'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Se...

'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

There are 274763 comments on the thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com story from Oct 1, 2010, titled 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate. In it, thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com reports that:

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Join the discussion below, or Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com.

republiCONS

Elizabethtown, KY

#144269 Jan 12, 2014
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>I see a pattern of you and the thoughts of sexual perversions. Is that why you continue to use the goat calls?. Most of your post, if you care to look back, almost always contain some form of perverted sex or sex acts.
Very odd. Where you sexually molested as a child? That could explain your abnormal fascinations.
I think you may be onto something there Injudgement. I basically report all of that with the rewrite of that article except for . that last line. Although I think it is a some sad, lonely porn freak. I rarely waste my time typing responding to the twisted idiot.

Great posts as always. Have a goodnight.

RIP GOP

DITCH MITCH
Info

Richmond, KY

#144270 Jan 12, 2014
demotards are stoopid wrote:
<quoted text>
lib·er·al
ffaaggggy-minded: intolerant of different views and standards of any kind of behavior
sodomistic politically and ethically: favoring rectal examinations especially from political figures end freedom and promotes thugacracy, distribute other peoples money, and molest the personal parts of the individual
generous: freely confiscating money, time, or some other ass,
Synonyms: fag-minded, gay-minded, nonmature, nonthinking, intolerant, lazy
Liberal Family Value
Accepting and loving as many fffaaagggs as you can, no matter what color, nationality, or sexual orientation they are.
"Liberalism is a disease"
Yes, because telling others about your lifestyle of placing objects in your recture of others rather than just yourself, being more concerned about people's communicable diseases, wanting to keep religion out of everybodys life and believing EVERYONE should be taxed to slavery is just so DISEASED,
Liberalism, above all, means emancipation from any form of social decency, sexual inadequacies, prejudice against those with moral standards, discriminate against anyone who opposes us, invoking poverty by crushing the middle class
NOT PROUD TO BE LIBERAL
Liberal
because greed, hate, and fear just work great for them
Retards would rather be a liberal than a real human being. They are CONs.
RIP DNC
Republican Family Value: pretend to not be gay but slip around & be gay.duh
Republican Christian Values: piss on the poor...
Republican means: Lie & Deny blame everyone else pretend to be Godly but really thinks they are Godly!!! LOL
republiCONS

Elizabethtown, KY

#144271 Jan 12, 2014
ShehotterthanHILLARY wrote:
<quoted text>
Reports of my demise were as "FOOLISH"
as you are UNWISE.
Emily I'm not, just call me Dick
I'm a dude, not a chick.
You definitely are a DICK.

RIP GOP

DITCH MITCH
bccb

Ashburn, VA

#144273 Jan 12, 2014
shhh dont tell

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#144274 Jan 12, 2014
demotards are stoopid wrote:
<quoted text>
I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go.
It's roses pub. I'm an illegal there lol
angel

Boise, ID

#144275 Jan 13, 2014
Info wrote:
<quoted text>
Republican Family Value: pretend to not be gay but slip around & be gay.duh
Republican Christian Values: piss on the poor...
Republican means: Lie & Deny blame everyone else pretend to be Godly but really thinks they are Godly!!! LOL
You cant reconcile Christian Values with Teabagger "Values".
They are diametrically opposed anyone who says otherwise is a Hypocrite.
angel

Boise, ID

#144276 Jan 13, 2014
demotards are stoopid wrote:
Its time for one of my favorite posts again libtards,
...and then he woke up.
There is no way ANY academic with any sense of personal pride would post that kind of meaningless 'gobshite' and declare thamselves to be a professor.
I just can't quit laughing at this, LOLOLOL, you libtards support ffaaaagggsss stuffing things in each others anal cavities, guys having sex with guys and underage boys, homos-bragging that they are fffaaaagggs, the killing of unborn children for social convenience, penalizing success from those who take the risk, subsidizing inner city blacks for welfare votes, a racist pig that bows to the King of Saudi Arabia, a marxist who tells you that you can keep your healthcare, sexual predators as your keynote speaker, and you mention personal pride,
ROTFL, LOLOL,
I am going to copy this post and repost it time and time again,
LOLOLOL, what a bunch of sodolib sheepletards,
Oh. Look. Another leering gibbering Teabagging Pervo.*Yawn*
angel

