Bible study rules for public schools ...

Bible study rules for public schools proposed

There are 138083 comments on the The Courier-Journal story from Feb 10, 2010, titled Bible study rules for public schools proposed. In it, The Courier-Journal reports that:

FRANKFORT, Ky. - The state would create rules for teaching about the Bible in public high schools under a bill filed Monday by three Democratic senators.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Courier-Journal.

TruthIs

Hazard, KY

#100557 Apr 22, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>You are not answering all the questions. Like why do you know homosexuality is an abomination?
Are you telling me it was not church policy to not allow blacks into the priesthood? Or are you purposely diverting because this is not a doctrine but a policy? Again, you are just avoiding so many of my questions.
I can't believe some people even waste a brainfart minute on stuff like this.

WHO CARES-that kind of stuff really isn't ANYONE else's business, except to those whom it pertains to.
There are people that accept that stuff and find it no flipping big deal, and then there are those who won't accept that type of stuff-just like ANY and EVERYthing else in this world.

It's the TERRORIST types in ANYHTHING, that think they have some sort of right to demand all people "behave/believe" the way THEY think they should, and when they don't, even WORSE, the twisted and warped think they have some sort of right to HARM or harass (or terrorize) others, for not believing the way that they do.
THOSE types are Sickos....no matter the race, creeds or colors of!

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#100558 Apr 22, 2013
TruthIs wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you just disagree with some of what is being quoted, because you don't like it-it doesn't suit your perspective, which is fine, but really, to assume anything beyond that, especially that one has any idea of what anyone else "thinks" "questions" or doesn't question, is just the epitomy of ignorance.
How would any of us know what any one questioned or didn't question, in any religion, especially over hundreds of years? That just makes no sense.
Just because we don't like something, specifically, something that isn't harming OTHERS, doesn't mean we have any "right" to trash it. Again, I personally find that type of illogic, abjectly ignorant...almost like trying to "brainwash" others, into demanding they see things ONLY the way they want us to, rather than allowing for individual freedom of thoughts, choices and beliefs.
If we weren't "allowed" (and that's almost apathetic to say that-because that too is just such an unrealisTic notion) these types of freedoms, we would all be mindless robots, or we'd be living in a communistic world (God help us, living like robots.
The idea of placing anything as some sort absolute "demagogue" is scary-prophet or not, because "absolute power corrupts absolutely". I also think there is far more to terrorism than just that "supernatural belief in what's beyond", far more to it, than just that nonsense.
I think we should add an additional curriculum in schools these days on "How to recognize brainwashing for all the wrong reasons tactics 101".
It' still okay to think for oneself these days, isn't it?
Ok, some may have questioned, but the churches hierarchy did not listen if anyone actually had the balls to ask them the question.
BTW, I am all for freedom of religion, unlike Moses and the claims of the ten commandments.

I am not speaking of all terrorism, I am speaking of the Islamic terrorism we have been hit with to date. It all stems from believing in prophets without question. Ignore that fact at your peril.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#100559 Apr 22, 2013
TruthIs wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you just disagree with some of what is being quoted, because you don't like it-it doesn't suit your perspective, which is fine, but really, to assume anything beyond that, especially that one has any idea of what anyone else "thinks" "questions" or doesn't question, is just the epitomy of ignorance.
How would any of us know what any one questioned or didn't question, in any religion, especially over hundreds of years? That just makes no sense.
Just because we don't like something, specifically, something that isn't harming OTHERS, doesn't mean we have any "right" to trash it. Again, I personally find that type of illogic, abjectly ignorant...almost like trying to "brainwash" others, into demanding they see things ONLY the way they want us to, rather than allowing for individual freedom of thoughts, choices and beliefs.
If we weren't "allowed" (and that's almost apathetic to say that-because that too is just such an unrealisTic notion) these types of freedoms, we would all be mindless robots, or we'd be living in a communistic world (God help us, living like robots.
The idea of placing anything as some sort absolute "demagogue" is scary-prophet or not, because "absolute power corrupts absolutely". I also think there is far more to terrorism than just that "supernatural belief in what's beyond", far more to it, than just that nonsense.
I think we should add an additional curriculum in schools these days on "How to recognize brainwashing for all the wrong reasons tactics 101".
It' still okay to think for oneself these days, isn't it?
If you think claiming homosexuality is a sin does no harm, then I think you are ignoring just what these beliefs lead to. Same for discrimination of black people.
TruthIs

Hazard, KY

#100560 Apr 22, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>So are you stronger due to your churches massive failure to treat black persons equally just as you now treat homosexuals without equality? If so, how?
And I understand you are not an apologetic as your excuses are lame, but they clearly suit yourself in order to keep faith.
Why do seem to think that "churches" (especially one particular denomination in particular) were the ONLY groups of people to fail on treating others equally?

