Eh....you're just mad because you too, do NOT know the exact time or the all the inclusive elements of the happenstance known as the creation of this earth and the inhabitants thereof as we know it.<quoted text>
I understood about 50% of this post. I don't speak whatever language you are using in half of it.
Creationism is stupid in general, all brands of it. The reason it is stupid is because it begins with a conclusion: god did it. And it then rationalizes everything to fit that conclusion. It does so by rejecting conflicting evidence and exaggerating confirming evidence. Why is it that a Creationist will scrutinize every single millimeter of the strata of the Grand Canyon looking for evidence of a Flood but they will ignore the nested hierarchy of DNA evidence that smacks the rest of us in the face?
Because they already have their answer and they're just trying to keep the argument going.
Don't feel too bad, NO scientist has yet to be able to give the accurate, precise and exact accountability of it all yet!