stories of weird things that would happen and I believed it to be demons. Looking back now tho I feel pretty stupid for actually believing those things but I was taught to believe that way.

Can I ask if most Mormons know about the ear story or is it just a small local to you amount? I guess what I'm asking is if I meet a Mormon and ask them about a child's ear being reattached then will they know what I'm talking about?
Most Mormons probably will not know about this instance. He told his family and close friends and I'm sure his wife did too. But they didn't want this to be something that drew a lot if attention to their family.

“I'll think about it.”

Since: Nov 07

central Florida

#101369 Apr 27, 2013
Satanic Priest wrote:
<quoted text>But, but that would mean it is "gods" fault when these things happen. That would mean it is gods fault people starve and children get beaten to death, gods fault when people get killed in horrible accidents, why it would also be gods fault when people commit crimes..........
Oh, brain fart because there is no god
Heheheeee... you are a smart cookie.

"God" is either a sadistic bastard or non-existant.
Let's give "him" the benefit of the doubt and go with the second choice.

“pervinco per logica”

Since: Feb 12

Eradicate willful ignorance.

#101370 Apr 27, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
So you are saying that a miracle means I no longer need faith? Cool. So I know that there is a God.
If you "know that there is a God", it's not that you don't "need" faith. It's that you don't HAVE faith. You never "need" faith.
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
The blood on the carpet and clothes, the scar, and the boy telling us what happened, along with the eyewitness of both parents is plenty of evidence for me to believe what happened. Especially since I saw the before and after of the carpet and ear.
I am quite aware of what you've convinced yourself of. You don't need to keep reiterating what you believe. Every logical person here has explained why the basis of your belief would be insufficient as proof.

I will add that I could walk up to any given three year old, pretend to pull a penny out of their ear, and if I was pretty smooth they would be completely convinced that I just pulled a penny out of their ear. What they thought they saw would be enough to convince them. And they would probably argue with people that told them otherwise.

Pikeville, KY

#101371 Apr 27, 2013
TruthIs wrote:
If man evolved from monkeys and apes, why do we still have monkeys and apes?
why do we have poodles, yorkies, pit bulls, wolves, and coyotes on top of that. cuz they are all of the same species in the tree. the same as lions, tigers, cheetahs, and cougars are all the same thing as the little siamese kitten. the monkeys and apes that are here now also evloved from that same ancestor and they evolved in there own direction the same as we did. it takes very little to see what im sayin here if u just look at DNA.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12


#101372 Apr 27, 2013
I am waiting wrote:
<quoted text>
I really don't give a damn what you think!
So you enjoy being delusional.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12


#101373 Apr 27, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
For some, faith was so strong that God manifest Himself to them. Then there is no need for faith, that is correct for that person. So you are saying that a miracle means I no longer need faith? Cool. So I know that there is a God.
The blood on the carpet and clothes, the scar, and the boy telling us what happened, along with the eyewitness of both parents is plenty of evidence for me to believe what happened. Especially since I saw the before and after of the carpet and ear.
So you have a crayon drawing from a child as evidence. Your standards for evidence are too low to consider you a thinking person.
Known Fact

Orlando, FL

#101377 Apr 27, 2013
This good news of the kingdom will be preached in all the inhabited earth.—Matt. 24:14.
This earth-wide witness work regarding God’s Kingdom is being done on an ever-increasing scale. Today, over 7,500,000 Witnesses of Jehovah, associated with more than 107,000 congregations throughout the earth, are preaching about God’s Kingdom, even as Jesus made it the theme of his preaching and teaching.(Matt. 4:17) As a result of our present-day preaching work, great comfort is being given to mourning ones. Why, in two recent years, a total of 570,601 individuals were baptized as Jehovah’s Witnesses! The great scope of this preaching work can best be appreciated by noting that Jehovah’s Witnesses now translate and distribute Bible literature in over 500 languages. Nothing like this has ever been seen in all human history! The existence, work, and growth of the earthly part of Jehovah’s organization are truly extraordinary. w11 10/15 4:5, 6

“pervinco per logica”

Since: Feb 12

Eradicate willful ignorance.

