'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Full Story

Since: Dec 11

.

#98884 May 10, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! So you refused the assignment, guess I can smear your dumb-ass anytime I want.
J.D. I apologize for not being in on this argument last night, I was only here briefly (heavy assignments this week).
You are right again, Unca Flbitha (as usual) has his @$$ hat on again: I would compare this to the "which came first, the chicken or the egg" argument with a twist; the United States Constitution Came first and therefore can be amended to erase the scope and powers and even the existence of SCOTUS!

"Constitutional Origin. Article III,§1, of the Constitution provides that "[t]he judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." The Supreme Court of the United States was created in accordance with this provision and by authority of the Judiciary Act of September 24, 1789 (1 Stat. 73). It was organized on February 2, 1790.

Jurisdiction. According to the Constitution (Art. III,§2): "The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;-to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;-to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;-to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;-to Controversies between two or more States;—between a State and Citizens of another State;-between Citizens of different States;—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects."

http://www.supremecourt.gov/about/briefovervi...

J.D. is correct Uncle Tab is just a squirrel on his roof trying to get a nut, HE IS THE NUT! ROTFLMAO!

“Stand with me for the U.S.A.”

Since: Apr 13

Lexington,Ky.

#98885 May 10, 2013
When I took Hillary Rodham Clinton to task in January for the mishandling of security in Benghazi, Libya, I told her that if I had been president at the time, I would have relieved her of her post. Some politicians and pundits took offense at my line of questioning.

During those hearings, I reminded Mrs. Clinton that multiple requests were sent to the State Department asking for increased security measures. I asked if she had read the cables from Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens asking for increased security. She replied that she was busy and had not read them. I find that inexcusable.

Four months later, we are hearing that Mrs. Clinton allegedly withheld information from a counterterrorism bureau during the response. We are hearing new allegations that Special Forces wanting to respond during the attacks were told,“You can’t go” by superiors. Ambassador Stevens‘ deputy, Gregory Hicks, testified this week that he spoke with Mrs. Clinton on the night of the attack, when these orders were given. We are hearing that Mr. Hicks was initially told by the State Department not to meet with congressional investigators.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/...
Uncle Tab

United States

#98886 May 10, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
HTML text is not formatted in page number, however (this instance) EACH HOUR IS a UNIQUE web page! Therefore (DUMB@$$)
"If there's a gentleman or a woman with a grenade launcher attacking our buildings or our Capitol, we use lethal force. You don't get due process if you're involved with actively attacking us, our soldiers or our government. You don't get due process if you're overseas in a battle shooting at our soldiers. But that's not what we're talking about. The Wall Street Journal reported and said that the bulk of the drone attacks are signature attacks.
(Senator Rand Paul,1st Hour-Pg. 1, Paragraph 6 3/6/2013)
HTML Document (Hyper Text Mark up Language)
The DOCTYPE declaration defines the document type; The text between <html> and </html> describes the web page!
http://www.paul.senate.gov/ ...
You Lie!
You Lie!
You Lie!
You Lie!
You Lie!
You Lie!
You Lie!
You are a _________ LIAR!
No where, and I mean NO WHERE dors he say 'drones should be used on these sorts Of incidents'

Thank you for proving my point.

You can try all you like, those words ARE NOT IN THE TRANSCRIPT DUMBASS!!!!

'lethal force'..... Is that code word for drone??

The WORD DRONE WAS NOT USED IDIOT!!

LMMFAO at how completely stupid you are and how easily fooled and led you are.

You do know that the filibuster was about don't you?? 13 hours and those words were never used. NEVER!!

Republicans are so stupid, that when they are told what to think, they just run with it.

So no..... I'm not a liar.... Dumbass, leathal force doesn't mean drone, drone means drone.

Leathal Force means that if a armed gunman after robbing a store..... We can throw piano's at him til he's dead?? That's lethal.... Correct??

The word 'drone' is NOT used in that context super stupid!!

Spin Spin Spin..... LIE LIE LIE!!

You are the most gullible, most ignorant, most uneducated fucktard on this board Ari. Your Internet education has failed you. It's simple.... If the words aren't there, it's not true.

This poster is why republicans love these NO INFORMATION VOTERS!!!!

