'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Se...

'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

There are 287826 comments on the thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com story from Oct 1, 2010, titled 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate. In it, thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com reports that:

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Join the discussion below, or Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com.

“A proud Kentuckian ”

Since: Aug 13

At Your Mama's House

#124392 Sep 22, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
History of the US Income Tax
Compiled by Ellen Terrell
Business Reference Services
February 2004
Updated 2012
Overview
If, in the midst of sorting receipts and studying the latest changes in the US income tax laws, you suddenly wonder "What is the origin of this annual ritual in the weeks leading up to April 15th?" here are some places you can go for answers.
The origin of the income tax on individuals is generally cited as the passage of the 16th Amendment, passed by Congress on July 2, 1909, and ratified February 3, 1913; however, its history actually goes back even further. During the Civil War Congress passed the Revenue Act of 1861 which included a tax on personal incomes to help pay war expenses. The tax was repealed ten years later. However, in 1894 Congress enacted a flat rate Federal income tax, which was ruled unconstitutional the following year by the U.S. Supreme Court because it was a direct tax not apportioned according to the population of each state. The 16th amendment, ratified in 1913, removed this objection by allowing the Federal government to tax the income of individuals without regard to the population of each State. For additional information on taxation in the United States, see the section on taxes on the web site of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
http://www.loc.gov/rr/business/hottopic/irs_h...
Get "rid" of the 'rino's AND rats'
in
CONGRESS!
and in the IRS!
They "admitted" to the SCANDAL!
IRS Scandal Steven Miller: IRS 'Admission' Of Wrondoing Sounds Like a George Carlin Skit
Recently, it has been reported that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status. This Tuesday, the acting
IRS commissioner Steven Miller broke his silence on the scandal by writing a piece for USA Today stating, "Mistakes were made."
Miller's political jargon-laden writing is very hard to understand, and it almost seems like this was intentionally done as a sort of defense mechanism from criticism.
After all, it is hard to criticize what one does not understand.
Miller also reminded his readers that IRS employees are "civil servants" and that while they "could have done a better job" (an understatement if I have ever heard one),
"new procedures [will] ensure that the mistakes won't be repeated." Additionally, he reminded his audience that the mistakes were ultimately because of the increase of groups applying for 501(c)(4) tax exempt status, not because of "any political or partisan motivation." [ha ha ha - no way - huh uh]
http://www.policymic.com/articles/41805/irs-s...
~~~~~~~~~~
Unreal: IRS Official Who Oversaw Targeting Scandal Now In Charge of Obamacare Division ...
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2013/0...
WHAT about THIS libTARDEDnes do you libTARDED dwIdioTs
NOT UNDERSTAND ...!?!
"WHAT about THIS libTARDEDnes do you libTARDED dwIdioTs
NOT UNDERSTAND ...!?!"
Very little for two reasons.
One, it is often difficult to decipher the unique twist and turns that happen in your head.
Secondly I have a life, and it is too precious to waste reading all your cut and paste garbage.
If you have some kind of point to make do so in your own words and I will make the attempt to figure out that point and discuss it with you.
IF I dispute any particular factual part of your contention THEN feel free to back it up with some cut and paste. Otherwise I will just pass it up.
I am here to have a discussion with people, not to argue everything every nutcase has posted on the web.
Please try to use normal writing instead of your usual disjointed style. It will make it easier for us to interpret and more likely that you will be taken seriously.
I say this not to be mean but because I want understand the points I know you wish to make.

“A proud Kentuckian ”

Since: Aug 13

At Your Mama's House

#124395 Sep 22, 2013
Sorry for the double post

“A proud Kentuckian ”

Since: Aug 13

At Your Mama's House

#124396 Sep 22, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a total dumb@$$, not if or when...it's REALITY!
0 emissions! follow the link, read the facts as presented by OSU and L.S. Fan.
"The researchers are about to take the technology to the next level: a pilot plant is under construction at the U.S. Department of Energy's National Carbon Capture Center. Set to begin operations in late 2013, that plant will produce 250 thermal kilowatts using syngas. Tests there will set the stage for future commercial development."
http://www.osu.edu/features/2013/ohio-state-d...
This actually shoots the Anti-Coal Democrats in their collective @$$e$! Sort of like your denial or feigned ignorance.
What part of "If coal is clean energy, there is no regulations either in place, or proposed that will stop or hinder it's production and use" did you have trouble understanding? Its pretty simple but I would be more than happy to try and make it simpler. Perhaps draw you some pictures?
If it works on a large scale and is economical then YAY!
Many of these type of concepts work great in the lab but fail to scale up to practical levels economically.
If it works you can thank Obama for his investments in clean energy research.

“A proud Kentuckian ”

Since: Aug 13

At Your Mama's House

#124397 Sep 22, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a total dumb@$$, not if or when...it's REALITY!
0 emissions! follow the link, read the facts as presented by OSU and L.S. Fan.
"The researchers are about to take the technology to the next level: a pilot plant is under construction at the U.S. Department of Energy's National Carbon Capture Center. Set to begin operations in late 2013, that plant will produce 250 thermal kilowatts using syngas. Tests there will set the stage for future commercial development."
http://www.osu.edu/features/2013/ohio-state-d...
This actually shoots the Anti-Coal Democrats in their collective @$$e$! Sort of like your denial or feigned ignorance.
Oh ya, about that "0 emissions!" thing.
The article says "chemically converts coal to heat while capturing 99 percent of the carbon dioxide produced in the reaction"
If it is 0 emissions why not 100%? I cant wait to hear your explanation.
What about substances other than carbon? Sulfer, mercury? Any combustion waste unique to this process?
Still a LOT of questions but I am rooting for it. Any truly clean energy is good energy. At least until it runs out :P
FoxNewsiNOTforID IOTS

United States

#124398 Sep 22, 2013
Newport Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
What part of "If coal is clean energy, there is no regulations either in place, or proposed that will stop or hinder it's production and use" did you have trouble understanding? Its pretty simple but I would be more than happy to try and make it simpler. Perhaps draw you some pictures?
If it works on a large scale and is economical then YAY!
Many of these type of concepts work great in the lab but fail to scale up to practical levels economically.
If it works you can thank Obama for his investments in clean energy research.
Then why isn't this front page news?
Policy is now to ignore this technological advancement because of the "War on Coal". Obama's hand picked anti-coal administration and EPA is making a concerted effort to keep good sheeple ignorant...like YOU!
American Lady

Danville, KY

#124399 Sep 22, 2013
Just an FYI ...
Make of it, what you will, libTARDS!
As WE know you KNOW so much about 'everything'...

To anyone else - Take it with a grain of 'salt'...
``````````

