'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Full Story
American Lady

Danville, KY

#106681 Jun 23, 2013
Calvin_Coolish wrote:
<quoted text>
I always GET my way
can I pee on you too?
I'm NOT into 'golden showers' like you "perverts" ARE!

Since: Dec 11

.

#106682 Jun 23, 2013
Jay wrote:
<quoted text>
*********
Ahh, so that's who Corney morphed into?!!! LOL...figures!
Could anyone else on earth be as mentally unfit to wield the right of free speech?...and then attack other for exhibiting/using their right?
American Lady

Danville, KY

#106683 Jun 23, 2013
Reality wrote:
Hope n Change
"To fight terror Obama is secretly gathering data from your phone, your computer, your home, your business and everywhere else....except Mosques."
Islamic Mosques: Excluded From Surveillance By Feds

While Government agencies watch you – Mosques run amuck

Homeland Insecurity: The White House assures us that tracking our every phone call and keystroke is necessary to stop terrorists, and yet it won’t snoop in mosques, where the terrorists emanate from. Fact - Many of the terrorists have been radicalized in Mosques and Muslim agencies right here in America. According to the NSA the government’s sweeping surveillance of our most private communications excludes Mosques and Muslim affiliated facilities. Supposedly this is done to protect the sensibilities of innocent Muslims who worship in Mosques.

Since October 2011, mosques have been off-limits to FBI agents. Surveillance or undercover sting operations are not allowed without high-level approval from a special oversight body at the Justice Department dubbed the Sensitive Operations Review Committee (SORC). Who makes up this body, and under what methodology do they review requests - nobody knows. The names of the chairman, members and staff are kept secret. Why is it necessary to keep the names and titles of the people who decide whether or not to protect the rest of the country from radical Muslims, secret?

MORE:
https://usjf.net/2013/06/islamic-mosques-excl...

Peter
6 days ago
Removing mosques for supervision is incredibly stupid. What fools authorized that?...

luvzforplay
4 days ago
It is my understanding that recently the majority of Homeland Security top officers appointed by Obama are Muslims ! Seems with all the terrorist threats from them , isn’t it kind of stupid to appoint what amounts to Muslim Brotherhood members to supposed anti-terrorist agency ??

Doug
4 days ago
Idiots, subversives, and traitors are running the government.

Nancy
2 days ago
Why do Muslims have more rights than Americans? Than Christian groups? Patriotic Tea Party members? Our nation is in serious trouble. Read “When a Nation Forgets God” by Erwin Lutzer, Moody Press. It talks about Hitler and how he gained access to the German people, little by little, helping them he said, and then WHAM! We need to wake up as a Nation, return to God, and get real about our enemies……usually attached to Mosques. Come On, Get Real!

Since: Dec 11

.

#106685 Jun 23, 2013
Good night ya'll!
American Lady

Danville, KY

#106686 Jun 23, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
Good night ya'll!
God Night Ari ...
Sleep Well ...