#101378 Apr 27, 2013
-NEPHILIM- wrote:
<quoted text>
The JWs are so scared of Smurfs and mgic that they made a cartoon for kids and it's about Sparlock, the warrior wizard. The mom makes the kid throw it away. Its hard to find online anymore but worth watching if you do?


Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#101381 Apr 27, 2013
GWB wrote:
Why I generally distrust Mormon scholars

When I was growing up in the Mormon Church, I liked the Church but didn’t really have a testimony of it. I wanted to really know if the Church was true. I prayed about it after reading the BofM and didn’t receive any confirmation either way.

I went to the LDS bookstore and bought several books written by Mormon scholars. One that had a profound impact on me was the book The Book of Mormon on Trial by Jack West.

It gave some pretty convincing evidence that the BofM was true. It showed all these big statues in Central and South America that were Egyptian as evidence that people had come across the ocean like the BofM said. It recounted conversations with Native Americans ,who when asked what the name of a local mountain was, they said “Nephihah” and when asked what the name of a river was, they said “Moronihah”.

That was proof to me as these are the very names given as cities and lands in the BofM. There was no way Joseph could have known that. Books like this one really helped give me a testimony that the Church was true. Why would I even think to question that a book I bought at the Church Bookstore, written by a Mormon scholar would be anything less than truthful?

In wasn’t until many years later that I tried to verify the claims of the book to find out that the author, Jack West, made this stuff up. There are no Native Americans that knew those places as Nephihah and Moronihah.

Those pictures of ancient statues that he said were Egyptian were actually Aztec. I was pretty unnerved to find out I had bolstered my testimony on lies made up by a Mormon scholar that seemed to believe that ‘the ends justifies the means’.

Get people to believe any way you can seemed to be his philosophy. Or maybe he just wanted to sell books and made up stuff to make his case for the BofM stronger than it really was. Current LDS apologists like Kerry Shirts candidly admit Jack West and other zealous LDS authors made stuff up in their books.
There is no excuse to lie. I haven't seen this particular author. Thanks for sharing. I'm sorry that this person left you with a distaste for all Mormon scholars.

Elkhorn City, KY

#101382 Apr 27, 2013
In reference to post 101219 - SP

The Bible is, and always was, the only Word of God, providing, in it’s own words, a lamp to our feet, and a light to our paths. The Bible is our only sure guide to heaven, containing all the counsel and guidance we need along what is often a long and difficult journey. As Paul said …

“All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness”(2 Timothy 3:16).

However the Bible contains both Old and New Testaments, each with seemingly different teachings and commands, which has led to more than a little confusion for those that have not grasped the seamless relationship between the Old and New Testaments. Many Christians struggle with the tension between the Old Testament emphasis on regulations, and the New Testament emphasis on grace, and are not clear what our relationship to the Old Testament should be, especially when it comes to the Old Testament Laws (particularly the Ten Commandments), and the keeping of the Sabbath and/or other Feasts of the Old Covenant.

For example the Ten Commandments, held in high regard by most Christians, are often prominently displayed on the walls of courtrooms, school rooms, and churches, which leads one to suspect that the vast majority of people (both Christian and non-Christian) believe that the Ten Commandments are foundational laws that all Christians are to conform to.
Which then leaves out the vast majority of the laws of the Old Testament and the question of what we are supposed to make of them. Are any of them applicable to the Christian world? And if so, how are we supposed to decide which are still in effect. What criteria is to be used in making the determination as to which of the laws we follow, and which of them we ignore. There are usually two main schools of thought on the subject.

Some Christians will tell you that the Ten Commandments are timeless moral laws which apply to all Christians for all time, while the rest of the law is not applicable to Christians today.

