'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Se...

'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

There are 243898 comments on the thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com story from Oct 1, 2010, titled 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate. In it, thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com reports that:

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Join the discussion below, or Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com.

wtf

Elkhorn City, KY

#92956 Apr 9, 2013
baaaaaaaaaaaa wrote:
<quoted text>
Kind of shows just how smart the unions are now doesn't it. Unions in Michigan are now irrevelant in politics because the people got fed up with their thug and self serving interests. Those rich got richer you mention, well, put unions at the top of that list. They did it to themselves and got what they deserved. Unions do not care for anybody but the ones who run it. Reagan had nothing to do with labor unions - he only fixed the so called govt unions (Air traffic controllers) by firing them for walking off the job. He told them he would fire them. They did not believe him. It was a costly lesson that the labor unions had to learn the hard way as well.
Now that was really stupid.
baaaaaaaaaa

Jackson, MI

#92957 Apr 9, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>Now that was really stupid.
So are you chicken man, baaaaaaa, I mean, cluk cluk cluk,

Here is your video chicken man, baaaaaaaaaaaa

baaaaaaaaaa

Jackson, MI

#92958 Apr 9, 2013
Therealnews com wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a quick trigger finger. LOL
Highest amounts of funding by average Americans and yet Obama destroyed the liberals.
Obamacare and Romneycare and the Bush/Cheney Senior Citizens Prescription drugs are all one and the same which puts the HMOs/Big Pharma in control.
BTW: Republican Bob Dole and the Conservative Think Tank Heritage Foundation endorsed the same plan back in the 1990s.
Smarten Up.
==========
Revolving door for health care aides / 9/15/09 / http://tinyurl.com/q243zq
Some of the most influential aides in the closed-door Senate Finance Committee negotiations over health care reform have ties to interests that would be directly affected by the legislation.
Before she was hired last year as senior counsel to Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), Liz Fowler worked as a highly paid public policy adviser for WellPoint Inc., the nation’s largest publicly traded health benefits company.
Mark Hayes, health policy director and chief health counsel for Finance Committee ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), is married to a registered lobbyist for a firm that represents drug companies and hospital groups, although the couple says she doesn’t lobby Grassley’s office.
Frederick Isasi, a health policy adviser to Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.), was a registered lobbyist at Powell Goldstein, where his clients included public hospitals and the American Stroke Association.
Kate Spaziani, senior health policy aide to Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), was also a registered lobbyist at Powell Goldstein, although Conrad’s office says she worked as a lawyer — not as a lobbyist — for public hospitals on Medicare issues.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/271...
How can anyone 'smarten up' when the only news media is controlled by marxist libotards. baaaaaaaaaaaaa
baaaaaaaaaa

Jackson, MI

#92959 Apr 9, 2013
Therealnews com wrote:
Could somebody explain again what "fiscal conservative" means
National Debt When Jimmy Carter arrived at the White House
Oct 13, 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/3l7rbx /$660 billion./
Added during Carter's four years:$337 billion.
Added during Ronald Reagan's eight years:$1.6 trillion.
Added during George H. W. Bush's four years:$1.6 trillion.
Added during Bill Clinton's eight years:$1.5 trillion.
Added during George W. Bush's seven years, nine months:$4.5 trillion.
Portion of the $9.5 trillion added to the national debt during the past 31 years and seven months that came during Republican presidencies:$7.7 trillion.
Percentage of that $7.7 trillion added during George W. Bush's two terms: 58%.
Could somebody explain again what "fiscal conservative" means
=========
HEADLINES THAT YOU NEVER READ IN THE REPUBLICAN/FOREIGN-OWNED U.S. MEDIA:/ http://tinyurl.com/5mq65x
President Ronald Reagan is the first President to increase the National Debt by more than $100 Billion in one year!
President Ronald Reagan is the first President to increase the National Debt by more than $200 Billion in one year!
President George H.W. Bush is the first President to increase the National Debt by more than $300 Billion in one year!
President George H.W. Bush is the first President to increase the National Debt by more than $400 Billion in one year!
President George W. Bush is the first President to increase the National Debt by more than $500 Billion in one year!
President George W. Bush has increased the National Debt by more than $500 Billion AGAIN! Almost hits $600 Billion!
President George W. Bush has increased the National Debt by more than $500 Billion a THIRD time!
President George W. Bush has increased the National Debt by more than $500 Billion a FOURTH time!
President George W. Bush has increased the National Debt by more than $500 Billion a FIFTH time!
"Our National Debt is up Three Trillion Dollars under George W. Bush!" / http://www.lafn.org/gvdc/Natl_Debt_Chart.html
Glad you didn't include oblamers 6 trillion in 18 months. That would have been just too much to deal with. baaaaaaaaaaaaa
wtf

Elkhorn City, KY

#92960 Apr 9, 2013
baaaaaaaaaa wrote:
<quoted text>
Glad you didn't include oblamers 6 trillion in 18 months. That would have been just too much to deal with. baaaaaaaaaaaaa
Glad Bush did not pay for his 2 failed Wars, the pos.
whitehair

Fort Thomas, KY

#92962 Apr 9, 2013
baaaaaaaaaa wrote:
<quoted text>
Glad you didn't include oblamers 6 trillion in 18 months. That would have been just too much to deal with. baaaaaaaaaaaaa
Normal reporting from the left. Now isn`t the Obama figure somewhere close to $ 7 trillion in the last 4 years?

