Or better yet, you show me where it has ever happened at all. If hearsay counted, we'd have conclusive proof of bigfoot, aliens, ghosts, loch ness monster, Thor, Zeus, etc. etc. We've been through this. There are millions of occurrences throughout history of people claiming to witness something supernatural. That's not proper evidence of those things. Given the amount of evidence to the contrary (and the fact that many of these witnesses are not known to be liars), it's more likely hallucinations.<quoted text>
So an ear could reattach in a matter of minutes with no medical tools or professionals involved? Show me where that has happened before.
I'm not justifying anything. People say stupid things, I call them stupid. I'm "calling a spade a spade". Duh. Degrading is what people do when they call me stupid, because I'm clearly not and nobody has evidence to support such claims. I haven't posted a single thing that could be described as such when I'm being serious and not just messing around.<quoted text>
That was a terrible attempt at trying to justify how your name calling is not degradation. And I'll use your definition and still nail your actions when you brag about how smart you are as compared to everyone else on topix. This is lowering others. I really don't care that you do it, but I'm calling a spade a spade.
And how, exactly, is me saying I'm smarter than any given person "degrading" them if they are indeed exactly as I describe? You must be using some definition of the word that I am not aware of. To me, it means to unjustly portray a person more negatively than they truly are. I don't think saying I'm smarter than a person does that in any way. And regardless, there's plenty of room below that bar for one to feel very dignified in their level of intelligence.
But those aren't my words or opinion. It's a popular Christian site, and they are explaining their beliefs concerning the topic. I was interested in your opinion on it because it seems different from yours, yet you are playing the old "I don't click links" game. I don't get it. I'm not paraphrasing a 3 page website, and it's a stupid expectation for you to have. If you don't want to give an opinion, don't.<quoted text>
As far as links, give me your own words. I don't post links to LDS sites that I know you don't care about reason and ask you to follow them. You would already doubt the source anyway. I also don't post scripture links and ask you to go read them. I speak in my own words and include a quote when necessary.
Explain yourself. I did not say "normal circumstances". I did not say "that you could not explain logically". Tell me what happened and how my actual question applies.<quoted text>
The fact is,that it did not happen under normal circumstances,moreover,the events that took place,that led to the response I received,could mnot be explained logically;
This is the rest of the information that I provided you with,which your response did not address,possibly because you were unable to.
Also, my response DOES address it because if it's true, it invalidates the remainder of your post.