Others have endeavored to rationalize their beliefs about which of the laws are to be obeyed by making a distinction between ceremonial, civil and moral laws, the last category supposedly the only one that is still to be observed.
Ceremonial, Civil And Moral Laws?
Those that believe that the content of the law is the criterion by which we make our decision as to which of the Mosaic laws are valid for today, also run into huge problems. For starters it has to be noted that no such distinction occurs in Scripture…. they have been imposed on the text from outside the text. In any case deciding which category many of the laws fall into, is not as easy as some may think. Any one who gives the matter some thought will realize that the Sabbath law in the Ten Commandments is not a moral law but very clearly a ceremonial one… moral and ceremonial commandments often found mixed together in the Old Testament. Also consider…

Jesus identified Leviticus 19:18 (“You Shall Love Your Neighbor As Yourself”) as the second greatest commandment ever. However this verse was directly followed by the commands to not breed together two kinds of your cattle, nor sow fields with two kinds of seed, nor wear clothing woven of two kinds of material" (19:19). Yet many have decided that verse 18 is a timeless moral law, therefore applicable to 21st century Christianity, while commandments in the very next verse are civil law, and therefore can be rejected
However, while instructions on sowing your field may sound like a civil law, it really wasn’t.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#101383 Apr 27, 2013
GWB wrote:
Book of Mormon

The Book of Mormon is basically about two groups of peoples that lived in the Americas some 1,000 years apart. They were steel-smelting, chariot-driving, temple-building people that grew so numerous that 2 Million people died in a single battle. Yet there is absolutely no evidence that any of these people ever existed.

The BofM is not backed up by any archeological, anthropological or linguistic evidence. There is no evidence of any Hebrew culture in the Americas as you would expect from descendants of Israel as is the premise of the BofM.

DNA evidence indicate that the natives of the Americas originated from Siberia, and probably came across the Bering Strait, just as scientists have thought for decades and not from the Middle East.

Isn’t it strange that we have found much evidence of many other cultures that existed in the Americas like the Aztecs, Mayans,Toltecs, etc. yet not a single Nephite coin, steel sword, armor, or ‘Reformed Egyptian‘ writing has ever been found which is unbelievable considering the span of Jaredites, Nephites & Lamanites which numbered in the millions over the almost 3,000 years that these various peoples reportedly flourished.
I refer you to the FARMS website to see that there is some evidence of the BOM people.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#101384 Apr 27, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>Wounds do not scar over night, takes weeks for the scar to be fully realized, and months for it to be fully formed. Blood, did you have a lab test it? It could be cow's blood, or any of the animal flesh you find in your fridge. If so, it's a waste of good blood, that's where the flavor is. But I digress, the point being, you don't know the details, just what you were fed, and you swallowed without questioning it because you wanted it to be a miracle. Answer this riddle:

A man lies dead on the ground, surrounded by water and blood. How did he die?
Hence the miracle. The scar healed too quickly for science to be the answer.

No, of course I didn't have the blood DNA tested. I don't have a general distrust for my close friends or assume they are too delirious to remember the details of something that happened hours before.

Elkhorn City, KY

#101385 Apr 27, 2013
One of the central themes running throughout Leviticus is the holiness of God. The discourse by God in Leviticus 19 is prefaced by the commandment,“Be holy because I, the Lord your God, am holy.” Part of this theme is the teaching that holy things must be kept separate from profane things. While the significance of these commands against mixing seed or mixing cloth material may not be fully understood, it is clear that they relate back to the holiness of God. In fact all of the levitical laws regarding separation seem to relate to the overarching principle of God’s holiness and the separation required because of that holiness. How then can this law not be moral?”[1]

Besides which, the “moral law” of the Old Testament extend well beyond the Ten Commandments. There are commandments that order adulterers, fornicators, homosexuals and those who dishonor their parents to be put to death. For example..

If anyone curses his father or mother, he must be put to death. He has cursed his father or his mother, and his blood will be on his own head. If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife—with the wife of his neighbor—both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death (Leviticus 20:9-10. See also 11-16).