The Eagle IS watching :)
Reality

Frankfort, KY

#106687 Jun 23, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
Islamic Mosques: Excluded From Surveillance By Feds
While Government agencies watch you – Mosques run amuck
Homeland Insecurity: The White House assures us that tracking our every phone call and keystroke is necessary to stop terrorists, and yet it won’t snoop in mosques, where the terrorists emanate from. Fact - Many of the terrorists have been radicalized in Mosques and Muslim agencies right here in America. According to the NSA the government’s sweeping surveillance of our most private communications excludes Mosques and Muslim affiliated facilities. Supposedly this is done to protect the sensibilities of innocent Muslims who worship in Mosques.
Since October 2011, mosques have been off-limits to FBI agents. Surveillance or undercover sting operations are not allowed without high-level approval from a special oversight body at the Justice Department dubbed the Sensitive Operations Review Committee (SORC). Who makes up this body, and under what methodology do they review requests - nobody knows. The names of the chairman, members and staff are kept secret. Why is it necessary to keep the names and titles of the people who decide whether or not to protect the rest of the country from radical Muslims, secret?
MORE:
https://usjf.net/2013/06/islamic-mosques-excl...
Peter
6 days ago
Removing mosques for supervision is incredibly stupid. What fools authorized that?...
luvzforplay
4 days ago
It is my understanding that recently the majority of Homeland Security top officers appointed by Obama are Muslims ! Seems with all the terrorist threats from them , isn’t it kind of stupid to appoint what amounts to Muslim Brotherhood members to supposed anti-terrorist agency ??
Doug
4 days ago
Idiots, subversives, and traitors are running the government.
Nancy
2 days ago
Why do Muslims have more rights than Americans? Than Christian groups? Patriotic Tea Party members? Our nation is in serious trouble. Read “When a Nation Forgets God” by Erwin Lutzer, Moody Press. It talks about Hitler and how he gained access to the German people, little by little, helping them he said, and then WHAM! We need to wake up as a Nation, return to God, and get real about our enemies……usually attached to Mosques. Come On, Get Real!
You have my full support on this.

The other thread, liberals are denying that this administration is not trying to instill the Sharia Law in America.

With Muslims in this administration dictating the laws and the latest with Obama wanting to imprison any military person for saying anything about Islam----what else does one need?

“Equal Opportunity”

Since: Apr 13

Blasphemer

#106688 Jun 23, 2013
RepubliCONS wrote:
Goodnight HOT C...give 'em hell. hahaha
Bunch of Circus Clowns led by the queen LOON. PRICELESS
Goodnight MsR
Jay

Paris, TN

#106689 Jun 23, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
Could anyone else on earth be as mentally unfit to wield the right of free speech?...and then attack other for exhibiting/using their right?
**********

I remember being on here with AL a long while back, and you appeared - or re-appeared - and was greeted by CS. The tone of the greeting gave me the impression:

Enemy.

Yes, I remember him and his wanting proof of everything anyone opposed to him posted. What a PITA!!!

“Equal Opportunity”

Since: Apr 13

Blasphemer

#106690 Jun 23, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm NOT into 'golden showers' like you "perverts" ARE!
It'll be a flood and you will need an ark, and at least one more donkey..Get it?

“Equal Opportunity”

Since: Apr 13

Blasphemer

#106691 Jun 23, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
Good night ya'll!
night Ari, don't let the liberals bite

“Equal Opportunity”

Since: Apr 13

Blasphemer

#106692 Jun 23, 2013
Reality wrote:
<quoted text>
You have my full support on this.
The other thread, liberals are denying that this administration is not trying to instill the Sharia Law in America.
With Muslims in this administration dictating the laws and the latest with Obama wanting to imprison any military person for saying anything about Islam----what else does one need?
a srtait-jacket and some lithium?
did you miss me? Yes?
thought so

“Equal Opportunity”