Boise, ID

#144277 Jan 13, 2014
republiCONS wrote:
Caribou Barbie is funny too. haha
Why I Really, Really Hope Sarah Palin Runs in 2016
Let’s be honest, Sarah Palin is the gift that just keeps on giving. Any time she throws herself into the middle of some sort of scandal and makes some bizarre comment to keep her book sales going, it’s like Santa Claus came to town if you’re a political writer or pundit. Palin is nothing short of a gold mine, regardless of your political affiliation. Why? Because every time she opens her mouth and says something outrageous or just plain stupid, people come out of the woodwork to either mock her or support whatever dumb idea she just had.
Caribou Barbie (as I like to call her) isn’t stupid. Making yourself the darling of the Tea Party after being a failed VP nominee and only serving 2 years as governor isn’t dumb – it takes a certain amount of strategic savvy. Getting hundreds of people to show up at a Minnesota mall, a Wal-Mart in Texas or a Barnes and Noble in The Villages, Florida to buy your latest book isn’t a sign of stupidity. It actually shows enough sense to know where you can constantly tap into xenophobia and ignorance and convert it into cash any time you need it. Even Fox News and Roger Ailes know that whenever they need a ratings bump, all they have to do is get her to come on and say something to get liberals all riled up while their ever-aging audience eats it up with a spoon.
Again, Sarah isn’t stupid. I wouldn’t say she’s a candidate for Mensa but then again, liberals need to stop referring to her as dumb because she’s anything but. I know showing up with a Big Gulp at a Republican conference or insisting that Obamacare is the modern version of sending your relatives off to die on an iceberg seems ludicrous, but it absolutely sells to the people who follow her. So why do I want her to run so badly? It’s simple. As I stated earlier, every time Sarah says something stupid, a political or comedy writer gets paid. There’s an entire industry out there that makes money whenever she or Ted Cruz or any of the others say something outrageous.
Trust me, the Republican Party has been a treasure trove over the last few years. I don’t see her making any serious move for running, even though my crazy Tea Party ex in-laws would be thrilled if she did. At the most, she’ll make a teasing tour of Iowa just to get the Tea Party faithful all fired up and their wallets open. It’ll be a few stops at a couple of gun ranges, several 7-Elevens, and all eight Sam’s Club locations to sign copies of her newest book. Then it’ll be back off to Fox News to complain about how the liberal media (that’s us!) were so harsh to her and how she needs to get back to family life.
But pretty please with a moose on top, Sarah will you please run? Or at least pretend to? How about just saying that you’re exploring your options? I know you know how to still do that wink and a hair flip. I’m sure you know how to say “you betcha” and give those old Tea Party patriots a sensation in their pantaloons they haven’t experienced since the last time you visited The Villages to sell another book. Come on Sarah, just once more. For old times sake?
http://www.forwardprogressives.com/why-i-real...
She is a late night comedian's gift that keeps on giving.LOL
RIP GOP
DITCH MITCH
She has just enough substanceless,Reality Show charisma to spell-bind the sort of Culls who are transfixed by crap like Duck Dynasty and Nascar and savvy enough to know you cant go wrong telling the Teabagger base what it WANTS to hear regardless of whether or not its true or even sane.

Since: Oct 09

.

#144278 Jan 13, 2014
angel wrote:
<quoted text>You cant reconcile Christian Values with Teabagger "Values".
They are diametrically opposed anyone who says otherwise is a Hypocrite.
The onslaught of liberal/progressive "broad/sweeping" generalizations are making y'all look desperate, also the more ad hominem, non sequitur crap y'all sling the more it sticks to your own hands.