Did your mother have any kids that lived dumbass??
wtf

Pikeville, KY

#98887 May 10, 2013
RandPaulforPOTUS2016 wrote:
When I took Hillary Rodham Clinton to task in January for the mishandling of security in Benghazi, Libya, I told her that if I had been president at the time, I would have relieved her of her post. Some politicians and pundits took offense at my line of questioning.
During those hearings, I reminded Mrs. Clinton that multiple requests were sent to the State Department asking for increased security measures. I asked if she had read the cables from Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens asking for increased security. She replied that she was busy and had not read them. I find that inexcusable.
Four months later, we are hearing that Mrs. Clinton allegedly withheld information from a counterterrorism bureau during the response. We are hearing new allegations that Special Forces wanting to respond during the attacks were told,“You can’t go” by superiors. Ambassador Stevens‘ deputy, Gregory Hicks, testified this week that he spoke with Mrs. Clinton on the night of the attack, when these orders were given. We are hearing that Mr. Hicks was initially told by the State Department not to meet with congressional investigators.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/...
Lmfao
You little Fhag.
Lmfao
Uncle Tab

United States

#98888 May 10, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
J.D. I apologize for not being in on this argument last night, I was only here briefly (heavy assignments this week).
You are right again, Unca Flbitha (as usual) has his @$$ hat on again: I would compare this to the "which came first, the chicken or the egg" argument with a twist; the United States Constitution Came first and therefore can be amended to erase the scope and powers and even the existence of SCOTUS!
"Constitutional Origin. Article III,§1, of the Constitution provides that "[t]he judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." The Supreme Court of the United States was created in accordance with this provision and by authority of the Judiciary Act of September 24, 1789 (1 Stat. 73). It was organized on February 2, 1790.
Jurisdiction. According to the Constitution (Art. III,§2): "The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;-to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;-to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;-to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;-to Controversies between two or more States;—between a State and Citizens of another State;-between Citizens of different States;—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects."
http://www.supremecourt.gov/about/briefovervi...
J.D. is correct Uncle Tab is just a squirrel on his roof trying to get a nut, HE IS THE NUT! ROTFLMAO!
This 'nut' pointed out for everyone to see that the word 'drone' was NOT used.

Remember how you fools went on and on about Clinton when he said 'it all depends on what your definition of the word 'is' is?

The words used are important, in the post YOU posted,'lethal force' could be anything.... The filibuster was about DRONES!! He did NOT SAY DRONES COULD BE USED. I'll just say throwing piano's as him.... That's lethal... Right?(Even tho we're talking about drones yet not mentioning them for THIRTEEN HOURS)

I guess he didn't have time in the 13 hours to say 'yes, Drones should be used on armed criminals' that only would have taken 4 seconds out of the 13 hours.

Tools!
Uncle Tab

United States

#98889 May 10, 2013
"They misunderestimated me." --Bentonville, Ark., Nov. 6, 2000

This is a Bush quote... So I can understand why you dumb republicans don't understand how important using the correct wording is.

Idiots don't catch the simple things!

You have to laugh at idiots with an Internet education not understanding the simple things and being programmed to repeat things that are out and out lies, even when pointed out to them using their own posts.

You ignorant uneducated morons is why our country was almost ruined...... You're just plain fucking STUPID!!
whitehair

Eminence, KY

#98890 May 10, 2013
I`m sitting out on the sidelines of this argument.

What was heard from Rand Paul came our clear to some of us,(Drones were not to be used on U.S. citizens in the U.S.)Did it not come out that way to you?

“Stand with me for the U.S.A.”

Since: Apr 13

Lexington,Ky.

#98891 May 10, 2013
I made my point, spin till you drop!

He made the idea clear, in his filibuster and more since then. You are simply a LIAR! Trying to make Paul look bad because you know Billary will never win against a REAL Candidate with real points that make sense to ALL AMERICANS (except Radical Jihadist Dimocrats).

“Stand with me for the U.S.A.”

Since: Apr 13

Lexington,Ky.

#98892 May 10, 2013
misunderestimate much?
whitehair

Eminence, KY

#98894 May 10, 2013
Uncle Tab wrote:
"They misunderestimated me." --Bentonville, Ark., Nov. 6, 2000
This is a Bush quote... So I can understand why you dumb republicans don't understand how important using the correct wording is.
Idiots don't catch the simple things!
You have to laugh at idiots with an Internet education not understanding the simple things and being programmed to repeat things that are out and out lies, even when pointed out to them using their own posts.
You ignorant uneducated morons is why our country was almost ruined...... You're just plain fucking STUPID!!
Using the correct words is greatly appreciated and requires an education to do it. Unfortunately , as we get older, many of our words slip out of our minds and sometimes come out incorrectly , if we can remember them at all!

