doesn't have to specifically state that atheism is a belief system. regarding epistomology.<quoted text>
Your first link is to a philosophy page that discusses the many interpretations of atheism and how they apply to philosophical ideas. At no point in that whole article does it define atheism as a belief system.
Sections 3 and 4 further investigate the epistemic role of perception and introduce two distinct conceptions of the architecture of our belief system: foundationalism and coherentism. It is shown how perceptual experience and perceptual beliefs are integrated into these systems. Finally, section 5 turns to the externalist view that thinkers need not be aware of what justifies their perceptual beliefs.
what you think is the whole point of this argument. thinking is of the mind. it isn't of any thing else.<quoted text>
Your second link is to an atheist blog. This author accepts that rejection of god is enough to be called an atheist, as all reason indicates. But his opinion is that atheism probably should be part of a wider worldview rooted in naturalism. Personally, I agree. As I have said over and over I came to be atheist with regard to deities BECAUSE OF my naturalistic worldview. I'm a skeptic.
I think you are being intentionally misleading in your posts. You seem to have no way to make your argument otherwise.
And frankly, like other posts I've seen on Topix lately, it is quite a dumb argument.
can you show me an accurate image of the mind? can you describe it's fundamental properties?