Washington DC Navy Yard shooting linked to attempted arrest of Obama for treason

“In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.”

~Franklin D. Roosevelt.

U.S. military police were targeted and killed by Obama in the Washington DC Navy Yard shooting. Why? Agents from the U.S. military’s criminal investigation units had uncovered a plot to detonate a nuclear device in the heart of the nation’s capitol as part of an Obama government false flag.

Officials from NCIS (United States Naval Criminal Investigative Service) and the U.S. Office of the Provost (both with field offices inside the Washington DC Navy Yard) had threatened to arrest Obama for planning to attacked Syria without Congressional approval following a planned nuclear detonation false flag in Washington DC.

The Office of the Provost is on the second floor of Building 34, One First Avenue, Charlestown Navy Yard and NCIS is located at 716 SICARD STREET SE, SUITE 2000, WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DC.

http://presscore.ca/2012/washington-dc-navy-y...
American Lady

Danville, KY

#124400 Sep 22, 2013
“The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizens of this plight.”
- U.S. President John Fitzgerald Kennedy

In a speech made to Columbia University on Nov. 12, 1963, ten days before his assassination!
FoxNewsiNOTforID IOTS

United States

#124401 Sep 22, 2013
Newport Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh ya, about that "0 emissions!" thing.
The article says "chemically converts coal to heat while capturing 99 percent of the carbon dioxide produced in the reaction"
If it is 0 emissions why not 100%? I cant wait to hear your explanation.
What about substances other than carbon? Sulfer, mercury? Any combustion waste unique to this process?
Still a LOT of questions but I am rooting for it. Any truly clean energy is good energy. At least until it runs out :P
particulate mater is ash...reclaimed for other uses.
Also projected coal resources will last @ 300 years, that's just the identified resources we have already discovered.
:b
FoxNewsiNOTforID IOTS