One thing was noticed , everyone understood what was intended!
wtf

Pikeville, KY

#98895 May 10, 2013
whitehair wrote:
I`m sitting out on the sidelines of this argument.
What was heard from Rand Paul came our clear to some of us,(Drones were not to be used on U.S. citizens in the U.S.)Did it not come out that way to you?
No you ignorant dipshit, they never were but the Fhag Paul wanted some attention.

Since: Dec 11

.

#98896 May 10, 2013
whitehair wrote:
<quoted text>
Using the correct words is greatly appreciated and requires an education to do it. Unfortunately , as we get older, many of our words slip out of our minds and sometimes come out incorrectly , if we can remember them at all!
One thing was noticed , everyone understood what was intended!
So does SpongeBrain LiarPants, he tries to muddy the water like a Dimocrat always does. I made my point VERY easily he tries too hard to obfuscate the truth, and it shows. Thanks WH. have a great day!
TGIF and Thank God for real Patriots like you!
wtf

Pikeville, KY

#98897 May 10, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
So does SpongeBrain LiarPants, he tries to muddy the water like a Dimocrat always does. I made my point VERY easily he tries too hard to obfuscate the truth, and it shows. Thanks WH. have a great day!
TGIF and Thank God for real Patriots like you!
Thank God you Fhags do not matter to anyone.
wtf

Pikeville, KY

#98898 May 10, 2013
whitehair wrote:
<quoted text>
Using the correct words is greatly appreciated and requires an education to do it. Unfortunately , as we get older, many of our words slip out of our minds and sometimes come out incorrectly , if we can remember them at all!
One thing was noticed , everyone understood what was intended!
You slipped a turd out into your underwear you ridiculous old stupid diaper man.
Uncle Whitey

Johnson City, TN

#98899 May 10, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>You slipped a turd out into your underwear you ridiculous old stupid diaper man.
DALLAS—After taking an “eye-opening” tour of the newly dedicated George W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum in Dallas Thursday, President Barack Obama reportedly ordered the United States military to reinvade Iraq.

The president told reporters that the museum’s numerous displays provided illuminating information concerning the ongoing threat posed by Iraq and the necessity of re-deploying combat troops in order to bring stability and lasting democracy to the troubled country.

“I have no doubt in my mind, after spending some time in Mr. Bush’s library and museum, that the United States simply must intervene in Iraq in order to temper volatility in the Middle Eastern region as a whole,” Obama said, noting that bombers and approximately 250,000 ground troops were currently en route to the Middle Eastern nation.“The way I now see it, we have a responsibility as Americans to create that kind of change and to lead the world by example.”

“Though it will not be easy, our work in Iraq will ensure a better life for the Iraqis,” Obama continued.“And they will, I am confident, greet us as liberators.”

Pointing to the array of informational displays and exhibits housed in the former president’s 226,000-square-foot educational facility, Obama said he was “absolutely convinced” that al-Qaeda has established a major foothold in Iraq and that the people of Iraq deserved to live in a society that is “free of fear and free of want.”

“Let me go a step further and say that if we do not act now to enact a regime change in Iraq, the consequences will be dire,” Obama said, adding that, as evidenced by documents he read in the Bush museum, Iraq was likely the axis upon which the entire Middle Eastern region turns.“It is a hotbed for terrorism, and, as demonstrated by the Bush archives, invading Iraq will allow us to put a stop to those religious extremists who actively seek to harm the U.S. and hold America hostage.”

“They hate our freedoms,” Obama continued.

Obama added that though engaging Iraq might result in a protracted conflict, he was confident upon further researching the library’s materials that the United Nations and the international community would come together to support such a necessary, morally justifiable endeavor.

“Working together with our numerous allies, we can and will be an agent of change,” the president said, thanking his predecessor for making a “truly convincing case” for military intervention in Iraq.“Through our noble efforts, we will transform Iraq into a bastion of democracy and cause peace to spread throughout the region, ensuring stability and prosperity in the Middle East for generations to come.”

