'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Se...

'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

There are 286587 comments on the thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com story from Oct 1, 2010, titled 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate. In it, thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com reports that:

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Join the discussion below, or Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com.

Jay

Springville, TN

#157924 Mar 21, 2014
If you think inner city blacks are fed up with Obama, you need to listen to the Black Panther leader call Obama a "blood sucker." This man is to be reckoned with.

Sheesh!

Well

Kathleen, GA

#157925 Mar 21, 2014
Limbertwig wrote:
<quoted text>Wonder what the Koch brothers plan to get in return for that 30, million?
Could it be they are just civic minded individuals who want Congress confined to it's enumerated functions? Or are they seeking special consideration from Congress that will not be be afforded to other Americans? In any event, would it really matter how much money was spent on influencing congressional and presidential elections if we had a law that said "whatever Congress does for one American it must do for all Americans." It wouldn't benefit the Koch brothers or anyone else for that matter if we had a law like this, coupled with Congress limited to its enumerated powers, which really is an affirmation of the equality under the law principle. There would be nothing to gain by bestowing large sums of cash to political campaigns because Congressmen and the president would be unable to grant favors to some people at the expense of other people. Bribing elected officials would be a waste of time because Congress would be limited in what it could authorize in the first place not to mention as soon as it was discovered one American was receiving a benefit that another American was not receiving, that benefit would be afforded to all Americans. There's one big problem with all this. Most people like treating people differently under the law and they come up with all kinds of reasons to justify unequal treatment under the law.
OZombies

Van Nuys, CA

#157926 Mar 21, 2014
Fed Up Again wrote:
This is to the smart ones on here. Hint: you are not a dumbazz liberal.
Please pray that China's government will keep Michelle Obama there for ever and B.O. will go over there to retrieve her and kiddos and China will keep him also.
Yet, we need to consider China is smarter than we believe and they know Americans will not pay any ransom for them and then they are stuck with the thugs.
Obama: who needs enemies when you have him.
Since Obama is so popular in his fatherland Kenya,
he should go after his second term here and be president of Kenya. At least, America can be what use to be and Barack Hussein Obama can then FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM KENYA...since his own people loved him so much, they wouldn't mind. And they can keep their healthcare and their doctor. Now we know why Obama is helping Kenya.

“Not afraid to stand alone.”

Since: Jun 09

Flat Lick Ky.

#157927 Mar 21, 2014
Well wrote:
<quoted text>Could it be they are just civic minded individuals who want Congress confined to it's enumerated functions? Or are they seeking special consideration from Congress that will not be be afforded to other Americans? In any event, would it really matter how much money was spent on influencing congressional and presidential elections if we had a law that said "whatever Congress does for one American it must do for all Americans." It wouldn't benefit the Koch brothers or anyone else for that matter if we had a law like this, coupled with Congress limited to its enumerated powers, which really is an affirmation of the equality under the law principle. There would be nothing to gain by bestowing large sums of cash to political campaigns because Congressmen and the president would be unable to grant favors to some people at the expense of other people. Bribing elected officials would be a waste of time because Congress would be limited in what it could authorize in the first place not to mention as soon as it was discovered one American was receiving a benefit that another American was not receiving, that benefit would be afforded to all Americans. There's one big problem with all this. Most people like treating people differently under the law and they come up with all kinds of reasons to justify unequal treatment under the law.
Sounds like a plan to me....

Since: Jun 12

Deadwood, SD

#157928 Mar 21, 2014
OZombies wrote:
<quoted text>
You have COMMON SENSE...!!
Thank You,

I think, Lol!

“Not afraid to stand alone.”

Since: Jun 09

Flat Lick Ky.

#157929 Mar 21, 2014
OZombies wrote:
<quoted text>
Since Obama is so popular in his fatherland Kenya,
he should go after his second term here and be president of Kenya. At least, America can be what use to be and Barack Hussein Obama can then FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM KENYA...since his own people loved him so much, they wouldn't mind. And they can keep their healthcare and their doctor. Now we know why Obama is helping Kenya.
You should see the golden throne he had made, he's going home to Kenya in style. Imagine how proud the Kenyans must be, their King will be home soon.
OZombies

Los Angeles, CA

#157930 Mar 21, 2014
_Twisted Wicked_ wrote:
<quoted text>Thank You,
I think, Lol!
You're Welcome ...!!
:-)!!

“Not afraid to stand alone.”

Since: Jun 09

Flat Lick Ky.

#157931 Mar 21, 2014
OZombies wrote:
<quoted text>
You're Welcome ...!!
:-)!!
Mislim, da sem kon&#269;no dobil ta jezik stvar pogruntal.

“Rational Selfishness”

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#157932 Mar 21, 2014
Limbertwig wrote:
<quoted text>
You should see the golden throne he had made, he's going home to Kenya in style. Imagine how proud the Kenyans must be, their King will be home soon.
You have a good point, Sir... and it's mos likely tue as well...

“Not afraid to stand alone.”