Equality is logical-but were secular groups of people so "special" that they always treated others with equality?
I think not.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#100562 Apr 22, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Let me rephrase the question you skipped. What took so long for you or anyone in your church to question Brigham's policy?
I questioned it but no one really cared. Guess I was not high enough in the hierarchy. I was just a kid, but knew enough in those days that treating black people as lessors in such a manner was just wrong. No need of a holy ghost to tell me this.

Now I question the concept of homosexuality being a sin. Do you?
I have no idea why it took so long for the declaration to come forth that blacks could hold the priesthood. I always supposed it was because Brigham was a prophet and people were afraid to ask, or they just assumed he was right. Or maybe that some of what he said was right but some was his opinion. If we all came from Adam and Eve, maybe the curse of Cain was black skin. We have no clue because we weren't there. All we know now is that since the atonement of Christ, we are not responsible for any sins of our ancestors. So even if black skin was supposedly the mark of Cain, it wouldn't mean anything any more. So who knows, if that part is true, then maybe when people prayed for an answer, it was confusing because some could have been true, while the rest was Brigham's opinion. I really don't know. Sorry I can't answer this for you with certainty.

And no, I do not think that homosexuality will ever be acceptable to God, nor will His doctrine change on this. Even if society continues to find it more and more acceptable, I do not believe God will.
I have no problem with people that are gay. I have several friends and classmates that are gay, and we have great conversations about the topic. But I can't approve of the act itself so we do not talk about the details of their sex lives, but then again, I don't do that with my straight friends either.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#100563 Apr 22, 2013
TruthIs wrote:
<quoted text>
I can't believe some people even waste a brainfart minute on stuff like this.
WHO CARES-that kind of stuff really isn't ANYONE else's business, except to those whom it pertains to.
There are people that accept that stuff and find it no flipping big deal, and then there are those who won't accept that type of stuff-just like ANY and EVERYthing else in this world.
It's the TERRORIST types in ANYHTHING, that think they have some sort of right to demand all people "behave/believe" the way THEY think they should, and when they don't, even WORSE, the twisted and warped think they have some sort of right to HARM or harass (or terrorize) others, for not believing the way that they do.
THOSE types are Sickos....no matter the race, creeds or colors of!
So you think my questions here are bullying? Sorry, but I see the Mormon church being bullies by funding anti gay marriage initiatives.
I am for equal rights, not just for believers.
I push for no law that prevents a religious person from practicing their religion, as long as it does not harm anyone.
But I guess you are more interested in being PC. Well that is your choice, not mine. I will speak out again what I feel is bad. Don't like it, to bad. Religion has forced people like me to be quite for most of history, but freedom works both ways now. Atheists can speak out against religion.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#100564 Apr 22, 2013
TruthIs wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do seem to think that "churches" (especially one particular denomination in particular) were the ONLY groups of people to fail on treating others equally?
Equality is logical-but were secular groups of people so "special" that they always treated others with equality?
I think not.
Did I say that? Nope. I am simply pointing out if a church claims moral authority, then they are proved less than moral, then they should be exposed for the frauds they are.

I am speaking to one individual here and he claims to be Moron, so I am focused on that for now. But I certainly can show you how this happens in any religion and why it leads to terrorism in the case of many Muslims.
TruthIs

Hazard, KY

#100566 Apr 22, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Ok, some may have questioned, but the churches hierarchy did not listen if anyone actually had the balls to ask them the question.
BTW, I am all for freedom of religion, unlike Moses and the claims of the ten commandments.
I am not speaking of all terrorism, I am speaking of the Islamic terrorism we have been hit with to date. It all stems from believing in prophets without question. Ignore that fact at your peril.
Add from brainwashing of and instilling hateful plague propoganda by the same..and I would agree with out issue.