This is a perfect reason why I have repeatedly said, we do not get represented by our elected officials after they have been in office in Washington more than about 2-3 years. They are so embedded with the lobbyists and special interests, so involved in collecting money for their next run for office(to keep the job) of collecting money, But they simply do the wishes of the ones paying money, rather than representing the peoples interests.

Until we can elect ones with term limits, not able to collect money nor be entertained by the special interests, not taking sight seeing trips overseas (fact finding wastes),not able to sell their votes to any ,even the President or Treasury, maybe we could get a representation of ,by, and for the people and the Country.
Yes

Elkhorn City, KY

#92963 Apr 9, 2013
whitehair wrote:
<quoted text>
Normal reporting from the left. Now isn`t the Obama figure somewhere close to $ 7 trillion in the last 4 years?
This is a perfect reason why I have repeatedly said, we do not get represented by our elected officials after they have been in office in Washington more than about 2-3 years. They are so embedded with the lobbyists and special interests, so involved in collecting money for their next run for office(to keep the job) of collecting money, But they simply do the wishes of the ones paying money, rather than representing the peoples interests.
Until we can elect ones with term limits, not able to collect money nor be entertained by the special interests, not taking sight seeing trips overseas (fact finding wastes),not able to sell their votes to any ,even the President or Treasury, maybe we could get a representation of ,by, and for the people and the Country.
The President had to pay for Bush's 2 failed Wars Stupid. You just cannot read too well.
whitehair

Fort Thomas, KY

#92964 Apr 9, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>Glad Bush did not pay for his 2 failed Wars, the pos.
No one of even the elite can pay what Washington runs thru as spending collectively. If there was any audit of the spending and the waste they throw to their money givers it would be an eye opener . There is no one at any helm with power to stop it. There is no control any more than when Rome was last the great power.

Just think of the some $3 trillion coming in and some $4 trillion spent per year. As mentioned before, this is what we all send Washington collectively. They can not even stay inside what comes in!
wtf

Elkhorn City, KY

#92965 Apr 9, 2013
whitehair wrote:
<quoted text>
No one of even the elite can pay what Washington runs thru as spending collectively. If there was any audit of the spending and the waste they throw to their money givers it would be an eye opener . There is no one at any helm with power to stop it. There is no control any more than when Rome was last the great power.
Just think of the some $3 trillion coming in and some $4 trillion spent per year. As mentioned before, this is what we all send Washington collectively. They can not even stay inside what comes in!
Quit sending money to Israel, let those deadbeats work.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#92966 Apr 9, 2013
Therealnews com wrote:
Could somebody explain again what "fiscal conservative" means
National Debt When Jimmy Carter arrived at the White House
Oct 13, 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/3l7rbx /$660 billion./
Added during Carter's four years:$337 billion.
Added during Ronald Reagan's eight years:$1.6 trillion.
Added during George H. W. Bush's four years:$1.6 trillion.
Added during Bill Clinton's eight years:$1.5 trillion.
Added during George W. Bush's seven years, nine months:$4.5 trillion.
Portion of the $9.5 trillion added to the national debt during the past 31 years and seven months that came during Republican presidencies:$7.7 trillion.
Percentage of that $7.7 trillion added during George W. Bush's two terms: 58%.
Could somebody explain again what "fiscal conservative" means
=========
HEADLINES THAT YOU NEVER READ IN THE REPUBLICAN/FOREIGN-OWNED U.S. MEDIA:/ http://tinyurl.com/5mq65x
President Ronald Reagan is the first President to increase the National Debt by more than $100 Billion in one year!
President Ronald Reagan is the first President to increase the National Debt by more than $200 Billion in one year!
President George H.W. Bush is the first President to increase the National Debt by more than $300 Billion in one year!
President George H.W. Bush is the first President to increase the National Debt by more than $400 Billion in one year!
President George W. Bush is the first President to increase the National Debt by more than $500 Billion in one year!
President George W. Bush has increased the National Debt by more than $500 Billion AGAIN! Almost hits $600 Billion!
President George W. Bush has increased the National Debt by more than $500 Billion a THIRD time!
President George W. Bush has increased the National Debt by more than $500 Billion a FOURTH time!
President George W. Bush has increased the National Debt by more than $500 Billion a FIFTH time!
"Our National Debt is up Three Trillion Dollars under George W. Bush!" / http://www.lafn.org/gvdc/Natl_Debt_Chart.html
Amazes me that you completely omit the over $6 trillion added by Obama in 4 years. It is estimated it will be over $10 trillion by the end of his second term. Bush $4.5 trillion in 8 years compared to Obama's $6 trillion in 4 years. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm! What is so interesting is Obama doesn't think there is a problem and wants to continue spending. He wants to increase taxes on the rich to allow him to spend even more. No plans to reduce the debt.
wtf