Since: Apr 13

Blasphemer

#106693 Jun 23, 2013
New CNN poll
John Boehner - 3% approval rating

Family, gotta love them.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#106695 Jun 23, 2013
Calvin_Coolish wrote:
<quoted text>
It'll be a flood and you will need an ark, and at least one more donkey..Get it?
I "got IT"
you don't boi!

``````````

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You post quotes from a third party and you tell me to carry on a "decent debate"? Are you kidding. You maybe contributed max 5 words to the above post.
And, I don't care about covenant, Exodus and chronology. You have sex with your mom or dad or sister or half-sister, you are committing an incestuous act. And, the medical consequences are well known, physical and intellectual infirmities to name just two. Were the latter two not a consequence of incest BEFORE it was declared verboten? If God is God, could he have not found a better way than incest to populate the earth? How'd he make Adam and Eve? Why did He just not continue thus?

AL said:
Just like God tested Job… and Peter… and even His own Son.

God asked Abraham to take what he treasured most,“your only son, yes, Isaac, who you love so much-“[3] out into the bleak wilderness of Moriah[4]. There Abraham would be required to “offer him up” in absolute dedication to the LORD.

I squirm in my seat as I read those words.

How could God ask that of one He called a friend?

Why would He?

Yet Abraham, father of our faith, didn’t ask those questions. He just went.

Setting off as the sun was rising over the desert, Abraham saddled his donkey, hoisting his young son on it’s back along with a bundle of wood for the sacrificial offering. All the boy knew was that he was on an adventure with his father and a couple of servants.

A strange entourage trekking across that barren land.

Three days into the journey, Abraham spotted way off in the distance that place where all his dreams would die.

And still he went.

When his little boy asked,“Father where is the lamb for the sacrifice?” Abraham must have choked on his answer.“God will yirah, my son.”[5]

Can’t you see them?

Father and son walking together towards death.

How God must have loved His friend in that moment. Did tears spill from the Father’s eyes as He watched the determined steps of a father willing to let his own son— his only son, die just because God said so?

At the last moment, God caught Abraham’s hand in His and provided a ram caught in the thicket to sacrifice in his son’s stead.

Can you imagine the worship that went on there on that mountain? Father and son, arms wrapped around each other in heart-pumping relief. Weeping, laughing, hollering, as shouts echoed off barren cliffs.

There was nothing tame about Abraham’s faith!

http://www.hespeaksinthesilence.com/2011/05/y...

He has 'tested' you ...
-n-
you have FAILED!

just like the pResident FAILS d-a-i-l-y ...!!!
``````````
you TOO boi
American Lady

Danville, KY

#106696 Jun 23, 2013
Calvin_Coolish wrote:
<quoted text>
It'll be a flood and you will need an ark, and at least one more donkey..Get it?