So, when was the last time you heard of an adulterer being given the death sentence in the modern day church? All of which makes me wonder why it is that you can read a thousand articles on a thousand different websites and blogs about all the reasons that the author believes Jesus did not abolish the law, yet you do not read one where the author claims to follow the whole law. I have wondered how many of these articles were written after a bacon breakfast!

Without giving the matter sufficient thought and study, we are picking and choosing which of the Old Testament laws we will and will not obey based merely on whether a law seems to be relevant. The fact of the matter is that the laws of the Old Covenant are…

A Unified Whole
As the apostle Paul said in his letter to the Galatians

Behold, I Paul say unto you, that, if ye receive circumcision, Christ will profit you nothing. Yea, I testify again to every man that receiveth circumcision, that he is a debtor to do the whole law.[Galatians 5:2-3] James summed it up best when he said, "For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all" (James 2:10; See also v. 11). The Scripture declares that to keep 612 commandments, and yet fail to keep one, is to break all 613. To break a "ceremonial" law was viewed in the same manner as a "moral" law. Perfect obedience was demanded to all the commands of the covenant, because it was a unified whole.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#101386 Apr 27, 2013
GWB wrote:
<quoted text>Why then was Mary ,the mother of Jehovah, not giving the same respect. Is the Father partial or was Mary just another vagina to be used and thrown to the dogs.
People were able to visibly see His earthly mother. It's be kind of hard to hide her identity. Plus she was part if the miracle of a virgin birth.

Elkhorn City, KY

#101388 Apr 27, 2013
there are several passages in the Old Testament that indicate that the Law, including the Ten Commandments and the Sabbath were given only to the nation of Israel, and that only at a certain point in their history (For instance, no mention is made of any of the patriarchs keeping the Sabbath) it is impossible to keep all the laws which, we need to remember, were given to a very small nation, the sheer smallness of which made possible the physical keeping of some of the laws. Once Peter took the Gospel to the Gentiles, and it began to spread to the furthermost corners of the earth, many of the laws became impossible to keep, becoming even more unworkable as the number of Christians mushroomed.

For example, if God intended the animal sacrifices to continue, why in the world did He let the Temple be destroyed? However even if the Temple were still standing and in Jewish hands, how long do you think it would be before the sheer weight of numbers of Christians converging on Jerusalem three times a year, would make the Israeli authorities throw up their hands in horror and shut down the airports. Chaos doesn’t even begin to describe the situation.

Elkhorn City, KY

#101389 Apr 27, 2013
good now try and understand it

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#101390 Apr 27, 2013
GWB wrote:
<quoted text>Reads like he is the only God. Says that in multiple places in the O.T. I can see another reason for Judaism to reject LDS teachings.

Isaiah 43:10-11
Before me no god was formed,
nor will there be one after me.

This verse is up for interpretation by many. After all, the Bible was written by humans. I see how this can fuel many different beliefs about who God is and why many are confused about God books.

I see the writer making the use of the word "formed". Like making a god from some substance. Notice also that the word "god"is lower case(possibly indicating lower ranking gods).

Since the word "formed" was use then it would be impossible for Jesus to be formed if the verse was taken literally. Jesus would never have existed.
I'm not one that believes the Bible is inerrant. Men have taken books out of what should have been included in the canon. Men interpreted the scriptures to derive a trinitarian belief. Men interpreted the nature of God as well.
So I believe the Bible so far as it is translated correctly.
There are so many more scriptures that tell us that Jesus and the Father are not the same individual.

Elkhorn City, KY

#101391 Apr 27, 2013
glad I don't have to post the whole go read it for yourself.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
$500.00 reward 2 hr wtf 2
Where is King Town Hill? 13 hr Fyi 2
Knox fiscal court 13 hr NowServing 27
Thompson rv park 17 hr Moe Long 16
Law on first st 19 hr blow me 3
Anyone know where Amanda Dani Gray is? 22 hr I can locate 2
Cancer in eastern ky! 23 hr George 16

Barbourville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Barbourville Mortgages