Your "constitutional scholar" is very lacking in the most basic understanding of that which he is proclaimed to be an expert!
Noel Canning v. National Labor Relations Board
The Senate WAS NOT in “recess”…in fact; they were meeting every three days in “pro forma sessions” to fulfill the requirement that the chamber was NOT in recess, in order to keep “recess powers” from taking effect.
Can you smell what Obama stepped in? It smells like the stuff y'all post day in and day out!

No...I will not ROTFLMOA, because it's actually bad for America to have a POTUS would intentionally disregard the Untied States Constitution just to further his own ambition or a temporary political goal.

My prediction: this case will not be decided in Obama's favor.
angel

Boise, ID

#144281 Jan 13, 2014
Ari son of Anarchy wrote:
<quoted text>
The onslaught of liberal/progressive "broad/sweeping" generalizations are making y'all look desperate, also the more ad hominem, non sequitur crap y'all sling the more it sticks to your own hands.
Your "constitutional scholar" is very lacking in the most basic understanding of that which he is proclaimed to be an expert!
Noel Canning v. National Labor Relations Board
The Senate WAS NOT in “recess”…in fact; they were meeting every three days in “pro forma sessions” to fulfill the requirement that the chamber was NOT in recess, in order to keep “recess powers” from taking effect.
Can you smell what Obama stepped in? It smells like the stuff y'all post day in and day out!
No...I will not ROTFLMOA, because it's actually bad for America to have a POTUS would intentionally disregard the Untied States Constitution just to further his own ambition or a temporary political goal.
My prediction: this case will not be decided in Obama's favor.
I think your going to be disappointed on that count but well see.
angel

Boise, ID

#144282 Jan 13, 2014
Ari son of Anarchy wrote:
<quoted text>
The onslaught of liberal/progressive "broad/sweeping" generalizations are making y'all look desperate, also the more ad hominem, non sequitur crap y'all sling the more it sticks to your own hands.
Your "constitutional scholar" is very lacking in the most basic understanding of that which he is proclaimed to be an expert!
Noel Canning v. National Labor Relations Board
The Senate WAS NOT in “recess”…in fact; they were meeting every three days in “pro forma sessions” to fulfill the requirement that the chamber was NOT in recess, in order to keep “recess powers” from taking effect.
Can you smell what Obama stepped in? It smells like the stuff y'all post day in and day out!
No...I will not ROTFLMOA, because it's actually bad for America to have a POTUS would intentionally disregard the Untied States Constitution just to further his own ambition or a temporary political goal.
My prediction: this case will not be decided in Obama's favor.
The secret to slinging ad hominem,non sequitur crap is: sling it quickly.BEFORE it has a chance to begin setting up .(and obtaining that sticky viscosity that makes it difficult to get off your hands.)
Generally its been my experience that you have about a four second window.

Since: Oct 09

.

#144283 Jan 13, 2014
angel wrote:
<quoted text> The secret to slinging ad hominem,non sequitur crap is: sling it quickly.BEFORE it has a chance to begin setting up .(and obtaining that sticky viscosity that makes it difficult to get off your hands.)
Generally its been my experience that you have about a four second window.
I always use shovel.

Since: Oct 09

.

#144285 Jan 13, 2014
One more before I go:
Many times I have seen my Liberal/Progressive opponents here state that "Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor".

Facts; however tell another story, Out of all Senate and Congressional representatives, Democrats have more wealth than Republicans.
This fact is an example of how well Liberal media distorts and even hides the truth from the American public to manipulate outcomes in our political arena.

" congressional Democrats had a median net worth of $1.04 million, while congressional Republicans had a median net worth of almost exactly $1 million. In both cases, the figures are up from last year, when the numbers were $990,000 and $907,000, respectively. "

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2014/01/milli...

Since: Oct 09

.

#144286 Jan 13, 2014
Fox News Is A Joke wrote:
<quoted text>To deliver your useless abS.
Like YOU, that was a JOKE.

