Bible study rules for public schools ...

Bible study rules for public schools proposed

There are 138492 comments on the The Courier-Journal story from Feb 10, 2010, titled Bible study rules for public schools proposed. In it, The Courier-Journal reports that:

FRANKFORT, Ky. - The state would create rules for teaching about the Bible in public high schools under a bill filed Monday by three Democratic senators.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Courier-Journal.

TruthIS

Hazard, KY

#100477 Apr 22, 2013
Satanic Priest wrote:
<quoted text>The word imbibe means to absorb information. You where thinking of the word indulge maybe?
Shows why you believe myths and cons are true, you are stupid.
I am building a church in Africa, they line up for miles to hear about jesus, please send as much of a love gift as you can
Quit being so narrow minded and only presenting one part of the definition.
I said IMBIBE and I meant IMBIBE.

SHAME on YOU!

Definition of IMBIBE
transitive verb
1
archaic : soak, steep
2
a : to receive into the mind and retain
b : to assimilate or take into solution
3
a : drink
b : to take in or up <a sponge imbibes moisture>

----------
a : to receive into the mind and retain

Sal'ut-aye!

And NO, I won't send any. There's not even enough to feed all of America.
Besides, any old hut will do for that sort of thing...and it's better that native populations (in any country) build such themselves. They are then at least some what appreciative when they have to DO THE WORK themselves.
TruthIS

Hazard, KY

#100478 Apr 22, 2013
Skeptical Spectacles wrote:
<quoted text>

I also happen to like the Arthurian legends and think they can serve a role in teaching about honor and chivalry. Does that mean I have to believe King Arthur to be real? No, of course not.
<quoted text>
Transaltion-Sexism 101, How to stick toes under stove, without getting the leash tangled.

Go make us a samitch, wormbrain.
TruthIS

Hazard, KY

#100479 Apr 22, 2013
ChromiuMan wrote:
<quoted text>
"basic human components?" "entitleMentally disabled?" Are you a Malthusian Teabagger?
What if I am?
You gonna stick me in a jar of blackballs for it?

(go ahead-I'll just already find something WAY better to do!!!)

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#100480 Apr 22, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>That mentality will always exist with the ignorant. To bad the "one true church" was so ignorant for that hundred years or so.
Point is, if you are going to claim "truth" and are proved to not have full truth, you are a failure at the game of god perfection expectation. Now if your prophets are just fallible men as you and I are, then stop calling them prophets and get off your high horse. Your church is no more true than any other.
Every prophet in the Old Testament had faults and sinned. It did not make them less of a prophet.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#100481 Apr 22, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>So your prophets are equals? Give me a break. Their is a leadership ladder (rank) in the Mormon church.
Maybe question your prophet on that?
As I said, people are equal. Callings have different scopes of responsibilities.
curious

Ocoee, FL

#100482 Apr 22, 2013
what wrote:
<quoted text>
revelations says 144,000 go to heaven....12k from each of the 12 original tribes of israel
JJG wrote:
What is really funny is that most Christians will end up in hell, according to the Bible on 12,000 will enter the kingdom of heaven

You are both wrong,thereby proving your lack of knowledge regarding the Scriptures.
You are reffering to Rev7;4 to 8 and conveniently left out the next verse Revelation 7:9
The Great Multitude in White Robes
9 After this I looked, and there before me was a( GREAT multitude that no one could COUNT), from EVERY nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands.
You both,are either misinformeb OR intentionally deceitful

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#100483 Apr 22, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Of course you mean if they claim to not have homosexual relations.
It is no secret your church opposes gay marriage. Again, behind the times of much of our government.
That is correct. Homosexuality is a sin. It doesn't matter what the government says about it. God made his stance known very famously in the OT.
However, like most sin, people can turn from their sin and be forgiven.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#100484 Apr 22, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>First, acting as if you know it is a sin is a problem. Second, you act as if all in the priesthood never sin.
But of course you take your church's stance without question, clearly.
Acting as if I know it is a sin is a problem? What?

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#100485 Apr 22, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Are you joking? I was in the church when the rule changed. I lived in Florida. Utah is not the only place Mormons were then or now. Evidently someone is feeding you a bunch of lies or else it is you who is willfully lying.
Their was controversy long before your superior prophets took a second to ask god. They did not worry about it because even our government was not to worried about it. Seems your perfect prophets just barely kept up with the times of government. Far from superior.
Sorry took so long to respond, had some computer problems.
Sorry I missed this one. Please, tell me all about your time as a Mormon

“pervinco per logica”

Since: Feb 12

Eradicate willful ignorance.

#100486 Apr 22, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
That is correct. Homosexuality is a sin. It doesn't matter what the government says about it. God made his stance known very famously in the OT.
Not to go on too much of a tangent, but it would be nice if somebody somewhere could actually justify following parts of the Old Testament (like this) and ignoring others (like shaving, eating shellfish/pork, tattoos, etc.).

I mean, I've heard the tired old Acts 15 and Matthew 5 stuff, which various sects use to deem valid whatever things they choose (and which in fact can be easily used to refute your position), but I've never seen any sort of logical justification. And I suspect there is none. It's more likely that the most life-interfering and ridiculous laws are simply ignored, and people rely instead on the words of a "prophet" to tell them what is OK.

