That very well may be true.... No way to tell. Can't depend on anything Zimm says because he's changed his story so many times. If you're innocent, no reason to keep changing the story.<quoted text>
I can see that, too. I just find it hard to believe that the marks came from Martin, maybe one or two of them, but not all. I think if the police had taken Zimmerman's vehicle, they would have found his blood already in it from whatever no-good he had been up to that night. I really think Martin was a cover-up for what Zimm had been doing. And being that he is a racist shtface, he saw Martin's life as completely disposable.
This is treebeard, btw, someone has hacked my account on here and I haven't been able to log in today. I'm fixing it now.
It all just doesn't add up.
The biggest things that gets me is people saying both are wrong.... It's wrong to walk home? Really?? Wish they'd post that law here cause I've never heard of that. Was he wrong for punching someone who followed and chased him who didn't identify himself? Nope!
It's sad how closed minded republicans are.