I happen to LIKE the Ten Commandments personally, and find a lot of common sense for peaceful, sane and decent living within them.
But I won't act like a twit and demand you like them...although I think people should respect the few that some of our civil and moral ethics are based on.
Otherwise, we'd just have anarchy all over.
Sasha

Glasgow, KY

#100567 Apr 22, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no idea why it took so long for the declaration to come forth that blacks could hold the priesthood. I always supposed it was because Brigham was a prophet and people were afraid to ask, or they just assumed he was right. Or maybe that some of what he said was right but some was his opinion. If we all came from Adam and Eve, maybe the curse of Cain was black skin. We have no clue because we weren't there. All we know now is that since the atonement of Christ, we are not responsible for any sins of our ancestors. So even if black skin was supposedly the mark of Cain, it wouldn't mean anything any more. So who knows, if that part is true, then maybe when people prayed for an answer, it was confusing because some could have been true, while the rest was Brigham's opinion. I really don't know. Sorry I can't answer this for you with certainty.
And no, I do not think that homosexuality will ever be acceptable to God, nor will His doctrine change on this. Even if society continues to find it more and more acceptable, I do not believe God will.
I have no problem with people that are gay. I have several friends and classmates that are gay, and we have great conversations about the topic. But I can't approve of the act itself so we do not talk about the details of their sex lives, but then again, I don't do that with my straight friends either.
Do you feel that one's sexual orientation is a choice?
TruthIs

Hazard, KY

#100568 Apr 22, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>

I have no problem with people that are gay. I have several friends and classmates that are gay, and we have great conversations about the topic. But I can't approve of the act itself so we do not talk about the details of their sex lives, but then again, I don't do that with my straight friends either.
Common sense, respect and decency! Who really wants to hear about other peoples personal business like that (like you said-whatever the preference is) especially in public places!

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#100569 Apr 22, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Did I say that? Nope. I am simply pointing out if a church claims moral authority, then they are proved less than moral, then they should be exposed for the frauds they are.

I am speaking to one individual here and he claims to be Moron, so I am focused on that for now. But I certainly can show you how this happens in any religion and why it leads to terrorism in the case of many Muslims.
I claim to be Moron?

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#100570 Apr 22, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no idea why it took so long for the declaration to come forth that blacks could hold the priesthood. I always supposed it was because Brigham was a prophet and people were afraid to ask, or they just assumed he was right. Or maybe that some of what he said was right but some was his opinion. If we all came from Adam and Eve, maybe the curse of Cain was black skin. We have no clue because we weren't there. All we know now is that since the atonement of Christ, we are not responsible for any sins of our ancestors. So even if black skin was supposedly the mark of Cain, it wouldn't mean anything any more. So who knows, if that part is true, then maybe when people prayed for an answer, it was confusing because some could have been true, while the rest was Brigham's opinion. I really don't know. Sorry I can't answer this for you with certainty.
And no, I do not think that homosexuality will ever be acceptable to God, nor will His doctrine change on this. Even if society continues to find it more and more acceptable, I do not believe God will.
I have no problem with people that are gay. I have several friends and classmates that are gay, and we have great conversations about the topic. But I can't approve of the act itself so we do not talk about the details of their sex lives, but then again, I don't do that with my straight friends either.
Well clearly Brigham, the great prophet of the Mormon church did not get the memo you claimed all know. That " we are not responsible for any sins of our ancestors." And following prophets did not change the policy why again? Did they also not know that sins of the father are not passed down?

You still did not answer why you believe the claim in the bible about homosexuality must be true when you have admitted prophets can be wrong? Really, your statement on homosexuality answers not a single thing I asked on the subject.

)Oh, and science can explain why some have black skin, mystery solved. It has nothing to do with the ignorant claims some fallible prophet made back before science knew such answers.
TruthIs

Hazard, KY

#100571 Apr 22, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>So you think my questions here are bullying? Sorry, but I see the Mormon church being bullies by funding anti gay marriage initiatives.
I am for equal rights, not just for believers.
I push for no law that prevents a religious person from practicing their religion, as long as it does not harm anyone.
But I guess you are more interested in being PC. Well that is your choice, not mine. I will speak out again what I feel is bad. Don't like it, to bad. Religion has forced people like me to be quite for most of history, but freedom works both ways now. Atheists can speak out against religion.
Do you think personal small business owners should have a right to refuse service to those whom they might wish to service?

I do. No matter the race, creed, color or any other preferences.

So much for PC for me huh?

Speak out all you wish too, just don't expect everyone else to agree with you, or share your sentiments.