United States

#124402 Sep 22, 2013
matter
Tea Party Republican

Johnson City, TN

#124403 Sep 22, 2013
Former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano ABC News Aug 27, 2013:“A massive and “serious” cyber attack on the U.S. homeland is coming, and a natural disaster — the likes of which the nation has never seen — is also likely on its way.“

The only way anyone could know that there is “a natural disaster — the likes of which the nation has never seen — is also likely on its way” is if you are the one planning and preparing it.

“You also will have to prepare for the increasing likelihood of more weather-related events of a more severe nature as a result of climate change, and continue to build the capacity to respond to potential disasters in far-flung regions of the country occurring at the same time.

“You will need a large bottle of Advil,” Napolitano joked.

Napolitano is hinting at what the United States government (Obama) is planning and preparing for using its weather modifying weapon of mass destruction called HAARP.

Don’t think the U.S. government is planning to detonate a nuke in Washington DC? They’ve already planned for it. DHS (illegal posse posse comitatus force)/ FEMA Washington DC nuclear detonation scenario report – http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/dhs/fema/ncr.pd... complete with nuclear detonation maps, charts and fatality estimates. NCR stands for National Capital Region.

Why else would Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano suddenly resign her post (announced her resignation July 12, 2013) and leave Washington DC for California? Because while she was Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano planned for and prepared for a major Washington DC event. She got out of dodge before the “attack on the U.S. homeland is coming“.

Janet Napolitano’s resignation as Department of Homeland Security Secretary was effective … September 7, 2013 – just 4 days before the planned 9/11 anniversary nuclear device detonation false flag. Just before leaving her post Dyess Air Force base reportedly moved nuclear warheads to the East Coast of the United States in a secret transfer that had no paper trail. The Dyess Air Force Commander allegedly authorized unknown parties to transfer nuclear warheads to an unknown location on the U.S. East Coast, where the warheads would then be picked up and potentially utilized. Conspiracy?

Legal definition for conspiracy – An agreement between two or more persons to engage jointly in an unlawful or criminal act, or an act that is innocent in itself but becomes unlawful when done by the combination of actors.

A conspiracy is codified as a criminal offense. A conspiracy is not fiction, made up, make belief or theory. A conspiracy is an indictable offense wherein – two or more persons engage jointly in an unlawful or criminal act. The evidence reveals that Obama, the DHS, FEMA and other agencies of the United States are actively conspiring to levy war against the United States through a false flag – an unlawful or criminal act.

MY GOD!

Thank you ever so much AL :)

“A proud Kentuckian ”

Since: Aug 13

At Your Mama's House

#124404 Sep 22, 2013
FoxNewsiNOTforIDIOTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why isn't this front page news?
Policy is now to ignore this technological advancement because of the "War on Coal". Obama's hand picked anti-coal administration and EPA is making a concerted effort to keep good sheeple ignorant...like YOU!
Its not front page news because it is still experimental.
It will be front page news if and when it proves to work economically on a large scale.
There are other advancements you have heard about yet because they too are still in the proving stages.
Advancements like Thermal Wave power plants and thin-film cadmium telluride solar panels. Seen either of those on the front page?

“A proud Kentuckian ”

Since: Aug 13

At Your Mama's House

#124406 Sep 22, 2013
FoxNewsiNOTforIDIOTS wrote:
<quoted text>
particulate mater is ash...reclaimed for other uses.
Also projected coal resources will last @ 300 years, that's just the identified resources we have already discovered.
:b
Ash would be counted in with the captured carbon (you yourself said "reclaimed for other uses", so there are some gaseous emissions.Good try though.(hint: if you read the article carefully you will note that gasses are burned in the process)
What other kinds of waste? What chemicals are used for the reaction and what kind of waste does it produce?
That 300 years worth is based on what? Current US usage, current world usage? Does it take into account higher demand if it proves clean? Is all the coal in those "Identified sources" economically retrievable, or (Like oil) depend on rising prices and new technologies to make getting at it profitable?
How many of our beautiful Appalachian mountaintops do we have to lose to get this coal?