Do you have any knowledge at all?
angel

Boise, ID

#144287 Jan 13, 2014
Ari son of Anarchy wrote:
<quoted text>
I always use shovel.
Well yes,a Shovel is one of the Classics.
Nothing wrong with Old School.

Since: Oct 09

.

#144288 Jan 13, 2014
Do they allow you to post from the short bus?
Or are you at special ed. already?

That shall be thy name here from now on...Short Bus Eddie.

:b

C ya later Short Bus Eddie.

Tell the driver to clean your snot off those windows.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#144291 Jan 13, 2014
Fox News Is A Joke wrote:
<quoted text>Fact, it is Mitch McConnell and his fellow Republicans that have pushed for 30 Years to allow unlimited contributions from Corporations to Political Candidates.
Now deal with that Stonewall.
pssssssssssst, hey pookie, that was decided by the Supreme Court, not McConnell. Who do you get your info from, Mad Magazine?
conservative crapola

“Hicksville Hootenanny”

Since: Sep 13

Kornfield Kounty

#144293 Jan 13, 2014
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>
lafraud cry-a-thon: 1 year 68 days.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#144294 Jan 13, 2014
Fox News Is A Joke wrote:
<quoted text>More stupid bS from Le Crybaby.
Rush Lintball is not popular with anyone but racist old white people that are going to die off before 2016.
Oh my, poor baby gonna cry again. I'm sure your weak opinion of Rush or anybody for that matter might keep them awake for a nano second. Give it up puffer, your life has peaked at loser.

Since: May 11

Glasgow, UK

#144297 Jan 13, 2014
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Hillary Clinton ranks last on U.S.'most admired' list, behind Rush Limbaugh, Bush
By PAUL BEDARD | JANUARY 12, 2014 AT 1:56 PM
On the U.S. list, she does even worse, coming in 10th of 10 listed and most named. Among Americans, Pope Francis is the most admired, followed by the president, evangelist Billy Graham and former President George W. Bush. Even Rush Limbaugh, the nation's most popular conservative talk radio host, beat Clinton. He came in ninth.
Seriously? The wingnut daily quoting a global You.gov poll from the London Times? How is Hilary Clinton going to figure highly in a global poll? Hilary Clinton came 27th out of the 30 and not "dead last" as your masters expect you to believe.

WHO CAME FIRST IN THAT POLL JIMBO? Can you even stand to know? It was:
Bill Gates, the originator of a product which exists almost everywhere, closely followed with a gap of 0.83% of the worldwide vote by....wait for it....

The 44th President of the United States of America Mr Barrack Hussein Obama JD.
Isn't it weird how the Wing Nut Daily didn't mention that.

http://yougov.co.uk/news/2014/01/11/infograph...

You may be interested in an actual US poll........although you wont be...because reading it will hurt your vacant little head.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/166646/obama-clint...

"For the sixth consecutive year, Barack Obama ranks as the Most Admired Man among Americans, and Hillary Clinton is again the Most Admired Woman. Both won by comfortable margins. Sixteen percent named Obama, compared with 4% each for former President George W. Bush and Pope Francis; Clinton (15%) finished ahead of television personality Oprah Winfrey (6%), first lady Michelle Obama (5%), and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (5%).
"Clinton was named the Most Admired Woman this year for the 18th time. Unlike this year, each prior time she won she held an official government role. Her public service may not be complete, though, as she is frequently mentioned as a possible contender for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination, and likely would be the clear front-runner if she decided to pursue it. She has dominated the Most Admired Woman list since becoming first lady in 1993, failing to finish first only in 1995 and 1996 to Mother Teresa, and in 2001 to Laura Bush."
Reality! It's awesome.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
I will show your wife a good time. 22 min The Specialist 6
Black dog on Sampson LN. 44 min sorry 3
Lindsay 52 min The hills 5
Jessica Diane Hubbard 1 hr freeloaders 51
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 1 hr Pres Donald J Tru... 164,683
Trump better watch North Korea. 2 hr The Specialist 44
This is A Serious Deal! 2 hr The Specialist 14

Barbourville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Barbourville Mortgages