That's just reality.
TruthIs

Hazard, KY

#100572 Apr 22, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>So you think my questions here are bullying? Sorry, but I see the Mormon church being bullies by funding anti gay marriage initiatives.
I am for equal rights, not just for believers.
I push for no law that prevents a religious person from practicing their religion, as long as it does not harm anyone.
But I guess you are more interested in being PC. Well that is your choice, not mine. I will speak out again what I feel is bad. Don't like it, to bad. Religion has forced people like me to be quite for most of history, but freedom works both ways now. Atheists can speak out against religion.
and peas: You;re a little overbearing and snarky with people tha might not agree with YOUR perspective, and that hold their own beliefs.

If any such gay person wishes to join a church-then perhaps Mormonism is NOT the church they should join. There's TONs of others that see things differently. Why would anyone want to join a church that they didn't share the same beliefs with anyway?(talk about ILLogical!)

and again-I actually do not do "poliTical correctness" very well-not at all lol...sooooo badly sooooooooo...:-).
So AGAIN-speak fer yerself, I've often Patoo-ied on PC (and paid the prices for it!) stumpy!

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#100573 Apr 22, 2013
TruthIs wrote:
<quoted text>
Add from brainwashing of and instilling hateful plague propoganda by the same..and I would agree with out issue.
I happen to LIKE the Ten Commandments personally, and find a lot of common sense for peaceful, sane and decent living within them.
But I won't act like a twit and demand you like them...although I think people should respect the few that some of our civil and moral ethics are based on.
Otherwise, we'd just have anarchy all over.
If you like the commandments, fine, but kind of hypocritical to complain about someone demanding what to believe then as this is just what the commandments do.
I have a serious problem when people demand the commandments be posted by our government as they mostly would be unconstitutional to enforce as law and are not within the spirit of freedom of religion.
TruthIs

Hazard, KY

#100574 Apr 22, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
I claim to be Moron?
Just don't claim to be Katlick-there's some that will attack you with such venom, you'll think you're looking at a rattlesnake!!

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#100575 Apr 22, 2013
Sasha wrote:
<quoted text>Do you feel that one's sexual orientation is a choice?
I believe that our surroundings and our experiences, in conjunction with the way we were raised, shapes who we become.
For example, one of my friends that is gay was badly picked on all through school. He grew up poor and did not have access to running water. The bullies capitalized and made his life tough until he got out of school. Once he started working and earning money, he moved away. But of course this stuck with him and he had a lot of social problems. He couldn't talk to girls because he got so nervous around them. He worked with mostly guys and he could always talk more openly with guys because he could be himself and not worry about impressing them. One of the guys that he worked with let it be known that he was gay, and over the course of about 5 years, they formed a relationship.
He said he is still more attracted to girls, but feels more comfortable around guys. He has no problem saying he wasn't born gay. In his case, it could be said that this was a choice. But it certainly doesn't seem like a cognizant choice that he made. It seems like he became a victim of his childhood.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#100576 Apr 22, 2013
Sasha wrote:
<quoted text>Do you feel that one's sexual orientation is a choice?
To answer briefly, I do not think God predestines His children to have a tendency towards a sin that He condemns.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#100577 Apr 22, 2013
TruthIs wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think personal small business owners should have a right to refuse service to those whom they might wish to service?
I do. No matter the race, creed, color or any other preferences.
So much for PC for me huh?
Speak out all you wish too, just don't expect everyone else to agree with you, or share your sentiments.
That's just reality.
If they refuse service due to race, then I have a problem with it.

I certainly do not expect all to agree with me. Why would you assume this is what I think?

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#100578 Apr 22, 2013
TruthIs wrote:
<quoted text>Common sense, respect and decency! Who really wants to hear about other peoples personal business like that (like you said-whatever the preference is) especially in public places!
Agreed. Holding hands, and a kiss on the lips is fine in public, but much more than that and I prefer they find a room, regardless of sexual preference.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Do you think Kelly Sprinkles qualified for supe... 3 min Local 7
Knox county marijuana petition starting !!! 3 hr football head 5
What's Going On With Patrick Wilson? 4 hr Wandering Individual 1
Sizemores 5 hr Hah 3
Go fund me scams 5 hr Dunno Bout All That 13
burger king service sucks!! 7 hr bk will still go on 9
tess fisher (Nov '10) 9 hr What 15
More from around the web

Barbourville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]