Since: Jun 09

Flat Lick Ky.

#157933 Mar 21, 2014
The Specialist wrote:
<quoted text>You have a good point, Sir... and it's mos likely tue as well...
It made as much sense as what she said.

“Not afraid to stand alone.”

Since: Jun 09

Flat Lick Ky.

#157934 Mar 21, 2014
OZombies wrote:
<quoted text>
You're Welcome ...!!
:-)!!
let me try this again.

da li ste imali dobar dan?

“Not afraid to stand alone.”

Since: Jun 09

Flat Lick Ky.

#157935 Mar 21, 2014
The Specialist wrote:
<quoted text>You have a good point, Sir... and it's mos likely tue as well...
What brings you out of hiding?
Jay

Springville, TN

#157936 Mar 22, 2014
Limbertwig wrote:
<quoted text>let me try this again.
da li ste imali dobar dan?
Let me try this:

Sei un asino muto come tutti i liberali

Arrivederci

“Not afraid to stand alone.”

Since: Jun 09

Flat Lick Ky.

#157937 Mar 22, 2014
Jay wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me try this:
Sei un asino muto come tutti i liberali
Arrivederci
Non č cosė stupido come te.
angel

Boise, ID

#157938 Mar 22, 2014
Jay wrote:
Broke Party: Inner-City Blacks Abandoning Obama & Democrat's Liberal Agenda
So all these black people in this community once thought Hope and Change meant them.?
Not the least bit happy now, do you really think they would vote for a white woman whose agenda is the same thing? Good luck with that!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =fdTihf2_GGMXX&nofeather=T rue
Yeah. Im sure inner city Blacks are going to come rushing to the GOP.
I know it said it on YOUTUBE and all..... but kind of doubt it.
angel

Boise, ID

#157939 Mar 22, 2014
Goodbyesenate wrote:
<quoted text> So what you are trying to say is that the democrat party will buy 2016 election much like you did in 2012
The Democrats didnt have to buy it.
The Electorate,the Majority of American Voters found the Ignorant Toxic Swill Republicans and Teabaggers were ladling out so repulsive it was an easy choice.
Which is why the Right are two time.... about to be a third, LOSERS .
Commietator

Madisonville, KY

#157942 Mar 22, 2014
How do Repubs in DC continue to fool their voters? All anyone needs to do is just a little research.
1) Government spending since Nixon has increased more with Republican Presidents than with Democrat Presidents.
2) Job growth is almost double under Democrat Presidents than it is under Republican.
3) Some of the most strict gun Laws have been under Republican Presidents.
.
As always none of my facts posted can be proven wrong.
angel

Boise, ID

#157944 Mar 22, 2014
Commietator wrote:
How do Repubs in DC continue to fool their voters? All anyone needs to do is just a little research.
1) Government spending since Nixon has increased more with Republican Presidents than with Democrat Presidents.
2) Job growth is almost double under Democrat Presidents than it is under Republican.
3) Some of the most strict gun Laws have been under Republican Presidents.
.
As always none of my facts posted can be proven wrong.
Because the most exstensive Research the Repubs Halt and Lame Teabagger Base is likely to indulge in is trying to read the expiration dates on the back row of Milk Cartons at Costco.
And they know it.
Besides you know one of these Righty Culls will show up with Cut & Paste charts and tables pulled off the RightWing Inter-Nut Blogosphere that span three pages to try to prove your factual statistics ACTUALLY show the exact opposite(in their favor of course)
Beleive it their credo isnt whats True its what you can make people BELEIVE. Period.
Profesional Liars manipulating Stupes who Love to be Lied to.
The American Right Wing in a Nutshell.

Since: Oct 09

.

#157945 Mar 22, 2014
Commietator wrote:
How do Repubs in DC continue to fool their voters? All anyone needs to do is just a little research.
1) Government spending since Nixon has increased more with Republican Presidents than with Democrat Presidents.
2) Job growth is almost double under Democrat Presidents than it is under Republican.
3) Some of the most strict gun Laws have been under Republican Presidents.
.
***As always none of my facts posted can be proven wrong.***
FIRST and FOREMOST,***That is your "opinion" not "facts"***
1). I can be "proven" in many cases that it was not a President that created jobs, it was the opposing party Congress and Senate.
2). Redundant (see 1).
3). The Reagan "gun law" debate is mute Democrat majorities in house and Senate passed those laws.
freelance

Lexington, KY

#157946 Mar 22, 2014
Just heard O'bama cut off visa and mastercharge to 4 Russian banks.
Now that's action. Worse than dropping a bomb.
I guess he doesn't need the rep congress.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Chris N Daisy Hubbard 5 min facts 1
Collection/Barbies 46 min Skipper 2
Did Russia actually help Trump get Elected? 1 hr Chris_Jarvis 12
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 1 hr Patriot 166,315
Back and Forth 1 hr Good Job 3
Jerry Wayne Garland property 2 hr fred b 7
Jason miller 2 hr Jobeth 1

Barbourville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Barbourville Mortgages