“A proud Kentuckian ”

Since: Aug 13

At Your Mama's House

#124408 Sep 22, 2013
American Lady wrote:
“The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizens of this plight.”
- U.S. President John Fitzgerald Kennedy
In a speech made to Columbia University on Nov. 12, 1963, ten days before his assassination!
http://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-ther...
You really need to quit reading those redneck blogs.
Tea Party Republican

Johnson City, TN

#124409 Sep 22, 2013
Yea AL, quit looking at MSNBC!
RepubliCONS

Elizabethtown, KY

#124410 Sep 22, 2013
I agree Newport and it looks like they need to lay off the Alex Jones conspiracy sites too. haha

It looks like a fairly quiet day on the thread. I hope everyone got to enjoy the beautiful arrival of Fall. Nothing like temps in the 70s. Beautiful day in Kentucky. I sure enjoyed it.

RIP GOP CONS

DITCH MITCH
Tea Party Republican

Johnson City, TN

#124411 Sep 22, 2013
There are some people on this forum, that portray themselves as brilliant, then fall for the most idiotic things. All I can say is, MY GOD!
RepubliCONS

Elizabethtown, KY

#124412 Sep 22, 2013
Unbelievable what sick logic these repukes have, much like the ones on here:

House Republican Says If You’re Unemployed, You Should Starve

Remember when Jesus told that hungry man to get a job instead of giving him bread? Me neither. On Thursday, the supposed “Christian” Republicans in the House of Representatives narrowly voted to eliminate nearly $40 billion in food stamp funding that provides poor families with a way to stave off starvation. Now, Raw Story reports that on Friday, House Republican Kevin Cramer of North Dakota attempted to excuse his vote in favor of the cuts by posting a Bible verse as a response to a constituent on Facebook who posted a Bible verse of his own.

North Dakota resident Kevin Tengesdal posted the following on Congressman Cramer’s page:

“Dear Congressman Kevin Cramer –
Matthew 25:36-43
The Message (MSG)
34-36 “Then the King will say to those on his right,‘Enter, you who are blessed by my Father! Take what’s coming to you in this kingdom. It’s been ready for you since the world’s foundation. And here’s why:
I was hungry and you fed me,
I was thirsty and you gave me a drink,
I was homeless and you gave me a room,
I was shivering and you gave me clothes,
I was sick and you stopped to visit,
I was in prison and you came to me.’
37-40 “Then those ‘sheep’ are going to say,‘Master, what are you talking about? When did we ever see you hungry and feed you, thirsty and give you a drink? And when did we ever see you sick or in prison and come to you?’ Then the King will say,‘I’m telling the solemn truth: Whenever you did one of these things to someone overlooked or ignored, that was me—you did it to me.’
41-43 “Then he will turn to the ‘goats,’ the ones on his left, and say,‘Get out, worthless goats! You’re good for nothing but the fires of hell. And why? Because—
I was hungry and you gave me no meal,
I was thirsty and you gave me no drink,
I was homeless and you gave me no bed,
I was shivering and you gave me no clothes,
Sick and in prison, and you never visited.’”
At 1:55pm on Friday, Cramer responded thusly:
“2 Thessalonians 3:10 English Standard Version (ESV) 10 For even when we were with you, we would give you this command: If anyone is not willing to work, let him not eat.”

(Note: Tengesdal has posted that he intends to delete his post since it is filling up his notification box on Facebook, so if you click the link and it doesn’t work, that’s why.)

Of course, the passage Cramer quotes is a reference to Christians who had stopped working in the false belief that Christ was returning soon.

Instead of working the fields to grow their much needed crops, people became gossips and stuck their noses into the private lives of others. Paul warned these Christians to take care of their crops or starve waiting for Jesus to arrive.

In short, Cramer has completely misinterpreted his selected verse and has taken it entirely out of context whilst ignoring a Bible verse that has not been. Cramer clearly believes in letting the poor and unemployed starve, thereby proving how dangerous it is when religious fanatics have government power.