AL says:
Was the marriage between Abraham and Sarah incestuous?
...
12 Besides, she really is my sister, the daughter of my father though not of my mother; and she became my wife.
```

10
Like my answer **here, you need to keep the chronology right. There is no levitical law at the time of Abraham.

Thus, even if he did marry his sister, remember that he was breaking no covenantal restriction on doing so. As I said in that answer, you don't convict someone of a crime ^^ex post facto.

http://christianity.stackexchange.com/questio...

**
Did Adam and Eve's Progeny Commit Incest?

18
There is a third option -

The prohibition on incest didn't come about until the covenant in Leviticus & Deuteronomy, and to accuse Cain, Abel, and Seth of incest is to accuse them ex post facto.

As an aside, a Young Earth Creationist would date the Creation to 4004 BC, and the Exodus (and hence the Covenant) to about 1440BC. As such, you would be accusing them of a crime that wasn't mandated for nearly 2600 years.

If you want to say, "but surely the law goes back further than the covenant," you get into territory of, "So when did it become a law?" Incest is prohibited in most secular cultures today because it weakens the gene pool. Over time, the level of closeness has gotten wider in order to ensure a wider mixing. In modern times, a first or second cousin is off-limits. If I remember correctly in Leviticus, immediate family was prohibited, but I believe that cousins were ok. If you follow the trajectory backwards, you'd probably arrive at a date at which it was ok even for family members to procreate together, societally speaking.

And, a fourth option -

Finally, Genesis 6:1-4 mentions the "Nephilim" - potentially an alternate breeding stock.

http://christianity.stackexchange.com/questio...

LEARN your "biblical history"
-n-
your World & American history
PLUS your U.S. Constitution ...!

you might be ABLE to carry on a 'decent' debate THEN!

^^
ex post facto

ex post facto adj. Latin for "after the fact," which refers to laws adopted after an act is committed making it illegal although it was legal when done, or increases the penalty for a crime after it is committed. Such laws are specifically prohibited by the U. S. Constitution, Article I, Section 9. Therefore, if a state legislature or Congress enact new rules of proof or longer sentences, those new rules or sentences do not apply to crimes committed before the new law was adopted.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...

Allegorical - look it up!
American Lady

Danville, KY

#106697 Jun 23, 2013
Report: IRS Sent $46M In Refunds To 23,994 ‘Unauthorized’ Aliens At One Atlanta Address...
June 22, 2013

http://redflagnews.com/headlines/report-irs-s...
American Lady

Danville, KY

#106698 Jun 23, 2013
'Sweetest Comeback In The History Of Ever'? New Hostess owners say Twinkies will be back on shelves starting July 15
Hostess Brands Inc. filed for bankruptcy in 2012 following fight with unions
Metropoulos & Co. and Apollo bought Twinkies and other Hostess brands for $410 million
Company says they might experiment with flavored and 'crunchy' Twinkies
By ASSOCIATED PRESS REPORTER
PUBLISHED: 12:53 EST, 23 June 2013 | UPDATED: 12:53 EST, 23 June 2013

The company that went bankrupt after an acrimonious fight with its unionized workers last year
is
back up and running

under new owners and a leaner structure.

It says it plans to have Twinkies and other snack cakes back on shelves starting July 15.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-23469...
Follow us:@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
wtf

Glasgow, KY

#106699 Jun 23, 2013
American Lady wrote:
Report: IRS Sent $46M In Refunds To 23,994 ‘Unauthorized’ Aliens At One Atlanta Address...
June 22, 2013
http://redflagnews.com/headlines/report-irs-s...
And the democrats assure us that the IRS is very capable of overseeing Obamacare crap. I'm sure they will do their best for the democrats like they did before his second term. They made sure the republicans didn't get the tax exemption the progressive crooks did so the republicans couldn't participate in Romney's campaign. Makes you wonder what the hell they are planning to do with republicans health records.

I have to say it has really been nice and "quiet" on here without scooter and the goat girl. I got bored with giving their stupidity a platform.

Thank you AL for all that you do to keep people informed and presenting your posts with facts.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#106700 Jun 23, 2013
IRS gets its own 'SWAT team' to hunt down tax evaders
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
PUBLISHED: 21:22 EST, 20 March 2012 | UPDATED: 21:23 EST, 20 March 2012

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service is staffing up with high-powered talent to crack down on companies shifting profits from country to country to lower their tax bills, a strategy the agency has targeted before with only limited success.
The IRS showed its elevated concern on the issue, known as 'transfer pricing,' last May by hiring Samuel Maruca to fill the newly created post of transfer pricing director.
He has since brought aboard specialists from Big Four audit firms KPMG and Ernst & Young LLP, as well as law firm Mayer Brown and boutique consultancy Horst Frisch.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-21179...
Follow us:@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

JUNE 13, 2013 · 1:16 PM
IRS SWAT team – why?