“There is no god”

Since: Jul 12

War, WV

#100487 Apr 22, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
That is correct. Homosexuality is a sin. It doesn't matter what the government says about it. God made his stance known very famously in the OT.
However, like most sin, people can turn from their sin and be forgiven.
So you do not eat pork?
Since your god is not real people who do not belong to your "faith" are not doing anything wrong when they ignore your bible

“There is no god”

Since: Jul 12

War, WV

#100488 Apr 22, 2013
The christian cult needs an extra large cup of "mind your own business"
If they minded their own business they would be able to live their lives by their beliefs (not that they want to, their beliefs are for every one else) and no one would care

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#100489 Apr 22, 2013
Satanic Priest wrote:
<quoted text>So you do not eat pork?
Since your god is not real people who do not belong to your "faith" are not doing anything wrong when they ignore your bible
Your opinion. You're entitled to it.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#100490 Apr 22, 2013
Satanic Priest wrote:
The christian cult needs an extra large cup of "mind your own business"
If they minded their own business they would be able to live their lives by their beliefs (not that they want to, their beliefs are for every one else) and no one would care
I have not forced my faith on you. You ask me questions. I answer.
Matter of Fact

Monticello, KY

#100491 Apr 22, 2013
You all rot in total ignorance. Jesus has no prophets now, only witnesses. When He said it is finished He meant it. The prophets were until John it plainly says. The OT is prophetic, the NT is prophecy fulfilled. When Jesus said He will say "depart from me ye workers of iniquity, for I never knew you" maybe He should have added and YOU never knew ME either. You are all clueless. "Ever learning but NEVER coming to the knowledge of the Truth."

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#100492 Apr 22, 2013
Matter of Fact wrote:
You all rot in total ignorance. Jesus has no prophets now, only witnesses. When He said it is finished He meant it. The prophets were until John it plainly says. The OT is prophetic, the NT is prophecy fulfilled. When Jesus said He will say "depart from me ye workers of iniquity, for I never knew you" maybe He should have added and YOU never knew ME either. You are all clueless. "Ever learning but NEVER coming to the knowledge of the Truth."
What about Jesus' prophecy about the restitution of all things before His return? What about the passage that says " Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets."?
Looks to me like the prophecy was fulfilled in Revelations that says there would be a period of time when the Heavens would be rolled up like a scroll and God would not speak to man during this time. But if the other 2 scriptures are true, you should be looking for a prophet to once again speak for God on earth.
Don't judge too quickly and be just like the Sanhedrin that missed the coming of the Christ because they were so stuck in their comfortable laws and traditions.

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#100493 Apr 22, 2013
TruthIS wrote:
<quoted text>
What if I am?
You gonna stick me in a jar of blackballs for it?
(go ahead-I'll just already find something WAY better to do!!!)
I one breath you denounce labeling groups, then in more than one post you proceed to do so.
Ignorance is not the "enlightenment" you should be heralding as a virtue - yet you apparently do.
Look up Malthus before you praise his ideology.
If still lay claim to being a Mathusian Teabagger, then I will state that you are not only a hypocrite and an unconscionable contradiction, but the very antithesis of what you claim to be as well as what Christ was attempting to teach.

“There is no god”

Since: Jul 12

War, WV

#100494 Apr 22, 2013
Sounds like your jesus needed some medication

“Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law, and a man's enemies will be the members of his own household. He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me; and he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me." -- Jesus (Matthew 10:34-37)
You are funny

Johnson City, TN

#100495 Apr 22, 2013
Satanic Priest wrote:
Sounds like your jesus needed some medication
“Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law, and a man's enemies will be the members of his own household. He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me; and he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me." -- Jesus (Matthew 10:34-37)
Ever here the term, "text and context", yea I bet you have! You use scripture as does the TV preacher as they steal from the old and feeble; like them you are a liar and an abomination! Play your harp for the weak minded. Enjoy the hour of the fool, the clock is ticking! For those watching, reading all of Chapter 10, it gives you the context of what Jesus was teaching. And you Mr priest, continue to amuse.

“pervinco per logica”

Since: Feb 12

Eradicate willful ignorance.

#100496 Apr 22, 2013
You are funny wrote:
<quoted text>
Ever here the term, "text and context", yea I bet you have! You use scripture as does the TV preacher as they steal from the old and feeble; like them you are a liar and an abomination! Play your harp for the weak minded. Enjoy the hour of the fool, the clock is ticking! For those watching, reading all of Chapter 10, it gives you the context of what Jesus was teaching. And you Mr priest, continue to amuse.
That's not taken out of context at all, idiot. It's meant to say exactly what it says and is in a part of the text that allows it to stand alone. So defend it.

As for the whole using the scripture to steal from people thing... how is that not what every church does? The way I see it, the only difference is magnitude.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Jeff & Jamie Mays (Jul '11) 10 min cupid 23
Rabbitt cox arrest 13 min crooked official 15
burger king service sucks!! 13 min sam an ellla 16
Courtney Simpson 58 min tired 2
Disability Fraud 1 hr goodone 41
Need Deep freezer 1 hr Maytag repairman 4
Teresa Gray in Jail Again 2 hr Tim 8
More from around the web

Barbourville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]