CONtinued:

RIP GOP CONS

DITCH MITCH
RepubliCONS

Elizabethtown, KY

#124413 Sep 22, 2013
CONtinued:

So who will be affected by Cramer’s heartlessness? Well, according to Feeding America, 47 million Americans rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to put food on the table.
“76% of SNAP households included a child, an elderly person, or a disabled person. These vulnerable households receive 83% of all SNAP benefits.”

As for Cramer’s claim that the unemployed are lazy freeloaders who don’t earn their calories,
SNAP already has strict time-limits for unemployed workers. Able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs) may only receive 3 months of SNAP benefits during any 3 year period, unless they are working in a qualifying job training program.
The SNAP benefit formula is structured to provide a strong work incentive – for every additional dollar a SNAP participant earns, their benefits decline by about 24 to 36 cents, not a full dollar, so participants have a strong incentive to find work, work longer hours, or seek better-paying employment.

In other words, SNAP isn’t a luxury, it prevents people from starving to death while encouraging them to keep looking for a job. Of course, if America hadn’t been put into a recession by Republican policies in the first place, millions less would be in need of food assistance. And that’s not to mention the Republican insistence of austerity that prevented a large enough stimulus from being passed that would have actually lifted the economy. Oh, and then there’s the American Jobs Act that Republicans refused to pass that would have created jobs for the unemployed to seek.

If the GOP thinks their actions won’t backfire, they should think again. Most of those 47 million Americans that Cramer and his fellow House Republicans want to see starve live in the very states they claim to represent.

Cramer and House Republicans also appear to be subscribing to communism, particularly that of the Soviet Union during Joseph Stalin’s tyranny. Cramer and many other Republicans are repeating the 1936 Soviet Constitution word for word when they use that particular verse to justify their hostility to food stamps. According to Bucknell University Article I, Section 12, of Stalin’s 1936 Constitution reads:

In the U.S.S.R. work is a duty and a matter of honor for every able-bodied citizen, in accordance with the principle:“He who does not work, neither shall he eat.”

Oh, snap (Pardon the pun)! Once again, Republicans are looking to Soviet Russia as an example of how America should be run. First, they want Russia’s anti-gay policies to be implemented here and now they want the former Soviet constitution as well. Are Republicans really pro-America or pro-Russia? Because the evidence is mounting in support of the latter.

Cramer wasn’t the first Republican to advocate for starving the unemployed and he won’t be the last. In November 2011, then Republican Presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann said the same when she said:

Our nation needs to stop doing for people what they can and should do for themselves. Self reliance means, if anyone will not work, neither should he eat.

It would seem Republicans are just digging that hole deeper and deeper as we get closer to the 2014 midterm elections. Not only have they now alienated and threatened the very lives of 47 million Americans, including millions of children and elderly people, they are adopting the policies of Stalin’s Soviet Union and wrapping it into Christian Right-Wing religious dogma to do it.

It’s more than a mere hole that they have dug for themselves now. It’s their own mass political grave that they’ll be buried in as more and more people become fed up with them. Once you take food out of the bellies of children and use Stalinist philosophy to do so, you’ve committed political suicide.

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/09/22/house...

RIP GOP CONS

DITCH MITCH
RepubliCONS

Elizabethtown, KY

#124414 Sep 22, 2013
Kentucky coal leader calls EPA rules a 'de facto ban on coal-fired power plants'

Nobody is likely to build more coal-burning power plants in the United States under strict emission limits proposed Friday by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Kentucky coal and utility officials predicted.

That could further weaken demand for the coal of Eastern Kentucky, which has seen mines close and thousands of mining jobs disappear over the last few years. Coal counties in the mountains suffered official unemployment rates this summer between 11 and 18 percent.

"We in the industry truly believe this is a de facto ban on coal-fired power plants because we don't believe what they're asking for can be achieved in the marketplace at this point," said Bill Bissett, president of the Kentucky Coal Association.