“I stand by this decision because I know it is the right thing to do,” Obama added before leaving the museum.“And I think history will judge me accordingly.”
Uncle Ben

Bowling Green, KY

#98900 May 10, 2013
All of you turd slurpers can go invade your outhouses. This whole list reeks of republican inbred imbeciles.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#98901 May 10, 2013
Uncle Tab wrote:
<quoted text>
It just doesn't get any easier!
Can I call emmor what??
LMAO!!! You're so damn stupid, you can't call shit, you didn't do the assignment, so I own you ass!
HELLO, STUPID!!!
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#98902 May 10, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
J.D. I apologize for not being in on this argument last night, I was only here briefly (heavy assignments this week).
You are right again, Unca Flbitha (as usual) has his @$$ hat on again: I would compare this to the "which came first, the chicken or the egg" argument with a twist; the United States Constitution Came first and therefore can be amended to erase the scope and powers and even the existence of SCOTUS!
"Constitutional Origin. Article III,§1, of the Constitution provides that "[t]he judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." The Supreme Court of the United States was created in accordance with this provision and by authority of the Judiciary Act of September 24, 1789 (1 Stat. 73). It was organized on February 2, 1790.
Jurisdiction. According to the Constitution (Art. III,§2): "The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;-to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;-to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;-to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;-to Controversies between two or more States;—between a State and Citizens of another State;-between Citizens of different States;—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects."
http://www.supremecourt.gov/about/briefovervi...
J.D. is correct Uncle Tab is just a squirrel on his roof trying to get a nut, HE IS THE NUT! ROTFLMAO!
This is the problem with our congress, they think the USSC can run roughshod over the people and the government.
Uncle Tab

United States

#98903 May 10, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
So does SpongeBrain LiarPants, he tries to muddy the water like a Dimocrat always does. I made my point VERY easily he tries too hard to obfuscate the truth, and it shows. Thanks WH. have a great day!
TGIF and Thank God for real Patriots like you!
http://americablog.com/2013/04/rand-paul-dron...

Have to be careful if people robbing stores with RPG's huh??

And you both are disagreeing with each other.

The man DID NOT say drones could be used on someone ribbing a store, he said they could be used on a terrorist with an RPG.

You people are so fucking stupid..... He talked for 13 hours making it clear that drones were NOT to be used on American Citizens then the next day he said they they COULD be used on someone robbing a store with a gun.

It doesn't get any simpler than that.

You all are idiots and do your best to spin things to fit what you want.

And you wonder why no one trusts republicans?? It's because you're all ignorant uneducated flip flopping fools!

Spin away you idiots!! You know I'm right. I pointed out that you could not find anywhere in his filibuster where drones could be used on violent criminals robbing a store and you could not do it.

Idiots!!! No wonder elected republicans depend on your kind.... They know how truly stupid and uninformed you are.

I proved it..... Yet again!!
Uncle Tab

United States

#98904 May 10, 2013
"We knew what he meant" even tho he spoke for THIRTEEN HOURS and didn't say ONE WORD ABOUT IT.

Int 13 hours, he had more then enough time to make it crystal clear, which would have taken all of less than 10 seconds.

It's just fun laughing at your stupid republican asses!!

Get back to your Internet education super stupid!! You'll be cleaning toilets for the rest if your life!!

LMMFAO!!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 12 min o boy 131,856
truck payments 41 min gator 10
Need food badly 49 min Need food badly 25
~~Keep A Word~~Drop A Word Game. (Jun '10) 1 hr TOASTup 404
city of barbourville 3 hr Three losers 15
Rats?? just wondering 4 hr pacman 4
it should be against the law for a woman to drive 5 hr yea 2
Porsche mills 10 hr Prayers 17
How to make homemade ice melt for steps, sidewa... (Jan '13) Dec 15 Corky 51
Barbourville Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Barbourville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Barbourville News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Barbourville

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 7:18 am PST

Bleacher Report 7:18AM
Tennessee Titans vs. Jacksonville Jaguars: Complete Week 16 Preview for Tennesse
NBC Sports12:38 PM
Dexter McCluster out Thursday, likely out Week 17 as well
NBC Sports 2:30 PM
Manziel looking for better showing in second start - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 2:48 PM
Titans RB McCluster ruled out of game vs. Jaguars - NBC Sports
Bleacher Report 5:47 PM
Denver Broncos vs. Cincinnati Bengals Betting Odds, Analysis, NFL Pick