Got your quarterly estimate filed?
Training with assault rifles. The IRS? The government’s been buying billions of rounds of hollow-point ammunition (under applicable international treaties, good for domestic use only) for its Homeland Security branches, now the IRS is forming SWAT teams? Something’s happening here ...

http://christopherfountain.wordpress.com/2013...

Buffalo Springfield - For What Its Worth (good sound quality!)


Something happening here what it is ain't exactly clear
By Cory Franklin on 05/20/2013

But that’s not what I am going to dwell on. Yesterday on Face The Nation, Bob Schieffer pretty much said what should have been said far earlier. When Obama senior advisor Dan Pfeiffer (and if he’s the senior advisor, I’d like to see the junior advisor) gave stock answers to questions about the three crises facing the President, Schieffer accused him of taking “exactly the approach that the Nixon administration took” and finally scolding him by asking,“Why are you here today? Why isn’t the White House Chief of Staff here to tell us what happened?”

That tells you something. Why are mouthpieces with scripts just thrown in front of the public? How about some people who know something? Susan Rice had nothing to do with Benghazi, so why was she explaining it all over the networks?

And even the people who are involved have to resort to scripts. Lois Lerner had to resort to a planted question, which she had a prefab answer for to notify the public of the IRS “nontargeting”. What is going on here?

When people in government behave like this, there is something wrong. The President has always been acclaimed for his oratorical skills. Yet all we hear now is “I didn’t know anything” or “ We will find out who did this” or “We will get it fixed”.

Maybe the public will buy it. I don’t know. But one thing is for sure- it’s no way to run the Government. And in the long run, it will be bad for all of us.

http://ivn.us/left-right-and-centered/2013/05...
American Lady

Danville, KY

#106701 Jun 23, 2013
NSA HAS TOTAL ACCESS VIA MICROSOFT WINDOWS
'They can effectively compromise your entire operating system'
Published: 4 hours ago

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/nsa-has-total-acce...

Dfallis 12 minutes ago &#8722;
Bill Gates would crap his liberal panties if we all switched to MAC or Linux systems. LOL I like that idea.

Connie Mitchell • 13 minutes ago
OBAMA AND HIS ADMINISTRATION ARE AFRAID OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!! HE WANTS OUR GUNS & NOW HAS TO SPY ON US...WHAT'S NEXT!!!! THEY ARE ALL A BUNCH OF LYING ARROGANT PROGRESSIVE COMMUNIST JUST LIKE ADOLF HITLER!!!!!!!!!!

DM •21 minutes ago
The only way to keep Liberty is to use it. Let them spy, all they will find out is how much we believe in our Bill of Rights and The Constitution. If for some reason the government wants to nail you they will so go on with what you are doing as a free person, as an example to those around you. As soon as we give in and act controled we will be controled.
When you disarm the people, you commence to offend them and show that you distrust them either through cowardice or lack of confidence, and both of these opinions generate hatred. Niccolo Machiavelli
**********
W A R N I N G: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.
**********
Jay

Paris, TN

#106702 Jun 23, 2013


I just know you Obama supporters will enjoy this one......





Why am I not supprised



* In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia
region, Obama received 100% of the votes
with not even a single vote recorded for Romney.
(A mathematical and statistical impossibility).

* In 21 districts in Wood County Ohio, Obama
received 100% of the votes where GOP
inspectors were illegally removed from their
polling locations - and not one single vote
was recorded for Romney.
(Another statistical impossibility).

* In Wood County Ohio, 106,258 voted in a
county with only 98,213 eligible voters.

* In St. Lucie County, FL, there were 175,574
registered eligible voters but 247,713 votes
were cast.

* The National SEAL Museum, a polling location
in St. Lucie County, FL had a 158% voter turnout.

* Palm Beach County, FL had a 141% voter turnout.

* In Ohio County, Obama won by 108% of the
total number of eligible voters.

NOTE: Obama won in every state that did not
require a Photo ID and lost in every state that
did require a Photo ID in order to vote.

Imagine that!





Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
jason carnes and stacy keys 6 min Friend 10
holly ledford 29 min No wonder 2
girl at advance yesterday buying windshield wipers 2 hr heather m 8
Joshua vandusen 3 hr Need to know 6
People with fingers over license plate 3 hr Beat u 14
Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 4 hr Jamona 134,368
Verlan Brock 5 hr need to know 3
How to make homemade ice melt for steps, sidewa... (Jan '13) Tue Spur41 72

Flood Warning for Knox County was issued at March 05 at 4:09AM EST

Barbourville Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Barbourville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:12 pm PST

NFL 4:12PM
Titans to release safety Bernard Pollard
NFL 6:04 AM
Bernard Pollard thinks Titans need winning attitude
NBC Sports 8:28 PM
Reports: Ted Ginn visiting Titans, 49ers
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Weighing the Pros and Cons of Top Free-Agent Targets
NBC Sports 4:30 AM
Albert Haynesworth to Ndamukong Suh: Do your research on suitors