To deal with air pollution and climate change, the EPA proposed a rule capping new coal-burning power plants at 1,100 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt hour. New power plants that burn natural gas would be capped at 1,000 pounds if they are large and 1,100 pounds if they are small. Existing power plants would not be covered, although the EPA says emission limits will be proposed for them no later than June 1, 2014.

If enacted, the rule would give another significant advantage to natural gas: It burns cleaner than coal and emits less carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that traps heat in Earth's atmosphere. At present, natural gas also is cheaper than coal.

Kentucky's existing coal-burning power plants put an average of 1,950 pounds of carbon dioxide into the air per megawatt hour, according to the state Energy and Environment Cabinet. The state's best-performing coal plant goes only as low as 1,750 pounds.

The EPA suggests that new coal plants could reach the lower emission limits with carbon capture-and-storage technology. A new plant using this technology would capture carbon dioxide from the smokestack and inject it underground, either for storage or for some later industrial use.

Given the shift to "new-generation technologies," the EPA "does not anticipate this rule will have any impacts on the price of electricity, employment or labor markets or the U.S. economy," the agency wrote in its regulatory impact analysis.

However, carbon capture-and-storage technology has not yet proven to be commercially viable. Southern Co. is spending $4.7 billion to build a 582-megawatt coal plant with that technology in Kemper County, Miss., with a tentative opening date of next spring. There have been multiple delays and cost overruns, and the utility's ratepayers will see $2.9 billion added to their bills to recoup the company's expenses.

East Kentucky Power Cooperative, based in Winchester, has three coal-burning power plants and one that burns natural gas, spokesman Nick Comer said Friday. Under the proposed rule, any future plants that are built probably would burn natural gas, Comer said.

"This seems to put some pretty significant limitations on coal as a means to generate electricity," Comer said.

Tom FitzGerald, director of the Kentucky Resources Council, said that even before the EPA's proposal, utilities were turning away from conventional coal-burning plants. Other energy sources are cheaper and cleaner, and in coming years that's clearly going to be an advantage, FitzGerald said.

EPA studies identify power plants as the leading contributor of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States, ahead of cars and industry, and coal produces more carbon dioxide than any other fuel, he said.

"If you're trying to address the problem, it just makes sense to bring down the level of emissions from this sector," FitzGerald said.

Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2013/09/20/2833314/ke...

It's called SAVING THE PLANET you bunch of dumbasses. Figure it out.

RIP GOP CONS

DITCH MITCH
RepubliCONS

Elizabethtown, KY

#124416 Sep 22, 2013
TV SoundOff: Sunday Talking Heads

This is what is embarrassing about the modern political media. Warren Buffett did not criticize Obamacare. In fact, he supports it. Some old quotes of Buffett's have been dredged up, assigned a new context, and have been deployed as talking points. Because the internet exists, the "Buffett says to 'Scrap Obamacare'" meme was very swiftly debunked, and one of Buffett's own spokespersons said that Buffett was "shocked" that the statements had been "attributed to him."

Now, out in the hinterlands, the low-infos are probably still laboring under the misconception that Buffett wants Obamacare to be scrapped, and so you'll get a lot of ALL-CAPS tweets with misspellings about this for a while yet. But Graves, while he is a never-before-booked backbencher that looks like a magician, is nevertheless part of the modern world, he knows, because he's been briefed by professionals, that the Buffett quote isn't true. He's going to use it anyway, for two reasons: 1) the lie still have some life in it and 2) because he knows that ABC News is not powerful enough to stop him. No one is afraid of organizations like ABC News, and so they'll gladly lie and lie and lie, right to their faces.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/22/sund...

Warren Buffett did not criticize Obamacare. In fact, he supports it.

Guess that disputes the Buffett lies you CONS were spewing as always.

RIP GOP

DITCH MITCH

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 10 min USA 166,443
Rodney Bullock 25 min mindy lou 10
Today Eclipse 36 min MEH 4
Unfaithful 1 hr Chris_Jarvis 12
anthony castle 1 hr sidechick 7
Jobeth hobeth 1 hr Prez 4
Daniel Boone Owned Slaves, shut down the DBF! 2 hr pity tha fools 20

Barbourville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Barbourville Mortgages