Elkhorn City, KY

#92967 Apr 9, 2013
Republican Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
Amazes me that you completely omit the over $6 trillion added by Obama in 4 years. It is estimated it will be over $10 trillion by the end of his second term. Bush $4.5 trillion in 8 years compared to Obama's $6 trillion in 4 years. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm! What is so interesting is Obama doesn't think there is a problem and wants to continue spending. He wants to increase taxes on the rich to allow him to spend even more. No plans to reduce the debt.
Bush did not pay for his 2 failed Wars in his numbers you dumbass.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#92968 Apr 9, 2013
skittles 111 wrote:
Kentucky will always vote for McConnell and Paul because inbreds rule this state and stomp over their women and tourism will decline unless a holcaust on these racists occur, this is a lost state and does not matter for obvious reasons and should be treated as such. Common sense does not exist here.
Kentucky will always vote for McConnell and Paul as they have core values and beliefs. Everything else you said is totally untrue! If you are a Kentuckian, you should be ashamed of yourself. If you are not a Kentuckian, you obviously do not know what you are talking about.
wtf

Elkhorn City, KY

#92969 Apr 9, 2013
Republican Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
Kentucky will always vote for McConnell and Paul as they have core values and beliefs. Everything else you said is totally untrue! If you are a Kentuckian, you should be ashamed of yourself. If you are not a Kentuckian, you obviously do not know what you are talking about.
They look pretty light in the Loafers.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#92970 Apr 9, 2013
Yes wrote:
<quoted text>The President had to pay for Bush's 2 failed Wars Stupid. You just cannot read too well.
The Iraq War accounts for less than 8 percent of the federal debt held by the public at the end of 2010.

During Bush's Iraq years, 2003-2008, the federal government spent more on education than it did on the Iraq War.

Little-known fact: Obama's failed stimulus program cost more than the Iraq war," Washington Examiner, August 23, 2010.

http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php...

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#92971 Apr 9, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>Bush did not pay for his 2 failed Wars in his numbers you dumbass.
The Iraq War accounts for less than 8 percent of the federal debt held by the public at the end of 2010.

During Bush's Iraq years, 2003-2008, the federal government spent more on education than it did on the Iraq War.

Little-known fact: Obama's failed stimulus program cost more than the Iraq war," Washington Examiner, August 23, 2010.

http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php ...

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#92972 Apr 9, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>Quit sending money to Israel, let those deadbeats work.
In fiscal year 2011, the U.S. government allocated the following amounts for aid:

Total economic and military assistance:$49.5 billion

Total military assistance:$17.8 billion
Total economic assistance:$31.7 billion

Only a little over $3 billion of that went to Israel.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_fo...
wtf

Elkhorn City, KY

#92973 Apr 9, 2013
Republican Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
The Iraq War accounts for less than 8 percent of the federal debt held by the public at the end of 2010.
During Bush's Iraq years, 2003-2008, the federal government spent more on education than it did on the Iraq War.
Little-known fact: Obama's failed stimulus program cost more than the Iraq war," Washington Examiner, August 23, 2010.
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php...
The Stimulus was a huge success compared to the Iraq War Stupid.
countrygirl

Dunmor, KY

#92974 Apr 9, 2013
Republican Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
The Iraq War accounts for less than 8 percent of the federal debt held by the public at the end of 2010.
During Bush's Iraq years, 2003-2008, the federal government spent more on education than it did on the Iraq War.
Little-known fact: Obama's failed stimulus program cost more than the Iraq war," Washington Examiner, August 23, 2010.
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php ...
Sooooo!!!! no matter the cost, it was OK
for us to pay for them.??

Since: Jul 12

Houston, TX

#92975 Apr 9, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>Why don't you go back to your retard Counseling and STFU, Stupid?
Hey, it's not ME with the problem, here! Check out YOURS below.
baaaaaaaaaa

Jackson, MI

#92977 Apr 9, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>The Stimulus was a huge success compared to the Iraq War Stupid.
Yeah, a great success, 7.7% unemployment, 15% out of work and not looking, economy starting to recede again, oblamercare causing layoffs and reduced hours for part time workers, LOLOL, baaaaaaaaaa, you libtards are stupider than a bag of rocks,

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 42 min usa 153,768
Timmy Jordan aka Pork and Shannon 45 min Amy 3
Is Paul Baker a good Disability Lawyer? (Dec '12) 1 hr myrahnna 86
Daniel Boone 2016 3 hr partyondudes 11
School board employees hide cash THEFTS ! 3 hr tony 2
Everyone's is for Freedom of Speech............... 4 hr Knox county mad man 4
News Farr back in custody - 4 hr Knox county mad man 1
Who will be the next Knox Co. Judge Exec.? 11 hr Martin 101

Barbourville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Barbourville Mortgages