"Not all scientists are stupid"?? As if most of them are? You have a very strange definition of stupid if the most highly trained minds on the planet count as such.<quoted text>
Not all scientist are stupid, many recognize that there must be a creator. Anyone who has examined the complexity of life on earth would have to admit there is no way it could come about by blind chance.
Can you explain why that book is in many libraries throught the U.S. and Canada.
All you can do is try to belittle anyone who does not buy into your false claims with no evidence to support them. You are correct about evidence not being an element of faith. So why don't you drop this THEORY of evolution with no evidence or produce one shread of evidence to support it! As the old saying goes, "put up or shut up!"
"Anyone who has examined the complexity of life on earth would have to admit there is no way it could come about by blind chance."
People who examine the complexity of life on earth are called biologists (and related "ists"). Most of them are atheists, agnostics, or otherwise non-religious. So that kinda throws a monkey wrench in your hypothesis.
Also, "blind chance" is not what drives biological diversity. That is a Creationist strawman. Crack a book. I suggest "What Evolution Is" by Ernst Mayr as a very good primer on the subject of evolution.
Your last paragraph is weird. Why are you arguing with me by simply reversing all the things you think I'm saying? It is not a very compelling argument for the accused killer to scream at the prosecuting attorney "Oh yeah, well I think YOU did it!".